Can we talk about this piece of shit for a moment?
Can we talk about this piece of shit for a moment?
Camden Moore
Other urls found in this thread:
Parker Rodriguez
no.
Bentley Taylor
I don't wanna.
Owen Parker
Sure, go ahead
Adam Walker
It's not bad, actually. Played it two weeks ago with second expansion (contains all mechanics of first too) with mod to multiply tech/civics cost by 3 and it was fun.
Loyalty mechanics are kinda bad and districts require special planning but it's okay overall.
Isaiah Campbell
a smash thread died for this
Jose Roberts
It just doesn't add to part 5, that's the only bad thing.
Christopher Hughes
And that's a good thing. Smash is shitty, overrated "fighting" game for children that should be thrown into trash.
Ian Morgan
i enjoy it
Julian James
only if you promise to whine about the graphics and artstyle
Hudson Fisher
SJW garbage
Christian Murphy
I like it. Fuck Hungary and fuck diplomatic victory though.
Angel Parker
it's the first civ game i've played, got it to play with a couple friends. people keep telling me it's the worst game in the series. i don't doubt it but can anybody tell me why? i'm struggling to imagine how they can take a successful formula and fuck it up
Samuel Jackson
It's fun and enjoyable.
Aiden Thomas
what's there to say
it sucks but not in any kind of interesting way, just a mediocre game that the franchise should move on from, like sfv
Bentley Morgan
They simplified everything so girls could play it
youtube.com
Bentley Ortiz
Here's my experience with it:
After sucking in mp and half-assing it and too many hours fighting barbarians n shit, I decide to give it 100% and beat that smartass that always owned me. 6 hours in, I get my army ready, I manouver them into a pincer to cut him off from his allied cities, vital trade routes and key resources. He thought I was a noob so he was unprepared. I move to strike, he doesn't see it coming AND... Just before I launched my attack something urgent came up and we had to stop playing, never get the chance to continue that lan game. 6 hours of prep, tactics, timing and keening, the one epic battle I would ever be part of fucking gone.
Civ can eat shit.
Wyatt Lee
that's why you play it with friends
Joshua Young
Better than 5.
Isaac Parker
this
IV>VI>V
Tyler Wood
It's not as bad as people make it out to be. Sure, some of the leader choices are definitely questionable, and the new artstyle sucks DICK. But I like it's focus on city planning and interaction between tiles.
There's also a mod that changes the landscape graphics to be similar to Civ5 and that made the game a lot more enjoyable for me.
Matthew White
Does it at least benefit from multiple cores or threads?
Hudson Bennett
What would be some non-meme comeback mechanics to be added to this game?
Feels like once you get a lead in medieval/renaissance you're only left to go through the motions for the next 200 turns.
Kevin Morris
yes
Sebastian Baker
it "runs" on a single thread on linux
Noah Lopez
well they added this thing
Charles Barnes
So you have a turn time of several minutes towards the end?
Xavier Parker
yes, it's awful
Luis Jenkins
>Better than 5.
And this suppose to be an achievement?
There are things you can find after turning up piece of wet rock that are better than Civ5
Julian Morales
"i'm fond of pigs"
Elijah Morales
Civ games suck ass. They take forever. The actual "skill" is based on autistic game mechanics abuse, and has little to do with actual skill, strategy, or tactics.
Kayden Robinson
*makes all other units obsolete in your path*
Kayden Brown
>more complex than V
wtf