Bad goy, how dare you negbomb these games, i'm gonna lock all your reviews!
little steamies will bend over and allow this to happen
Bad goy, how dare you negbomb these games, i'm gonna lock all your reviews!
little steamies will bend over and allow this to happen
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
Which of these two games are you refering to? Ion Fury negative reviews are still there, and no one gives a shit about suicide safe space
Are you saying review bombing should be allowed when it's anti-consumer and misusing the system?
>still have a notification that the game was review bombed and gives people the opportunity to see what it was about
What's the problem exactly?
doesn't that text literally say that it's still letting whatever shitpost reviews those are still weigh on the overall score
Calling a game bad because its creator did something dumb is not a valid criticism
what, do you expect sensationalist retards to be able to read?
Fuck valve
Fuck niggers
Fuck steam
Fuck gaben
Fuck kikes
Fuck jannies
you can change this on your settings. just disable/enable it. whats the problem?
>legit
Its funny to me that there are people surprised by the turn of events surrounding Night in the Woods. Did they seriously expect better from male feminists? I thought them being snakes in the grass was common knowledge by now.
This isn't new you retard, when a game starts getting bombed for things unrelated to the game itself they start hiding those reviews for people who just want to know about the game, you still have the option to unhide them if you care and they still factor into the score. Go fucking neck yourself.
Sure, one needs to learn to seperate art from artist, but I can most definitely see how the whole ordeal would leave bad taste in people's mouths
Yes, but thing like this should not be allowed and deleting such reviews is okay if not even a must, ever day I'm getting more and more glad that I rarely use twitter beyond porn
Where do they say that reviews need to be objective?, its just asking if you recommend the game or not
The fuck does a review user?
>Muk artist makes a G-rated VN that is released for the public in Japan
>Muk gets falsely accused by SJW trannies that he traced real CP and no real evidence of proof he did
>Valve trannies believed these lies and removed his game he worked on off steam, even though it was released in Japan no problem.
are we going to forget this one?
Reviews can be opinionated, "dev did something I not like" is valid reason to choosr to not recommend something. If they wanted quality reviews they would ask for them instead of putting a Funny button that encourages shitposting.
Who said I support the shitty funny button?
My point is that a review of a game should be about the game, not its creator, those things should be separated
>Artificially manipulate the User Review system or voting/rating systems
They likely removed all of the """""reviews""""" that were single sentences by totallynotpol with
>Consumers giving feedback is anti consumer
Nani the fuck did he mean by this?
But you didn't even play the game.
That's not what review bombing means user, review bombing is when a nigga buys a game, doesn't play it, leaves a bad review, and refunds it because he's mad at developers
>legit negative reviews
"Your game is shit" is a legit review.
and no you don't need to even play to 2hrs to know if a game is objectively shit
I manually removed my Negative review on Ion Fury chief!
>"Your game is shit" is a legit review.
Maybe, but "I hate other website" is not.
>you don't need to even play to 2hrs to know if a game is objectively shit
Then maybe you should give some reasoning as to why you really hate the title screen.
>Based on your preferences, the reviews within these periods have still been included in this product's Review Score.
Where do you draw the line between manipulating the system and people just reacting to something?
God i fucking hate people like this so much.
If you are going to whine about the devs being shitty at least play the game a bit and write how it is shitty too, even if its a blatant lie it won't make you seem like as much of a cunt.
note how he didn't say "play" but "buy", which he obviously did. he's still in the right.
other groups of people neither buy nor play and a dev could care less if his game is being played if it bought at least
Are you implying they aren't one in the same in this scenario?
This has been a thing for a while. Thanks Epic for that. Fuck Epic and fuck China.
Yes
Good riddance.
Steam should be all about videogames and only videogames, I don't give a rat ass about the developers life (if he even still fucking lives lmao). When I read a review I want to hear from people who actually has dedicated hours into the game and has experience, I want to hear -only- about the fucking game: gameplay, controls, soundtrack, graphics, technical support. Not from some faggot who has less than half an hour of gameplay telling me that the developers literally eats babies.
You'd be wrong there.
Most of the reviews end up being for shit that isn't a review and/or about the company.
Muk?
So if some fag who bought NitW now wants to change his old review to negative hes not allowed to?
It's not a review if it's not about the game, numbnuts. Review, in this context, specifically refers to talking about the game itself, as in, it's a game review.
If game went to shit then yes
How are these not legit?
What did they do to the game to change your opinion on it?
>"dev did something I not like" is valid reason to choosr to not recommend something.
Yeah, you're most definitely retarded, I'm sorry for your parents
the reviews are literally not removed though lmao
sjws lose again
The point is that Steam has never been for objective reviews, they are not interested on it and the funny button proves it
Typical Resetera SJWs.
So you are saying people have to recommend a game even when they clearly dont want to?
>not locking reviews
>THEY ARE LOCKING THEM
You are late user, everyone knows this system by now
Should have thought of that before, /pol/-kun.
>dev destroys his own game because ideas man
>makes a shitty sequel to milk battle royale
but according to this retard you can't tell the dev did something incredibly wrong
>That's what this is all for right, people who actually spend money on your game for the sole purpose of review bombing before refunding it?
Why are you even bringing up your boogeyman when even the OP shows both sides doing it?
Two wrongs don't make a right user, sure, Steam figured out it will not win a war against shitposts and therefore added the funny button, but that does not mean that review that don't even have anything to do with the game are okay
If they don't want to recommend it because devs suck then they can always not leave a review and bitch in social media
Game itself sucked too user
What would give you that idea? If the game actually got worse, then there would be no reason not to give it a worse review.
Yes
Because you're making it far too obvious.
Nigger what the fuck are you on about? Muk never got any attention like that. The entire reason Key to Home was removed from Steam was because the retards put in the store page description "This is a game for all those gentlemen out there who love little girls!" which obviously made Steam recoil the instant they saw it. And that was that, once Steam removes the game once getting any discussion with them is impossible, so it never got a second chance.
It finally came out a while back and it's a garbage release with a machine translation and zero QA, fuck those guys.
So Im defending the right for people to backstab NitW if they want to because they disaprove of the dev yet I am /pol/? Nice schizophrenia faggot.
>Nigger what the fuck are you on about? Muk never got any attention like that.
wrong, go read his twitter.
he said he was going to kill himself from all the harassment and false accusations, then all those trannies on twitter deleted their posts to try and hide the evidence.
>anti consumer
it's not anti consumer letting potential buyers know the company is full of awful cunts that don't deserve money
[citation needed]
if you can't do some basic thing like search his twitter i can't help you with your retardation
You'd be wrong to say they were the same. If people purchase something they have a right to review it.
I wish we could just lock out chinese reviews for games. Three Kingdoms Total War wouldn't have half the positive reviews if it wasn't full of fucking rune reviews.
Yes. You want an excuse to chimp out when something unrelated to the game happens, because you don't play video games, you just want to be a part of an outrage.
>dude find it yourself it's totally real I swear
The west should just block China altogether.
take your meds schizo
seething trannies and newfag poltards
based steam
What if they just buy it, leave a bad review, and the refund it without as much as playing the game?
>uses twatter
>supports censorship
Not even surprised tbqhwy
>leave a negative review
>dev replies to apologise for the game being bad
Ion fury negs simply got overtaken by positives because the bombing was only for like 3 days.
Bombing night in the woods deserves to be deleted as nothing you are bombing over has anything to do with the game and a decent amount of the reviews can be considered libel under US law.
What part of beyond porn don't you understand?
And what censorship? I'm just arguing that review about the game should be strictly about the fucking game and not dumb shit nigga who made it did
>muh censoooors
Grow up and have sex
Good. You stupid fucking niggers posting a stupid fucking unrelated off-topic review should be removed. You should also fucking hang yourself while you're at it you pathetic piece of shit.
Seems perfectly reasonable to me. What's wrong with shitting on bad developers?
Did the ion fury devs become sjw?
are you fucking retarded?
no now they are based and redpilled and hate niggers
Is it really a bad dev if the game is good?
If they disagree with me politically and don't defend sexual abusers? Yes
Was Hitler really a bad guy, if his heart was in the right place?
The devs aren't except 1 supposebly
but all the people at 3D realms are pozzed.
BASED VALVE WINS AGAIN
EPICBUGS SEETHING
He didn't have heart in the right place, he wasn't even a decent artist
No i gave hitler a positive review but valve jew
>switch button
>doesn't happen anymore
Thought you asians were supposed to be clever chang.
