I loved fable 1. Should I play this?

I loved fable 1. Should I play this?

Attached: 220px-Fableiii.jpg (220x272, 22K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=CPIbGnBQcJY
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Bump

Attached: IMG_20190908_111101.png (2110x1542, 48K)

Fuck no. Play 2 and stop there.

No. This game is squandered potential and feels like a real regression after Fable II. Interactions with NPCs are streamlined to a preset good or bad emote. The Sanctuary as a start menu feels tedious at times and the open world feels very much like a series of corridors you can't deviate from. Plus the Road to Rule progression system is unsatisfying to use.


I will say this though, once you take power and have to rule the kingdom, I did enjoy seeing how your choices of morality vs financial security effect the land. The choices feel like they really matter in the scheme of things leading up to the final boss. The only issue is the final boss is something you face half way through the game, and the villain is so very underdeveloped.

All up 6/10 imo.

spbp, 2 is the last good Fable game

No

I don't have an Xbox 360

Attached: 1554343389090.jpg (603x579, 27K)

No, it's a massive step down from the second game. I just wish Fable 2 wasn't trapped on the 360 forever.

3 is arguably the worst one, play 2, the DLCs and end it there.
The amount of end game content in 3 is non-existent.

Just be content with Fable TLC then. 3 is not worth it effort.

what a shame. its fucking retarded that its the only one thats restricted to just the 360 still.
if you must play 3 to scratch an itch or something, pirate it

It was honestly pretty bad.

Just play Lost Chapters for Fable 1 and never ever touch a Fable game again.

It’s backwards compat, so as long as you have an xbone, you’re good.

I'm glad Yea Forums agrees on something I feel is true for once. TLC>1>2>2dlc>>>>>>>>>>. Anniversary and Kinect don't fucking count.

Attached: 1564185018918-v.png (400x600, 116K)

Emulation is coming soon.

3 is shit

For the story, sure. It's definitely enioyable, in fact i myself put a couple hundred hours into it, but by all means it's the worst fable game

>2010
>week after 3 came out
>go to blockbusters
>they have a copy for sale (blockbusters used to SELL games too sometimes)
>30 dollars
>"wow only 30 dollars the week after release?!"
>never paid attention to pre-release info
>never heard of HIS lies
>spent my birthday money on it
>beat it
>felt so empty
>still sits on my shelf
I could've done so much more.

It also occurs to me now that I'm angry at this game again, that King Logan is voiced by Michael Fassbender who completely and utterly phones it in. It's such a lazy voice performance. Such a waste.

this is the correct answer

listen here kid listen

play it, turn off the golden trail and explore, it will be your favorite game in retrospect

I'm still convinced most of the budget went towards the voice cast. Look that shit up.

I have a ps4

Attached: 1539436921180.jpg (228x221, 10K)

The first Angry Joe video I ever watched was about Fable 3.

>this era joe will never return
why even live Yea Forumsro's

Attached: skinnyjoe.jpg (418x344, 16K)

I miss enjoying things.

it was alright. not worth buying but you can go ahead and watch a no commentary playthrough on youtube

Fable 1 had a fucking great OST.

Fable 2 had a couple improved elements whilst others were simplified dramatically (armour is purely cosmetic and won't reduce damage). But a very underwhelming story compared to Lost Chapters.

Never tried Fable 3 outside of a demo. A couple steps forward but several leaps backwards, from what I understand.

Attached: riki.jpg (2948x2446, 1.62M)

>A couple steps forward
Not even this.

Well, I mean, the evolving weapons seemed like maybe a good idea if poorly implemented?

Affecting the world around you when you're king? Although I guess it's basically Option A (open a park) or Option B (establish a sweat shop).

The pause screen system seemed retarded. The way you buy clothes seemed pretty stupid.

Anyone here who's played F3, can you please list the most infuriating shit in the game?

Attached: dkc2-title-screen.jpg (520x390, 68K)

Not really. It's almost entirely a rehash of all the mechanics from the second game but somehow worse in most respects. The only real improvement I can say about it is that they put more effort into building their cast of characters but that's about it.

>The choices feel like they really matter in the scheme of things leading up to the final boss

There's a Demon Door that will give you all the money you need to always make the "good" choice.

I made the mistake of following coverage for Fable 3 pretty closely and listening to Molyneux's lies so seeing how the weapon morphing and ruling mechanics turned out infinitely pissed me off.

Don't even play 2, 1 is the only good Fable.

2 is good

>Anyone here who's played F3, can you please list the most infuriating shit in the game?
The menu is in fact stupid but you what's even worse? The atrocious level up "menu".
>fully interactive just like the base menu
>to access it you have to go through a loading screen and small cutscene
>is a mile long road where you have to find the right chest, select the chest and receive your level up thing
Also you can only have one person follow you at a time and have to LITERALLY hold their hand the whole time. Fucking dye packs and expressions are level up items. Black dye was a dlc.

Nah, 2 is the best in the series.

Fuck off, retards.

That sounds like a rubbish game experience. I'm glad I never played it.
Fable 2 had a decent dye system. Once you found/bought Th e colour, you could use it infinite times.
It shouldn't be a level up reward. That's just dumb. May as well be an overwatch loot box.

Does TLC version of the Oxbox runs fine in the 360???

Works alright for me. Expect a couple freezes every once in awhile. Like maybe once every few sessions.

cringe

Attached: download (1).png (1600x900, 3.17M)

Is there a way I can get a controller to work for TLC on PC? Or do I have to get Anniversary for that, how is that anyway

This is correct.
Fable 2 is decent.
Still listen to it.

