Neo-nu Yea Forums will defend nanny state

Is it even happening, its been months.

We've argued this to death in many threads but I've yet to see someone explain why the proposed bill is bad besides "muh slope" fallacy.

He looks like a villain.

Dey goin 2 taek me gunz

>Lootboxes literally make the worst games the most profitable
Were born only a few minutes ago, or do you seriously think there were no bad games that still made a shit ton of money?

>defending multi million dollar companies

Shills are real.

It goes against the AMERICAN principle that every man is the architect of his own fortune.

Nanny state, corporate state, you're still under someone's boot. Having both fight each other down is the best case.

>I have no arguments so I will just insult everyone who disagrees with my view points

Yea Forums will defend giving the world governments the right to censor their games just because they hate EA'S business model. Guess what guys, you will never stop the masses from being retarded and propping up evil megacorps with their money. Its futile. All you have is your freedom of expression.

You know they only reason Big Gov wants to regulate thisnis so they can take tax revenue of the top, right? They dont care about fairness or that it may be predatory business. They prop up Big Pharma, the most predatory industry in the world, the cause of our wars and strife.

Dont give away your freedom of choice just to spite a video game company. They will find a million other ways to squeeze the whales

Attached: 1567512141227.gif (499x315, 481K)

>oh GAWD, regulating massive corporations? this is an OUTRAGE! what about MUH FREEDUMBS????

Attached: 1538713790669.png (274x290, 11K)

The constitution is about protecting about the individual, corporations are not individuals, the government would actually be doing the governments job by serving the people

Yeah bro how come we aren’t allowed to do whatever we want whenever we want? It’s the AMERICAN way brooo

>has only one line "laws bad" so resorts to greentexting

He IS a villain, unless you're a shareholder at EA:
youtube.com/watch?v=PTLFNlu2N_M

>You know they only reason Big Gov wants to regulate thisnis so they can take tax revenue of the top, right?
They're probably already making enough money from the game industry lobby.

>yes got, you cant make a voluntary lootbox purchase using your own money without giving Papa Gov 15%

You know the concept of liberty is fucked when people wield taxes as a hammer.

FUCK LOOTBOXES I DON'T GIVE A FUCK HOW THEY'RE GONE AS LONG AS THEY'RE FUCKING GONE

I agree broro.
We need to seize the means to determine our life back. That is the AMERICAN way after all.

"NOOOOOOO STOP BULLYING THESE POOR MULTI-NATIONAL CORPORATIONS!!!!"

Attached: c75hixlzxef31.jpg (798x798, 58K)

If I have to choose between a nanny-state and unchecked capitalism, I'll choose the nanny-state 100% of the time.

If you actually read the bill, it's not about stopping adults from buying loot boxes, it's to stop kids from doing it

Both the videogame industry and big pharma need to be put in their place. If you don't put up some sort of defense against it, then they just keep pushing their luck with new outlandish schemes.

Reddit will defend corporations

Government does care for the purchasing power of its citizens to some degree. Why do you think gambling isn't allowed for children and heavily restricted otherwise? Lootboxes are the same basically. You can argue against a ban, sure. But I wanna see you argue against lootboxes being considered as gambling by law.

Not to mention that I don't think banning games with lootboxes is a slippery slope to censorship. The definition of lootboxes is pretty clear so far, so it's not like you can apply a ban arbitarily.

>game industry lobby

Are you high? Big Pharma is king. He'll they are probably the ones pushing the "gamers are mentally ill" meme because they have a whole line of prescriptions just waiting for release. Imagine "Ritalin Xtreme". A person who sits at home playing vidya and buying lootboxes generally isnt developing diseases that require long term medicinal treatement.

That’s more than “THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN”.
But here is another one.
Culling retards is always a good thing. Whether it be parents that don’t watch their kids or people who actually spend money on skins, if you just recklessly spend more than you can afford over bits, it’s better for society that you get punished for it.

i'm glad congress is doing something worthwhile. Now if only they can stop that stupid emergency funding for the wall.