He wasn't a bad guy even if his heart wasn't. He made a lot of sense.
>legit negative reviews
try harder you worthless brain damaged retard
Why don't gaymers review bomb in GOG?
because everyone pirates gog games.
>stop letting the goyim have their say on our toxic leftism
COPE
>stupid meta bullshit
>legit
Fuck off. Reviews should be about the game.
I get so sick of browsing review pages and seeing walls of non-stop bitching about whatever retarded crap the developer said on Twitter. I DON'T CARE. TALK ABOUT THE VIDEO GAME.
Gog doesn't have the userbase that steam have, and everyone review bombs a game for attention, and they won't get that with gog
>stop letting the goyim have their say on our toxic leftism
COPE
What's your opinion of the BDS movement?
>stop destroying video games with your toxic leftism
>"thoughts on Israel?"
LMAO sjwtards on absolute suicide watch
>night in the woods makes mainstream news
>try it out
>its fucking boring as shit
>leave negative review
Big Dick Sex movement?
This is a good compromise.
The asterix makes ppl know somethings up and they can enable it themselves in the options. For ppl who dont give a fuck about behind the scenes drama and just want to play, they can see score as default.
cringe
en.wikipedia.org
nice try chang, steam WILL ALWAYS be our guys
>Seems perfectly reasonable to me. What's wrong with shitting on bad developers?
On the internet in general, or Yea Forums particularly? Nothing. But it's fucking worthless for telling me whether I might like the game or not because I don't give a single fucking shit what /pol/niggers or SJW extremists (same thing really, they're both just mirrors of each other) are sperging about this week. It has nothing to do with vidya. I don't care if the game was made with slave labor or by the most woke 100% trans dev team on the planet, if it's a good game that's good enough for me.
So yeah based Valve dabbing on you faggots. What's wrong with banning you shitters WHEN YOU DON'T ACTUALLY SPEND MONEY. Spending+Refund = 0, and you're actively trying to cost everyone money for your own bullshit rather then vidya.
>/pol/ and sjws on suicide watch over gaben telling them to fuck off
COPE
>hosting anti-SJW extremist hate speech is telling /pol/ to fuck off
C O P E
>this game is bad because the dev is a doo doo head :(
Laughing out lmao
it's just people rightly expressing the factual reality that leftists cannot produce art of any appreciable quality.
all great art was and is made by Conservatives and it's the same with video games.
>muh vidya is art
>muh left vs right
Top lel americans
LMAO better than you are
>I don't give a single fucking shit what /pol/niggers or SJW extremists (same thing really, they're both just mirrors of each other)
cope cuck
but that is a legit review and many such cases.
Butthurt
Conservatives HATE art and not a single good piece of art has been made by a conservative in all of human history. Are you guys just all in super cope mode right now over the based UK kicking the alt-rights ass and choosing to stick with the EU? Hilarious!
how the fuck did all of those articles and tweeter posts made by trannies get so many likes and shit like that when the actual game has so little reviews?
Its almost as if trannies didnt play fucking videogames at all
You genuinely can't tell which side is which, because you can cherrypick people like that from either.
>implying he wasn't right
look at yourself you triggered nignog
>it's just people rightly expressing the factual reality that leftists cannot produce art of any appreciable quality.
Show some "art of appreciable quality"
Why wouldn't they delete review bombs? Are you fucking retarded like all right wingers user?
he wins 2020 because of this website, cope cope cope
go ahead, make your own version
wrong, objectively all good art is made by Conservatives, vast majority Straight White males. cope and UK is cucking EU to death rn
Classical music, all made by Straight White Conservative Christian males. cope.
>Look guys I posted an image macro instead of providing an arguement
>Its almost as if trannies didnt play fucking videogames at all
>almost
NOOOOOOOOOOOOO DELETE THIS STOP BTFOING US
>Classical music
Define classical music.
>devs make edgy jokes on discord
>trannies "expose" them
>devs panic and censor a couple of things in their game to try and soften the psychotic Twitter lynch mob
Why did these people get so mad at the devs over this? Jesus fucking Christ.
>anti-consumer
You're either a shill for one of those games or a shitty indie dev yourself.
>Replying to yourself
>reviews require purchase
>buys game, launches once, refunds immediately
>REVIEW: 0/10 THIS DEV TRIGGERED ME ON THE TWITTERS
>haha beat dumb valve im so clever
>reviews gets deleted because no you dumb faggot
>runs to sob about it on Yea Forums
The complete and absolute state of /pol/justice warriors. I miss the days when you'd just dress all in black and cut yourselves.
>go ahead, make your own version
there you go
>going into semantics overdrive when xe gets BTFO
oy
none of those are as disgusting as your average antifa leftoid specimen
>conspiracy theory
schizo
they bought the fucking game. and remember valve says games are a service. their service had been compromised by a forum for mentally ill pedos. they can say whatever they want about it.
>they bought the fucking game
And do they still have it?
Valve could improve this by just making it so that leaving a review instantly eliminates your ability to get a refund. If people actually had to put their money where their mouths were that'd eliminate the review bombing thing, it's only done because it's free. There'd be a few dedicated folks so triggered over the latest net drama that they'd pay $50 to leave their sperg review but then at least you'd know the drama made someone care THAT much.
Reviews with nothing on the line though are worthless, same as when some "influencer" gets it for free from the publisher. There are plenty of vidya worth it a $5 or $0 but not $50. If someone wants to write their own ragesperg for free they can get a blog or do it on Yea Forums or something. If they want to put it on a store they should pay.
>posts a picture of liberals
>this is supposed to support his point
Whew!
The dev was not joking nor being edgy. I agree that it's wrong for parents to pump small children with hormones just because they want that child to be another gender.
>that pic
>liberals
which gender was Mozart when he was writing Exsultate, jubilate I wonder
>they bought the fucking game.
Child, if you "buy" the game for 35 seconds and then immediately hit the refund button no, you didn't really buy it and you're violating the point of the rules, and Valve is completely right to just tighten them up. Real life isn't a vidya.
Most of them yes. Your review is not forfeit because you refunded idiot. people can see themselves if they still have the game. the most important reviews you can read are from people who refunded.
lol most of the great liberals were straight MEN kid, while most of the "great" conservatives turned out to be homo child rapists and frauds. But of course you still defend religion anyway!
If the game has some game-breaking bugs or performance issues, I don't think bringing those up should exclude you from being able to get your money back. That said, a mark on your post to show if you refunded would do wonders.
>implying people listen to arguments
That aside, it's not an argument, it's barely a premise.
>/pol/ and SJW's are mirror images of each other
If you have a predisposition to hating both, then sure, that's enough to be merely a method to stroke an ego that is predicated on "BOTH ARE BAD, I AM ABOVE/BETTER THAN THEM".
But it is certainly not an argument.
lmao I hit a nerve on this tranny, go dilate then kill yourself faggot
>Your review is not forfeit because you refunded idiot
Apparently it is if you make a pattern of it and rightfully so.
*ahem*
>Most of them yes.
How do you know?
And there you go, you lost the argument by saying meaningless cope and posting wojaks, that is assuming you are not a troll or false flagger
>That said, a mark on your post to show if you refunded would do wonders.
Or just making it two broken out scores, one for those who kept the game and one including the average of those who refunded.
Some level of play time too, like 1 hour. If you refund without ever even going past the main menu it's obvious you're just engaging in faggotry.
this a seethem likely jewish in nature
watch and learn kids
I will not deny it, but I at least know I'm shit at drawing
Ah, right. I just didn't know what they said. So they posted an opinion on discord. The rest of my post still applies.
>own it
>can't even sell it
GOG is shit too
Just remembered that NITW fan game.
>alec was involved with it
>got sick and left
>eventually it fractured in to two
>the original one has commented on all what went down
>the other has been totally silent
The fuck is a seethem?
Everyday this tweet becomes more and more based
only people who won the culture war understand
Okay, let's talk about your composers here.
>Bach
He's a baroque composer, he was not very active during the classical period.
He was also lower-class and politically liberal.
>Händel
Not a classical composer, but baroque like Bach.
>Vivaldi
Again, Baroque, not classical.
>Mozart
Yeah, Mozart is a classical composer, but he's also a liberal, a member of the Freemasons and firmly of progressive thought. And let's not talk about his conduct.
>Beethoven
The man who had a serious disdain for authority is a good Christian conservative, yes?
But he is also a classical composer, that's two. Not bad.
