So, the picture quest is out? Why? and don't tell me it's because of the absence of the GBprinter...

>and don't tell me it's because of the absence of the GBprinter, most people who enjoyed that mini-quest didn't have one.

It doesn't matter dumbass. The gb printer was the only reason it existed then, and it's the reason its not there now. However much fun you had with it doesn't make a difference.

>and it's the reason its not there now
It's not a good reason. especially as people played to get them all despite not having a printer. Not to mention, those pics could easily be repurposed as Switch icons.

OG > DX

It did far more than that and added additional scene with Link and Marin as well as with others.

DX is better than OG.

It's a remake of Link's Awakening, not Link's Awakening DX [laughs]

black & white looked better
the color dungeon was really poor too

They kept the color dungeons.
Colors work nice and the new dungeon doens't hurt the game, the picture quest is the real plus.

This guy?

Attached: Screenshot_20190914-203345_YouTube.jpg (1079x584, 386K)

this game actually has a 2nd quest like the original game added, as well as hero mode

>a 2nd quest like the original game added
The OG didn't have a 2nd quest, though. and the 2nd quest IS hero mode.

Kinda sad they changed her. i liked her old wavy black hair look. now she kinda looks like Ariel.

Ariel is black though. :^)

DX was not a GBC-exclusive cartridge, you could still play it in black and white on and original Game Boy. Doing so even reverted the perfect ending to show Marin with wings rather than her turning into a seagull.

like the original game meaning the first LoZ, sorry

hero mode isn't 2nd quest

The statue of her was red though.

Attached: 0.png (480x384, 11K)

k
Yeah but i always thought it was some kind of brown metal like bronze when i was little

Hero mode is activable form the start, right? What is 2nd quest? New kind of dungeons?

Why does Link have the Mermaid Suit from Oracle of Ages?

Attached: 844F88FC-B9FC-444B-81E3-CF0E305024F2.png (48x45, 216)

Those are flippers, not a mermaid tail.

>60$ for a port
>but now with removed content
kek

>port
You don't know what hat word means.

And it also has added contents.

I actually had a GB Printer but it was a waste of money. LA DX and GB Camera were just as fun without it, I barely used it. Shame the photo quests are gone.

Shit, you’re right.

you were just dumb and autist

sixty buckaroos for a remake from the ground up without any busy work

>loser doesn't know how to screencap on Switch

Why hasn't this game leaked yet, it's less than a week away. Don't tell me nobody can dump a copy yet

Go ahead and tell me how to screencap this with the Switch game.

Attached: 0.gif (240x216, 11K)

if that's link in the back, who took the picture?

The rat photographer

Inform yourself, before trying to school someone about something you know nothing about and look like a complete moron.

hope the dx extra dungeon is cut too

I didn't do this quest when I played LADX. What did I miss out on?

I'm not even that other person, I just never played DX and was confused, I thought Link took the pictures like the pictogram thing in wind wanker

Funny pictures and nice additional moments with Marin.

>t. zoomer scum

I am asking for switch awakening, a game that isn't even out yet.

I hear you get to get a mermaids bra, get kissed and have a young lady slather you in magical ointment. Is all this true?

if there's more warp points and you can select where you go what is the use of the Ocarina songs

SOULLESS

Yeah, that fucking blows.
Nintendo probably didn't want to bother to draw the pictures is all.
Lazy fuckers.

it'll be a cutscene and you'll be able to take a screenshot of it

revive the roster, free the wind fish

>I hear you get to get a mermaids bra,
In the OG version, you retrieve the mermaid's bra she has lost, but later version has it switched for a necklace instead. (one of the thing you could do was go under water next to the mermaid when she was missing her bra, and she would call you out for it and move to an other spot, when it get switched for the necklace, she simply said that the necklace isn't there as she has already checked that spot)
>get kissed
Miss Meowmeaw kiss you for rescuing her dog Bowow.
>and have a young lady slather you in magical ointment.
Crazy Tracy textbox say she has applied to you a magical ointment that will restore your full life if you lose all of your heart.