>March
>same bait thread as always, now with extra buzzwords

Nah, I just hate video games and people who make them. Anything that ruins their lives is fine by me
>B-b-but what about
I don't play videogames that were made past 2009 and only come here for the porn and shitposting
*dab*

Children dont have access to their own credit cards. A child has no way to buy lootboxes without their parents permission, and in fact I doubt children are a significant amount of box purchases because they dont male fucling money. This is an issue that should be solved between the parent and the child, thats why I said Papa Gov, because the weak willed of our society will ALWAYS turn to the government to make rules for them, just like their parents did.

Nanny state is ok when it's copyright

>That’s more than “THINK ABOUT THE CHILDREN”.
That's not our argument, our argument is that we don't like lootboxes and they're ruining games.
Bringing children into the mix just makes a ban easier to justify.

Attached: 1557584082097.png (1946x1052, 212K)

Hahahahaha dont think for a second anything will happen to Pharma. You dumb assholes are going to cause censors to be able to cut and edit video games, while Pharma will be running all the opium it wants worldwide. Get your priorities straight.

Not really, kids grow up with the loot boxes, they become addicted to the mentality. the parents don't care, the schools don't, he grows up with a gambling addiction. It gets significantly worse and now he's on public assistance, homlessness etc now its a grave burden on society no matter what. If congress passes a law that stops this in its tracks theres a chance he doesn't become a gambling addict and doesn't auction off his kidney

>implying any of these first three things are good

Libertarian shills should be gassed

Attached: A9C0A576-4583-469A-92ED-CC90C8B6C02A.png (808x486, 351K)

I can't do with my money as I please?

fucking exactly. this is why i think age of consent, legal age of alcohol and smokes are fucking bullshit. Kids can not make money so these laws are unnecessary. If these things affect kids then it's the parents fault only and THEY should deal with the consequences

>Oh no the big corporation is losing their freedom of expression what ever shall we do!!!
Fuck off corporate shill, freedom of expression doesn't apply to a soulless corporation, they're not people they're a fucking company trying to abuse retards

>"NOOO, YOU CAN'T JUST BAN SHITTY BUSINESS PRACTICES, WHAT ABOUT THE FREE MARKET?!"

Attached: Soyjack.jpg (785x731, 101K)

Not liking something isnt a reason enough. You are allowing government to regulate content, all it takes is a foot in the door and then you have an FCC for video games.

Attached: anon your corporate shill game is on point today.png (485x461, 383K)

>age of consent
B
b-bro lets not go that far into pedo territory

Because a child has never stolen from their parents purse/wallet, or has ever lied about how much they were going to spend

I wouldnt waste gas on nanny state shills, since they are already brain dead.

>You dumb assholes are going to cause censors to be able to cut and edit video games

SONY and other california based companies are already doing that with their products, companies don't really need our help with that :^).

>all it takes is a foot in the door and then you have an FCC for video games.
But we already have that in Valve, Sony and Nintendo all heavily curating and censoring their products?
The artistic content is restricted but the payment options are unrestricted, why as a consumer would I ever be happy with the current situation?

Make gambling legal. Then I won't have a problem with the clear double standard.
Same reason instathots need to pay taxes. I'm all for everyone getting tax cuts but until that happens, pay up, bitch.

user it's for the players so its okay when sony does it

>slippery slope argument

Yawn

>protecting kids from predatory practices
>literal nanny
What's wrong with that you cunt?

No I won't Government should stay out of my business and let me get kids addicted to gambling.

Liberty lovers drink unpasteurized milk.

It's not free if you can't your own choices.

Authoritarianism at the hands of corporations isn't any better, my retarded Ancap friend, though I'm sure you'll deny such a thing is even possible right up to the point where they start charging you for oxygen.

