Yea Forums talks about stupid shit like daylight, male/female tags...

>removal
Never mentioned.
Outside of a handful of scenes you’ll only see yourself in reflections or driving.
It was always ‘almost entirely’ first person.

>nothing was removed, 3rd person cutscenes weren't big part of the game to begin with
Exactly. It's like people didn't watch the E3 footage that consisted of 45 minutes of first person and two extremely brief flashes of third person. One of those flashes was V brushing her teeth, and that would work way better in first person because you'd be able to do the classic "gazing at yourself sadly in the mirror because you just let a big muscular man pound you in the ass and it didn't really feel good because girls don't have a prostate" thing that Prey did back in 2006, in a manner of speaking.

I dont see a problem with that desu.

Convince me otherwise

Because only braindead monkeys that only play AAA trash still give a shit about this game

Deus Ex always had third person dialogues you underage retard.

>>Yea Forums doesn't talk about THE REMOVAL OF THIRD PERSON PERSPECTIVE EVEN IN CINEMATICS
That's literally what every Cyberpunk thread is about though, also it's been confirmed to be fake news. Nothing has been removed, but people just ignore that for some reason

So all those cutscenes we saw so far, they were for nothing? A mere vaporware cocktease?

>nothing was removed
>except for these things that were removed
Top notch post, champ

They are still in the game. Facebook PR guy is a retard and he caused this whole mess but devs confirmed that nothing has been changed

DROPPED

>cdpr shills already in full force

i was referring to 3rd person cutscenes
mate

Yea Forums talked about nothing else when it was first announced over a fucking year ago.

I can't believe there are still autists getting mad that it isn't 3rd person.

Deus Ex didn't have animation systems good enough to sustain first person dialogue.

Something to understand is that Cyberpunk is doing its best to get rid of non-interactive cutscenes. You are in control of V as much as possible. One of the core design pillars of Deus Ex was that the game shouldn't show you your character doing things but rather let the player do those things. If Deus Ex 1 had had better facial animation systems and eye tracking for NPCs and stuff like that, they couldn't had seamless dialogue where you walk around and talk to people without turning into wannabe movie mode.

Third person cutscenes and dialog systems are a holder from when games wanted to be movies.

>Deus Ex didn't have animation systems good enough to sustain first person dialogue.
No, it just understood that third person cutscenes make dialogues flow better when your character is not a voiceless self insert.
Observing him from third perspective doesn't mean you're not in control, in fact you're in a better control since you observe everything about him including the visual style you've created for him.

>THE REMOVAL OF THIRD PERSON PERSPECTIVE EVEN IN CINEMATICS
good, fuck third person fags

>No, it just understood that third person cutscenes make dialogues flow better when your character is not a voiceless self insert.
No it doesn't.

I don't really like first person games, it also seems weird for a tabletop rpg adaptation. I don't know if I'll ever play a CDPR game at this rate, they just always miss my preferences. But that's not their problem I don't ask devs to cater to me.

Hot opinion and fantastic argumentation, moron
Just what i've expected from CDPR fans

Who's looking forward to finally being able to play as a girl!

Attached: 724-7248123_117kib-999x972-slowpoke.jpg (820x837, 147K)

>THEY DIDNT DELETE 3RD PERSON FAKE NEWS
>THEY DELETED IT SO WHAT WHO CARES
PPFFFFFFFHAHAHAHA
THE STATE OF CDPR CU CKS

>Observing him from third perspective doesn't mean you're not in control, in fact you're in a better control since you observe everything about him including the visual style you've created for him.
Dude, videogames are not movies. When you are watching characters talk in third person, you may as well be watching a movie. You are not in control. An example of a game that has dialogue systems that never remove control from the player would be Titanfall 2. Look at badly designed games like Metal Gear Solid and compare them to well designed games like Thief and Splinter Cell. The key to those games is that they told a story but they never, ever took control away from you while playing. Heck, Perfect Dark in 2000 had very brief third person cutscenes at the start and end of each mission, but aside from that it was fully first person and you were always in control of Joanna. You could walk away from people mid-conversation.