>Grieg
>Chopin
>Schubert
>Dvorak
>Tschaikovsky
This is getting tiring, but be aware that all of these are romantic composers, rather than classical composers.
There is a serious stylistic difference between romanticism, classical music and baroque music. Just pick any piece by Bach and compare it to a piece by Schubert. Both are very good, but they're also not alike.
Why do you speak of things you do not understand? You use art as a bludgeon to beat people with, rather than appreciate it's intricacy. You're spitting on the legacy of these great composers.
The constant shitfits and arguing on this site prove that the "culture war" isn't won by anybody
Reminder no one has come to Alec's defense but more and more claims of him being abusive have come out.
Occam's razor states he was likely abusive. This is a more likely outcome than a shadow cabal involving the man's friends, family and co-workers who all had it out for him and put forth a plot to destroy him.
you're trying to come across as intelligent yet you do not understand how to use apostrophes correctly
none of those composers were liberal, especially by modern standards
wrong, even normies are waking up to the fake news and hating on ANTIFA and trannies on the reg nowadays
Yea Forums has taken over and they're coming for you
>you're trying to come across as intelligent yet you do not understand how to use apostrophes correctly
Point me towards where I misuse them, please. Be aware that I might not be as proficient in the English language as you. This can be related to why I know more about music than you do.
What makes you think I support dipshits in antifa or trust any news sources anymore?
Or care about trannies?
You are making a lot of assumptions based on just one guy disagreeing with you
You don't know more about music than me. You are of deficient stock.
>I dont like ANTIFA and fuck CNN fake news!!!
>but we need to censor and ban any dissent towards sjws on steam
THIS.
Further more we need to develop systems going into the future were players can combat outsider activist faggots trying to pressure devs to ruin their game.
For instance in this case if players could see & were notified of reseteras faggot complaints. the response would be overwhelming.
>don't listen to these fuckers they don't even play your game
it would cut through the bullshit in a matter of seconds, give the devs a clear picture and this whole controversy would have never happened.
Then why did you call 8 composers "classical music" when they didn't make classical music? If you do know more about music than I do?
How's wanting reviews being strictly about the said video game same of censorship?
>autistically splitting hairs about muh baroque muh classical
please post some of your faggot "arthouse" jazz """music""" on your soundcloud. bonus points if you have nigs mumbling over it.
>how is censorship censorship
LOL
It's literally telling you that you can choose to hide them or not, it's not just hiding them and not telling you, so what's the problem? It's better if I don't want to have to deal with retards bombing a game for a retarded reason and want to see what people that actually played the game think.
You gonna prove your point or no?
>Doesn't understand that "Classical Music" is a catch all term for all of those styles
>Doesn't understand that "liberal" of yesteryear was a completely different beast in comparison to the modern day
>Ditto for progressive
>Acts extremely condescending in the final line, acting as if he has the slightest clue as to what he is talking about.
Either top tier bait or redditor sewage, fuck off.
I don't know why you're suddenly talking about arthouse jazz music (whatever that means when you use it). But I can post some jazz, if you'd like that.
This one has an Arab in it, I hope that offends you.
youtube.com
Reminder that had Zoe Quinn said nothing, he'd still be alive.
because it is about the video game. they were censoring the game and the feedback stopped it.
blumpf btfo
im just riffing off of what type of person I know you are
That is a good point
Not sure what trump has to do with anything
>Doesn't understand that "Classical Music" is a catch all term for all of those styles
exclusively used by people who didn't actually know or care about the music, yes. That proves my point in itself.
>Doesn't understand that "liberal" of yesteryear was a completely different beast in comparison to the modern day
>Ditto for progressive
It's also a far cry from the "conservative" of today, so make of that what you will.
>Acts extremely condescending in the final line, acting as if he has the slightest clue as to what he is talking about.
It clearly bothered you. That's why I acted that way.
>pro-consumer is anti-consumer in shillspeak
You cucks say the darnest things.
>I know you are
You don't know anything, you are just projecting your own deficiencies and insecurities.
Reminder that people are responsible for their own actions and that trying to pin blame on others for things like this is BPD behavior.
post that soundcloud urbanite retard
I don't know about any of that.
I guess I can post more ECM if that's what you're into.
People are making reviews for outside stuff that doesnt have anything to do with the actual game
>people are responsible for their own actions
If anyone needs to hear that, it's these "folks".
>exclusively used by people who didn't actually know or care about the music, yes
Or it's used by goddamn everyone, including professionals, to describe a particular genre of music.
>It's also a far cry from the "conservative" of today, so make of that what you will.
The point is that attaching labels to people of the yesteryear with modern terminology is fucking retarded.
That said, he was correct, they would be closer in ideology to Conservatives than Liberals, if we're using American as the standard.
I still think you're both retarded for doing it.
>It clearly bothered you. That's why I acted that way.
Oh so it was intentional. That casts everything you've said into doubt and makes it extremely likely you're just baiting (You)'s with extremely unintelligent comments structured as a redditor would trying to evoke airs of intelligence, yet failing.
Well done, you got two out of me.
>removing reviews that have nothing to do with the actual games and it's just people bitching about the devs
so whats the issue with that?
Samething happen with Metro when people started review bombing 2033 and Last Light because of the Exodus shit
Irrelevant
Why do you think you'll leapfrog over millenials in the chain of order?
A company and their products are one in the same. The performance of one has an impact on the other. If Valve had a company review page then this would be different, so the product is the best outlet for consumers to voice themselves.
You're in the screencap, aren't you?
Then reviews should be removed entirely ala epic
You can't argue, can you?
So is making trash "le funny" reviews and valve not only allows that but encourages it
>so the product is the best outlet for consumers to voice themselves.
Because social media doesn't exist apparently
here's the difference Einstein.
It does have everything to do with the game because no ones bitching about the devs beliefs or politics. it's the devs actions and what they're doing to the game.
What exactly are they bombing Nigth In The Woods for?
The guy's suicide or for the fact his ''allies'' in the dev team didn't stick up with him and took his side?
There was no action by NITW devs
Classic feminism bonus.
The backlash would be very big for Valve to do that now. Best to just filter reviews and hope people move on to something different.
>Because social media doesn't exist apparently
I'm sure the same people review bombing are also very vocal about their displeasure on social media as well.
What you would like to talk about, "user"? Your guilt maybe?
Like what?
Iron Fury and Night in the Woods remain unchanged
The studios could blow up but the games remain the same
I see you have no argument.
Last (You).
How so?
Backlashes are temporary and can be ignored. They could raise prices by 50% and you'd shut up in a month
yes there was the reviews just stopped it in its tracks. they would have censored the game otherwise. this has nothing to do with the devs unrelated beliefs.
How is it misusing the system?
Can you explain how a bunch of random tweets by da evil leftists has anything to do with your argument about Zoe quinn, which was not a counter argument for any of this. "IF ZOE QUINN!" is not a counter argument for the following. You aren't arguing in good faith, though
>Occam's razor states he was likely abusive. This is a more likely outcome than a shadow cabal involving the man's friends, family and co-workers who all had it out for him and put forth a plot to destroy him.
Fuk wrong game disregard that. yeah Night in the woods is just classic trolling.
They hated you, because you told them the truth.
Leaving negative reviews because the devs didn't defend a serial abuser is pretty clear misusing.
>company finds a way to stop review bombing
This is bad why exactly
>exclusively used by people who didn't actually know or care about the music, yes. That proves my point in itself.
Actually, it's used quite extensively in the world of music by all kinds of musicians.
t. DMA
How to fix review bombs
Pick a few out each time
Give them a black mark on their steam profile akin to a VAC Ban, stating they are known to leave misleading reviews to games.
Permanently ban them from the review system
actually it isn't
t. DMA
We are at the point where paying service to the Alphabet gang is so important that people are APOLOGIZING for saying something reasonable that's not even transphobic. Apologizing when you're in the right is a huge problem. Especially when that apology comes with sensitivity training for your employees.
>They're locking reviews!!!!!
>reviews still not locked
>They're hiding the negbombs!!!!!!!
>still counted in the overall total
>reviewbomb doesnt hurt the overall score
>The negative reviews arent removed, and picking an option will let you see them
So tell me again what the fucking problem is for letting you choose to see the reviewbomb and nor letting angry shitposters tilt the game's overall score
>that's not even transphobic
lol
Imagine genuinely believing this
>This is a more likely outcome than a shadow cabal involving the man's friends, family and co-workers who all had it out for him and put forth a plot to destroy him.
