OLD GAME GOOD!

NOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST DISAGREE WITH ME, WHAT THE FUCK CROWBCAT I HAVE TO MAKE A THREAD ABOUT YOU NOW AHHHHHHHH

He makes faggots like you seethe, so no.

(You)
Lazy bait

>caring about literal who youtubers

>highlights old game interesting mechanics in contrast with new game flaws
>completely ignore old game flaws
>completely ignore new game interesting mechanics

You can overshadow any recent game in comparison using this tactic.

Attached: 13640123849.gif (300x225, 1.55M)

>Is he the most insufferable faggot on YouTube?
is dsp dead yet?

REMEMBER

Unfortunately most of the "mechanics" in new games relate to graphics, instead of, y'know, gameplay.

new game should be everything old game is but better

if new game can't even do what old game does, how can we call it better than old game?

>OLD GAME GOOD!
He specifically goes after games where this is the case though. It's like getting mad at an automotive channel for focusing on cars.

this, you can also still play and enjoy games that are worse than older games in some aspects

Stop watching people you don't like and also stop making e-celeb threads on Yea Forums. Especially if you yourself hate said e-celeb

Attached: 729a1e4d.png (201x249, 59K)

What are some unfair comparisons he made?

Hes not wrong. His Dead Rising 4 comparison really did speak for itself.

>crowbcat insults some faggots favorite game ITT
>they make witty posts talking about the age of the game instead of the merits of what the video shows
>most responses are just them lashing out back at criticism becuase MUH FAVWIT GAEM WAS INSULTED!!!!! IT'S NEW AND THERE IS A LOT OF HYPE AROUND IT
Let's face it, most people who dislike his videos can't take criticism. He shows off new games with features that are enhanced as well, but it's no different than some user from Yea Forums posting a video comparing the games. Crowbcat just has a following and the contrarians come out of this godforsaken board to disagree. Epic!

www.twitter.com

I don't mind some of his videos but its incredibly easy to manipulate retards by using the style of editing he does.

>Cherry pick shit no one noticed about old games
>Choose specific areas in games which highlight the point you're trying to make
>Choose a totally epic and fitting music as you title your video something super unbiased sounding.
>Watch redditors and drones go "woah.... wow...." in comment section.

Attached: 1427665322568.png (319x317, 255K)

He gets off to confirming people's biases to games they won't play

I enjoy his vids a lot. He simply let's the video games speak for themselves.

NEW GAME BAD
VR GOOD
BUY VR

>He shows off new games with features that are enhanced as well
you mean like that time he showed some shitty VR game his friend worked on in an incredibly hilarious attempt to sell it then removed the video as damage control?

Which one? The one where he correctly stated that TF2 has lost all sense of art direction by obscuring the silhouettes with retarded outfits and actually going down in quality?

Ive got 3k hours in TF2 and even I agree.

He literally does nothing except show a clip from either game, you're the one making the judgement on whether it has improved or regressed. Just because he doesn't show the highlights of the "bad" games doesn't mean he's misrepresenting them - if there are flaws to point out in the first place that were nonexistent in the older game, that says enough.

Attached: 1563667179151.jpg (988x1300, 286K)

>if new game can't even do what old game does, how can we call it better than old game?
By not being as garbage as the old game.

Attached: 4803-gta-iv-screenshot.jpg (1280x720, 110K)

Idk, I like to watch his comparisons, it doesn't stop me from enjoying new games

Bicentennial reminder that the "old game, new game" "soul, soulless" shitposting about Crowbat started as soon as he dared make fun of Far Cry 5, and it has been going on 24/7 ever since.

so no matter how much anyone could hate on Crowbat, the faggots and their dumb spam is way worse

Attached: Marty.png (400x400, 171K)

Yes
He is solely responsible for dumbfucks with
>fc2 good
>anything onwards bad
Fuck him

link

>OLD GAME GOOD!
Not like he's wrong though.

case in point

Yeah you mean like how many features GTA IV was missing when it released and got backlash as it was basically a floaty physics based piece of trash which ran terribly and was worse than San Andreas in every single conceivable way if you weren't a retarded graphics fag?
Yikes.

It's less saying FC5 was bad, more pretending FC2 was good.

>OLD GAME GOOD!
Isn't that most of the time accurate, especially regarding longtime running series that get fucked over due to corporate meddling?