Never take control away from the player if you can avoid it. This is a lesson game designers need to learn. You are not making a movie. You are making an interactive videogame where interactivity is the core design pillar. If the player wants to stop talking to someone, they must have the freedom to simply turn around and walk away.

they didn't delete anything but I wish they did, I hate 3rd person cutscenes in a 1st person game

Reminder that Cyberpunk 2077 is the spiritual successor to games like this. Imagine thinking at any point that this was going to be some sort of "third person" or "cinematic" game.

Attached: PD_Chicago.webm (640x360, 2.21M)

Not being able to see my own clothes really takes away from the character fantasy

>girl
Sorry but your outdated social constructs have no place here cis scum

What an absolutely terrible post.

Attached: SHAMEFURDISPRAY.jpg (640x480, 74K)

>Dude, videogames are not movies.
Showing your character from third perspective doesn't equal mimicking a movie. It simply allows the dialogue to flow much, MUCH better, especially when your protagonist has voiced responds and actual personality of his own. Hearing some other voice coming from first perspective during the scripted dialogues with someone is extremely obtuse and not needed, reserve it for the games where protagonist is a true voiceless tabula rasa. It's why Dishonored 2 is so shit.
>Look at badly designed games like Metal Gear Solid and compare them to well designed games like Thief and Splinter Cell
We are talking about dialogue systems, not about gameplay.
There's nothing stopping a game from having third person dialogue system while still being atmospheric and allowing you to experience actual gameplay from first perspective.
>Never take control away from the player
Your control is taken the moment scripted dialogue becomes.

So let get facts straight for the one shitposter here:

1. The Third Person perspective was never ever promised. Never . You made this up.
2. Third Person cutscenes werentpromised either. You made this up.

This leads to the conclussion thtCdProject didnt remove anything

Smart decision, keeps character flow and Immersion

>Not being able to see my own clothes really takes away from the character fantasy
What are mirrors?
It's funny how a lot of people didn't notice the meaning of the Pond Punk strip club in Perfect Dark.

Mike PONDSmith.
CyberPUNK.

this was in the first trailer so people expected it in the whole game

Attached: cyberpunk-2077-header-2.jpg (1920x1080, 140K)

it kinda bothers me that they scrapped Third Person in cut scenes. I hope a fan mod will fix it

for a second i thought that was that Minecraft world some user was creating

Fake news, brainlet.
Heres a you for you.
Also buy Death Stranding for based cinematics and piss in 3rd person.

see this:

History repeats itself.

Attached: 1528864464539.jpg (1024x559, 85K)

not him but that's a cutscene, not third person, only a retard would think it was.

>3 seconds cutscene in a 28 minute gameplayvideo where the rest is First person
>is actually mentioned in Op picture that not every TPP is removed
Yeah see your brain checked holy shit you must be retarded

youtu.be/edYCtaNueQY

>wow I cant believe csgo is in fpp the trailer showed 3rd person perspective

Ah yes, the classic.

>not gonna have full control anyways!
>lets take it all away!
thanks fag

They are not taking anything over what's already scripted.
Are all CDPR fans literally brain damaged?

Why WOULD we talk about that? It's not like we're going to affect their decision in that regard.

Not even about CDPR at that point, you're just a cunt who probably wants unskippable cutscenes since the artist worked hard to make it.

>Take all the options away, it's fine, not like you had any, right?

>they literally promised us, how could we not see this coming??????
anyone who is surprised by this is an actual seething brainlet

Attached: 1567588274329.jpg (1920x1080, 203K)

>who probably wants unskippable cutscenes
Take that "probably" and shove it into your own ass, retard.
Don't bump into discussion if you have literally no idea about what's being discussed.

I hate that this is "news"
gaming journalism is such a joke

>has to physically see a character to understand them
sure thing dude, you seriously sound pretentious
>only reason to have third person cutscenes is to see body language better but everyone is stiff robots and voice actors never communicate with animators
and that's you're problem, not fucking first person or third person, both of them are fine but require direction

Attached: DA ALLIANCA.jpg (706x706, 52K)

>to understand them
Yet another episode of "user reads things with his own ass"?
I'm all up for it, but it's pretty embarrasing to watch.
> both of them are fine but require direction
Yes, and the direction required for first person dialogues to work is FOR YOUR CHARACTER NOT TO TALK because you're self-inserting into him.

Fine by me.
Now if only they could make the protagonist silent.