Pretty easy to pull off if your followers BELIEVE everything you say.
Users who own the game left a negative review because they dont think others should buy the game. You not liking their reason has nothing to do with the legitimacy of it.
>scapegoat a few shitposters
No, fuck off. pissing off reviewers will only exacerbate reviewbombs
what?
>this autist is still seething over Ion Fury
legit mentally ill
People who regender a literal baby are child abusers. That's not transphobic.
What was their basis regarding the games content?
Who says it has to regard the games content? Is that a policy written in the review system?
Your argument is essentially
>DA NORMIES AGREE WITH ME ZOOMER REVOLUTION NOW
Boomers aren't even dead yet and millenials are next in line to take over from them. Your zoomer revolution is AT LEAST 50 years out
How is it anti consumer? These people bought the game.
So it doesn't relate to the games content and as such has nothing to do with the game. Thank you for admitting your defeat.
>anti consumer
Negro, was der fick are you sprechening about.
They say that you should separate the creator from the creation and that these aren't legitimate reviews. But if I want the creation then I have to give money to the creator, and if I don't like the creator then why would I want to give them money anyway? I think these reviews shouldn't be silenced.
Your review of the game is removed if you refund it.
It’s al they have in life.
>It is not transphobic to say trans people are attacking babies even though this is false and been disproven
k lmao
Issue is that the NITW devs didn't do anything. They didn't change anything, did nothing. It's literally just attacking for the fuck of it.
This is false. I still have the top neg review for an indie game on steam and I refunded that over a year ago
>even though this is false and been disproven
Says the social reject who pumpus their kids with HRT. Gonna kill yourself soon faggot?
They’re review is removed
this is a cope, millennials are literally fluoride zombies and the ones that arent are right wing
...
I don't admit defeat. There are reasons to not buy a game that have nothing to do with the game itself. You disagreeing with that doesn't change the fact that thousands disagree and will act accordingly.
Kill yourself, autistic_frog.
.
How is that false and disproven? What the dev said is that in a scenario where a parent decided that their baby was trans, that that would be abusive. He didnt say that trans people were attacking babies.
That one retard with 3 minutes total playtime shitting on the game because of muh sjw boogeyman isn't a consumer
I'm giddy thinking about all the left wing suicides I have caused by posting here over the years, good times
This is consumerism at its core, fuck off shills
>sjw! :(
>woah this totally lets me know what the fuck the GAME is about
kys
>SJWs aren't consumers
Fixed.
Valve can delete whatever review they want on their system.
The could delete every negative review on Half Life and openly admit
>lol fuck you our store our rules
and no one could do anything about it.
no it's a case that actually happened. these trannies are fucked in the head and they write this shit themselves. they just had a new baby and they're already thinking of mutilating it. the fuckers can't help but out themselves as sickos by writing their stupid blog posts.
>off topic political reviewbombing considered a legit review
/pol/ leave.
>see apology
>make the main character trans
Fucking kek.
I’m very angry about Holowka’s death but it’s not gonna stop me from enjoying Night In The Woods. It’s sad we won’t ever get more, though.
>coordinated political action
>legit reviews
Neck yourself fatass incel
/thread
>HAHA HE MAD CUZ HE KICKED FROM ART SCHOOL
Why are you here? Go to where you belong.
no only if the user selects that mode.
Still using Steam in 2019. Pathetic. Valve hasn’t had their shit together in years. They drag their feet and release changes only when competition heats up. Too late not, the alternatives are far superior. I remember a time when the competition was bloated and annoying to use, now Steam is the inferior one. No one unironically likes Valve anymore, get over it.
Valve made Steam profiles a pay to win micro transaction mess. I don’t expect anything good from them. Consumers have a right to know what the developer is like because they provide them an income and allow them to thrive. Besides, they don’t delete the inane faggot posts like, “game is ok” with 4,000 hours played. They even added a funny button.
Fat fuck Gabe.
> Ion Fury negative reviews are still there,
well, many people changed their negatives to positive.
>Based on your preferences, the reviews within these periods have still been included in this product's Review Score.
Hey, that's actually pretty based. If you care about what developers did or didn't do, you can have it on and read about it, if you care only about the game and the developers being trannies, nazi, chinks or kikes is all the same to you, you don't.
>made Steam profiles a pay to win micro transaction mess.
>Pay to win
>A fucking profile
Are you high right now user?
Also calling Steam 'the inferior one' when it's better than any storefront in the mobile, console or PC space is hilarious
Keep being delusional, friend. Just because you invested time and money in a platform that failed doesn’t make me wrong.
Steam has the worst mobile app out of all of them. Discord is a better platform at this point. Console? Umm. PC? Not even close. Battle.net, Epic Games Launcher, Discord, Origin (somehow), Uplay, and even Bethesda.net is FAR superior.
Spending money on games that are on sale just to never play them doesn’t mean you got a good deal. It means you lost money and have no self control. Valve knows this and played into it. You need to spend $5 just to add friends and other things. WHAT?! Imagine if Facebook did this... And Steam isn’t even a good service, people just tolerated it for the sales until they grew up and realized they were being manipulated. Discord is FAR superior and costs nothing. Even has free servers you can make and control.
You know I’m right. Part of maturing is knowing you’re wrong.
so much libtard coping ITT, 2020 is going to be glorious
What even is the point of reviews if they can't be honest?
Does the metric even have a point on Steam? Does games get pushed off if the reviews are too bad or is it the users that are morons, like how some kids would be, like, "I'm not gonna play a game unless IGN give it at least a 9".
Like, can't people form their own opinions on whether or not they wanna play Ion Fury or Yikes in the Oof?
They don't agree with the """"correct"""" opinions
Yes user I'm sure all these people with 0.1 hours played really got a good idea of the GAME that they're reviewing
how do you know they didnt transfer a save file from when they played at their friend's earlier?
How do you know they didn't buy the game, launch it once, make a non-review, then refund it?
>how do you know they didnt transfer a save file from when they played at their friend's earlier?
Because I'm not a five year old incapable of critical thinking who could be convinced that's a realistic notion for those 40+ reviews
ah, so you dont. thanks for conceding.
why are liberals so easy to destroy?
So every one of those bad reviews played the game at their friend's house?
just like Trump winning 2016 election, there is a very, very small chance of that being the case. doesnt mean it couldnt be, liberal retard.
what the fuck are you talking about get the fuck out my board nigger
>leftists are the problem
Explain to the class how that
is anti-consumer and maybe we won't refer to you as retard anymore.
Fucking moron
You are literally arguing with a 14 year old.
you can find playlists on youtube full of footage antifa assaulting Trump supporters + their families in the run up to election. there are no videos of Trump supporters viciously ganging up on liberal scum and spitting on their kids.
all the mass shooter events are sloppy jobs by failing globalist (((fraternities))) and (((sororities))) which is why the shooters are all literally jews, niggers, mutts with deep connections to human traffickers and Epstein. the last one's dad was literally best buddies with John of God, arrested for his baby rape farms in Brazil.
When your fucking agenda starts to get in the way of my videogames I put you in the same sack as the sperglord sjws. Dumb cunt.
>there are no videos of Trump supporters viciously ganging up on liberal scum and spitting on their kids.
that's because they prefer literal terrorist but did you miss where the leaders of patriot prayer got arrested because they batoned a woman unconcious and only it was only found out because a lefty navy vet videotaped it?
Dude you are a fucking moron.
>that's because they prefer literal terrorist but did you miss where the leaders of patriot prayer got arrested because they batoned a woman unconcious and only it was only found out because a lefty navy vet videotaped it?
Source: CNN
They do if they make good videogames you stupid cunt.
>There are reasons to not buy a game that have nothing to do with the game itself
Reviews aren't only for buying a game, numbskull.
Steam isn't a forum for you to vent your political and social angst. If the review can't talk about the gaming experience and you're intentionally bombing it then it has no place among actual reviews. People that insist on doing it should get a 1 year review restriction and not even be able to make them.
It's a tough problem to solve. On one hand, it should require a certain number of hours played to leave a genuine review that isn't just a thumbs/down and 'I liked it/Didn't like it' typical steamtard brainlet post, on the other the ability to only own the game and give it a rating allows the dev know very directly that a community is dissatisfied, since there are very few other paths that are as impactful as their reccomendation on the store.
Personally, I feel more inclined for the former, but the latter has its merits, despite being extremely abusable by people like what happened with this entire Ion Fury shitshow.
>off-topic bullshit
>legit reviews
Pick one and only one.
