Is there something Yea Forums hates more than them?

women & minorities

CDPR love to pretend they're better than everyone.
They're just the slav EA.
The Holy Trinity of cancerous video game companies would be them, EA, and Square/Square-Enix

What makes you say that?

Persona 5. For a good reason, it's a garbage game and the biggest disappointment of this and last gen.

I know this website is populated by the mentally insane and assblasted, but I don't understand the hate for CDPR. It's one of the most consumer friendly companies out there, and without doubt THE most consumer friendly in the vidya industry. Just look at the quality of production in TW3, the free content, the quality of it's DLC, blood and wine got GOTY awards and is the best DLC in the history of DLCs. I don't see any good reason to hate on CDPR. There's alot of fiascos surrounding CP2077 but that won't turn me into a mentally retarded faggot that is going to deny CDPR's good past.

Also,people here make it sound like CDPR is caving in to twitter trannies, when they literally doubled down on the poster dickgirl on the last gameplay reveal, they literally zoomed the camera on her and showed cans of soda pouring out of her crotch. If that's not shitting on trannies I don't know what is. CDPR is walking a dangerous path right now, it has to play it safe with the trannies and SJW twitter crowd all the way up to release, just like they did with TW3, and look how TW3 turned out. It literally was tranny repellent. Trannies lost their shit about all the girls in TW3 looking like victoria's secret models. In the end this is all petty stuff to bitch about and only retards and mentally insane fags and actual unironic trannies care about this shit. Twitter and resetgender trannies get uppity over pixels being too attractive, and Yea Forums trannies get uppity about them being not attractive enough. The net result is that both's opinions should be discarded in the trash.

Brain cancer

Ah the shills have arrived in defense of their beloved company
>5 PLN have been deposited to your account

Ah the EA shill has arrived
>a coupon for 0.99$ has been deposited to your EA(tm) account

b-based CDPR!

Attached: 15672485752571500396375798933463.png (1600x900, 1.59M)

Are you guys capable of providing rational discourse/rebuttals or is this the game we're playing?

Why would you reply to a post calling CDPR "slav EA" like he is defending them? ADD schizo much?

EA

did you pretend to be a retard for so long that you actually became one?

he's from the following list of mentally traumatised trannies:
>bloodbornetranny with PTSD of losing GOTY in 2015
>toddshill on payroll to damage control TW3 shitting over FO4 and dabbing on skyshit with awards and critical appeal
>EA NPC bot directed to subvert the success of CDPR from the witcher franchise
without fail, he belongs to this list like the many other NPCs that hate CDPR with absolutely no clear motive or reason. When you see this kind of shit, it's always NPCs, bots or shills doing psyops.

Attached: 1556812440476.png (662x602, 335K)

Their approach to game design and marketing, as well as their general attitude in spite of the aforementioned.
Everything they say is contradicted by their actions. They invent a narrative where they're the good guys, when they're really just a conglomerate that couldn't identify what a good game designer looks like, even if they genuinely wanted to make a good video game.
No offense, but I get suspicious when a company feels the need to spend 75% of the amount that went into producing a game in marketing it. All the shit you could've done with that money instead, like hiring talent or fixing your game pre-release instead of having to piss away with 100gb+ of post-release patches over a year and still not being able to fix anything.
When you can't sell a game based on its gameplay, just market it with CGI and lies. Tell me that's not EA/SE in a nutshell.

EA

Actually they're not that hated at all.

They're just controversial.
So you got the fans who make the threads, and the people who shit on it every single time. You got the trolls who make the threads, and the people who take the bait every single time.

Something universally hated wouldn't get nearly as much attention.

it's because of the aggressive shilling like this
>THE most consumer friendly
it's stuff like this that makes us hate your company. the most consumer friendly is likely a small company like croteam or warhorse

you also push memes that quality of production is important in video games, while your largest title is marketed as an RPG but doesn't have any means of roleplaying what.so.ever.

I don't get all the hate. People are just jelly.
The game looks fun and we've only seen the district of Pacifica so sunposter are retarded fags.

This. The development of Gwent stand alone is a fucking nightmare

>I don't get why someone has a different opinion than me
sweets summer...

Yea Forums is just contrarian for the sake of it, as always. CDPR were loved back when it was just the first and even second Witcher games. 3 was popular with normies so now they're out.

