Iss it right to write a bad game review over a controversial issue that doesn't directly relate to the quality of a...

Iss it right to write a bad game review over a controversial issue that doesn't directly relate to the quality of a game?

Attached: D9tLzjO.png (626x532, 157K)

just don't be offended

What the fuck is wrong with steam?

Attached: 1553037315171.png (1154x855, 475K)

why are there so many incels on steam?

>2 people found this review funny

Attached: 1c9a42711251ac71299af993dac4d31a.jpg (623x546, 63K)

what the fuck did 3d realms do

People treat it like a social media platform + just overall there are more awkward and weird people in gaming = huge fucking disaster

Attached: 5618438970_6510b21b65_b.jpg (1024x579, 67K)

>actively reject my right to exist
Jesus you can't write comedy this good.

Only if it's convenient for Yea Forums. See A Hat in Time.

You heard it here folks, "ogay" is now one of the terrible words never to be spoken.

Yeah, I can think of a few reasons. Unexplained price hikes right before a sale or otherwise, pushing for paid mods years after release, and taking down singleplayer and non-disruptive multiplayer modders are some reasons I can think of.

Yeah, I can think of a few reasons. Unexplained price hikes right before a sale or otherwise, pushing for paid mods years after release, and taking down singleplayer and non-disruptive multiplayer modders are some reasons I can think of.

Yeah, I can think of a few reasons. Unexplained price hikes right before a sale or otherwise, pushing for paid mods years after release, and taking down singleplayer and non-disruptive multiplayer modders are some that I can think of.

It's up to 54 people found this funny and 23 helpful, lol.

Has anyone been noticing something weird with Yea Forums recently? I keep seeing the same posts over and over.

somethings up with post and it looks like your post isn't being accepted because it's taking forever, you abort it and try again, and then it posts it anyways even after you already aborted

I think it's acceptable to do in a few cases where the developer breaks trust with the consumer, eg. deciding to make their game an e*ic st*re timed exclusive after taking kickstarter money from fans who were promised a concurrent steam release or cutting content that was promised at the last minute.

Is this a serious question or are you being funny? If you're being funny I concede I chuckled.

>saying "fag" actively rejects the right for me to resist
I genuinely devalue trans people because of this exact type of non-human thinking; they are not capable of actual, non-emotionally-compromised, rational thought and therefore are lower than human.

As for your question OP, it depends on what exactly is being protested by review bombing. I think issues of company corruption or maybe even the company employees being treated fairly are a valid reason for the consumer base to review bomb a product. But politics is such a wishy washy area that you'll most likely get answers that just support the answerer's agenda. i.e. "you can review bomb because of a thing I dislike but you can't review bomb because of a thing I like, fact."

These fags need to get off their high horses and just enjoy the content they do like. I'm black and I don't give a fuck about everyone saying they hate niggers, day of the rope, or any of that gay shit because it's words on the internet.

Attached: Can I be the niggest.png (1920x1080, 330K)

INCREDIBLY based

>Ogay as an in game joke you cant even see normally
>They actively reject my right to exist!!!
So fucking what
Trannies have no sense of self worth at all, do they?

That first post in pic, a black guy playing RDR2 and watching Buster Scruggs. Very based.

I keep seeing reeeeetards claim that there is transphobic content in the game, but I’ve never seen it. Is this just a product of people who’ve never played the game spouting BS?

>Athazagoraphobia
i quit so fast jesus

It's something you have to noclip out of the map to see.

>they are not capable of actual, non-emotionally-compromised, rational thought
>generalizing an entire group of people as identical is non-emotionally-compromised and rational thought
Your next line is "dilate"

I think he's referring to the 'transphobic' comments one of the devs made on discord. All which was saying "don't force it on your kids".

Yes? We do it all the time if we see lefty shit outside a game but tied to a dev

what is with anime and people wanting to become a women (male)

So, wait...you are angry a tranny left a review regarding the devs and not the game? But...Yea Forums literally did this same thing and I was told it was good?

>I'm black and I don't give a fuck about everyone saying they hate niggers, day of the rope, or any of that gay shit because it's words on the internet
You're retarded if you aren't worried about people spreading radical propaganda that can lead to society polarizing enough to kill you.

Where's the lie?
No really, where's the lie?
There isn't a single trans who isn't an emotionally compromised invalid who's too crazy, unstable, or flat out stupid to be considered on the same level as a standard functioning human being.

Oh right, and dilate.

Dilate!

Where's the lie?
No really, where's the lie?
I guess someone doesn't actually live around trans "people" hm.
t. Californian

Oh right, and dilate.

Attached: 1564904394942.png (453x188, 93K)

Source?

Attached: 0P54dw5.gif (480x270, 1.63M)

>actively reject my right to exist
Not active enough apparently.

Attached: 1453979776127.jpg (320x320, 82K)

>implying any tranny ever is capable of rational thought
Generalizations exist for a reason user
But even that's not the point. Transgenderism is a mental disorder that is entirely emotionally compromised thinking that makes no rational or logical sense. And the solution to this problem? Why fuck up your body with hormones and castration!

Its interesting seeing posts like this here. There's definitely a divergence in reaction between people who are generally loved suddenly getting hatred or backlash for something they have concluded to be innocent and people who have mostly known hatred desperately trying to find something to believe in.

Don't copy me you double n*gger

Only if the developers / publishers address the controversial issue AS the developers / publishers officially. If some employee even if its the CEO addresses the controversial issue on their own off the clock time than no. But if the developers / publishers take a stance as a company than absolutly.

it's in the pic user, right above the review

Attached: ev001c.jpg (387x264, 70K)

>MUH DICK tab
Stereotypes really do write themselves.

>Grape soda tab
>DBZ fightan gaems tab
Idiot

based retard

no gay sex with hats on, though

Of course it is not right. By the way, could you link me to your thread that complained about their enemies doing the same when 3D Realms announced that they'll be changing that one soap bottle sprite and a text string that can only be seen with noclip? Just to make sure you're opposed to agenda-pushing as a whole, not only when one group does that.

Upvoted, liked and subscribed

Are you all right there, friend? Having a hard time finding the thread in the archives? Just give me a date, maybe I can find it myself.

what game is this scene from

taba

Attached: wife.jpg (988x1200, 204K)

>trans furry anime avatar
Into the trash it goes

>i found a disorder that makes you a bigot if you ignore me
tranny attention whores are evolving

Id say yes, nowhere does it say that you have to be objective, just why you recommend it or not; If someone is bothered by a political reason hes free to signal it to people who might sympathize and have their consumer experience affected by it too.

thanks nerd