>>Yea Forums doesn't talk about THE REMOVAL OF THIRD PERSON
fuck off pajeet.

>being surprised Yea Forums cares more about stupid shit then something that will actually affect gameplay

Can i look down and see my chara's boobs?

>Everything that made it good has been scraped.
Nothing was scrapped because it was never going to be good in the first place brainlet.

>Yes, and the direction required for first person dialogues to work is FOR YOUR CHARACTER NOT TO TALK
This. They're just mix and matching shit with no sensibilty to it and falling back on the line "muh immersion" even when it's clearly not true.

As much as I hate cd projekt and cyberpunk 2077, I don't get why are people having a shitfit about this.
Unless I'm just dumb and everyone is just using this as an excuse to shitpost.

you know the dumbest thing about the latest wave of "oh no it's first person" was that this shit was confirmed... like... a year ago?

It it always was "almost entirely first person" why even make a mention about the "removal", you fucking tool? Like, would it hurt you to use your brain cells even once before hitting the submit button?

>everyone is just using this as an excuse to shitpost.
What do you think user? I think it'll be a 7/10 at best and a decent enough game, but I've just accepted nobody on Yea Forums will ever want to actually discuss the game so I shitpost and call shills and other shitposters trannies.

>first person means you literally can't communicate with dialogue
wow, okay guys, should we just get rid of the text too?

>this fucking retard again
Seek help.

Properly. Honestly if I look down and can't see my body then I'm not even pirating, you can't use muh immersion as a excuse and then make it so your a floating camera all the time.

These cutscenes were obviously only ever going to be using sparingly.
Fuck, that one wasn't even very long, and the second one they used in that what, 50 minute demo? Was maybe 30 seconds long. Everything else was saw was entirely first person.

It was obvious from the get go that it was pretty much going to be non-stop first person almost any time we have control over V.

why spend time and resources on character creation stuff like wires on your face, glowing hair, etc. etc. if you never see it?

No you should just give actual answers for the design choices instead of buzzword cop-outs.
Which would probably sound something like "well we didn't actually think about that, sorry".

Doesn't it get boring to shitpost about a single topic though

>self insertion
>but you can't choose anything because everything is scripted
So, you just have an opinion that only third person cutscenes can have a protagonist talk?

Isn't that a weird thing to disconnect at, what fucking insertion are you doing when you get at most 7 sentences to choose from.

It was never gonna be third person retard.

Attached: 1556829440120.jpg (1080x1042, 174K)

Read ops post and then apologise.

>So, you just have an opinion that only third person cutscenes can have a protagonist talk?
This is the case when your goal is "immersion", which is exactly what they've stating as the reason for first person.

Not really, I come into these threads just to shitpost now. The only time since last years e3 I've seen these threads actually have people trying to discuss the game is after this years e3, and it only lasted a few days. Nobody wants to actually talk about this game, I've seen people shitposting and shitting on the game over them saying there would be no pre order bonus.

I believe the game looked bad to many people and it's a year before a release so it's kind of obvious there won't be any discussion. Like to me the game looked like a gta copy and the image certainly doesn't change with news.

They have literally shown third person cinematics in their gameplay demos, retard

>cutscenes with the player are now thirdperson
dank, all movies are third person games now

>Nononono how will I play dressup with my character if the game is in first person!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????

>Yea Forums cares about a game called cyberpunk actually being cyberpunk
>Yea Forums still cares about third person camera but not enough to satisfy my retardation

is there? or are you just too much of a retard to understand what is going on in those threads?

>actually being cyberpunk
Seeks pretty accurate to cyberpunk 2020

uh, we're talking about cyberpunk 2077 my dude

Consolebabby waifufags btfo

I dont really see the gta comparison outside of California being bright and sunny during the day. It looks like a first person witcher in a near future setting while something like bladerunner looks like a sci fi city to me. Besides sleeping dogs was the best gta type
game I've played and that was a shameless gta clone.

Another nontroversy about the game that isn't out for another 9 months.
Wow! A first-person video game isn't going to have enough third-person cut scenes.

Shut the fuck up with you autism you're as bad as Fox news when they didn't have shit on Obama besides what mustard he liked or tan colored suit he wore.

Attached: 1565640992944.png (402x600, 165K)

I'm looking forward to it because they have been pro-consumer.