GUBMENT BAD

CORPORATE COCK GOOD

because then EA will stop paying my bills to argue against the bill on Yea Forums, reddit, and resetera

fuck you and fuck kikes

>regulate content

Companies already do that without your mythical big gov interfering, keep that in mind next time you go into a thread about Sony's "Ethics Comittee"

Yeah no more shitty freedom-restricting regulations like seatbelts and FDA. We decide what we do because we’re AMERICAN

I understand people want them illegal cause it's bad video game design but is it necessary? Only bad shallow video games use loot boxes anyway so Yea Forums should just not buy them.

>no you can't ban baby murder! women will just murder babies with a coat hanger

>WE NEED TO BAN GUNS OR ELSE KIDS WILL GET SHOT

which is it libtards? :^)

>Publishers don't care what's popular.
Stopped watching there.

boycotting never works

Even if everyone on this board stopped playing games with lootboxes it wouldn't make a dent in the profit they generate.

>NO BUSINESSES SHOULD JUST GIVE THINGS OUT FOR FREE, WHY AREN'T ALL GAMES MADE BY BASED DEVS LIKE VALVE!
>GOVERNMENT PLEASE SAVE US!

>vote with your wallets!
>so what the majority of people are not spending a dime on lootboxes and they are making billions off of the minority
>by the way I hate roads

Both, conservatard

This, fuck government they can fuck over their citizens until their votes run out. Companies need to sell something people will buy.

The existence of “Muh Feels” legislation (Laws only implemented due to massive butthurt over literally nothing) worsens society as a whole.
Simply put, the world right now is TOO SAFE.
The retards and the poor of the world get to breed, typically having 4+ kids, and all of them help cause overpopulation world wide while also draining the world of its resources through gibs. And when those 4+ kids grow up, they don’t die either, and have 4+ kids each.
Having so many retards also means that the average IQ drops, and it increasingly becomes more likely that the smart people also breed with those retards.
You know who loves it when retards dominate the demographics? People with power and scammers. Democracies go from a group of intelligent people trying to fix real issues (unlike lootboxes), to appeasing el goblins with promises of gibs and safety.
These El Goblins also never let their offspring take their places (see boomers) in maintaining society. They simply just live too long.
And they live too long because everything is designed to be as idiot proof as possible, and even when idiots do fail, there is always the people in power to get them back up and take advantage of with votes and money.

This is why Global Warming is good. Survival of the fittest will finally take its course, most of those rats in power will die off, and humanity as a whole will improved.

>I want to kill kids legally
>but I don't want kids to die

gonna have to explain this to me

>age of consent
And libertarians wonder why people call them pedos.

>expecting the senate to ban something that literally prints money
hahaha you guys never learn

Attached: tumblr_af9a9aaf1e5fa8efdd4ae15a90ebfb8c_38c17c8e_640.jpg (640x747, 151K)

Because people have tried voting with there wallets and it doesn’t work and because there is enough dumb whales to make it worth while developers will keep shoving this stuff in

You say trannies killing themselves is a problem.

Well, I say it's a good thing. I never asked for a women with a dick.

Your move.

Imagine actually bending over, spreading your ass, and happily inviting corporations to ass fuck you
It's exactly the thing that Yea Forums used to be against but this r/the_donald faggot refugee OP is trying to talk about how "nu" Yea Forums is against it, as if he belongs here

Outlawing faulty products and tools isn't censorship. It's like allowing car manufacturers to provide defective parts and saying "Whaever it's a free market, libertarian, bro". It's about objective cost and function, not a fucking culture war.

>Bro just let the retards who actually buy this shit ruin it for you and everyone else not braindead enough to buy it

>hard drugs are banned because they are dangerous to individuals and those around them
>the right sees this as good

>loot boxes are banned because while they not physically dangerous for you, they are financially dangerous to individuals and those around them
>the right see this as the nanny state over stepping its power

This just goes to further prove anyone on the right just wants to scam people for easy money rather than having to actually work for it. The absolute state of the political right.