Nah, it's just that they went from that to this

>marketed as an RPG
did you actually legit just try to convince me that CDPR tried to ruse people into thinking TW3 is a fullscale RPG with roles after announcing a witcher game with the same fixed protag from the first two? are you mentally retarded?
Small indie companies tend to be consumer friendly, but list me 3 AAA companies that are extremeyl consumer friendly to the point of completely destroying industry standards and releasing high quality high fidelity 100% produced DLC like CDPR did, I'll fucking wait. And while you're at it give me some legit reasons on why you think CDPR is a bad company that relate to CDPR, not what you see CDPR fans say, because that is NPC logic.

seeWhat does the quality of the DLC matter when the quality of the core gameplay and main story are atrocious? You can't play the DLCs separately. Their quality is tied to the game as a whole. You don't get to judge them as individual entities.
Also Hearts of Stone was terrible. I'll reserve judgement for B&W because I'm still early on in it.
What exactly makes TW3's DLCs so great comparatively, though?
I'm not entirely sure I could even argue in the defense of DLC expansions to begin with. Seems like a fad that was resurrected for shekel siphoning.

>When you can't sell a game based on its gameplay, just market it with CGI and lies
But they did the exact opposite. They've shown a ton of gameplay and judging from the last video they didn't show us bullshots either.
I think the main reason people are disappointed is because they set their expectations too high, maybe at unrealistic levels. Keep in mind this is still a current-gen game and that they still need to get it running on the gimped shitboxes that are the PS4 and xbone.

Attached: consider.jpg (569x428, 25K)

what the fuck did you just write their? their game is advertised as an RPG, they pay journalists to put their game in top RPG lists, yet the game barely has any roleplaying in it, mechanically or otherwise.
>Small indie companies tend to be consumer friendly, but list me 3 AAA companies that are extremeyl consumer friendly to the point of completely destroying industry standards and releasing high quality high fidelity 100% produced DLC like CDPR did
Proof it wasn't just cut content later released for a pricetag? There are MANY AAA companies releasing expansion sized DLC but if I post any you'll say it doesn't count in typical shill fashion.
>And while you're at it give me some legit reasons on why you think CDPR is a bad company that relate to CDPR, not what you see CDPR fans say, because that is NPC logic.
HereWhy do they need Keanu in their game when their previous game had massive quest design flaws and some of the worst combat in any so called ''AAA game''?

write there*

Why should I care about some low polly cans?
What I look for in a game is if I'm going to enjoy my time playing it? Things like driving around, story, progression, weapons, combat, look, ect. If I can enjoy these things than I will happily play this "GTA clone" for over a thousand hours.

hello zoomerturd.
witcher 2 was already ripped-apart and shat on because they decided to go the consoles route. you were still shitting your diapers when witcher 2 came so stfu.

cd turd eject only ever made one good and beloved game and that is witcher 1. after that they immediately became Bioware/Bethesda tier because they wanted to play with the big boys now.

>Fanmade Gwent gets produced shortly after TW3's release
>Gets shut down in favor of CDPR's neutered version
"Based, the most consumer-friendly company in the history of recordkeeping, 100% dedicated to video games as a business" - Steve "Shekelshyster" Steinberg, Better Business Bureau

>this company is good because they release dlc lol
dude are you stupid, like 1 in 3 devs release lengthy dlc

don't forget the PR guy claiming the game didn't get downgraded up until release day and them sending angry letters to pirates asking for money that they then decided to backtrack on

there's also many horror stories about working there on the internet, but I don't doubt all of you shills will deny them ;)

BTW witcher 3 is stale normie shit, you can wank to your waifu all you want but that wont fix the shit gameplay

>What does the quality of the DLC matter when the quality of the core gameplay and main story are atrocious? You can't play the DLCs separately. Their quality is tied to the game as a whole. You don't get to judge them as individual entities.
What does it matter when you didn't like it, but others did? it doesn't. It's a subjective tastes matter. You didn't like it, you thought it was atrocious? many others didn't, many others, including me, liked it. Why should I concede to your opinion? what makes your little drop in the sea of an opinion the final say? literally nothing. User reviews and scores of this game broke charts and have set world records, why should I discard my own formed opinion and the opinions of thousands of others in favor of an anonymous faggot on a central known for it's contrarian bias? literally nothing. Your opinion doesn't matter. Majorly because it is what it is - an opinion. I can take it at face value, or I can recognise it to be trash, and deposit it in the trash.
>Also Hearts of Stone was terrible. I'll reserve judgement for B&W because I'm still early on in it.
You'll call it trash when you finish it, let's not trick eachother about your NPC status bandwagon orbiting status.
>What exactly makes TW3's DLCs so great comparatively, though?
The production. HoS had an excellent storyline integrated seamlessly throughout the entirety of the main story, and extremely good and entertaining sections such as the wedding, a highly intelligent and intricate branching story with lots of food for thought and moral dilemmas, you can easily make a subtle mistake and get punished severely in the story. The characters are great, some of them have close ties to important main story characters. That's my critical judgement of HoS, your critical judgement is a meager "it's shit". I'm too short on words for B&W but I'll let the picture do the talking.
>why do they need keanu
Why do they not?

