Are western game devs purposely making all female characters ugly?

Are western game devs purposely making all female characters ugly?

Attached: 10 out of 10 in burgerland.png (164x157, 72K)

It's a form of activism, they think beauty standards are shaped by media and not muh dick

Meanwile in japan
>every female character is a loli
>colorful hair because they can't in memorable design
>pedodream

So it's not that bad compared to chimps

Attached: 81-GM9o3fbL._SX342_.jpg (342x393, 41K)

Yes

she looks like a Fallout 2 CGI character

Holy shit spot on

Kait is pretty in-game

Attached: control.png (1301x823, 762K)

I saw this posted a couple of times and it's so weird to me. Because most people dont like ripley either

>couple of times
What? I did this OC yesterday.

why are western devs so shit at making women not look ugly

Attached: 1568401506859.png (286x400, 302K)

>What? I did this OC yesterday.
yeah whatever you say bro

yeah they're doing it just to make you mad user, glad it's working

Mandela effect

they're both UGLEH

Because they're doing everything they can to MAKE them ugly senpai.

Attached: REALISM.jpg (1200x816, 96K)

Organised ugliness and mediocrity

Glad I only spent £2 for the gamepass to try out Gears 5. Game has next to no content map wise, and an awful selection of characters. I feel sorry for anyone who bought this shit full price

and you both are gays.

Gotta appease the vocal landwhales that now have the power to sink you through PR, even though they don't buy the games.

This is why you buy the international-aimed Jap material that has the best of both worlds. Domestic nip-media is aimed entirely at sedating their depressed workforce working 7 days a week.

Attached: Marcus.jpg (640x438, 56K)

This unironically looks like a dried-up Shrek.

both ugly, ripley is a likeable character though which makes her attractive

>tfw always thought Gears could use some Fallout inspiration, be it writing or weapons
>we get the ugly early-CG art instead

So it's on par with Judgement's? Money saved here then.

Attached: 1552429869618.jpg (390x398, 135K)

Marcus was made before Shrek, though.

Are you sure?

Attached: shrek-book-cover.jpg (608x735, 116K)

>So it's on par with Judgement's? Money saved here then.
I didn't play Judgement but I know it's god awful. There's like 7 maps with maybe 3 of them being decent, and very few characters. What bothers me is that in 4 they had all these maps and characters by the end of it's lifespan there's no reason most of it shouldn't be here.

That's really the cover for the game?

It's sales repellent. Marketers are naive, and they are paid to so this...

only americans do that shit

Attached: Julianne.Stingray.full.2354123.png (1033x1500, 544K)

Fap

Attached: 758d4c9c15b766ecc3a87312ffc4cda5.gif (720x646, 2.06M)

They're probably just going to pad content to artificially extend the lifespan. Or milk you.

What bothered me with Judgemet was there being only a few gametypes + a knockoff TF2 mode in place of Horde/Beast and so on. Gave the game little life beyond the campaign like 2 and 3 did.

This is usually the case, but I think in Gears' case someone thought a gruff-looking protag would sell the game better.

>realism and believability
fucking why

why do you want to achieve realism in a game where you fight robot dinosaurs

It's weird though because Hollywood movies like Hunger Games and Divergent have somewhat attractive females in "le strong" main roles and they're as sjw as it gets.

It's just a codeword and reasoning for uglification in order not to make the whales feel (more) insecure.

Attached: horizon-zero-dawn-arte-conceitual2.png (1080x1080, 622K)

They're trying to push the cash shop with this game too so it's not really surprising. We're getting 4 'new characters' in the first 3 months, and anything after that is up in the air. Not going to be surprised in the least if we see fan favourites cost 12.99

But women love to self-insert in Otome games.

But the woman above looks like a man. Weaver looks like an actual person.