>he thinks it wont happen

Attached: 1538609816876.png (446x451, 128K)

All laws are essentially the nanny state and you would never vouch for anarchy

oof you dodged the point of the post so hard i actually feel bad. here is a few more pitty (you)s (you)(you)

Absolutely based

It's hard to take a side on this debacle.
On one hand, I hate that the gaming industry has reached the absolutely embarrassing state that it's full of gambling and shitty MTX vehicles. It's started to infect every single franchise, nothing is safe now that the shareholders have smelled blood in the water.
On the other, I hate that the only way to seemingly stop it is to let big fucking brother get involved. Why do we need to be policed? Stop being such simpletons, stop letting these niggerkike studios get away with all this whaling, gamers need to throw a brick through their proverbial window to say NO to this anti-consumerist bullshit. But we don't. Instead, they rake in billions off the back of kids who were brought up on horse armor and ultimate team. It's too late for us to do the right thing, the newest generation has already been brainwashed to think it's okay. "What slippery slope?" they say, it's always been this way as far as they know. The megakikes have won this battle with their evil jew magic, mutating the face of gaming to suit their moneygrubbing needs over the course of the last decade and a half. I'm not sorry that the law has to get involved. I AM diappointed they had to push it this far; we could have lived in harmony, gamer and studio, but that wasn't good enough for the kikes.

it's not neo/v/ it's /pol/'s fault

Banning any of those things in the picture is completely retarded and a war on guns would go about as well as the war on drugs.

You don't get it retard.
Games with lootboxes are ALWAYS bad without a single possible exception because lootboxes inherently make a game bad.
Games with lootboxes also make 100 or 1000 times more money than games without.
Before lootboxes there was never a financial incentive to make a game purposefully bad. With lootboxes, there is.

gambling is as addictive as hard drugs

It's not easy to boycott as the majority of the money is made from fucking whales.

>neo-nu Yea Forums will defend nanny state

Attached: 1450935965781.jpg (297x365, 36K)

All libertarians are right wing but not all right wing are libertarians. Here's your (you)

I for one enjoy tax funded roads

its a dead end product actually. It doesn't help the economy or the people. It also cannot be sold or traded because its limited to the game itself.
it simply takes money out of the economy.

its essentially not a service no a product.
I don't know about banning it, but its actually bad.

whoops looks like you forgot to have a point there, conservatard

/n/, /news/, /pol/ knows what they are.

A Jew job.

>”bad games become massively popular and profitable due to lootboxes”
>bad games in the past made tons of profit. Why is it suddenly an issue?
>”REEEEEEEE ALL GAMES WITH LOOTBOXES ARE BAD!”
Come back to Yea Forums when you are over 18 years old.

white obama

So you're saying I should defend them when they're ruining literally every game that comes out?

dumb fuck

now that trumps is all for gun control that image is a little outdated

>rise up gamurs!11
It's a small group of cultist retards paying and defending corporations, there's nothing we can do about it. All the ridiculing we can muster is never going to get past their indoctrination.

You say it's wrong for me to have sex with a sixteen year old girl.

But you'd have no problem with a boy getting fucked by a fag in drag.

Be gone now monkey man. *throws pebble*

>banning gambling degeneracy
Based and redpilled.

Not every game is mobile Gacha shit or made by EA, and you would 100% hate the games without lootboxes anyways.

Well there was a very simple solution too this and it was not go hog wild with the shit to the point the government has to step in, but unfortunately the game industry is retarded.

What if you’re a libertarian but hate both gubments and corrupt corporatists? I just want general laxness and freedoms and hate authoritarian assholes.

No argument

It hurts the people I want hurt so therefore it is good.

Not that guy just laughing at your generic ass post

Attached: 697.png (1000x600, 453K)

>gun control
You guys hear about that white conservative teenager that shot his family while they slept, killed his mother, father, and all 3 of his siblings aged 6 years old, 5 years old, and 6 months old
This was in Alabama or Arkansas, I dont remember exactly

There's no way to prevent power itself from existing.

>now

Ohohohohohohoho he's always been for gun control. Most of his voter base is too stupid to notice. And I say this as someone that voted for him and owns guns.