>Bicentennial reminder that the "old game, new game" "soul, soulless" shitposting about Crowbat started as soon as he dared make fun of Far Cry 5, and it has been going on 24/7 ever since.

>so no matter how much anyone could hate on Crowbat, the faggots and their dumb spam is way worse

Attached: 1541395861385.png (1080x1020, 475K)

>Old game mechanics and tech are more interesting than the new ones

>new ones are basically "muh graphics"

>NUH UH, WHAT ABOUT THE NEW FEATURES?

Attached: 1STD Drive.jpg (300x57, 4K)

I was referring to IV and V, actually. All Rage era GTA is trash, but at least V is playable.

Heh i wont quote post imma make greentext and wojak
Epic

i think we need a few more "old game good, new game bad" and "soul, soulless" threads, amirite user.

to really stick it to old man crowbcat

>Heh i wont quote post imma make greentext and wojak
>Epic

Attached: 1550395452282.png (726x750, 124K)

@478094591
03AOLTBLRGqqziMbm8UO5YEeqbIujAQYNhHSyombpdRbdu8-SKlGJ1oubSnNVupAl23yq8yi5smShlx5IqeOMxpY92E4QjnJSxNidxnulODM5PnO2CJ47HBw2v4_ZysjqWg0eE1yBAAaGBWSz1pr5slsfRtxp36_dMBvapynoB9U5Qyv8IQ2z64fQRnWCQFkyka0nbi35SdUZxc8Ja5sMgAEmH79EE4YIMvBRFwf1h8rRJUGLD5QJenxyxqUT5vVXfZ8JNA5XQzuq9

Attached: 1519678118290.png (635x430, 261K)

No. The only time he fucked up is when he shilled that shit VR game

youtube.com/watch?v=VvQmdhD520E

Literally a shill.

based

The reason that game devs cut small things like cans exploding off the street is to make the game run smoother on consoles with better graphics, not that you would know that though

IM EPIC

Attached: 1521916238253.png (1024x595, 390K)

he just makes videos on things that are sort of unforgivable. His video on ass effect andromeda is the best.

youtu.be/7KWkao73HuU

Like clockwork

His GTA V / GTA IV comparison was completely dishonest, and unfortunately got a lot of retards parroting that IV is somehow a great GTA, even though/v/ hated it when it was released.

I know the far cry 2 vs 5 comparison was pretty BS, yeah sure far cry 2 had a much more interactive environment, but it was and still is a buggy piece of shit with low depth, and while far cry 5 isnt exactly an original far cry game, it had some better mechanics like flying grappling etc. Most of the comparisons made were "fire spreads more wow" and "shooting people in the leg makes them limp crazy huh," stuff that game dev's dont actually put much effort into anymore because gaming strayed away from the t e c h n o l o g y trend of the 2000s.

The game looks fun desu. First half was a good look at how many vr titles are disappointing too.

but I want those little things even if it means graphics aren't as good. the most popular games this gen are fucking Minecraft and fortnite, graphics mean fucking nothing.

Give me back Source level environmental manipulation

How much do you wanna bet he doesn't even know we exist?

>Just because he doesn't show the highlights of the "bad" games doesn't mean he's misrepresenting them

This has to be bait, nobody can be this retarded.

I'm guessing the skins one.

>none of it is really yours

Lawbreakers also
youtube.com/watch?v=wJ4v2LgVlEA

He did it with Gears 5 somewhat again. He completely ignored 5's destruction but shows what 1 did allowed in some levels. And the section is full with how cool it looked. Also shaky cam.

>makes video praising/showcasing the good sides of a recent game
>people either don't watch it or get mad and call him a shill
He made videos to highlight the good shit in older games in franchises which received downgrades instead of upgrades and his audience assumed he was a nostalgiafaggot and now his only release from this pain is E3 reels

Attached: 1568394773325.gif (533x300, 2.02M)

don't talk shit about /ourguy/

Attached: 1552588921567.jpg (1024x576, 109K)

Not really, it had plenty of valid comparisons, the way that melee combat and movement were fucking neutered in V in particular was awful.

Attached: 1539470100398.jpg (852x758, 103K)

>getting a slutty cosplayer to do any serious task for you
yikes

New games focus on graphical detail while old games focused on environmental detail, I dunno which I prefer. Why not bolth

Then they should prioritize the cool things and give me low-poly games

Detail > Graphics, the reason graphics are focused on is solely for marketing to retards

>The reason that game devs cut small things
is because retards like you buy every single game for 70€ anyway, regardless of quality, becauseyou have no social interaction whatsoever and flee into a imaginary world where everything is build around your worthless presence.
Yes you are right

>Old games had bad stuff that you're ignoring!
>And you're just comparing it with the bad parts of the newer game!!