Attached: B&W.png (948x541, 794K)

>they pay journalists to put their game in top RPG lists
proof, examples?
>yet the game barely has any roleplaying in it, mechanically or otherwise
Did they trick you into thinking as such?
>Proof it wasn't just cut content later released for a pricetag
Proof it was?
>There are MANY AAA companies releasing expansion sized DLC but if I post any you'll say it doesn't count in typical shill fashion
Begging the question.
>Here
You want CDPR to stop marketing their game? retarded call.

>but I don't understand the hate for CDPR
Because you fanboys are annoying. Same reason people hate Sony and Nintendo.

No CDPR is not some industry saving company, their works are not flawless masterpieces and Blood and Wine is certainly not the best DLC either, but yet you aggressively tell us so and yell buzzwords at everyone who disagrees. I mean you say people are assblasted but your blood pressure definitely rose while you wrote that post

if our opinion doesn't matter why are you here day in day out smashing your head against the keyboard trying to tell us how much our negative opinion doesn't matter?

fuck them FUCK THEM
they are literally favorite /pol/' developers
Their games are not welcomed on 4channel

>proof, examples?
all the games that make it on that list are from heavily marketed titles, there's no way publishers don't pay for them, but whatever.
>Did they trick you into thinking as such?
yeah because despite the fixed character the previous games had room for roleplaying, mostly built around the amnesiac thing.
>Proof it was?
you made the first claim.
>Begging the question.
Like I said prove the previous statement and I'll post full sized DLC from all those so called evil AAA companies that you are so giddy to hate on while defending your precious CDPR
>You want CDPR to stop marketing their game? retarded call.
No I want them to make good games instead of relying 100% on marketing just like all the other crappy AAA companies

you calling it shit isn't the epitome of discussion either, friend. Ofcourse I'm gonna defend my favourite game when some literal monkey bonobo makes retarded oneliner invalid criticism of it regarding autistic shit no one cares about and the general consensus disagrees with. Criticism is fine as long as it's good, not trying to fit in with a crowd of 80IQ contrarian zoomers.
Yes, you're assblasted. No one orbits a successful game they don't like bar the assblasted. It takes assblastment to put yourself in a shitty position like this. I don't like a game I take off from it, why should I give a shit about people discussing it? it's not my jam, it's not destroying my other franchises of video games that I play, it's not intruding on me, why should I intrude on it? this is what you should be asking yourself, why should you be this obsessed with TW3? assblastment, is the answer.

It's one mentally ill faggot that picks a popular game and spams negative threads about it for months. Then he finds a new game and the cycle repeats. The only thing (you) can do is stop posting in his threads.

Attached: 1511270027241.jpg (720x960, 101K)

You can make the argument that console development is what hindered the production, but it would be inaccurate, as evidenced by The Witcher (1).
CDPR were always jank, and they still are. Don't make an Action-RPG if you don't know how to program basic bitch shit, or even how to design an RPG.
I mean how many of the fucking skills are just numerical damage modifiers? I get that it's not a true RPG, so you can't have skills that actually change your interaction with the world outside of the ball-numbing combat, but could they have not come up with some more interesting shit?
Everything about the gameplay is an afterthought, mechanically and technically. From the combat, to the quest design (use yer witcher senses lmao), to the horse riding, to Gwent, to... no that's it. That's the extent of the gameplay.
>FOUR-HUNDRED THOUSAND LINES OF RECORDED DIALOGUE
This is why people call shit like this a moviegame. When you put so much time and money into your film rejects while your gameplay is in limbo somewhere between horribly mediocre and hot fucking shit, meanwhile you've got a gorillion hours of cutscenes dedicated to what is quite possibly the most unengaging storyline ever told that is comprised 90% of flashback exposition dumps.
Truly an innovative powerhouse dedicated to quality video games.