It's wrong for you specifically to have sex with anyone, ever
I mean just look at yourself objectively

The libertarian philosophy is that government should be used to prevent entities from gaining power that want to take most of your rights.
That’s the difference between libertarians and general anarchists.

>libertarian but hate both corrupt corporatists?

Well then you're not libertarian

The same people who will shit on lootboxes in this thread will defend their gacha waifu gambling games.

That doesn't mean you're gonna survive it either you basement dwelling neet.
Just because you fantasize about surviving the apocalypse doesn't mean you're gonna live past the first encounter with raving bandits looking to cannibalize you, stab you woth an AIDS-riddled shank, rape your pasty white ass (bonus points if you're a nigger) or anything else.
Also good luck thinking you, a poster on Yea Forums's shittiest board, can think of efficiently running a group capable of raiding others for food and survival, or knowing how to farm, or knowing how to ration your meals without gobbling down on spaghetti-filled civilian rations.

TL:DR you're a brainlet faggot whose gonna die first when the global warming apocalypse comes when he can't get his welfare checks from the government anymore

Attached: file.jpg (960x540, 39K)

Then you aren't a libertarian, you're an anarchocommunist

pic related is Yea Forums in this thread

Attached: BF84E9B0-EDE0-4AF1-8D4F-09ECA7D80CA8.jpg (900x1350, 496K)

The presence of the nanny state is already settled, as is the age in which everything gets banned. No sense in not making sure the fuckers that killed gaming don't come along for the ride.

Attached: Seinfeld.jpg (750x907, 221K)

Good meme

Why do jizzminds like this user only think about sex

>anarchocommunist
I despise commies and their shitty system would never ever work.

That is a genuinely good render

corpocuck spotted

most of this website grew out of their lolbertarian phase 4-8 years ago

Wait, wouldn’t this logic work in reverse?

Attached: 280C961E-9181-42EC-ACE7-010CC3C47EFE.jpg (1370x2020, 606K)

>people are actually defending lootboxes
stop ruining my video games you gambling addicts

Attached: 1552104218580.jpg (800x974, 204K)

>companies come up with shitlord way of selling you 25% of a full game, then charging you two more times for "dlc". That should have been included at Launch

Im fine paying 100 instead of 60 for a full game but give.me a full game

OP, on the other hand is a braindead, mouth breathing puppet of corporations who thinks we should all be giving them all our money and sucking their dicks.even though.they are exempt.from.taxes. Fucking kill yourself OP, you are a useless puppet that is bad for all of society

There's three problems with this approach:
1) Lootboxes allow the companies to make more money off a smaller playerbase.
2) Lootboxes being profitable makes more games include them, thus making them harder and harder to avoid.
3) Currently lootbox games are playable by children, and get kids addicted to gambling. Thus increasing the profitability of lootboxes further down the line.

I don't know if an outright ban is necessarily the right course of action, but at the very least it should come with an immediate 18+ rating.

Imagine trying to have a civil argument on here LOL

Might go worse since the escalation would be the weapons themselves. I mean if I’m timing jail for a gun I want it to be able to cut a tree down on one shot.

I love that this guy dresses and looks like a DmC reboot character.

Because he never had it, should have listened to all those kind anons trying to set him on the right path in life.

based

>It’s not gambling, it’s surprised mechanics.
Me: It’s not digital piracy, it’s unlocking an unlimited demo.

Attached: D5F796C6-757F-47B9-B1EA-81ABD4DB0A01.jpg (499x550, 40K)

I support smaller businesses and companies that are consumer-friendly/try not to be completely unethical, but I also don’t believe in brand worship and that kind of cocksuckery. I’m fine with a government that’s there if needed, but I would not support an collectivist police state hellhole.

Then you're an anti capitalist anarchist if you believe that corporations shouldn't be allowed to ass fuck you and if you hate the government and think it causes more problems than it solves by involving itself
You also probably have a meme definition of communism as well, and I'm going out on a limb and guessing you would unironically go on about what national socialism really means despite that

>xenophobe
>government enforcing laws against foreign threats is tyranny of its own people

Does the creator not believe in government all together? Most of these are true.