Get the fuck out of my board, you goddamn neglected child.

>Fable 2 is decent.
Better than the lost chapters.

>my board
Yea Forums belongs to angrychads and there's nothing /you/ can do about it

Attached: download.jpg (480x360, 14K)

Youtubers are for abandoned children who need a friend. Look at how you're shitting up a decent thread because you crave attention.
Get the fuck out.

Fucking black dye dlc in a game that is 50% about making edgy bad guy characters.

John Cleese though.

stay mad fag

Attached: smugku.jpg (633x651, 60K)

Fable 1 is a 4/5.
Fable 2 is a 3/5.
Fable 3 is a 2/5.
I'm glad the series ended before getting to a 1/5.

Stay lonely, homo.

Actually there was a shitty Kinect game, remember? There's your 1/5 Fable game.

Fable 2 is so much better than one, Jesus Tits. Bigger map, better characters, firearms, a dog companion. I'm convinced the people who pretend to prefer lost chapters never got to play 2.

The only thing Falbe 2 has over Fable 1 is the dog companion. The rest, being the story, characters, world, combat, character progression, no penalty for death, etc, is so much worse it's insulting. Also, Fable 2 has one of the worst final bossfights in history.

>no u
ebin response fren

ok bond, you were in blockbusters already why didn't you just rent it dipshit

>is so much worse it's insulting.
See, this is why nobody takes you seriously. You think you're fooling anyone but yourself by exaggerating.

>stay mad
Brilliant comeback, dicklips.

seething

We've got the master of wit over here.

No, the trilogy got worse with every installment. You really will regret wasting time on 3 if you play it.

I was fucking STUPID, user. I thought I implied that.

No, user, I was insulted when I realised that Fable 2 is essentially Fable 1, beat for beat, but worse. I get you like eating shit as long as it's Albion, but I was expecting Lionhead to make Fable but better and more creative, not more of the same but a whole lot more casual and shit. Kingdoms of Amalur is a better Fable 2 than the actual Fable 2.

Attached: sparklies for braindeads.jpg (896x504, 76K)

ah thanks user!

Attached: literallyme.jpg (478x734, 39K)

By itself, it's a decent game, but next to Fable 1 and 2 it's trash

>eating shit
It's weird how you immediately went there, I'm not even going to ask. Do you think these little outbursts actually win you arguments? You must be really young, or at least have the cognitive skills of a teenager. Keep posting gross exaggerations and angry shitfits, it shows the kind of person who didn't play Fable 2 but pretends it's worse than 1.

Apologies, I didn't mean to make fun of the mentally handicaped.

>no argument
>only ad-hom

Attached: fb0.jpg (640x432, 31K)

sure but go in with low expectations.
also prep that cheat engine because I guarantee you'll hate the ending

It alright.

Attached: 1504029983330.png (231x243, 37K)

Wait, people actually like the first game?

why was the game desaturated as fuck?

Attached: 1564000501924.png (719x1050, 1.44M)

>Anyone here who's played F3, can you please list the most infuriating shit in the game?
I really disliked how the game doesn't make any indication of how EXTREMELY important it is so earn alot of gold in your journey for the endgame.

>playing the """""""""""remaster""""""""""""

Never touched Anniversary Edition.

huh? thats where your screen shot came from

That's Fable 3.
Pic related is Anniversary.

Attached: Fable Ann Lady Grey.jpg (1280x720, 69K)

fair enough, my mistake

It's cool, just shows how fucked up the series got.
I hope Fable 4 becomes a thing next-gen.

Sabine and Page were obnoxious.
I wish you could tell the dwellers/resistance to fuck off and just make a coup with the bandits or the army.

The multiplayer was amazing on paper, that's where the improvement lies. You could trade, play with, have sex with and marry other players, and actually take your characters and dog into their game and fight alongside them and vice versa.

All it really did was trivialize an already trivial game though

rumor said that fable 4 is made by the guys who made forza

Yes.

Why can no other game replicate the feeling of being in a fairy tale better than Fable 1?

Because despite having lore that starts in the William Black/Archon/Old Kingdom era, we don't start there, that would be dumb, we have to force ourselves into a timeline corner with subsequent games with industrial shit and therefore by necessity downplay medieval magic shit and kill the entire premise, aesthetic and atmosphere

>no armor
>rushed ending
it's shit

Overlord does it here and there but not to the comfy extent that Fable does.

Attached: 20190318171343_1.jpg (1920x1080, 581K)

Remember all the lies Peter Molyneux made about Fable 3? remember the project Milo hoax?

youtube.com/watch?v=CPIbGnBQcJY

That's the problem with Fable 3. So many of the ideas sounded great on paper, especially with Molyneux hyping them up as innovative features, but the execution just leaves a bad taste in your mouth.

>There are people who believed this shit
I was laughing my ass off.

The morals of good vs bad are sort of dumb though because 1 gold = 1 life saved (why everyone in the kingdom didn't just pay 1 gold for their life I don't know)

eg. At one point you can rebuild an orphanage for 50,00 gold (good) or you can convert it to a brothel and earn 1.25 million gold (evil).

Brothels aren't inherently evil, and saving 1.255 million lives is a good thing, so it makes even less sense than the first game's "divorce is worse than murder" logic

Eh you might but it is an average game who'se main defining feature is the wastrd potential