How about this, you morons: not fucking DOWNGRADING the GOOD parts of your game after a fucking DECADE, and making the SHITTY STUFF BETTER!! WHAT A FUCKING CONCEPT!

Attached: 1340008512944.jpg (719x720, 51K)

It's such a cheap shot, but "I'm a writer" shouldn't be paired with "can't spell discomforting".

Maybe "better graphics" aren't actually "better" graphics when cans and mirrors don't even work.
I don't get why people always act like such things aren't part of the visuals somehow.

Maybe it's not worth wasting dev time and money on inconsequential details so some random asshole can post a webm of it in a TECHNOLOGY thread while the other 99.9% of the playerbase don't notice or care.

Yeah you are completely missing the point, its dishonest because he cherry picks examples on which the old game in somewhat better but he doesnt say anything about the improvements, for instance, in terms of how cars in V handle a lot better than in IV.

That's the point you idiot.
The new game should improve upon the previous entry in basically all ways, and GTA V's melee combat and movement were a fucking travesty compared to IV's.

>haha man NOBODY CARED about these details I mean I haven't even play the games but I guarantee you I'm right

Do you have any idea how videogames are made, you utter retard? I hate when ignorant faggots like you are so arrogant.

GoW games play practically the same, until 5 where wallbouncing isnt as faggotmode as previous entries, thats the whole difference

>guy tries as hard as he to explain why modern games lost the charm it used to have
>reduces his whole criticism to "old gaem gud!"

You haven't refuted a single video of his with this sort of argument.

Sorry but he's correct. And I'd say this comparison doesn't even make sense because video games of the past aren't really the same production process of the video games of today save a few small scale projects.

That wasnt your first argument though, you braindead nigger. Do you even know how to read? I don't give a fuck about previous aspects, I'm talking about how he cherry picks "downgrades" (according to a subjective criteria) and doesn't mention improvements (bigger map, more weapons, planes, etc).

>(according to a subjective criteria)

Nah they're objectively inferior

Man I remember the petitions when characters didn't have idle animations in the rain in GTAV like in GTAIV, the backlash was immense.

I do, first the marketing team decides what sells better, then they reuse already available assets ad infinitum, and finally the end product made by underpaid, overworked developers gets focus grouped to the ground, and then it gets released by $60 for soys that have too much money and too little sense due to not having children at the age of 35

Attached: woa.png (230x272, 36K)

>That wasnt your first argument though, you braindead nigger.
It literally was you moronic fucktard, see The point is that GTA V should have a bigger map, more weapons, planes, AND melee combat that's not shit and movement that's not fucking awful shit that ragdolls you if you jump from a height more than 8 feet off the ground.

>CROWBAT IS ACTUALLY MULTIPLE PEOPLE WORKING ON THE CHANNEL
When did the shills stop using this as a defense?

he lets the biased cherrypicked and misleading footage speak for itself.

He is an idiot hack

Based, fuck graphics niggers

after the vr shilling video

no it's not you brain damaged retard

Wow I'm so glad I can see the boring scenery with no intractability with slightly better visuals! So cool!

How is a bigger map related to graphics, you moron. I BTFO but you won't admit it. Don't reply to me ever again.

What is there to cherry pick? If you can shoot objects apart in the predecessor and you can't in the sequel there isn't much more to say about it. youtu.be/JalWT8oNxhk?t=189 Here's a timestamp of destructible environments in Gears 5 vs Gears 2. If you have any proof that there are other areas in Gears 5 with better environmental destructibility then feel free to provide that evidence. If this is the only spot in Gears 2 that lets you destroy terrain, also feel free to provide that proof. I doubt you'll respond at all though since you know you're full of shit.

He mostly just shows modern games that removed cool features that their predecessor had for seemingly no reason. He never states that one game is better than the other, he acknowledges this in the description of each video.

>>game dev's dont actually put much effort into anymore because gaming strayed away from the t e c h n o l o g y trend of the 2000s.