This is for the OG and DX version. I don't know how it will turn out for the Switch version, especially for the mermaid.

The manbo song is still useful to get back to the entrance of the Dungeon, or simply teleport directly to Crazy Tracy if you are low on life and out of ointment.

Someone tell me
Does this even add or change anything compared to the orginal DX version?
I don't give a single shit about the custom dungeon garbage
Why is it full price if it's the exact same game but with a different artstyle and a tiny bit more QoL improvements.

I appreciate the trolling but it won't be in the game at all.

>Does this even add or change anything compared to the orginal DX version?
Some cute moment with MArin and others are no longer present.
>Why is it full price if it's the exact same game
It's not. It's a complete remake.

are her ointments free

Every information and every screenshot and gameplay footage shown just shows me it's the exact same game with some MINOR details changed.
If it's just the same experience then why the fuck should I buy it for full price

youtube.com/watch?v=2ebBXD2nnEg

Attached: file.png (1366x768, 1.42M)

>shows me it's the exact same game w
Then you are blind and deaf. It's a completely new game engine and even 5 year old would be able to tell that.

Nope they are either 24 or 48 rupies.

>it looks different so it's a different game!
Fuck off, i'm not paying full prrice for the same gameplay experience with minor tweaks.

It's actually SLOWER due to larger screen size.

>with minor tweaks
A complete remake form scratch is not a minor tweak.

Hell, this game add much more than the DX version, yet I haven't hear anyone complain the DX was full price.

Okay so then tell me, what does it fucking add over DX?

can you only carry one?

>It's actually SLOWER
It's actually faster because there is no longer screen-transition.

Didn't DX only add colour and a Dungeon. If that's the level necessary to classify as new then upgrading the graphics, adding chamber dungeons and making item management more convenient seems to be just as much to me

Do you have eyes?

It's shit.

Yes, only one.

>graphical changes
so no gameplay changes? okay so it's not worth the money at all
I never said that DX is a good worthwhile upgrade over the original
But it's the definitive version of the original so that's why I am saying, is there ANY fucking improvement or new content added over the original fucking game?

>they gave it a different coat of paint, so it’s qualitatively a new experience!

have you played it?

>so no gameplay changes?
Do you have eyes? Anyone who has seen any demo of it immediately see there are now better control and item management.
>>graphical changes
Yes user, that's what a remake is. Especially when it get a new graphic engine. And new sounds and music too.

>But it's the definitive version of the original
Not any more, as the Switch version do more
.

>a different coat of paint

>completely rebuit from scratch
>with a new graphic engine
>a coat of paint.

do you enjoy displaying your stupidity?

Yeah and I literally already said that I saw that there are minor QoL improvements.
But is there any meaningful content beyond that?
The fact you are constantly dodging the fucking question and instead talking about >b-b-but it's graphically different!!
tells me that there isn't any new content besides the custom dungeons that are trash.
So what, it adds an additional button for items and removes the picture quest? I would rather play the original game then if they are literally removing content.

Yeah and if the gameplay is still mostly the same
then it's literally just a coat of paint
It doesn't fucking matter if it's made in unreal engine 4 with raytracing on a 5000 dollar PC with RTX.
It's still just a coat of paint since the GAME STILL PLAYS ALMOST EXACTLY THE SAME WITH THE EXACT SAME CONTENT

>ITT: retards who don't know how to screenshot on Switch

>is there ANY fucking improvement or new content added over the original fucking game?
-graphic improvement
-sounds improvement
-music improvement
-better control and item management that end the endless back and forth to the menu
-use of 4 buttons and shoulder buttons instead of just two
-Dungeon maker
-rocks no longer keep displaying the same text whenever you touch them
-no longer screen transitions
-bottles
-additional heart pieces
-improved mini-games
-Hero Mode
-improved bosses and mini-bosses
-puzzles solved in a dungeons remains solved
-more warp points
-autosaving

>1m43s
AAAAAAAAAH I'M COOMING

Please tell me how to take a screenshoot of thisin the switch game. Don't talk out of your ass.