Which is based off of cyberpunk 2020.

>almost entirely
So what won't be then?

I only saw the ?e3? trailer where there was something that looked like a desert and some redneck with sun in the background. To me it just looked exactly like gta 5 with the only difference being they had slightly futuristic guns.
When I think of Cyberpunk it makes me think of a big city, maybe something like New York not random looking farm houses but I may be misunderstanding the setting.

so it's a shit representation of cyberpunk 2020? or was cyberpunk 2020 not cyberpunk at all?

No you're understanding the setting correctly, city-wide megastructures with the rich at the top where there's clean air, and the poor at the dirty crime ridden bottom.
Trannies are desperately trying to change the definition of cyberpunk.

You reached so far for your strawman it doesn't even make sense anymore. It's an RPG user, if W3 is anything to go by it will be like 50% dialogue and cinematics

It will be like dying light without any cool shit, just trannies with metal arms or legs. Great...

Attached: 1560931101194.gif (500x281, 1.92M)

>talks about stuff he has no clue about

Attached: deusex.jpg (1920x1080, 536K)

Maybe I will buy it on sale when someone made a 3rrd person mod.

Out of the 2 demos they have shown there's like only two instances where they show cutscenes in third person. One with pedroman which is probably just faked in and one where you wake up next to a dude.

>or was cyberpunk 2020 not cyberpunk at all?
by Yea Forums's standards, no.

Really makes you think eh?

>Yea Forums doesn't talk about THE REMOVAL OF THIRD PERSON PERSPECTIVE
Nigga there's a new thread made every three hours, probably by you

Cyberpunk is normally described as high tech, low life and near future. As I said, to me bladerunners L.A while admittedly looking cool as shit, feels more like a sci fi city to me.

on a topic that is actually something like 10 months old or so by now no less.
third person shitposters were not quiet as prolific as the sunposters back then but they were there.

No dude, you don't understand, nuDX is bad because cinematic takedowns, but this uninspired console "RPG" is the true Deus Ex successor because it's in first person.

>stupid shit like daylight

if they managed to mess up the most important thing and that's atmosphere I don't even want to talk about totally irrelevant stuff like gameplay perspective. they haven't made a good game since first witcher.

Attached: 1556082724361.jpg (1200x800, 198K)

Because talking about muh third person is just as retarded as screeching about the sun.

As long I get to make a cute tomboy I'm fine.

if they decided ro crap it then there was a plan to have it in it.

Literally this. Fuck CD projekt dead.

>pic
What movie/series?

>but this uninspired console "RPG"
human revolution? mankind divided?

Are you scared because you won't be able to have an enormous field of view and cheat by looking around corners while taking Tactical Cover TM by pressing the "cover" button behind an obstacle? Yeah, I sure do miss the tactical cover genre like Gears of War, actually not at all, it sucks, go FPS, escially when it's visceral and has a lot of pression.

>RPG with massive character creation and lots of gear
>game is always in 1st person so you never see your character or gear
find the error

Why is Yea Forums full of baiting retards?

B-but celebrity man in my bideo game!!!!!

LMAO get fucked consoleniggers.

Press V to dab on third person niggers

Attached: 1535149678398.gif (750x500, 334K)

Altered Carbon.

Fucking this.

So what exactly of value has been lost?

third person perspective is for fucking casuals.

First person is the only way to make immersive video games. ALL mmos should be in first person, third person was the beginning of their downfall

First person: roleplayers

Thrid person: normies that want to press BUTTON AWESOME and watch their character do cool stuff on screen, like watching a movie

Reaching really hard there.

>not being able to be immersed in a third person game
Your pathetic

>I can only immerse myself when the game is first person
found the casual

>you’ll only see yourself in reflections
lmao
you think they'll actually have reflections in the game
based retard

Attached: laughing frog.jpg (640x633, 87K)

>has a create a player
>can't see your character

Why even both than with a create a player?...

one of the best games of all time is locked to first person view even during "cutscenes"

nice effort though, sperg

Attached: endyourself.jpg (1600x1200, 101K)

They're throwing shit at a wall and realizing that not much of it actually sticks.

It’s gonna be a fallout clone, tons of useless modifications that doesn’t actually mean anything.

