I heard you on the wireless back in fifty two

>bigger is better

You need to play more games lil bitch nigga

How do we go from that to a cheap delorean knockoff?

Attached: Deluxo-GTAO-front.png (1920x1080, 2.96M)

>He thinks that's the argument being made
BASED RETARD

Are you fucking retarded

San Andreas countryside and desert were the comfiest.

It was shit but not just because of map size, it actually hid it well due to good level design. The gameplay was still a copy of 3 with all of its problems and the missions were pretty underwhelming for the most part, aside from some good ones. Once the game feels like it starts getting good, it just ends. Still a good game but definitely the weakest of the 3D games.

country side no

desert yes

>The gameplay was still a copy of 3 with all of its problems
Did you forgot that gta 3 did not have bikes, helicopers, planes(except one castrated dodo), and only 1 useless boat? Or how shitty were its physics? Or how bleak and pointless plot was? Or mute bland self insert protagonist? Gta 3 was a terrible game and only succeed due to novelty.

All of that felt tacked on since only a couple of missions really made use of them. 3's missions were more focused on the core mechanics it had so I had way more fun with it. However I did play it with m+kb, along with VC, but I made sure to change the vehicle physics as they were ass in VC as well.

Well, Vice City was meant to be an expansion pack at one point so it makes sense it felt somewhat tacked on.

> tacked on since only a couple of missions really made use of them
This does not make sense. You could ride bikes more often than you would drive cars. And vc vehicles had distinct physics unlike gta3 moving square boxes.

YOURE OUT OF TOUCH IM OUT OF TIME.

Attached: 90F3DD0D-2BFA-464E-8B9B-D5C3C00ADBC7.jpg (1280x720, 124K)

*100$ shark card has been deposited into your account*

The physics for both games sucked. What it really boils down to me is the missions which I liked slightly more in 3. VC had good ones too but not enough as it felt like it had to introduce the new vehicles rather than let you have fun with the world and core mechanics like it used to. I'm not trying to change anyone's opinion here but rather explain why people feel VC sucked. The 80s aesthetic was grreat but didn't utilize it as much as I'd like. The song list was probably the best in the series but 3/4 into the game, I've already listened to every station twice over and got tired of the same songs. It being an expansion makes sense considering it only took them a year to make.

>durr big game good game

Attached: 1539063771901.jpg (352x550, 13K)

thats the fucking vice city sims 3 map

That's a thing?
wtf

Honestly I think VC stories is a better game in that sense. It's basically VC with better improvements. Top 3 games for me are easily SA>VC:S>VC

Vic isn't as cool as Tommy

>muh nostalgia
i replay vice city once a year and it's still fucking fantastic.
also just finished gta 3 again and it holds up great despite some mechanics being outdated or lacking.
fuck anyone who shits on these gems

Attached: SOUL.jpg (3840x2160, 517K)

>You faggots really need to take off the nostalgia goggles and realize Vice City was a shit game.
Kill yourself

Attached: 1559251454392.png (400x416, 156K)

Whoah, is Vice city past the "Yea Forums hates an universally acclaimed game to be contrarian after certain time has passed" point? Time sure flies by

Fuck you the deluxo is peak aesthetic.

I don't see any argument at all. Just an empty attempt at boomerhumor.

I don't think people hate it, just understands its flaws better.

Old Deluxo was distinct and would've been similarly æsthetic if it was updated the same way Stallion was.

True but it still looks better than 99% of the ricer shit they add. Plus it can fucking fly in gtao.