>trump is a good president and should be supported
>wait no don't say anything bad about him or the crimes he's committed or the people he's friends with or the jews and arabs he fellates
>he's a billionaire businessman who loves filling positions of power with his friends who have conflicts of interest, that means he's a man of the people and he's fighting the deep state and totally isn't literally part of the deep state
>just because him and Epstein were really good friends despite his denial of that and some of Epstein's child sex slaves were recruited at Trump's favorite place that he owns doesn't mean that he's connected to Epstein at all because I say so
Uh huh. He's as guilty as Bill and you people still think he's your meme king.
There should be several levels of reviews: "would buy/wouldn't buy/want to buy/want to ignore" should be one axis, and a completely different axis should be about actual game owners. In the former, things unrelated to the actual content of the game (could be about videos, previews, forums) are allowed. In the latter, only opinion about the game proper are allowed. Both should be just as prominently displayed.
That said, certain number of hours doesn't work, especially in a world where 99% of games are less than half an hour long, because free flash games are apparently worth $20 a pop now.
Nope, games were objectively better when people had no way to bitch and moan and try to subvert them. When it comes to interaction with customers they tend to also weigh responses because 99% of forum garbage comes from less than 5% of a typical player base who are more concerned with fighting angst ridden battles on the internet than playing the game. Most developers will listen to someone who has only posted once but will ignore most of the garbage but it's now mutating into outrage campaigns by forum narcissist and complainers. People should be able to post a concern but deal with heavy moderation and restrictions. No one should be able to spam or expect direct dialogue. Nothing but constructive arguments with actual data should even be entertained and the rest of the bitching should just result in bans. You can't have a discussion when the one reasoned argument in a room is drowned out by 1000 others yelling and screaming about irrelevant bullshit.
>Donald Trump is a good guy and is trustworthy
Source: (((Fox News)))
I like your idea user. Too bad it'll never get implemented.
It's literally cancel culture just made by a different group of people.
It's nice to see Valve crack down on review bombing because "muh politics"
Correct, but devs and publishers keep pretending we should be voting with our wallets and refuse to hear whatever we have to say about the actual game's quality nowadays. If they bend to SJWs, you can be sure that, should they make any next game, it will be crap, thus you need to help people vote with their wallets by putting that to their attention, which hopefully results in fewer sales, and therefore no next garbage game.
Since demos are no longer a thing, if game 1 is good and in absence of any other information, people will buy game 2 before knowing it's shit. Most people don't care to tell others the game was shit and those in the know will already be aware and therefore not buy the game.
It would be nice, unfortunately they're only doing it on one side because they prefer playing politics rather than cracking down on non-game-related review "bombing".
>Only politician who's run for president in the last few cycles who's actually critical of Israel is a jew
Really makes you think
>Yea Forums triggered this hard because it's 100% right
user review process is completely useless unless those users are your peers or particular curators that you actually follow/enjoy
letting people whose interests and skill level you don't even know decide what is good or bad for you is a horrible idea
you are a subhuman beast fit for nothing but slaughter
>let me start by saying my opinion is objective reality and end by rambling pointlessly about the situation
you are literally not a human being. you have absolutely no basis for anything you do or think.
>resetera cancels a dev based on their actions and not the quality of their game
bad
>Yea Forums cancels a dev based on their actions and not the quality of their game
fine
both are idiots
no, because retardera are liberals and pedos while Yea Forums is based
/thread
video games really do make you retarded I guess, this thread is utterly subhuman
It still lets people know if something is going on one way or another. Once you see the message you can change the settings yourself if you want.
>I'm a real human bean because I think screaming into the void like a tard does anything despite countless devs over the years stating that they ignore seething forum narcissist
lmao at your life
>Stea pissing off their fans before Borderlands 3 release
I guess they really do hate money
>ALL ACTIONS ARE THE SAME
>MOTIVATION DOESN'T MATTER
how can you live your life like this? like literally how do you remember to breath?
>literally a subhuman blob sustained by the corporate government
>would instantly die if one or two modern conveniences were removed
>seething this hard over hypocrisy
>restera
>no suicide
>Yea Forums
>suicide
>totally the same thing
daily reminder that it's your moral and evolutionary imperative to exterminate every leftist
This man was right, Ion Fury was literally review bombed for reasons not involving the game at all.
this
>Consumers giving their opinion = anti-consumer and misusing the system
Silence liberal
Steamcels seething iTT
/thread
>game review
>consumers giving their opinion about politics of the devs
>game review
>silence liberal
you're a liberal too
all you do is try to censor people, you never try to actually remove the problem because you're an impotent coward full of self-righteousness
start killing leftists until they stop being leftists
how can you look back on the history of humanity and excuse yourself from the cycle of constant warfare?
and they said Yea Forums isn't an echo chamber.
Though it is funny to me how people who claim to be "free thinkers" just latch onto the hivemind mentality and then get enraged at anyone that doesn't agree. Then again anyone who gets their political positions from Yea Forums should kill themselves.
>game review
who said it should be a game review?
if it is it's solely in steam's interest to exploit their consumers.
they are people's thoughts about the game.
the developers have something to do with the game.
you are saying that it's irrational for people to have thoughts about the developer while having thoughts about the game.
obviously you can't even begin to support that view, you kike shill
>comparing the entire right-wing with a branch of antifa.
>crying about muh Yea Forums, infchan killing people
>suicide in one case
>not in another
>equal and comparable
kill every leftist
I WANT TO KNOW WHAT PEOPLE THINK ABOUT THIS GAME
I WANT TO KNOW ABOUT THIS GAME'S CULTURAL RELEVANCY
I WANT A FEEL FOR THE PROPORTIONS OF VARIOUS OPINIONS IN THE COMMUNITY WITH HONEST UNEDITED RECORDING OF THEIR STATEMENTS
THANKS FOR HELPING STEAM, YOUR REVIEW SYSTEM IS GREAT
You're literally incomprehensible.
>HONEST UNEDITED RECORDING OF THEIR STATEMENTS
look at this fucking snowflake who thinks the words he wrote down and that are attached to his name are what people will actually see
fucking thinks hes entitled to society
lets learn him
That requires seeing the message in the first place.
>one way or another
Do you have examples the other way?
If they're not talking about the GAME then it isn't a GAME REVIEW and should FUCK OFF.
I don't care if the developer is a transsexual or a fascist or kills puppies, talk about the fucking game and nothing else in your game review or fuck off retard
>I don't care if
most people do, your psychotic obsession with making this sterile safe space is at odds with society/humanity.
if you don't kill yourself we will do it for you
TYPING IN CAPS LOCK MAKES MY OPINION FEEL VALID BECAUSE I GET TO STAND OUT A BIT MORE
Go back to complaining about rape jokes on Twitter you fucking whale
>restera
>no suicide
>Yea Forums
>suicide
>totally the same thing
daily reminder that it's your moral and evolutionary imperative to exterminate every leftist
>/pol/cucks trying to use the thread to gloat
>end up BTFO'd
Pottery
Why are you snipping out the "I don't care" part as if that's meant to be taken on its own and not immediately followed up by "talk about the game in your game review"?
It seems like you're trying very hard to misrepresent that post for some reason.
It's not saying you can't be upset about stuff a developer does, just that even if they were literally Hitler the game review should be a review of the game not of the developer's politics outside of it.
Are you trying to be disingenuous on purpose?
YUM YUM YUM
your expectations are simply retarded and purposeless and are not the expectations of everyone else for very good reasons that have already been thoroughly expounded in this thread
>Valve hires Campo Santo (Firewatch) devs
>Slowly Valve starts fixing "problematic" issues
>Visual Novels start getting banned on Steam without reason and/or bogus one
>Claim underage nudity
>Novels with neither still getting banned
>Underage nudity by woke devs somehow ok
>Steam suddenly starts bootlicking devs and censoring "off topic" reviews
>Steam now locking reviews and reverting ratings.
Then throw out reviews. Reviews are useless unless their from a source you trust.
basically you try to narrow down the purpose of reviews to fit your personal bias with absolute zero reasoning and the emotion you conjure over it reveals you for the subhuman abomination you are
leaving a bad review of a game that has nothing to do with the game itself defeats the purpose of reviews
This place has become worse than reddit in many ways. It's mostly just screeching incels that are extra salty because no one in reality would entertain their thoughts and they constantly try to cope by insinuating that actual occurrences outside their hug box have anything to do with them at all.