Am I the only want who wanted both third and first person?

Where have you been but stupid reddit fucker?

CP2077 defense force going full out with the insults.

>N-NOO YOU CANT CRITICIZE TRANNY BULLSHIT because other things bad
lmao

They are going to sell you thirdperson as dlc after they get through making multiplayer DLC

>third person perspective is for fucking casuals.
>First person is the only way to make immersive video games.

good fucking lord the shit that gets posted here

Deus Ex style?

>We gonna make a Cyberpunk game!!
>people expect a Witcher 3 but cyberpunk where you would ride a motorcycle called Ro4ch, with the male skin being a geralt lookalike and female a ciri lookalike

Deus Ex at least had no character creation or customization.

Deus Ex 1 did, though it was limited.

LITERALLY CONFIRMED FAKE NEWS

It's hypocritical to complain about shitty combat and then complain about no TPP/FPP switching in the same breath.

Every single game that allows you to switch perspective like that has shitty gameplay.

Attached: 1500127587444.png (184x173, 31K)

The only way a companie can make me loss interest on their product is by involving politics on it such as " CP2077 is going to be inclusive" i believe theres more people who think the same way. I dont care if the game is FPP or TPP.

Attached: 1566769126681.jpg (500x399, 29K)

Why not make driving also first person then?

Attached: 1460692749371.jpg (1280x720, 53K)

Yea Forums: this game looks just like gta!
Also Yea Forums: why isnt it in third person?!

>Third person RPGs
Do you play The Elder Scrolls and Fallout in third person too? Disgusting.

It's both.

>Yea Forums doesn't talk about this this that has had non-stop threads ever since it was announced
fuck off

Elder Scrolls are shitty RPGs and the only good Fallout games are 1&2.

who's counting the old boomershit game, I meant Human Revolution

I just figured it out
>1st person chads
PUBG
>3rd person babies
Fortnite

Guess which group is whining about Cyberpunk 2077 being in 1st person? Really makes you think.

Attached: exoboo.webm (1920x1080, 2.05M)

You could create a character in HR or change the way you looked?

You have both in pubg tho

and the tpp gameplay is shit, most servers force fpp now

I only play first person because I actually have awareness of my surroundings. Let me guess, you're unable to back out of your parking space without a back-up camera.

Attached: exoboo at daaa lake.webm (1280x720, 2.6M)

Good, third person (shooting) fucking sucks.

I have no idea wtf you are talking about servers and shit

this is a board for english speakers

>This game is gonna be trash.
Why?

and retards

Why would you want TPP? It's much more immersive to play in First Person, it's definitely a good idea.

>implying first person is for roleplayers
It's like he only started playing games this year.
Get some experience before you talk about games, kid.

>and the tpp gameplay is shit, most servers force fpp now
faggot, stop saying bullshit crap to cover your lies.

All the kids that grow up playing Skyrim, thinking it's the best RPG ever.

The point of first person is to give you the views from the cybenetic implants and to your monitors.
Having a third person view while still having information pop ups will make the game looks like zoomershit rpgs instead of Deus Ex or Crysis.
Only consoleniggers hate first person view.

Cool, I was hoping they'd do that.

It's fine when anyone except cdpr does it

Wait. What the fuck is the point of body types and shit if you can't see them in third fucking person?

>>Yea Forums doesn't talk about THE REMOVAL OF THIRD PERSON PERSPECTIVE EVEN IN CINEMATICS
because it being first person at all killed most of our interest

>all those people who won't be able to enjoy game of the generation because they're too retarded to change the fov
sad!

Also notice how the writing says "work in progress - does not represent the final look of the game" and not "we promise guys - this is the final look of the game"

Can this company please stop telling us so much about the game? The game isn't even out yet and it feels like I know 90% about it already.

based, tppshitters just can't catch a break

Attached: 1.png (554x400, 71K)

third person cutscenes? in
multiplayer? in
cyberchads just can’t stop winning

Attached: B8E351A7-E122-489C-955C-A3823602FAA4.jpg (700x861, 218K)

literally every person complaining about first person or games not being rpgs are retards whose only rpgs are oblivion, skyrim and witcher 3 and that's a fact

i hate this shit too. by the time it comes out I'll feel 'familiar' with it in a way that takes away from the discovery. Exploring a mediocre game can be more exciting than playing a 'good' game that has nothing surprising in it. Shit, I remember when assassin's creed 1 came out and kept throwing me for interesting loops all the time. I didn't really walk away thinking the game was great but exploring what they had thrown out there is fucking HUGE

yeah that's the one that has no character creation or cutsomization

lmao cope harder Québécois nigger, you can't make real games like all leaf faggot.