>If you don’t want lootboxes banned, you must like lootboxes
>If you don’t want weed banned, you must like weed
>If you don’t want plastic banned, you must want sea creatures to all choke

why would you defend a practice that's only done harm to the general quality of games?

All politics is really just memes if you think about it. People just enjoy saying things that sound political.

>meme definition
The truest purest version of it couldn’t function in a society or support one larger than the population of a village. It’s unfeasible, and the versions of it that have been implemented led to totalitarian regimes with millions of its own people being rounded up and murdered.

1 fifa pack has been added to your account

>>If you don’t want lootboxes banned, you must like lootboxes
why else would you even defend lootboxes if you're not a gambling addict?

Attached: 1355164673702.png (305x332, 153K)

>stupid kids putting families in poorhomes because they steal parents credit cards to gamble in games
>games are lower quality because they don't have to try when morons are tossing money at them for stupid skins
Why would anyone defend this shit?

Most government regulations to counter "big business" actually harm small businesses and prevent them from growing all together.

There is a debate with Ted Cruz and Bernie Sanders about this. Some business owning lady brings this up to Bernie in the debate, you should watch it if you're interested.

See

You dont like the way they're banned or the reasoning for which they were banned.

If we could ban drugs over night with zero repercussions, I would. But there is always a downside to this sort of thing.

if you're against the practice why defend it?

See and

>we need to ban X because timmy might get his hands on it

just because you don’t like something, it doesn’t mean it should be banned.

Not much different than most other forms of government really, I can't think of one regime change that wasn't occompanied by violence or any style of government that didn't silence its dissidents through state backed violence

That would explain the rise in tranny threads.

Isn't that the same reasoning conservatives used for decades to try and either ban or censor video games

>We need to ban [X] because its actively making games worse and turning them into vehicles for [X] rather than actual games
Hang yourself, microransactions are pure cancer, there is no argument against this.

Yes, ban them. If we're not using the state against leftists and liberal-capitalists, those rancorous groups will use the state against us.

the top 3 things are enforced, it's not a matter of banning them but not being required by law to support it. try and argue that birth control, abortion shouldn't be paid for by tax dollars and that the government shouldn't force churches to marry gay couples.
meanwhile, left wingers want guns illegal and confiscated. the closest argument would be saying that the government shouldn't force businesses to sell guns to people even if they don't want to.

Is this only targeting what is officially known as lootboxes or is mobile gacha shit included as well?

Yes, that is how it works. If you have a strong opinion on something, that's generally because you care about the subject. If you don't have a strong opinion about it, you don't care about the subject.

Surprise mechanics is surprise mechanics

Attached: 0C715E8B-2780-4035-8DB4-3C726AE69217.jpg (1448x2048, 317K)

I'm with op here. We need to go so far as to lesson gambling laws and allow children of all ages to go to casinos.

stupid people don't deserve rights
neither do greedy sociopaths
libertarianism only works when there are no retards
the market isn't actually free anyways

Link it up.

Cruz Missile > KIKE

>regime change
This shit continued for decades past 1917 and at dreadful amounts. And state-backed violence against its own citizens is not a good thing.

If it impacts the overall quality of the industry in a negative way I see no downside in getting rid of it. It's essentially a scam anyway.

>$50 monthly
>Killer whales
This was made by some retarded website trying to make up shit.
The term whales was made to show that they are the small % that pays for the operational costs of the game, everything else is either small fish or nothing at all.
It is very common for mobile games to make $99 packs that you can only buy it once a month, even fucking FEH made new year's packs that costed over $50 for freemium and a special character, and there was 2 different verions of that pack. If you don't even buy the $99 monthly packs, it's hard to call someone a "whale".

libertarianism requires high iqs to function
based

>it simply takes money out of the economy.
I guess we should stop with lotteries, they take money out of the economy.

I hate when the "bipartisan" claim is made on anything when it's less than 10 people joining from the other side. It's so goddamn disingenuous.