>muh consensus
Then why do you not accept that consensus instead of having your blood pressure rise because a bonobo monkey said your game is not as good as you think it is?

And I certainly didn't call it shit, I liked the game, but it's not flawless and the quest design in particular is horrid. No I don't care that 10000 billion people liked following red trails, personally I didn't like it. Yes I know you're gonna say that doesn't matter, but I'll keep expressing my opinion.

As an african american, I was kind of disappointed about the lack of diversity in witcher 3. It was a good game tho

Also falling back on the contrarian argument is not very high IQ either, there's posts on reddit mocking the combat too and that place is definitely not ''contrarian'' friendly

Superb bait. Have a (you).
CDPR are one of my favorite developers ever. A few /pol/tards and a few trannies hating on them isn't going to change the fact that they are miles above everyone else.

The game looks fine.
I agree the combat and gameplay in Witcher 3 was underwhelming and merely servicable but I think they learned a lot from this. It's also easier designing combat, movement and animations from a 1st person perspective.
Only time will tell though how well the gameplay and smoothness of it turns out.

Attached: 9890073.jpg (319x243, 16K)

>CDPR are one of my favorite developers ever. A few /pol/tards and a few trannies hating on them isn't going to change the fact that they are miles above everyone else.
this unironically

>What does it matter when you didn't like it, but others did?
That wasn't the question.
Brood War wouldn't exist without Starcraft. There shouldn't be some major reserve to judge the former separately from the latter. They're the same game,
one is an extension of the other.
I.E. Blood & Wine is an extension of TW3, and before you started shifting topics we were discussing the production as a whole and its core values, all of which translate to the DLC without needing specification.

The game does look fine, who said otherwise?
I did have to fuck with the colors on my tv to get Geralt to not be a pink lobster, but otherwise, yeah.
>but I think they learned a lot from this
I'm not so sure. Cyberpunk is a different beast, so it's hard to compare. It's also about more than just the controlling character, the enemies and "bosses" in TW3 have such limited movesets and A.I. compared to other ARPGs. It felt as shallow as LoZ in this regard.
You can play D. March, but what does that even do? Just ups all the damage modifiers. The pinnacle of lazy, incompetent design.
Again, the gameplay is an absolute afterthought. I don't genuinely believe they learned jack shit, because they had a decade of companies failing behind them to learn and they still designed the same uninspired garbage and shipped and sold it and reaped the rewards without a mention of the game's design flaws.
They say it right in the prologue of the fucking game to never train alone, else you'll cement your failures. What is ignoring the problem going to do but cement CDPR's own failures? They've garnered critical acclaim for a game that by all rights shouldn't even been allowed a space on the shelf. What could they possibly learn from this safe space they're in, free to ignore all constructive feedback?
They'll just perpetuate the same flaws into their next project.

this is probably the only studio i respect, they don't treat their players like cunts and avoid the typical mtx pre-order bonus bullshit.

It looks like trash.

Attached: 1567191233997.png (1376x1070, 1.3M)

Imagine being this mad over fucking SODA CANS

they downgraded though

>warhorse
>consumer friendly

dude they had more refunds after launch than any game i've seen because they released an unfinished, buggy piece of shit. it was worse than a bethesda game. that is not a company that respects its players.

REPORT ALL LOW QUALITY TROLL THREADS

Attached: Report Rulebreakers.jpg (125x117, 2K)

OK, now you're just assuming a lot here without actually saying anything of relevance. The thing is we simply don't know yet. We haven't seen enough gameplay elements to draw a conclusion, but what I've seen so far looks promising.
>reaped the rewards without a mention of the game's design flaws
Why would they when it sold boatloads and won every award? It was only a vocal minority who complained about the iffy controls and in places simply bad gameplay.

Did anyone else notice the stark increase of redditors since yesterday? Did reddit go down or something?
/pol/

>they don't treat their players like cunts and avoid the typical mtx pre-order bonus bullshit
gamespot.com/articles/witcher-3-wild-hunt-pre-order-bonuses/1100-6426444/
u wot
I mean have you even read the thread?

ever heard of Activision

Can you read?

He means removing actual content from the game to sell as preorder or supergamerpro edition, newfag.

