this almost always means the game is bad, right?
This almost always means the game is bad, right?
awesome bait
next thread
Yes, people don't posting twitter links about good games.
It'll get anywhere from a 80-86 on MC. It's a cute little remake, nothing more nothing less.
The game is literally already out, go play it and see if it’s bad.
Can we just get a /nin/ and /ps/ please
...
Review embargo lifting a day before release is the standard for Nintendo games.
nintendo embargoes are usually thursday though
Who cares? Switch games are free. If you don't like it, it doesn't matter since you didn't pay money for it.
>THIS GAME COSTS FULL PRICE
THIS GAME COSTS FULL PRICE
>THIS GAME COSTS FULL PRICE
AHAHAHAHAHA
it's literally a fucking $60 remake of a gameboy game with barely any new features. the highest it will get is an 8/10 and only because the original game was good and you can't fuck that up
and?
Nintendo usually does this.
Hey , would you mind linking the NSP please??
It's a decade old mobile game with touched up visuals that now costs more than it during its original launch.
If you don't see how this is ridiculous then there's no helping you. It should be 20 bucks at most.
I'll play it because links awakening was the first zelda I ever played back in the day when I was like 5. Something about the music and exploring drew me in. I never beat it though, I tried the dx version a few years back but having to constantly open the menu to switch items turned me off. Yeah I'm a fag for that but I did get kinda far, I wonder why they chose that particular art style and not something akin to abtw. Is there even any official promo art for the remake? I remember abtw had some when it was announced where Link looked similar to alttp Link and then he got redisigned as the release date drew near.
The promo art is of them in the game's style, that I've seen at least
The original wasn't even good, actually.
The dungeon design ranged from pretty bad to horrible at times, soundtrack's quality ranged from fantastic to absolutely earraping, and it's clearly a disappointment to have the game be this linear after ALttP.
stay mad poorfag
>its another linear games are inherently bad episode
When will this meme end? If you don't linear games then fine, but being linear is not an objective flaw. Its a design choice.
I ain't paying $60 for a pretty'd up Link's Awakening that's adding hardly anything new. It's like 30 at most.
Already pre-installed.
I'm looking forward to playing it just as much as I'm looking forward to the kiddies on this board trying to cope.
this ling. mobile link to twitter that shoots you off to a express.co.uk article? nigga you are lazy
>snoys are going to seethe nonstop for the next 4 months
what a great time to be a nintendo fan
>but being linear is not an objective flaw
Fact: An unfun yet unnecessary design choice is a bad one. Linearity is only acceptable when it's here to allow the devs to focus more on other aspects that would have been too hard to focus on if the game was overly open-ended. In the case of a Zelda game, exploration is the major focus, therefore linearity is absolutely unwanted.
Fucking brainlet child trying to sound like an intellectual. How embarrassing.
ok incel, im glad mommy bought you a copy
Lack of linearity are the worst parts about BOTW and ALBW because it plateaus.
Cope retard, linearity is shit and so are you
A home console Zelda game has never gotten lower than a 93 on Metacritic
Speak for yourself retard
>more console war/critic score threads
stay seething lol
>F
Delicious
for me, it's E
>Link's Awakening Dungeons
>Bad
I've seen some fucking mouth breathers post on here before, but I never thought I'd be in the presence of their king
Awakening is generally said to have the best overall dungeon selection the series. The fuck are you smoking?
I've Never played the original and my first Zelda game was botw. I'm going to buy this for myself and my two buddies just to spite all the poorfags here crying about the price. Get a job losers
A, H, and I
$30 at launch here is the proof
Not an argument
>free shades
Damn the 90s were so rad.
Oh shut the fuck up.
If you call throwing pots at doors to open them (when they give you bombs), breaking crackless walls, or having to backtrack heavily to find back a fallen iron ball "the best overall dungeon selection the series", i can ask you back that last question, user. Also play the Oracle games, their dungeons are way fucking better. (and the bullshit one is entirely optional, only here for more content and challenge)
>Oracles
Really shut the fuck up.
>Capshit
Puh-Lease
>REEEE THIS REMAKE LOOKS LIKE SHIT
>REEEEEE WHY DOES THIS REMAKE COST SO MUCH IT'S NOT FAIR I WANTED TO BUY IT NOOOOOOO
top fucking lol
Good thing it's a remake of a handheld title huh.
A, J and L
>A, B, C, D, E, G, H, I, J and L are all fucking god tier
How is this even allowed? How are you supposed to fucking pick?
I'm feeling E.
to be fair $30 in 1993 is, due to inflation, $55 in 2019.
You're entitled to your opinion,
But you're totally fucking wrong
It's one of my favorite games, for gameplay, storyline, difficulty, and music.
I like them all, but my eye keeps coming back to K.
Am I doomed to chase after broken warning flags meme women who will ruin my life?
>Capshit
>Not Crapcom
...
>"difficulty"
>Game has big difficulty spike around the genie then everything becomes easy as shit
>music
Quite based, honestly. The game does have some really great tracks. (Tal Tal Heights, Ballad of the Wind Fish, and some really underrated ones like Richard's Villa) Then there's the earrape shit, like Dream Shrine.
I don't remember it becoming easy as shit... there were just certain parts that took a long time to figure out. The dungeon with the pillars, I think it's number 7, took me forever. I think I just ended up brute-forcing it.
>he pays for his switch games