Modern games are too easy. Beating the game isn't a right, it's a privilege you have to earn

I think it depends on the game and genre. Yeah, I want to work for it in games like RPG's and adventure titles. But in a life sim or something like that, eating shit isn't something I want to be doing.

There is also different kinds of difficulty. Easy combat is fine as long as there are extremely difficult puzzles to make up for it and the puzzles are the focus of the game, and vice versa.

Finally, there's also something to be said for a comfy easy game. Sometimes I just want to turn the brain off on a weekend and just play a super easy, chill game. That's usually when I pull out a Kirby or Mario game

An oatmeal cookie

...wait. Is that an oatmeal cookie?

Hes one of the few good youtubers.

We need more fighting games that aren't streamlined trash for little kids and less stupid fucking kindergartner mobile games.

Attached: Screenshot (3).png (1808x539, 474K)

The supreme feminist ideal of mediocrity is inserted into many things, regardless of whether they have any direct connection to women. The concepts of competition, challenge, and simple 'gitting gud' have been labeled as toxic, patriarchal concepts. Participation trophies have been a thing for decades, the cheering for every useless scrub mainstream. It's no surprise, with the entry into the mainstream, that they would want to remove the challenge for the majority of people who have been brought up to believe that mediocrity is a virtue. Casuals won't buy a game if they can't get through the story, and that costs the industry sales.

The original edgelord.

This makes a lot of sense. Especially as the world becomes more overpopulated and it's harder and harder to stand out people delude themselves into thinking that being mediocre is good.

Imagine saying a bunch of big words to act cool on a secret ping pong poster board

Imagine being proud of talking like a nigger and not recognizing basic high-school level concepts

>says the guy who made Devil's Turd
eh

New games are easier because the primary audience isn't children anymore, ie. not people who can devote all of their time to beating video games. Games need to be easier, or at least give you more freedom, because no adult who comes home from work wants to spend his one or two hours of free time doing the same thing over and over because it's difficult.
Used to love the Souls franchise, but ever since I got a job I don't like it as much as I used to, because I just don't have the time nor the will to spend hours going up against a boss. Took the wind out of Sekiro for me.

Games can be as easy as the devs want to make them, and they can have difficulty selections if the devs want those as well. Stop gatekeeping something that should just be fun

youtube.com/watch?v=Wb7sN7axblc

>Only hard games are good. Easy games are for FAGS AND WOMEN

Imagine being so starved for positive attention you legitimately think that video games that don't stroke your E-peen are a feminist conspiracy

Easy games are just a symptom of a larger problem.

No they're not

Video games are a leisure time activity with no pre-determined difficulty, and demanding all games be hard is just a sign you didn't get hugged enough as a child.

>paranoid pol-tard

Attached: 9e7.jpg (442x500, 11K)

I don’t care if a game is easy or hard as long as it is fun.

>itagaki talking shit about anyone after making Devil's third

Attached: 1567548179704.gif (403x227, 3.04M)

Devil's Third was decent, especially considering the production hell it got caught up in

>Beating the game isn't a right, it's a privilege you have to earn.
Same for me buying your game, and if I can't play it I'm sure as hell not going to buy it.