>consumers sharing their opinions on a game they purchased is anti consumer
BUT HOW WILL I KNOW HOW TO TRUST
OH WAIT I GET IT NOW
I CAN TRUST STEAM BECAUSE THEY ARE A BIG COMPANY AND IF THEY DID ANY LIES OR BAD STUFF THEY COULDN'T BE IN BUSINESS
SO THEY ARE THE GOOD GUYS
THANKS I FEEL GOOD NOW
>their opinions on a game
>on a game
>Consumers
Would only apply if steam didn't have a refund system. Buying a game to give a review and then refund it is the same as not owning it at all. It was never given a chance.
So the answer is yes, then, you are going out of your way to strawman an opposing opinion because you are being disingenuous on purpose.
>narrow down the purpose of reviews
>personal bias ... zero reasoning
>emotion you conjure over it
Uh huh. Radical notion to insist that product reviews be about the actual product, hmm.
As expected, your impeccable argument against it is to build up a strawman and roll with it. You're too emotional, you're talking about things that you don't care about but other people do care, you're trying to limit reviews because of personal bias.
It's a real shame that literally none of that is happening and you're reading the post wrong on purpose because you're a faggot.
The only reason people are review bombing the game are because they want to sway the opinion of uninformed consumers. The reasons they are review bombing having nothing to do with the game.
This is rageface comics but worse, Jesus Christ
>BUT HOW WILL I KNOW HOW TO TRUST
You don't have friends? You can't find a demo? You can't even find a let's play?
Does anyone actually care about Steam reviews? They only allow a pointless yes no review system and 90% of them are just stupid memes.
>product reviews
they aren't product reviews
no one wants them to be product reviews
they shouldn't be product reviews
>THEY HAVE TO BE PRODUCT REVIEWS
you can't support this. you are mentally deficient and emotionally bankrupt.
Doesn't matter, they purchased the game, and the practices of the developer/publisher or current events surrounding the game can influence your opinion on it.
aaaand that's /thread
>they purchased the game
*for the sole purpose of opening once to make the review and then refunding at no cost
One game was bombed because of the political opinion some people had, and the other was bombed because the dev team refused to support a man with a history of abuse, accused of sexual harrassment.
This is why Epic's got it right with no reviews, but I appreciate Gaben's review dismissals.
Yea Forums usually only gives a shit about Steam reviews when one game is being review-bombed and they're not in on it, fucking God help you if it's over SJW/anti-SJW shitflinging going on in recent weeks.
>history of abuse, accused of sexual harrassment.
I've got the answer friends, just keep doing it. As soon as they unlock, do it more, make it tradition until Valve gives up. Also bomb it on other sites, there is no need to be scared of negative attention you bring to yourself as a company, the truth will always get out.
The individual reviews are worthless, but the overall rating is worth a lot. I generally find anything without a Very or Overwhelmingly Positive rating is kind of a shit game.
They're not locking or reverting anything. They're just identifying those reviews as off-topic and you can chose if you want to see those kind of reviews and have them influence the overall score or not
Personally I do chose to see them because I think they still provide me with info I might use to make a purchase or not.
What is up with the brainlet invasion on Yea Forums?
lol
They could solve both this problem and give the finger to walking simulators by making it so you can't make a review until 3 hours played.
thisthisthis
>an incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity.
I'm not sure if it qualifies as an invasion. Most of the people here were retarded as fuck to begin with.
And yet we're still miles ahead of every other website.
>you may write a review for any product in your steam account
>you will be able to write a review for that product
>your review of the product also displays your experience with that product
WAAH THEY'RE NOT PRODUCT REVIEWS WAAH
The part of steam where you can review a product shouldn't be about reviewing a product, it should be about what I want it to be about!!!
There are no brainlets, Yea Forums is being Yea Forums. Which is to say, lying when it suits OP's current agenda to do so, and the vast majority of the thread didn't read OP and has no interest in OP's subject.
Reminder that the guy was a ticking time bomb and someone refusing to serve him a coffee could have been enough to make him explode.
how do you think Control has a low user score? no steam no buy
as if anybody on Yea Forums actually fucking cared about the guy or his wellbeing before he killed himself and it became a hot topic to use his dead body as a podium for bawling about sjws
>game reviews aren't product reviews
I think I know a better place for you
why cant liberalism survive in the free market of ideas? why does it need to censor free speech and thought to even have a shot at victory? is it because liberalism stems from mental deficiency?
Zoe Quinn is but one of the people accusing Alec, but I guess GGs need a visible enemy to continue their shitposting campaigns.
>get mad and spout stupid shit about how reviews shouldn't really be reviews when steam enforces their review-relevance feature
Their opinion isn't influenced on it though, they're part of an angry hivemind that wants to see the game financially fail so they're brigading against it as a means to force some sort of social change.
It's literally cancel culture, but from a right perspective. You only enjoy it because this time it's coming from a point of view you agree with. Horse shoe theory is a bitch.
What an absolute fucking retard lmao.
Yeah, no one gives a shit about Holowka. Truth is Zoe Quinn could have been raped by a hundred niggers and Yea Forums's hatred for Quinn would have outweighted their racism and claimed she accidentally tripped her mouth into their cocks. A hundred times.
>The part of steam where you can review a product shouldn't be about reviewing a product, it should be about what I want it to be about!!!
"The part of steam where you can express your thoughts should only be about expressing the thoughts I want you to"
why?
you are literally mentally disabled. literally.
you have no idea why you think anything you do.
you just side with authority blindly every single time like every single other leftist.
There's no place for you in the world any more. NO ONE wants you. Not your jewish masters that made you, not your former people, no one.
You are dead. You are a corpse. You are an apparition.
Not an good solution. If a game is a buggy mess that keeps crashing why should the user have to play that shit for 3 hours to leave a review?
>spoiler
It's pretty fucking sad.
>m-muh GG
5 years of cope. Countless anti-gg projectors.
absolutely based
>hey're part of an angry hivemind that wants to see the game financially fail so they're brigading against it as a means to force some sort of social change.
This. I review games on GameFaqs but even though most of my scores are negative, I never do it with the intention to make a game bomb because a bottle of soap was removed or a person committed suicide.
The idea of potentially missing on a cool game just because some retards are hating on a game because it had a joke removed gets on my nerves, but luckily I'm not someone that pays attention to reviews. Developers, sadly, do and know how harmful negative reviews are.
leave it to a /pol/ bootlicker to not understand (on purpose) that just because you can type words into a box doesn't mean it's an open invitation to post off-topic bullshit and get away with it, i'm guessing you're often banned from online games for thinking the chat feature is an open invitation to chant the nigger word in random servers and towns
Cope? It's a fact, bro. Just go around YouTube and pretty much every major gaming website.
>I review games on GameFaqs
Why would you do that though?
>cancel culture
SJW cant tell the difference between banning something you dont like and telling others not to support it.
>it's not a product review because I say so
>mentally disabled
>leftist
>jewish masters
lol
>cancel culture is only good when it aligns with my political beliefs
>why doesn't everyone think exactly like me? Better go grab my friends and review bomb some products I don't politically agree with so that the world things their opinions are bad.
>anything I don't want to hear is off-topic
>defend developers, corporations and businesses
>f-fucking bootlickers
Probably where it fits his ideology
I already said it's because that's what people want and expect it to be.
you don't have any reason for what you want it to be at all.
>accusing anyone but the sjw of supporting cancel culture
stop projecting nigger.
aaaand you made them angry
>reviewing the quality of a product is bootlicking
sasuga /pol/, good goyim
Buy our game, we're based and redpilled, don't buy their game, their cringe and bluepilled.
Will Yea Forums ever stop defending Valve?
no
>better DDoS 9-1chan and get my satanic pedo buddies that own web services to take down wrongthinkers
cope tranny
>its not my job to educate you
Zoe Quinn and Scott Benson are murderers
this. If people want to talk about something to do with the game, there is no reason to censor them except to increase sales for that game, which obviously isn't in the consumer's interest.
so anyone who disagrees is a leftist brainwashed flesh robot that has to be killed at any cost
I don't need to have a reason to want product reviews to be product reviews, dude. They already are, that's what makes sense to normal people who don't have whatever degenerate brain parasite is making you think that something openly stated to be a PRODUCT review should be about anything other than the product and it's quality.
If you want to whine about the dev's politics go tweet about it or submit an article to Kotaku you societal fucking leech.