Wasn't autosaving a feature in the gameboy versions though? You save the game the moment you enter a house/dungeon

So the only relevant changes are:
>better control and item management
>use of 4 buttons
>rock and pot text removed
>no screen transitions
>hero mode
>improved bosses and minibosses
>puzzles solved remain solved
>more warp points
>autosaving

Of those, most of them are QoL improvements and only the bosses and hero mode are actual content. Then you consider them removing the picture quest too as removal of content.

Does anyone really want to pay full price for a game, that is beyond some QoL improvements, functionally almost the exact same as the same game that came out 20 years ago?

No, it's not worth it at all.

Attached: 1518900126743.png (990x1200, 922K)

>The fact you are constantly dodging the fucking question and instead talking about >b-b-but it's graphically different!!
I am not dodging the question, I am pointing out that a complete overhaul is not a minor change and you are completely wrong to consider that that alone doesn't justify it.

> there are minor QoL improvements.
Not needing to constantly go back and forth the menu any more is not minor. At all. You just show you stupidity for thinking you can actually handwave it away.

>I would rather play the original game then if they are literally removing content.
It add more than it remove, the graphic and music alone already are more than whatt he DX did.
>then it's literally just a coat of paint
FALSE! acomplete remake IS NOT a coat of paint. A coat of paint would be a new skin over the same game engine.

that it was completely remade from scratch defacto means that you are wrong calling it a new coat of paint.

>Wasn't autosaving a feature in the gameboy versions though?
No.
>you save the game the moment you enter a house/dungeon
no.

It's still a coat of paint because the game plays almost the exact same
Again, the engine being different doesn't change that the game is still the same.
Graphics don't change gameplay and content
Sounds don't change gameplay and content

Engine
Does
Not
Change
Gameplay

>see hero mode mentioned in this thread
>get excited
>Look up what hero mode is
>"double damage and no hearts"

Pfffff hahaha, fucking lame, and here i thought it was some sort of master quest or something substantial.

>So the only relevant changes are:
False, all of them are relevant. Only a moron wouldn't think so.
>Of those, most of them are QoL improvements
Again, you are a moron for thinking you can handwave them away. those are huge improvement and address one of the biggest issue of the game.
> only the bosses and hero mode are actual content.
False, bottles, improved mini-gmaes and heart also are new content and so is the dungeon maker.

>Does anyone really want to pay full price for a game, that is beyond some QoL improvements
Once again being a moron thinking it can be handwaved, it can't.

>, functionally almost the exact same as the same game that came out 20 years ago?
It's a remake, this is exalty hw most remake work. Same thing happened with £Halo. And again, it does far more than the DX version yet no one complain about that one.

>No, it's not worth it at all.
You failed to provide any valid reason for that point.

>It's still a coat of pain
False
A game remade from scratch is never a coat of paint.

>Engine Does Not Change Gameplay
Gameplay
Has
Nothing
To
Do
With
Whether
Or
Not
It
Is
A
New
Coat
Of
Paint

What mater is the time and effort spent into making it.

Maybe if the game was completely ruined by the menu management, but it's still a great game even so.
The switch version improves on the game by adding those QoL changes, and making the graphics different.
But those changes are NOT WORTH full price. You are still paying for an experience that's almost 90% the same as the one from 20 years ago. Why would anyone think it's a good deal to pay full price for so few changes to the actual GAMEPLAY experience?
If the game plays the exact same but the graphics and sound are different then yes, it's a coat of paint.
>time and effort spent into making it
barely any? Because beyond the graphics and sound there is barely anything different.

Hero mode and new quest have never been the same thing.
Hero mode has always been "more damage and no RGN hearts"

Mind you someone actually talked about a 2nd game in plus of Hero mode in this thread But I don't know where he got that from.

So, what was a 5hrs game has been trimmed down to a 1-2hrs game with all the "QoL" and removed content. All for the modic price of 60$.
Interesting...

