Game gets low or average reviews by journalists

From back in the day, Digimon World 2. In hindsight it was just different from the first one and babby's first dungeon crawler. With Digimon.

GOLD HAWK REPRESENT
youtube.com/watch?v=iA_uV_pDYD4&t

Attached: 615Q3X62vsL._SX342_.jpg (342x339, 40K)

Pokemon Mystery Dungeon is like that. I'm not the biggest fan of those games, but journos rate it way lower than it deserves.

Godhand

>blanked out created by
why you fucking nigger?

DBZ Infinite World was the best of the old Budokai Fighters from the PS2 days and stayed the best one until Fighter Z came out. It was basically an improved Budokai 3 fixing numerous problems like the capsule system imbalance the ability to spam jab and stall to restore Ki and run away and the serious drop off in character strats after the top 6 characters into virtually nothing. The problem was being an end of PS2 life cycle game meant virtually nobody heard of it and the reviewers who mashed buttons got beaten up by the AI [Which would use the cancel system players had discovered] and were expecting a Tenkaichi game that would play anime scenes by itself as they mashed were confused and gave it shit ratings

Attached: file.jpg (1600x800, 228K)

I dunno, ask the person who made this image eight fucking years ago

Alpha Protocol

Crackdown 3

animal crossing amiibo festival
it's a very chill and fun party game, one of my top played Wii U games

Attached: 1568389530882.jpg (260x319, 23K)

Didn't reviewers bash the original for being too complex?

Darkest Dungeon

Attached: 1568040633232.gif (720x540, 2.21M)

Journos can barely play cup head, so this one didn't surprise me.

that's the opposite though
critically acclaimed game that's absolute dogshit

but darkest dungeon wasn't good
rng =/= difficulty

But... That games sucks ass.

Prey 2017 deserved better scores

"We will also be bringing Fallout 76 to Steam later this year" - where is it?

Travis Strikes Again.

Attached: happy.png (1080x1080, 532K)

Postal 2

Later this year

Journos and critics are supposed to actually value artistic games which might not be that consumable to the general public, but instead they're giving this a 6/10 because the only kind of "artsy" games they can value are those that literally scream out their "deep" message right at your face and have one or two gimmicks to show how "gameplay can tell stories" even if the whole story could've been told just as well trough a movie.
Meanwhile this game is completely built around a certain experience, a wordless story that's probably impossible to convey via movies or literature but journos just discard it because they got snagged by some vulture on industrial complex and gave up.