>Yea Forums
>the shills hired to be here
pick one
>something to do with the game
>developer's personal politics
Ok reptile
>The part of steam where you can express your thoughts should only be about expressing the thoughts I want you to
it's literally stated RIGHT THERE that it's all about PRODUCT reviews you stupid fucking retard
the only leftist here is you, as you distort the established definitions of a system to your own convenience
>banning something
Cancel culture literally refers to people on twitter trying to sway opinions on people because they don't completely align with them on the political spectrum. Like Tosh and his whole rape joke fiasco.
I wasn't referring to some faggy niche gaming website, stop obsessing over it.
It'd probably help if the negative reviews were actually pertaining to the game and weren't souly about things outside of the game.
This review bombing is 100% cancel culture. You don't agree with the developers political actions and you demand financial punishment over it. No different from the blue hairs getting upset over Chapelle.
>I don't need a reason for what I want
>Only you have that burden
this is the essence of the left
they are simply fake abominations that were created solely to be obstacles to actually productive people
the only choice is to murder every last one
>developer's politics has no bearing on the content of the game
>people can't just dodge a huge bullet (from their perspective) by judging product based on the creator
>it's against their interest to allow them to make these snap judgements
>we decided this for you
>now thank us
I don't WANT them to be anything you braindead retard. They ARE product reviews.
You're the one sitting here demanding reality conform to your autistic wants.
So you are pro cancel culture as long as the people in charge of cancelling align with you politically. Good to know.
>you have to use my definition of 'product review' because you have to do literally verbatim what authority says
>none of the reviews on steam are labeled as 'product review' to begin with
this is really just an absolute meltdown of humanity
you are not real
The irony is you posted a Jewish master to try to further your argument lol.
>the only choice is to murder every last one
>says the man that has never been in a fight
>re-defining terms to suit your agenda
Leftists are a cancer
>developer apologizes for an opinion you agree with
>somehow this means the game is bad
If the developer was a communist and put stuff INTO THE GAME advocating for a communist revolution in real life, that would be something about the dev that has bearing on the quality of the game
This is literally not that kind of situation, though, you absolutely ape nigger
>ARE
prove it
no they aren't
and why SHOULD they be
WHY
>THATS JUST THE WAY IT IS SO OF COURSE THAT'S THE WAY IT SHOULD BE BECAUSE THAT'S THE WAY IT IS
like seriously, you are NOT a human.
Every single leftist is like this (and most other people to be fair). But EVERY SINGLE leftist is like this because it is their defining characteristic that gives life to everything else about them.
the only choice for humanity to continue is to exterminate all leftism/judaism
The company doesn't matter if the game is genuinely good you fucking tool.
>This is literally not that kind of situation
PROVE IT
until you PROVE IT you cannot justify the censorship you lawless purposeless husk of a subhuman
>developer's politics has no bearing on the content of the game
9 out of the 10 times a game is being trashed for "political reasons", it doesn't, and it's just something to do with communication that sparked the autistic flame
>they are not product reviews nobody wants them to be product reviews you're dumb
>okay maybe they're product reviews but "product reviews" has to mean what I say it means or else you're being authoritarian
lol nice goalposts faggot
>terrorism is okay if its right wing terrorism
>play game for 0.2 hours
>leave negative review that has literally nothing to do with gameplay and is just whining about the developer's political views
>refund
>HURR DURR WHY WAS MY REVIEW REMOVED?
See I trust that all the people literally admitting their review isn't about the quality or content of the game itself is enough PROOF for you.
I mean, of course it isn't, you have stupid retard brain parasites, but I can only try.
PROVE IT
until you do you can't justify intervention as being in the interest of the people the fucking thing was made to serve to begin with
See
>only I can decide the goalposts and I don't need a reason
>your attempt to define the goalposts with reasoning is DISCARDED
you realize that every single right wing person has been through this ad infinitum and all it takes is a speaker like me to turn them into a murderous mob against you right
Wrong. Chinks did this shit with Devotion because it had a Winnie the Pooh reference, they just bought the game, left a negative review then refunded.
>leftoid instantly resorts to projecting
>no-u meme
unoriginal and cringe pilled.
>cherrypick some reviews
>this is proof
>still doesn't comprehend the argument or connect with it in any way
They don't even review the game, they just complain about the developers' personal politics. The point is to review the game, not to review people you don't like.
>can't actually refute what I'm saying
>has no idea what cancel culture is because most of his exposure to the world comes from Yea Forums
Cancel culture has always primarily been about people group attacking things they dislike on twitter. Also saying "doing something I dislike makes you a liberal" is a real slack jawed retarded thing to say.
Nigger you literally whined your ass off about how they're not product reviews and then as soon as people started calling you retarded you backed the fuck down and are now trying to argue the definition of product review as if there's literally any ambiguity to it.
Shut the fuck up, you retard.
>see my collection of cherries ive picked.
but people i dont like (leftists) cause games to become bad and as such i must dissuade developers kowtowing or otherwise interacting with said people, thus the review mechanism is an avenue for people to get the message across
>UH PROVE PEOPLE WERE REVIEWBOMBING
>ok
>T-THAT'S CHERRYPICKING
You have to be completely delusional if you think it didn't happen, lmao. This isn't the first time reviewbombing has happened and it won't be the last.
if you think we're "obeying" those definitions for arbitrary reasons then you're wrong, we follow them because they allow more order and fairness than your hippie mindset of "anything works" ever would.
your judgement of the developer shouldn't have an effect on the quality of the product. if the game is good, it's good, even if the dev is evil.
Yeah, leftie twitter has never called for people to be fired, banned and silenced due to their views. They just leave a counter argument on why they are wrong. Stop pretending, you are convincing nobody.
you didn't respond to what that post said and just made up a story instead
because your mind literally has no protocol for you dealing with being wrong about anything you're emotional about
we have a protocol for you and we will teach it to you.
kill every leftist
>y-youre cherry picking
>those reviews admitting that the product is good but the developer politics are the reason for their review are cherry picked
>even though product reviews shouldn't be limited to talking about the product itself, all the review bombers totally have legit issues with the product itself
Okay dude then what's the problem with the game itself based on the developer apologizing or whatever? Where are all the people talking about the product in their product reviews?
You can LOOK at the negative reviews yourself you fucking idiot.
Fuck off retard.
Nothing is ever good enough to you brain parasite retards.
>trumptard immediately resorts to misreading and misrepresenting on purpose
no surprise here, you should have bought more brain pills
Absolutely seething
>a simple negative review is now reviewbombing
neck yourself
I explained how you're moving the goalpost because your obviously don't understand what that phrase means, but it looks like your brain parasite is too deep for you to actually read my post.
>HOW DARE YOU RIGHT WING FAGGOT USE OUR OWN TATICS AGAINST US
>STOP IT, REVIEW BOMB IS ONLY FOR US TO MAKE DEVS BEND THE KNEE
>OBTFO
Funny, since Obama will most likely go down in history as that one President who despite being black and having the power to do so, refused to pardon Jack Johnson who was falsely accused of crimes he didn't commit and was accused of those crimes because he was black, whereas Trump was the first President actually pardoned him.
Really makes you think where Obama's priorities lie...
>allow more order and fairness
>NO ARGUMENT
>let me define order
>let me define fairness
>let me have no argument
or we could just kill you all
>F-fucking D-drumpf
Rent free
>right wingers think that leftists are playing a cynical game of propaganda misrepresenting facts only because its what right wingers would do in their position
naw you're just a piece of shit who assumes everyone else is a piece of shit like you. also known as projecting
Cope harder
>Muh cuckservatism will save us from evil sjws
>MOM, WHY IS HE ALLOWED TO ACT LIKE A FAGGOT? I WANT TO ACT LIKE A FAGGOT TOO
This is why there should be no reviews at all.
>he says without irony as he rants about trannies for past 20 years and review bombed games for the past month non stop
>accuse your opponent of what you are guilty of
>Nigger you literally whined your ass off about how they're not product reviews
Not that guy but these aren't product reviews. They're reactions of people tied to a hivemind that feel politically threatened and want to lash out over it. Their review has nothing to do with the product and should be removed.
You lack some vital reading comprehension skills.
>leftie twitter has never called for people to be fired, banned and silenced due to their views
Is literally what I've been saying for several posts. This is the same thing people are doing with the reviews for Ion Fury. They dislike the perceived politics behind the game and want to hurt it financially.
Both are bad, people only like the negative IF reviews because it aligns with their politics.
>it doesn't fit my agenda so it's reviewbombing
eat shit and die indie sub human
You can turn off the review moderation you stupid fucking retard.
