Should they make a ck3?
Should they make a ck3?
at this point, yes
but i wouldnt buy it
>buying anything from that jewish company
I love their games, but its fucking absurd charging $300 for all the dlc, most of which is needed to make the vanilla game playable/fun
No, fucking fix Imperator first
Cicero beta is a good start but it's probably going to be 2 years of free patches and content DLC's before this shit is good
>buying the DLC
just borrow money from the jews...
you do have sons of abraham at least, right?
Different question, but I've only played ck2 (have 400hrs on it). Is europa better or worse than ck2?
It's not as braindead easy. Still, I would say CK2 is better singleplayer, and EU4 is much better in multiplayer.
Yes but set it in a different part of the lore. Like a northern continent or Japanese inspired region. Doing the same location again is lazy.
It's different. I went from CK2 to EUIV and ended up way more addicted to EUIV. Playing as someone like Scotland and trying to take over the UK and out colonise Portugal and Spain is a lot of fun, also a great way to learn the game.