Name them

Name them

Attached: Every classic PC game.png (800x600, 57K)

I guess mine is Deus Ex.
>no
>no
>I guess if by awful you mean old
>I don't think so
>no
>not really
>no
>HR isn't garbage though I don't care for it
>how often do you hear from the DX fanbase?
>probably

classic world of warcraft

it's called dmc1 and your pic is wrong save for obnoxious fanbase and shit sequel being dmc2

Master of Magic
>No
>No
>Old, I guess?
>Not really
>No
>No
>The only shortcut I ever used was E, so no.
>Yes
>No
>No

So nice try.

serious sam is none of these
bethesda games fit into every single one of these bullet points and i think thats why this thread was made

S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
>no
>no
>sorta
>yes
>no but mods can make it way better
>not really
>no
>no
>yes
>no

No to all.

Dark Souls to a T.
>Yes
>Yes
>Yes
>Yes
>Yes
>Not really a maze; just a long road with shortcuts.
>Not really
>Yes
>Yes
>Yes

Deus Ex is very unfinished and the fanbase these days is obnoxious teenagers that love to drop "redpills"
Not PC games

I think this fits more with WRPGs than all PC games

Doom 2016
>No
>Ha
>Nope.
>Nu uh.
>None.
>Kinda? Not really, more arena.
>Nope.
>Sequel looks amazing.
>I literally have never met a guy who likes doom who thinks highly of themselves.
>Nobody calls it Underrated.

Previous fav was the original doom too, which means none of this fits there either, except the maze thing, Doom original was very mazy.

No
No
No
ever evolving content, so probably
ever evolving, so updates are frequent and when shit gets broke it normally gets fixed quickly
maybe
no
ever evolving, doesn't need a sequel
not sure, what I've interacted with seems pretty good. Yea Forums version is mostly shit
doubt

Morrowind
>sort of
>No
>I guess? It wasn't that bad on release but it wasn't that pretty either.
>No. There's cut content, but not enough to matter
>No. Maybe Sotha Sil but no.
>No
>Yes
>Yes
>Nobody has ever called Morrowind underrated

Bonus: Civ IV
>No. To everything.

Attached: IMG_20190819_112535.jpg (426x138, 16K)

That's Blood for me.
>Yes. Hitscan enemies
>No dialog at all
>Yes to the rest.

Medieval 2

>nope. In fact it's an improvement on its predecessor due to better pathfinding.
>no more than ten pages of dialogue
>For the 2000s it was fantastic and with some Overhaul mods it still looks amazing
>pretty finished, probably has the most content out of the series. Only thing missing was an extra patch for the two-hand /pike bug that modders fixed.
>You can just download SS if you want it to be more historic and fix some bugs that only really matter in multiplayer
>If you can't read a map of Europe you're either American or Italian
>This is just reaching for criticism. It's a pc strategy game and knowing the hotkeys only improves your reaction speed.
>Sequels alternate between really good and pretty awful.
>Only obnoxious part of the fanbase is the people who still have a hateboner for CA's launch of Rome 2.
>I think I saw it a few times, but nobody calls any of the total war games underrated. they get about all the praise and criticism they're owed.

>>Yes to the rest.
Holy shit, I have not seen someone this retarded in at least a week. But then it's not surprising seeing as it's from a muh hitscans babby.

>obnoxious teenagers that love to drop "redpills"

You mean objective truths that were actually easier to believe than the modern numbers?

Planescape Torment
yes
yes but answers are more nuanced
yes
yes
no, enhanced edition is good
no
no
yes
no
yes

Civ IV had a garbage sequel.

SS1

>no
>no
>arguable
>no
Only needs mouselook
>yes
>no
The bioshocks yes but ss2 and prey are great
>kinda I guess
>irrelevant

I still remember when Morrowind was in the Yea Forumscore hivemind and people were overrating as the best game of all time despite the gameplay being the absolute worst part of Morrowind.

SACRIFICE
>No
>Kinda
>They were good 19 years ago
>Not unfinished, but has some cut content
>no
>no, all maps are open
>it has 10 shortcuts
>Sequel never ever
>I don't even think it has a fanbase
>It got 9/10 and 10/10 scores, but almost no sales

TF2
> no and I'm not going to argue with contrarian retards who say it's shit
> lol no
> yes but vaguely debatable
> no and yes, next time don't make double statements
> no you fucking retard
> junction and steel I guess??
> WASD, number keys, R, E, Z, X, C
> : ^ ( why do you have to remind me
> probably desu
> point me to whoever the fuck is calling TF2 underrated I want to laugh today
in short, you don't know fuck about shit, thank you, have a nice day

Attached: 1544050431321.png (1024x768, 931K)

>You mean objective truths that were actually easier to believe than the modern numbers?
Do you have even a single fact to back that up?

Morrowind BTFO

Yeah, Civ VI.

Civ V wasn't good in vanilla but got great with expansions, Civ VI has gotten worse with every update from an already shit core. They even added spyware to the game at one point.

The jews

Fallout 1/2
>yes
>yes
>YES
>yeah
>mostly, yeah
>yeah
>kinda, but not really
>completely right
>hit the nail on the fucking head
>and completely correct

Is this image about the classic fallouts

Attached: fallout4.jpg (540x513, 88K)

Quake
>lol, no
>lol, no
>at the time of its release it was the first game ever to support 3D accelerated graphics cards and fully 3D models, so no, not really awful at all
>maybe, considering there is only one boss fight
>just need a source port and the original music
>yes
>lol, no
>yes aside from Q3A
>yes
>dunno

>yes but vaguely debatable
Despite having somewhat muddy textures and models not being super smooth, Source games have aged pretty damn well visually. TF2's style definitely makes it pretty easy on the eyes still.

what do you think

Attached: 1553487719847.png (760x572, 354K)

It literally looks worse than launch. Or well, sorta?
> Some maps now are designed with way more detail because computers can handle more graphically intense stuff
> Retarded engine limitations forced them to reduce cartoonish visual effects to make unusuals
TF2 has aged, definitively, the worst out of any Source Engine game. But yeah, maybe it hasn't aged badly, you're right.

Number one: In 1945, corporations paid 50 percent of federal taxes. Now they pay about 5 percent. Number two: in 1900, 90 percent of Americans were self-employed; now it’s about two percent.

Number one: that's terror

quake wars is ok

Number Two: That's terror.

Age of Empires 2
>no to all

No
No
Fuck No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No. RA2 fans, white or shitskin, are all top bros to each other.
No

Attached: Command-Conquer-Red-Alert-2-PC-Cover.jpg (618x464, 73K)

- no combat
- only minimal short dialogs
- graphics are pretty good desu but you can mod in some extra stuff if that's your thing.
- unfinished i guess but its keeps getting more and more addons
- patches add stuff and mods only make it better but are not necessary
- map design is pretty nice
- i suppose it does have a lot of keys to use but you can turn down the realism
- this is is the sequel and its way better
- i think the fanbase are pretty nice people actually
- i think its been on a few top 10s but i dont really check that sort of thing

Attached: somewhere in eastern europe.jpg (1920x1080, 710K)

>the fanbase these days is obnoxious teenagers that love to drop "redpills"
Chew you have a singlelicious satisfact to snack that up?

>not pc game
>has a pc port
kys with your arbitrary rules you didnt specify in first place

But corporations shouldn't pay taxes, that's a good thing