>it's not even review bombing anymore
Holy shit dude how far are you gonna carry that goalpost?
how many of those were poltical? oh none? wow a cuckservative misrepresenting facts how weird
you didn't 'explain' anything at all let alone respond to any of the questions posed to you.
you're an absolute liar and savage with no objective perspective at all.
simply put you a subhuman degenerate programmed against your nature and you must be exterminated.
>okay dude
notice how you started that sentence
you didn't just start explaining
you inserted that little affectation first
you hesitated
you hesitated because you are operating outside of your element and you don't have any agency over the circumstances
you have nothing
you've been had.
>it's a goal post
fix your face first
reminder
Didn't they put this system in place like half a year ago?
How is this news to you?
>Yea Forums supposedly claims that gameplay is the most important aspect of a game, mocks "movie games" for lacking it
>unironically defends and supports coordinated waves of negative reviews with 0.2 hours played that don't judge the game by gameplay
Amazing
because it was used against totally legit and not just ranting about trannies political message!!!! REEEEE
>we got stop mass shooters
>shows that most mass shooters are related to gang violence
>THOSE DONT COUNT, unless im talking about the massive number of mass shootings in america then it coutns
>reviews that are supposed to be about a particular product should instead be about whatever I want
>I will waffle about definitions all day in response to opposition because the only argument I can make is a semantic one where I pretend I don't know what words mean
>everyone who disagrees is a leftist
>defending reviews that do not talk about the merits or demerits of the game
Be underage somewhere else.
yea el paso shooting, poway synagogue shooting, tallahassee yoga studio shooting, maga bomber, jeffersontown kroger shooting, pittsburgh synagogue shooting, murder of blaze berntstein, murder of meshon cooper-williams all happening this year is just moderate right wing discourse
i don't get your point anymore
are you against following the conventions? are you against product reviews being solely about the game and not the developers? your only arguments so far are from a semantical standpoint and that we shouldn't follow them because "muh authority bad", but you haven't given any actual reason of why the current defined system of reviews should be changed
Oh god, I wonder why non of them were reported on. Really makes you think, why there is so much gun violence and no one in media is bothering to report on it. Almost like there is some political agenda in only reporting crimes committed by one racial group that commits that type of crime at disproportionately lower rate than other groups
>Both are bad
you have ABSOLUTELY NO REASON for thinking this
you are an animal
Guy made likw 80% of the game these faggots lead him to suicide so they can prodit off his work
and that disproves that image somehow? whats your point?
>you are not objective
>my FEELINGS are objective
Ok kid
The most important aspect of a game isn’t gameplay, it’s whether or not the developers agree with my political views
>da joooos
what a sad life where you imagine jews are subhuman and at the same time a monolith controlling the world. sounds like they might be genetically superior baby and you're lashing out
This but unironically
>bolshekikes infiltrate media
>lose to one smol Orange Drumpf
how mad can you be?
What does it say in Polish down there?
help me fill the list Yea Forums
any sjw bombs that i forgot?
SJW GAMES THAT BOMBED:
>BattleFieldV
>Mirrors Edge Catalyst
>Wolfenstein 2
>Wolfenstein young lesbians
>Mafia 3
>Watch Dogs 2
>Mass Effect Andromeda
>Lawbreakers
>Sunset
>Revolution 60
>Depression quest
>far cry rage 2
>life is strange 2
SJW GAMES THAT SOLD WELL
>Mortal kombat 11
>ANTI SJW GAMES THAT SOLD WELL
>Tekken 7
>Kingdom come deliverance
>Rinworld
>increasing white supremacist attacks is nothing to worry about
>what we really need to worry about is gang bangers shooting each other
sure bud
its almost like the jews dont control the world
Yes it's totally the jews specifically and not a network of people with money and power in general who work to maintain their grip on that money and power who are the real problem.
Only get mad at the jews for their collusion and nepotism, other rich and powerful people who do the same thing aren't bad they're BASED lmao.
>game is mediocre
>gets MIXED reviews
>not negative
>not mostly negative
>not overwhelmingly negative
>just MIXED
>"oh my god you fucking goyim do you not understand that the shekels need to flow?!?! it's anuda shoah!!!"
lmfao sorry nobody has shit taste like you
>1 white guy kills 20 people once
>100 black people kill 4+ people each
>somehow i supposed to fear the white guy more
>pretend to be confused after losing
Hitler warned us about this
for future reference, in real life debate, once you get your opponent to this point you have to inflict violence
It's almost like Donald Trump isn't bad for the people who are really in power and is in fact very good for them.
That would be weird haha.
Are you new here?
We have these pointless twitter screencaps threads every day with retards calling devs SJWs without ever mentioning the games, or completely retarded arguments for the sole purpose of shitting on games
>Subnautica is SJW because devs fired some edgy /pol/tard
>Kingdom Come is racist because dev said no blacks in my historically-accurate game
>PoE is sjw because Obsidian removed some kickstarter backer's joke that offended trans
And so on.
Those are just a few of the topics that are deemed worth talking, disregarding the fact that none of it is reflected in the games themselves.
>9 terrorist attacks just this year
>once
my sides
>no arguments
Okay buddy, you can go back to your dialation station now.
if only hillary had won...
so good hes cutting off (((supplies))) worldwide
he's right you dumb gorilla nigger;it's the one way for developers to hear consumers,AND it works
The real reason the black shooters aren't reported on very often is because the media doesn't report black on black crime. If it were white people getting killed in those shootings you bet your ass we'd hear about it.
Wolfenstein 2 bombed?
MK11 didnt sell well
>9 shootings committed by whites
>out of 297
"the jews" is an easy-to-swallow boogeyman that serves the same purpose and lines up with the intense stormfag bias of /pol/, they're trying to express that vast network but have to simplify it for themselves because most of them are tards and grasp the concept but not the depth of it
>you are an animal
hell yeah dude
thats arguing with literally anyone you fucking idiot. nobody ever changes their minds on the spot and sometimes takes years and only then they'll think they convinced themselves without your help but only if can produce reasonable arguments. hitler was a fucking idiot who crashed his country in 10 years
Yeah it matters I pay attention to the reviews, and use them as a reference on whether I should, or shouldn't buy the game. I have 222 games rn. All very positive, or overwhelmingly positive.
How you've come full circle.
Gameplay doesn't matter anymore because of muh polish ticks.
>Nani the fuck
You need to go back.
>just trust me bro plzzzzzzzzzzz
>my emotions are really well suited to this situation please adopt them
we are going to kill every last one of you
Nice chart, totally not fake news haha.
Review bombers are like niggers who loot their own neighborhood to protest the gubma. If they want to spray feces all over their own home, they probably don't deserve their own home.
for a fightign game it did wonders
BFV sold over a million but for a EA game, thats not even half of the marketing material
> is because the media doesn't report black crime
Hm, I wonder why is that the case. Can you help me out unravel this mystery? Hop on into mystery machine, let's do it.
maybe 'anyone' you've ever known your sick pit of jewish filth
>shareblue has a hacked together image with fake stats to "counter" the other one posted
WEW
t. las vegas hotel shooter
The media reports plenty of black crime but not many black on black murders
'
Gameplay doesn't matter because we don't actually play games here.
because its always black on black crime and you would normally celebrate cleansing the gene pool?
""the jews" is an easy-to-swallow boogeyman" is an easy-to-swallow boogeyman
here's a pro fucking tip for debate:
use your own argument against yourself before you speak
dumb nigger animal
...
...
>media doesn't report disproportionate amount of violent crimes committed by blacks
>It's all because they just don't care about minorities
Really, all those (((((white))))) people in the media must really hate blacks. We found a real neonyatzis guys.
Fucking video games
>those stats with the source listed and information given are FAKE
>you should trust my totally unsourced nonsense pictures and not research anything yourself
Yeah Trump, billionaire multiple sex scandal having friend of Jeff Epstein and owner of properties where Epstein recruited underage prostitutes, is totally not complicit in sex crimes.
nah you're just a dumb lefty larping as a conservative for some reason
only liberal cucks cry about muh official definitions and muh authority
let me tell you something basedboy, definitions bring order and a common consensus and behavior, if you're against it because you think it's unfair you have to give an actual reason, not cry about "m-muh oppressive systems''
this includes the current review system
Bill Clinton flew on the Lolita Express over 20 times. What was he doing on there? Filming CP with Jeff?
>deflecting
hillary lost!
i too can add quotation marks to your post to make it an incorrect statement