yeah and every sensible person stopped playing tpp the day fpp came out

>FPP only (almost)
This is awesome
Fuck third person cucks

you can see yourself in mirrors and how you look affects your stats

>idiots leaned a new word: "immersion"
The thread

half of what you heard about it is made up by Yea Forums

Good.
Now it's like Bloodlines.
>inb4 HURR BLOODLIENS HAD TPP
And it was fucking garbage. If you ever used TPP in Bloodlines you're fucking nigger.

All the things that made the game good never existed in the first place. It was all hype and you fell for it

CDPR has no idea how to make a mass market cyberpunk game. You can obviously tell this when instead of releasing hype trailers with concrete Cyberpunk aesthetics they keep releasing actual story elements of the game.

>CP77 flops and CDPR is forced to make a new Witcher game
The best timeline.

They're finished. If 2077 hype doesn't last until multiplayer is released I don't think they'll ever be a big name again

It's literally just fine, stop crying trannies.

It's gonna be a first person action rpg shooter, don't like it don't buy it

Yes, a first person RPG shooter in a first person saturated market.

W3 still sells well, so they have a cash-flow when CP is no success. Enough to make more W3 dlcs.

Name 2 others 1st person shooter rpgs that are coming out/came out during the last 5 years

You really think they're ever going back to that dogshit engine?

Destiny 1 and 2.. borderlands 3

To keep the lights on. Yes.

Oh man. Those poor pols must be working 100+ hour weeks to try and keep this shitshow together

all looter shooters

>yfw the reason why it's going entirely first person is because the sheer amount of customization they offered is impossible to do, so rather than own up to it they just hide the fact with restricting view to firstperson

They almost didn't even finish witcher 3 in the first place because of that godforsaken engine.

There's loot in 2077

you're comparing diablo to baldur's gate

Randomized tiered loot is cancer and it's in the game. If you'd like to explain have it's not the same as the randomized tiered loot from borderlands and destiny, feel free.

>the reason they shoe-horned a rick & morthy-tier character voiced by hollywood trendy action man and named him Johnny Silverhand is because the game's story is so lacking and the game itself is so far apart from the original pen & paper RPG that they needed to namedrop a classic character to maintain the connection

the difference is one's centered around the loot and the other is not. Also source on randomize tiered loot?

>source on randomize tiered loot?
Have you not watched the gameplay demos? At one point the narrator goes "OH LOOK, LOOT!" and they pick up that smart gun.

yes you can pick up guns. what's your point?

Randomized tiered guns you autist.

>REMOVAL OF THIRD PERSON PERSPECTIVE EVEN IN CINEMATICS
Nice, this game is going to outclass the DX reboots.

thick as a brick

gamerant.com/cyberpunk-2077-multiplayer-witcher-3/
>Little has been revealed about Cyberpunk 2077 since its announcement last year. The adaptation of Mike Pondsmith's pen-and-paper game was previewed with a powerful, provocative, poignant cinematic trailer in January, and Pondsmith himself offered up a few musings on the setting's cyber-enhancement-obsessed society days later. We know the singleplayer portion of the game will let players choose between customizable character classes while its non-linear story weaves through a futuristicly dark, gritty, shall we say Blade Runner-meets-Deus Ex open world. But if -- let alone how -- those elements would be bridged into multiplayer is anyone's guess.
>Classes
>Non-linear
>Bladerunner-meets-Deus Ex

Attached: 1549886886661.jpg (807x760, 150K)

Tell me user, what's the purpose of having tiers if all the weapon spawns are static?

Not likely.

>for years CDPR taunts everyone with the release date of "when it's ready"
>it comes out incomplete and a husk of what was promised
o i am laffing

Attached: 1478461554344.jpg (499x466, 45K)

to easily show in a way that everyone knows how good a gun is?

