Is he right Yea Forums?

He's right. Why is no one listening to him?

Attached: police lady.jpg (736x1308, 122K)

that's why he said 'eventually'

By that logic, Duke Nukem Foreverwas a fucking masterpiece. how many times was it delayed?

And KOTOR 2 is forever bad because it was rushed out the door by LucasArts to hit Christmas sales

Attached: duke-nukem-forever_cover-art-1280px-50p.jpg (1280x1346, 451K)

Nope, there's plenty of games that got delayed and ended up awful.
Star Fox Zero comes to mind.

all of nintendo's delayed games ended up being good tho

Duke Nukem Forever was restarted multiple times throughout those delays, basically rendering null all the previous work. The quote assumes a game that's delayed to actually finish it, not scrap everything and start all over again

>delayed game eventually good

not all the time

Attached: FINAL-FANTASY-XV_20161127125208.jpg (1920x1080, 260K)

Now did he say this before or after rushing every first party nintendo title out during the gamecube making it the shittiest console of the generation?

A game should take no more than 4 years to develop. Any more is a sign that the project lost focus.

ironic enjoyment
But yeah, he’s right

Star Fox Zero was delayed like twice and it's terrible

Thats because nintendo sucks

a delay is a delay. besides Duke wasn't the only one who had delay hell

a delay is a delay. besides Duke wasn't the only one who had delay hell

Attached: Crackdown_3_cover.jpg (275x350, 59K)

Attached: Cover_Art_of_Anthem.jpg (250x375, 41K)

it still hurts bros....
at least we got some quality husbandos out of it tho.

what game was he referring to when he used this quote? i first remember hearing it when pikmin 2 got delayed.

When did he say that? Where are his exact words?

The problem is:
Shitty devs delay the game for several years, then rush it because they are out of time

and the best example.
gamespot.com/articles/ea-says-it-would-delay-mass-effect-andromeda-again/1100-6445017/
>EA Says It Would Delay Mass Effect Andromeda Again If It Makes the Game Better
>After planning to launch the game in 2016, EA delayed Andromeda, only saying it would now be released during its fourth fiscal quarter

so yeah, tell me more how delays make a game better.

Attached: Mass_Effect_Andromeda_cover.jpg (266x374, 18K)

This is a half-truth

It only applies to games that HAD the potential to be good, because of good devs behind it.
He fails to consider games that were doomed to be shit because of shitty devs.

No amount of time would ever let ME Andromeda be good.

Wind Waker was rushed tho, he's a hypocrite

He never actually did

I agree

SO WHY THE FUCK DID YOU RUSH WINDWAKER YOU STUPID ASSHOLE? THAT GAME COULD HAVE BEEN INCREDIBLE AND YOU FUCKED IT UP.

No mans sky is the living proof of it
Even after all the fixes the potential sales are forever gone

don't you know the meaning of "eventually"?

Yes i do.
There was no case where MEA would "eventually be good"
It would NEVER be good, regardless of time spent, because the perfect dream vision of the devs, what they strived for, was shit to begin with.

>a delay is a delay

Attached: 8Hqn55xqCb-2.png (300x250, 14K)

100% right. Delayed games retain potential, rushed games will just fucking suck until you patch and patch and patch and who knows how many players you lost by that point.

MEA actually did have a solid base to work off of and the combat was genuinely good, there just wasn’t enough enemy variety and the story sucked.