Will this be the greatest Zelda of our lifetime?
>traditional top-down gameplay maintained
>analog movement
>faithful to the original level design
>original soundtrack rearranged
>pretty decent graphical improvements
>Wart is in
Will this be the greatest Zelda of our lifetime?
>traditional top-down gameplay maintained
>analog movement
>faithful to the original level design
>original soundtrack rearranged
>pretty decent graphical improvements
>Wart is in
3d > 2d
Why is Link an emoji?
Looks like shit. Will be the one of the biggest stains on The Legend of Zelda's record forever.
The issue I have is that there isn’t enough of the game changed to justify repainting it and selling it as new.
The graphics are just okay, and the music may be the only redeeming factor, but otherwise you can just play a rom of LADX and get a better experience
No, dipshit. It’s a cute little remake for fans of the original and people who never played it. That’s fucking it.
This. Everyone else is wrong.
People said the same about Wind Waker and look at where we are now.
Never played LA so I’ll be having my first experience. And it’s not like I didn’t have the chance, I was 11 when the GBC port released.
I dare even one person here to tell me what the point of this remake is. If you're going to remake a game, actually do something with it. What the fuck is the point of new graphics when they only subjectively look better than the old graphics and you don't make use of the 3D aspect at all? The fucking GRASS is still arranged in square tufts like it's a handheld Pokemon game. It's unacceptable and a ripoff at $60. RE2 remake wasn't perfect and certainly doesn't outright replace the original game, but it's a clear example of how a $60 retail remake should actually be done.
That was the first time a stain was placed on the series, I'm not sure what you're talking about. It's a good game, just not a good looking game, hence the stain. This game is stain number 3 or 4, I've lost track.
Wrong. It is both great game and a great looking product. You sexual insecurities about playing cartoony games won’t automatically make it bad. It’s literally your shitty, ignorant opinion.
>It is both a great game
Zoom zoom
>analog movement
It's not.
>faithful to the original level design
That's a bad thing, it's a 99.99% reskin. There's no reason not to emulate. A handful of QoL is not worth $60.
Just emulate.
>15-20h well designed game isn’t worth $60 because it’s a remake
7-10h AAAs probably are then?
It isn’t worth playing an inferior version with a proper remake coming in two weeks
>can’t find a good argument
>”b-but zoomers lmao hahaha”
kek
Some other user replied with that. I don't understand why people get so defensive about toon link games and how they look. I just said the game is good, so that should have set your heart at ease, yet you shit a brick anyway because I said it just didn't look good. What's the problem here?
>people pointed out that a game looks like shit but jokes on them because I like how shit looks so this completely different looking shit also looks good
Top notch logic.
Dilate.