They don't put effort into that stuff because the marketing department said those features don't sell games. Subtle detail is difficult to market compared to a grappling hook. When ever marketing departments can't figure out how to communicate the value of something, they just produce a chart showing that people don't want it.Conversely, if the people in marketing want something people actually say they don't want they just say people don't know want they want and rant about dark roast coffee and New Coke. You sound like a f a g g o t, and you were probably six when Far Cry 2 came out.

Attached: Capture.png (458x158, 12K)

Seethe harder, lil' zoom

he did an entire video on how most VR games are shit

A grappling hook sounds more fun than slightly more realistic explosions.

100% factual statement btw

>zoomers don't understand schadenfreude

The videos aren't disingenuous though, they don't tell you what to think, they just show a difference. Shooting people in the leg and making them limp being removed is a significant AI downgrade. The video isn't trying to show you all of the differences between the games. It would be a completely different kind of video that no one would probably watch. You'd get a video like "hey look at how far Farcry has come since Farcry 2! You can do this, this, this, and this now!" instead of "This is some stuff they removed in the newest sequel that made the world more realistic and interesting. It would be nice if they did more of the good thing.".

Willing to bet she has daddy issues

all feminists have daddy issues

>I don't know what the word "most" means
Based on your posting style I can already tell that you're a retarded ESL, don't reply to me ever again.

>implying anybody cares about warpaints

>no commentary
>100% gameplay footage
>OP is somehow upset that modern AAA games are getting exposed for their lazy design

Attached: 1537079124724.png (500x500, 51K)

>This is some stuff they removed in the newest sequel that made the world more realistic and interesting. It would be nice if they did more of the good thing
Think you hit the nail on the head on this. That's always been the main takeaway for me in his comparison videos

V is worse than IV on a technical level

>what 1 did
It was Gears 2. Gears 1 doesnt have any destruction at all. Shaky cam made the original gears games work really well, because you were supposed to feel like shit was going bad all around you. Play the first, second, or third gears games and then play 4 (or 5, they both are neutered) its actually really boring.

And I have no nostalgia for the old gears games. Ive only played 1 and I played it last week for the first time. And then I played the remastered version.

Understanding why something happens does not make it good

But Gears 2 was on console...

There's a reason they dropped the "of War" aspect from the name.
Gears is no longer about being a cog in a machine and having shit go south every other engagement, it's another boring generic western property (though to be fair it's been boring and generic since Gears 2) with strong, boring, and largely uninteresting characters.
Which wouldn't be a problem, but these new games seem to think that the characters AREN'T boring uninteresting planks.

Which is also wrong as IV runs like shit, is a 32-bit application and has no multicore support.

The only thing that's ever really pissed me off about him was that stupid shill video he made for that gay roller skating game, then got all fussy when people pointed out his obvious shilling and took it down

cowardcat is a FUCKING retard!

Attached: 1568148126912.jpg (1024x1024, 174K)

>OLD GAME GOOD!
In most cases this is exactly right. We're getting less and less nuance in favor of mass appeal and casualization.
That's a horrible reason to neuter games. Console games still run like ass at laughable frames and upscaled resolutions, so hamstringing games because of them and removing details is retarded.

nitpicking and biased

Graphics are for retards, period.

The issue is that the video acts as tho the quirky little roller skate game somehow is the remedy to VRs issues

But user, it's much more important that Gears 5 occasionally hit 4k on the XboneX (nevermind the drops to 1080p) than the game have physics that don't belong on last gen consoles.

Well you're the most insufferable faggot on this board so it balances out :^)

He's about equal to many of the faggot ass Halo Youtubers.

100% confirmed zoomer whose first GTA was IV.

Reminder this guy made an incredibly tasteless "we wuz kings" meme in one of his videos. Trash youtuber.

Thats an interesting point. Im sure it wasn't intentional but it makes sense.

I unironically thoroughly enjoyed the first GoW and Im thirsting to play the next 2. Maybe my taste is suddenly shit, maybe I just have a soft spot for games where my character makes a stomping sound when he walks. I installed and tried 4 (since its on PC and 2 and 3 arent) and it just felt...ugh. Neutered is the best word for it, really.

>OLD GAME BAD. GET OVER IT YOU BOOMERS!! PROGRESS GOOD!

Attached: seething zoom zoom.png (600x452, 132K)

Isn't this dude a known Yea Forums shitposter?

>makes videos only using clips from gameplay or video
>no commentary
>"insufferable faggot"
nice bait

Attached: 1367089847808.jpg (261x323, 16K)