This is not real-life photograph.
I repeat, this is NOT a real-life photograph.
This is not real-life photograph.
I repeat, this is NOT a real-life photograph.
are u sure?
Yea the foliage and shadows give it away.
thank god, I thought everything had turned into play doh
I could tell right away based on the fact that real life doesn't look like shit.
real life is pretty shitty though
>real life doesn't look like shit
Must've not seen much of real life
And it already looks fucking dated in comparison to pic related
>this is supposed to be Madagascar
jesus christ even GTA 5 looks better
Based
those trees look epic
Why do the plants look like they're made out of tissue paper
>glued on sky
>those leaves
no shit retard
kinito
This is not real-life photograph.
I repeat, this is NOT a real-life photograph.
Seriously
This is not real-life photograph.
I repeat, this is NOT a real-life photograph.
This is not real-life photograph.
I repeat, this is NOT real-life photograph.
There was no such event happen.
This is not Half-Life photograph.
I repeat, this is NOT a Half-Life photograph.
This is a real-life photograph
Who the fuck are you trying to fool, user? Those are obviously real life photos with game UI shooped in. No way any game looks this realistic.
Ha ha those shitty textures. Real life looks like shit, what the fuck were they thinking?
And this is proof that graphicstards don't know the difference between texture and lighting.
That looks like bad AR.
>RTX ON
it doesn't look even remotely lifelike
are you sure? It looks so real
He said doesnt look like shit. Not that real life isnt shit.
Real life can be shit, but even the shitty parts have the best graphics. After all, thats why game are striving towards life like graphics year by year. We'll probably get there in 100 years or so, and we'll all be dead by then.
Mint
can make more realistic 1/72 dioramas than your youtube machine
>youtube machine
kek, youtube can do actual 60FPS and 4k
You're supposed to post that taxi screenshot of GTA IV