>EA puts out live services filled with loot boxes and micro transactions. Constantly shuts down studios who don't make them $.
>CDred puts out large single player games with only DLC that is actual content, not cosmetics.
You're a bit of an idiot user. I think you meant EA, Activision, and Take-Two. Maybe a bit of Zenimx also.

When did we start talking about Cyberpunk 2077 exclusively?
I had to follow the reply chain because I genuinely am confused at this point.
I've been talking about The Witcher 3's production, more than anything.
I stopped keeping up with Cyberpunk after the E3 teaser last year, but Hell I can talk about that for a minute so you can see where I'm coming from...
>2012 CGI teaser concept-in-motion to establish the production
All well and good.
>E3 2018, another CGI teaser with an atrocious voiceover that is entirely comprised of concepts with no actual establishment of gameplay, story, or character
I have heard they've been showing gameplay since E3 ('19), how's it looking? I imagine the game is going to run a lot smoother, but like I mentioned in regards to TW3, there's a lot more to combat than (You). If the enemy is pants-on-head retarded, then what's the point?
Have they revealed the skill trees yet? That's another aspect I have zero faith. I heard the classes are essentially going to function as Red/Blue/Green, so R.I.P. roleplaying.

how many digital pre-order bonuses does cyberpunk have?

>shill
>calls CDPR slav EA
You have to be braindead to think that's a complement.

I will never forgive CDPR what they did to this genre and the game i've been looking forward to for 5 years.

Attached: 1600x1200_teaser_cp77.jpg (1600x1200, 1.13M)

Attached: 15668485826744727701040551938618.jpg (922x1024, 145K)

What's the difference between removing content and setting aside content specifically to be developed later and sold back? Why not finish development and include it in the game?
What makes Hearts of Stone a legitimate expansion? It's five hours long and takes place in the same map.
It's the same difference. The Witcher 3's production planned to have DLC expansions from the start, so they created concepts and determined which ones would be set aside for later.
>Evil is evil. Lesser, greater, middling, it's all the same... but if I'm to choose between one evil and another, then I prefer not to choose at all

I don't know.
I guess I can search for you, if you want me to, I don't mind.

Jesus does this game come out for ps3 aswell?

Watch it for yourself autist.
Why are you spouting shit without having seen any of the gameplay footage?

I HONESTLY don't get why Yea Forums hates them.
Is it cause of gender nonsense?
Who cares, i mean do you honestly need a big white letters that tells you "Pick a chad or a bimbo" to enjoy the game?

4what it's worth Glitcher3 was a nice game, can't say it's one of my favorites but it sure is well made comparing to Cuck Effect or GTAV

Attached: MWwsrKP1GI4.jpg (1080x1349, 228K)

Because I was talking about The Witcher 3, a game I've played, not Cyberpunk, a game that's unreleased.
>Why are you talking about a topic that I abruptly shifted to for no apparent reason and then got angry over?!
Get a CAT scan.

We've only seen the district of Pacifica so far which is only 1 of the six areas of the game. And yea it makes sense to have a district like Pacifia since it's set in 3rd world shithole America.
I'm sure shit like the corpo center will be more reminiscent of shit like Bladerunner.
Stop being niggering retards.

Attached: brainlet.png (621x702, 56K)

COPE

With what? I'm looking forward to pirating this shit day 1 and having fun with it while I'll be laughing my bottom off at seething cucks such as you.

Attached: 1447978316483.jpg (600x600, 65K)

Women, trannies, minorities, Epic, Valve, EA, Kojima, Konami, Blizzard and the list goes on and its hard to say which one is actually hated, which one is just memed and which one is just autism of few people

Attached: EGGS.png (680x347, 271K)

COPE

Pope

Nice bait, not a faggot drone who worship companies, but they are one of the few ok ones doing games.

boogie2988

Pepe

>CDPR love to pretend they're better than everyone.
They're okay people who make flawed but passionate games. Yea Forums's knee-jerk reaction since Witcher 3 came out has been nothing short of sad, gradually everyone became either a """shill""" for having any positive opinion and detractors are just autistic shit flinging monkeys incapable of expressing coherent thought because the underdog company is now making arguably the biggest game of the year and getting according press.

Sky high expectations and then absolute mayhem because there was a poster of a transsexual, all of this because everyone wanted the same cookie cutter Akira-like setting and is throwing a shitfit over not getting it. Changing demographics somehow made this place even more cancerous.

This shitty genre that never had anything good come out of it but leftie garbage? Yeah, what a fucking waste.

your kin

>Is there something Yea Forums hates more than them?
Video games.