Thaaat's right! Thaaz right.

The white man's world is burning. For it has been fortold in the book of my people. I am a black Hebrew Isrealite. Knowing of the seed of fruit is knowing of the eye of god.

The white man has a choice now. Give your world onto ours, the Native Americans, the so called Hispanics and the so called negro and you might be spared in the afterlife and serve the black man with honor. Honor your father Esau never had.

basically yes
ergo removing stupid people from the free market is not government intervention but setting the stage in order to ensure commerce may flow unimpeded

>I guess we should stop with lotteries, they take money out of the economy.
>the money that gets recycled back to the lottery winner and government takes money out of the economy

Peak commiebrain

>try and argue that birth control, abortion shouldn't be paid for by tax dollars
Why not, blue states already pay more taxes into social programs than they take out in benefits and they are the ones that support birth control and are pro choice, it would be a net gain for conservative states overall, they get expanded benefits while the liberals foot the bill

>he doesn't even know that the mississippi river is actually the nile

It was alabama.
>The handgun was in the home "illegally," said Young
Heah a gun the home of a felon got everyone killed. No wonder this kid was crazy honestly.

This is about fucking over companies like EA
The politics dont matter at fucking all.

>state-backed violence against its own citizens is not a good thing.
I know, the US has been doing it constantly and it's a pro capitalist democratic republic, so going "reeeee communism bad because it did a thing others have done and are doing" is incredibly narrow minded
You should take some time and really reflect on yourself, what you think you believe in, and if the things you think you believe actually do match your beliefs

>muh baby murder

If you've ever jerked off you're literally responsible for genocide, pro-life-kun.

>the closest argument would be saying that the government shouldn't force businesses to sell guns to people even if they don't want to.

Ah yes, all those hospitals forcing poor upstanding citizens into gay marriages at gunpoint after giving them abortions.
Many such cases!

Attached: 1566159658942.jpg (606x900, 70K)

This isn't about the left or right, or even video games. It's about greedy corporate lords turning our children into addicted gamblers before they turn 12. Just go on YouTube and look up how insanely popular they are among young children.

Attached: hd.jpg (644x598, 46K)

youtu.be/izKL_3tmpM0

I'm not sure if this is the debate or not. it was some fat hair care salon lady, but I didn't see her when scrolling through the debate.

Who said I defended them? I don’t like when the US does it either or when they fight wars solely to protect Israel interests.
>commie using whataboutism to defend his shitty ideology and many regimes

And?

So we should ban lewd women and cutscenes?

based

>If you've ever jerked off you're literally responsible for genocide

A sperm by itself isn't a human neither is an egg. Don't be retarded.

>encourage user to reflect on himself and clearly define what he wants instead of getting swept up in a bunch of memes that will define him for him
>memes in reply
Never mind, you're to far gone

>If you've ever jerked off you're literally responsible for genocide, pro-life-kun.
>sperm are babies now
>this is ignoring that sperm die even without jacking off

Why are libtards so phobic to logic.

Neither is a fetus. Use your brain just once.

>projecting and screeching after being told to think
Why are you guys so damn afraid of introspection

fucktard meme ideologies get fucktard meme prizes

As do humans.
Do you ever actually take time to think about the brain diarrhea you shit out onto the internet?

This double standard really bothers me.
Commies were far worse than nazis, but you have people say they're not "as bad" on public television.

How is it not?

Why should I have to debate the merits of joke ideologies without memes?

>As do humans.

So you're saying everything dies, its okay to kill babies?

ITT:

Attached: 32spk9.jpg (583x428, 54K)

Now that's an idea I can get behind.

it doesn’t take a lot to analyze the aspects of communism, take a look at history and knowing what the fuck went wrong
libertarianism overestimates human intelligence
communism grossly underestimates human fucking nature

>y-y-your ideology
What ideology is that, what do you even call not having your brain rotted by memes and actually taking 2 seconds to think about whether what you believe actually matches up with what someone's trying to sell you