>recreate the same exact game in a different engine
>literally only real changes are removing hardware limitations of the original system
>that'll be 60 dollars please

>Don't talk out of your ass.
buttface lol

>Maybe if the game was completely ruined by the menu management, but it's still a great game even so.
It's still enough of an improvement to not call it minor.
>But those changes are NOT WORTH full price.
It's a new game made from scratch, yes, it does.

>The switch version improves on the game by adding those QoL changes
And doing much more.
>You are still paying for an experience that's almost 90% the same as the one from 20 years ago.
And again, it was not an issue when the DX did the same.
>Why would anyone think it's a good deal to pay full price for so few changes to the actual GAMEPLAY experience?
If you have never played the game before, it's the definitive experience. and if you want to revist the world in a fully developed environment too.

>If the game plays the exact same but the graphics and sound are different then yes, it's a coat of paint.
False. IT CAN NEVER BE A NEW COAT OF PAINT IF IT WAS REMADE FROM SCRATCH! EVER!
>barely any?
Absolutely most. Are you one of those moron who think that game design is all about being an idea guy?

All I am seeing is someone who had his argument made in advance falling all appart and trying to make his point anyway.

>5hrs game has been trimmed down to a 1-2hrs game with all the "QoL" a
All the time spent going back and forth the menu don't really count as game time to start with. And stop pretending those improvement are minor.

lmao you're the one handwaving away his points

>bottles
>custom dungeons
>more hearts
>hard mode
And that just naming a few. Stop lying on the internet, retard

>from scratch
I can take a shit, then 20 years later take another shit
Do you want to purchase the new shit for 60 dollars when you already know it's almost the exact same shit as the one I took 20 years ago?
>custom dungeons
Something you try literally once before dropping it.
>bottles
>more hearts
Just makes an easy game even easier, okay. Not actual content.
>hard mode
Just makes an easy game slightly less easy. Doesn't change enough to be worth 60 dollars.

Now defend the removal of the picture quest huh? That is actual content they gutted out of the game.

>-literally all they did was remove hardware limitations
>+But that's wrong
>-D-DOESN'T COUNT
Based shitposter

I do not, I address them directly and tell him why he is wrong.

>I can take a shit, then 20 years later take another shit
In either case, it wasn't shit, so your analogy doesn't apply.

>Something you try literally once before dropping it.
Opinion
>Just makes an easy game even easier, okay. Not actual content.
It's actual content and might work well with Hero mode.

Other things you are ignoring
-Better boss fight
-Brand new game Engine
-Mini-game changed
-puzzle remain solved
-no more transition screens
-more warp points.

I am not defending the rmoval of the picture quest, but it still add more than it removes so it defeat your point.

Anyway,, I am 100% sure you would still make the same kind of bad faith arguments if it was still there.

I wonder if this thread is just samefagging and falseflagging central.
Even a big nintendork as myself can see nothing more in this game than a quick cashgrab.
Then you have posts like just to quote a few and you'd think they're Takashi Tezuka himself fighting for his life.

all planning, concept and design were already done, they just remade the game in a new engine. I'm sure it's still a lot of work mind you but is it worth the full price of a brand new game?, i'll let consumers judge it.

>IT SHOULD BE EXACTLY THE SAME

Attached: 71d624debf31627abaa84219400d8b99.jpg (540x405, 37K)

The removal of hardware limitations are the only relevant things they changed to improve the gameplay experience of the game.
If the custom dungeon is the only new content added to the game, then it's neutralized by the fact they removed the picture quest.

Sooo it's 60 dollars for a coat of paint and QoL improvements
yikes, that's a really bad deal. Most companies would say this would be worth 20 dollars max.
Even the shitty dark souls remaster that barely changes anything is still 5 dollars, a much better deal than the new links awakening.

>Even a big nintendork as myself can see nothing more in this game than a quick cashgrab.
A game completely made from scratch is not a quick cashgrab.

There should be a good reason to remove content.