Unironically underrated and redpilled

Blame the fans for the hate.CDRejekts are the absolute worst ambassadors for the company. You can't expect to avoid some backlash when you declare war on EVERY other fanbase. I hope 2077 bombs because I have learned from the 2016 election I have developed a taste for Schanefreude from smug self righteous cunts.
Fingers crossed.

Pretty sure majority of Yea Forums likes CDPR. They just have a habit of proving horseshoe theory by attracting hate from all flavors of crazy people.

>not ubisoft
>not take-two
>not Epic
>not bethesda
Yeah, I'm thinking he's retarded.

how do you from this......

Attached: 1567269703642.jpg (657x1770, 501K)

.........to this

Attached: lgghz6l2c2j31.png (640x762, 244K)

I don't have anything against CDPR, they're fine.

Now EA on the other hand...

>NOOOOOOOOO YOU CANT TAKE GENDER AWAY FROM A VIDEO GAME

Attached: maga_soyjak.jpg (1080x1114, 167K)

they seem ok, but theyr shilling army proves otherwise

Yes, anti-CPR shills.

Trannies.

Attached: 13.jpg (2048x2040, 1.32M)

more please, son

People are simply fooled by the amount of content they put out by using Polish slave labor.

EVERY single game dev ever downgrades their game. Relax, autismo.

Why do we hate them again?

that just could be all the Polacks in the world. CDPR is the only thing Poland is known for. and the Auswitz

>bad gameplay
>retarded fanbase
>caving in to sjws

Having productive lifes or having sex.

shill

most of Yea Forums are kiddos so they dont have sex (hopefuly)

Praise Geraldo!

Themselves.

>caving in to sjws
So like 90% of game developers?
Resetera, bay bay! is not a thing for nothing.

Heterosexuality.

It's fucking hilarious, as in hilariously stupid. The game isn't even out yet, but so far everything we've seen is pretty good and promising. And knowing the devs behind this game: their work ethic, their methods, their promises about the game and their tendancy to fulfill said promises. People still shit on it so much it's beyond retarded.

>"Muh subpar gameplay"
>"Muh not cyberpunk-y enough setting"
>"Muh diversity or not enough diversity"
>"Muh not enough info on the project"
>"Muh X, Y and Z mongoloid reasons and bullshit excuses"

Seriously. The shills, the trash devs, the retards, the (((videogame journalists and critics))) are out on full force. You tried this shit with Doom and Kingdom Come: Deliverance, it didn't work then and it won't work now. Then you proceed to REEEEE since your own garbage won't ever be successful, because you are fucking trash at anything and everything vidya related. Know this... Once the game comes out and BTFOs your dogshit yet again. I will be playing it and I will take massive satisfaction from your failed attempts at smearing, seething, shilling and overall getting triggered; your tears coupled with your failure makes my smug wider and my cock harder.

Stay mad and stay bad, subhumans.

Attached: Cyberpunk_2077_Samurai.jpg (600x600, 216K)

based and samuraipilled

Pic related as relevant as ever.

Attached: 1559896133000.jpg (700x414, 53K)

> One tracksuit has been deposited in your closet.

Yea Forums's reaction is due to Witcher 3 having gained praise and fame from video games journos and casuals. It went from 'they make games that we like' to 'they make games that they like'.

THEY HAVE TO PAY THE PRICE

v loves todd

>Know this... Once the game comes out and BTFOs your dogshit yet again. I will be playing it and I will take massive satisfaction from your failed attempts at smearing, seething, shilling and overall getting triggered; your tears coupled with your failure makes my smug wider and my cock harder.

I have fond memories of Dragon Age 2 vs Witcher 2 days.

>dedicated DA2 shills going on for weeks about how W2 will be shit
>game comes out
>they're literally gone overnight

Attached: DA2_promo.jpg (1280x720, 305K)

It's probably butthurt weebs hating CDPR

it's fun to go on about shills and whatnot, but more often than not you simply have to look at who benefits the most from an orchestrated effort to discredit a game. what else is coming out in the comparable timeframe and would see cyberpunk 2077 as competition?

>what else is coming out in the comparable timeframe
I have no idea. The only two games i'm looking forward to are Cyberpunk 2077 and Baldur's Gate 3.

I'm not even sure if this guy is ironic or not

>CDPR love to pretend they're better than everyone.
LOL NO