So it makes sense for some players to get a 1% droprate gun from a static spawn and cheese the rest of the game with oneshots.

>tfw I'm more excited for the game to sell truckloads than I am of the game itself
>Just to spite the faggots here on this board
I hate you all so fucking much you useless subhumans. Join the 40%.

Oh no, god forbid someone gets a good gun in a singleplayer rpg, think of the balance!

Is it true CDPR hired the devs who worked on Mass Effect Andromeda and Dying Light to work on this game?

Attached: 94857124985.jpg (1500x1700, 607K)

Yes. It's official.

This but I don't care how well or poorly the game does unlike this edgy faggot. It either flops and I get to laugh at the game, or it does well and I laugh at Yea Forums and potentially pirate it.

the whole fucking thread was made in response to 3rd person being removed in cutscenes retard

Is anyone else thinking they are making it so first person friendly so that the inevitable VR port will sell?

I don't even give a shit about cyberpunk but can someone explain to me why this shot even fucking matters?
Who cares if there's no fucking third person

I just cut myself on this transexual's post

I think people are all stirred up because it has character creation, what's the point if you can't ever see your character

I don't get why people keep saying this
Use your head, what's the point of your body type and shit if you see in first person?

You think I designed myself before I was born?

fuck yeah. first person is objectively the best perspective

this but unironically

it was always going to be first person for gameplay, for years they said that. it's just now all cutscenes are fp too. and yes probably vr was a factor (imagine was kinda fucking sick fourth wall breaks there could be in regards to inworld vr shit or cyberdrugs n shit, cool visuals like in Observer, another cool underrated cyberpunkish game)

I was so hyped a year ago bros, what the hell went wrong? This isn't anything like they promised in the trailers.

Attached: 1567320810050.jpg (773x659, 55K)

Do you not believe in clothing, changes in weight or general appearance?

obviously it's not ready.

BASED

Third person is console babby shit for hiding bad controls.

I used TPP in Bloodlines to look at female Malkavian's breast physics.

>What are PC mods

Attached: 1567575900661.jpg (409x314, 28K)

>exclusive first person game has a character creator

FC5 did this too and I just don't understand why. It just rings of mismanaged resources since you don't see any of your handiwork besides some different glove models.

yeah
cdpr is at the worst state now
western crew with polish middle managers
ultimate hell

this is starting to sound an awful lot like those threads where people try and make the worse game possible one post at a time, except for real

its typical success story
they hit gold and with it they transform
for worse obviously as plenty of original crew that make digging gold real is now gone replaced by people who want gold but don't know a shit about digging

Not rpg

>being able to mod this abortion of the witcher 3 engine

Mod support isn't confirmed.

>will now
but we all knew that from the start

>Yea Forums doesn't talk about THE REMOVAL OF THIRD PERSON PERSPECTIVE EVEN IN CINEMATICS

Thanks for outing yourself as a newfag that only browses Yea Forums to make outrage threads, faggot. We already talked about it and the fanboys already tried to damage control.

>Witcher 2 is moderately successful and puts poland on the radar
>corporate suits move in rubbing their hands
>convince CDPR that now that they have invented the wheel they should go to space
>Convince them to not only go to space but you should also start working on a lunar lander
>They start building the staircase to space
>many people fall off along the way, including the staircase builders
>move the lunar lander team to the staircase building team
>they don't know how to build staircases and instead build a ladder
>many people are falling off the ladder but cdpr just keeps throwing more of the lunar lander team at it
>they finally make it to space, but at what cost
>the hand rubbers tell the remnants "we should gets some satellites going"
>atop this rickety ladder they try to build satellites, many fall, but eventually there's a couple that manage to stay in orbit
>they collectively wipe the sweat from their brows as the hand rubbers now tell them to begin immediately working on the lunar lander project, and to start where they left off last time
>many are lost and the ladder keeps throwing people off
>"Oh, and make sure this lunar lander works the first time"

Attached: 1556074803030.jpg (768x768, 93K)

>he fell for the viral marketing

this game was NEVER going to be good, but still there was non-stop constant buzz even during the 2013 trailer with nothing to show. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY HAHAHAHAHAHA

Attached: 1561180692545.png (338x654, 349K)

>REMOVAL OF THIRD PERSON PERSPECTIVE
Based