>too dumb to understand when he's BTFO
You said all the changes were hardware limitations being removed.
I proved you wrong.
You lost.

>B-B-B-BUT I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE OTHERS
I don't care about your damage control. You lost.

yeah this reeks of actual, true autism, not the “someone said something stupid so everyone calls them an autist” brand that this place usually goes for. How do you argue with somebody that only takes the letter of your words and never the meaning? How do you communicate with somebody that is flat out unable to differentiate what’s new on a technical level versus an experiential one? It’s depressing. This might be one of the saddest threads I’ve seen on here in a long time.

it is if there's no significant design changes

How it is made has no relevance.
The silent Hill collection was remade from scratch because they lost the source code
But everyone knows the silent hill collection is complete garbage and shouldn't be played
How a game is made NEVER impacts the consumer experience. You sound like a shill, a really bad one at that.
Lost what? Are you a child?

Is there an ashtag trending for requesting to have the camera shop? I know it's twiter, but it's what corporations listen to, nowadays.

It isn't if it was remade form scratch and anyway, there were design changes. Far more than for DX.

Complaining about paying full price for it make no sense when no one make that complain for DX.

Nintendo doesn't care, because retards like the shills defending it in this thread are still going to lap up and buy this cashgrab.

>How it is made has no relevance.
It completely has. A quick cashgrab would mean it was hastily put together without care. which isn't the case therz.

>How a game is made NEVER impacts the consumer experience.
Beside the point, you called it a quick cashgrab, And how it was made is what define whether or not it is a quick cashgrab.

If you don't want to buy the switch version because you already have played the original before, it's a perfctly legitimate point, but don't call it what it isn't.

UGGGGHHHHHHH OOOOOOHHHHHHHHHH AHHHHHHHHHHHAHHHH IMMMM COOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMIIIIIINNNNNGGGG

I am not defending it. seeI am calling a cat a cat and this game is neither a coat of painting nor a quick cashgrab. I like words to be used correctly. But I DO actually think it suck the picture quest is removed.

>buy this cashgrab.
A game entirely remade from scratch is never a cashgrab.

>hastily put together
The fact they removed the picture quest because they couldn't be bothered to redraw the pictures tells me it definitely didn't have much effort put into it.
Recreating a game that already exists isn't hard work. Just like the silent hill example you completely fucking ignored.

Both that collection and this game are quick cashgrabs.
Just because it's shiny doesn't mean they actually put a lot of effort into making it.

It's a cash grab, again just like the silent hill collection that was made from scratch, it's still a cash grab.

>The fact they removed the picture quest because they couldn't be bothered to redraw the pictures tells me it definitely didn't have much effort put into it.
The fact that you ignore the work required to create an engine and recreate a whole world with it while working on way to improve it and think it take no effort show how much of a moron you are.

you know it's possible to critic something without relaying on falsehood, right?

>Recreating a game that already exists isn't hard work.
From scratch, with a new engine and completely new physic? yes it is. You know nothing about game development.

> just like the silent hill collection that was made from scratch, it's still a cash grab.
It's never a cashgrab if it's recreated from scratch, especially in this case if they have lost the code. you just showcase more of your ignorance.

weak
why not charge $80

Because that's not the standard price of a game.

Mind you Zelda games tend to go up to $70, from time to time. It's not the case, here.

>create an engine
Are you retarded? They clearly have an inhouse engine they use for many many games.
>working on way to improve it
What improvements? The world is essentially the exact same, with the removal of the picture quest and the custom dungeon being the only major differences.
>new engine
Many games change engine during development, many times infact. This doesn't make the game difficult or time consuming to make at all
>new physics
The same exact ones in the old game? How is that new in any way?
>it's not a cash grab
The silent hill collection is by definition a fucking cash grab. Just like links awakening is a cash grab.
They cheaply shat out some new graphics onto an already existing game. being on a different engine does not change any of this at all, in fact it would take more effort if they wanted to work on the old engine that the original game used.

