Anyone else gotta play new games on low settings? Im poor

Well sure if I put everything at the absolute lowest setting at 720p then it might hit 60fps if I'm lucky.

U cant hav pc that looks nicer than console unless u pay 2000 dollars now.

You must be 18+ to post here.

I have a, "high end" PC and I still play on low modt of the time.

are you braindead? you can build a pc capable of way better graphics than any console for less than 500$

I only use my gaming pc for Yea Forums and porn now, all my gaming is on ps4

No ones dumpster diving behind best buy for a few shitty console ports

>couldn't finish post because PC could only render so many characters

i can play monster hunter with high settings but i cant get consistent 60 fps on apex legends
really depends on how shit the devs are desu
warframe runs like its on cocain while conquerors blade runs like a fucking mentally challenged octopus on land

Attached: 1768675476575.png (500x400, 310K)

I have a GTX 770 and I play with whatever settings to get 60fps. I could probably play most things on high/ultra if I accepted 30 fps.

>have 1070 and 1440p/144hz monitor
>having to start dialling settings back on new releases
With Cyberpunk looming I sort of upgrade but I'm a poorfag.

>1440p/144hz monitor
What monitor?

I played Skyrim with the ultra-low graphics mod because my laptop couldn't run it otherwise. After a while, you get used to the graphics.

Attached: Mrw+people+getting+ready+for+fallout_80217d_55.jpg (480x360, 30K)

I have a 750ti, can't even manage 60fps on the absolute lowest for newer stuff. It's not too bad, been replaying a lot of early 2010s games I skipped (why did nobody tell me Borderlands 2 was good?)

WF is so well optimized it's fucking scary.

At the rate that videogame system requirements are evolving, I'll be having to play every new game on low in a year, two if I'm extremely lucky

Attached: 1567932596524.png (766x521, 119K)

Most of the art of modern games comes from the textures. I don't get these low texture settings though, what fucking card do you have that doesn't have 2 gigs of VRAM to make the textures look like the middle?

They usually all look better on low settings anyways, I basically stopped upgrading my GPU at this point

>1050 ti
Should have gone amd famalam. The rx 580 is the best low/mid range card on the market and amd increases performance to a ridiculous degree on driver updates.

low setting = SOUL

Why do people do this?

>Make some PC when I was piss poor
>Got a 9800 gtx+ at the time
>Ran games for 7 years and only had to upgrade because Dark Souls used dx11 and card didn't support it
>Now got a 4970k and r9 390
>Was still going strong and upgraded to 5700 xt just because I can, but the 390 would have lasted at least 2-3 more years.

It’s actually medium dynamic 4K

not him but I recall the 1050ti going on sale for like CAD$150 at a Staples. That's a far better value for budget gaming than a 580 easily even if AMD is wrecking everyone else in the consumer market in general

I play all games on low even if I dont have to, I just dont care anymore. Almost had this computer for a decade, apart from the graphics card.

Attached: file.png (848x671, 47K)

>i7 920
>r9 290

It's funny because I think you still beat out a Xbox One X which is why you don't need to upgrade until next year.