>They clearly have an inhouse engine they use for many many games.
This one is clearly brand new.
>What improvements?
Read the thread
>The same exact ones in the old game?
Not really. the old one was a 2D game working with sprites. Here you have to make it gives the same feeling with 3D objects. Not that easy.

>The silent hill collection is by definition a fucking cash grab.
No, it isn'T. if it was remade from scratch, then it never is a cashgrab.

fuck, call out the game for what it lack, but don't rely on falsehood to make your point.

Nintendo removed it and don't even bother to explain why. Soulless.

>clearly brand new
It clearly isn't, do you think these fuckers make a new engine for every game they make? You can lookup what part of nintendo is making it and see they clearly are making more games with similar graphical fidelity.
>read the thread
I did, you where talking about the changes to the world. Which beyond the two I mentioned, are incredibly minor shit like the additional warp points.
>it's 3d instead of 2d so it's different
It still plays the exact same so how it looks means absolutely fucking nothing, how many fucking times do I have to say that the graphics don't mean shit? Why the fuck would you buy a game for 60 dollars just to look at the graphics? JUST FUCKING WATCH A PLAYTHROUGH ON YOUTUBE
>it's not a cash grab
It's a cash grab.
It's the most low effort port they could have done, the QoL improvements are expected to be there from the start, and shouldn't be seen as new stuff they decided to add to the game because they have passion for the project.

>It clearly isn't, do you think these fuckers make a new engine for every game they make?
In this case, it clearly is. Also, it was made by greezo, who had only worked on 3DS before. First game on the switch, new engine.
>how many fucking times do I have to say that the graphics don't mean shit?
How many time do I have to tell you thatwhat matter to cll something a cashgrab or not is the time effort spent on it and therefore, in this case, it isn't.
>Why the fuck would you buy a game for 60 dollars just to look at the graphics? JUST FUCKING WATCH A PLAYTHROUGH ON YOUTUBE
I am not telling you to buy it. Fuck, wait for a second hand market or for an eshop sale if you want it at a lower price. I am telling you calling it a quick cashgrab is simply false.

>It's the most low effort port they could have done,
Complete false hood. a game remade from scratch is NEVER a low effort. Especially if it is well done.

You keep insisting on using words that don't apply.

I don’t give a shit about the price. I’ll gladly pay $60 for a from-scratch faithful remake of one of the most soulful games ever made and one of the best looking Switch games.
The game has 8 full dungeons which get pretty long and challenging by the end. 10hrs to complete or even significantly longer on a first playthrough.

Most of the people bitching about the price probaly never played the original anyway.

Ah I didn't know that Nintendo has no engines at all and every single time they made a new game they completely deleted all traces of the previous engines they worked with.
There clearly was very little time and effort spent into this port, otherwise they would have kept the picture quest in and added a lot more content.
It's still a cash grab. Me not buying it isn't enough. NOBODY should be fucking buying this scam cashgrab and telling Nintendo it's okay to make this low effort trash

It's a cashgrab, it's definitely low effort otherwise the picture quest would still be in the fucking game.
Instead they put a lazy recycled mode in the game.
Disgusting.

>Ah I didn't know that Nintendo has no engines at all and every single time they made a new game they completely deleted all traces of the previous engines
Not what I said. I said Greezo was in charge of the development and it was their first Switch game. Further mode it's a 3D engine that is meant to reproduce 2D physic.

>There clearly was very little time and effort spent into this port,
This statment never apply to any game made from scratch.
>this port,
A remake made from scratch is never a part. You keep insisting using words the wrong way.

>otherwise they would have kept the picture quest in and added a lot more content.
I am 100% sure that even if they ahad kept the picture quest, you still would have made the same statement. And they added contents.

>NOBODY should be fucking buying this scam
good thing it''s not a scam, then.

>
It's a cashgrab, it's definitely low effort otherwise the picture quest would still be in the fucking game.
You fail at logic. whether or not the game had the picture quest has nothing to do with defining if it's a cashgrab or not.