What the FUCK is this?

Is this 2013?
Is this fucking GTA 5?

Because it sure as fuck doesn't look like 2019 graphics quality to me. And it will only get worse from here, jesus.

Attached: Bez tytułu.png (1529x924, 1.06M)

Other urls found in this thread:

gamesradar.com/cyberpunk-2077-map-size/
youtube.com/watch?v=NmLPpcVQFJM
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

who gives a fuck about graphics in 2019?

all rdr2 did was finally make everyone realise that your game can be gorgeous as fuck but if the gameplay sucks then it isn't a tradeoff with making.

>if the gameplay sucks
Explain how RDR2's gameplay sucked?

also
>who gives a fuck about graphics in 2019?
cope

gamesradar.com/cyberpunk-2077-map-size/
>the map might be a bit smaller than Witcher 3's map but will be denser

HAHAHAHHAAHAAHAHHAHAHAHA
HUMILIATION OF CDPR KEKS

NOOOOOO THE MAP ISN'T 90% EMPTY SPACE

Attached: soy mad.jpg (785x731, 101K)

ITT : user found a still frame where somethings looks less than absolutely ideal based on his subjective perspective
>a city is smaller than a country
how troubling

People are forgetting RDR2 official screenshots had a bunch of badly looking shit. Like characters clipping inside benches and shit.

>a supposedly gigantic cyberpunk city can be crossed in 10 minutes in a car
>where 4 minutes of that is the badlands

That sounds excellent. Not even Yea Forums will be ironically outraged about that.

X number is to small it should be an Y number

seething
cope harder

I can never tell if you people are actually saying graphics are bad, or if you're pretending that they are and just immediately say people who disagree are blind. There's nothing wrong with this at all. It's more likely that you're just pretending they're terrible because there's some political agenda that you have and this game disagrees with, so you're grasping at straws to downplay the game.

Only people who don't know how to read would be persuaded to not buy a game because some nobody says that ok graphics are bad. You're better off going to a street corner and yelling at children.

yikes
they should have made the car slower easy fix

the graphics look awful. look at the hair. look at the fucking TEXTURES of the fucking FACE and the JACKET, look at the fucking LOD

this literally looks like GTA 5. maybe worse. maybe actually just GTA Online LMFAO

For a bunch of fags who like medium to low quality graphic games like hollow knight, anime games, and literally any nintendo game especially for switch you sure make plenty of shitposts about actual decent looking games.

I think it's a mix of just dumb shitposting combined with a bunch of genuine retards living in delusion.
I mean these retards are still pretending GTA 5 somehow looks bad when it looks pretty good for a game that came out a previous fucking generation. Cyberpunk clearly is a big graphical upgrade over GTA 5 but they'll just keep pretending it's bad.

>this gta online looking shit
>7 years outdated
>actual decent looking games
lmfao, seething cope
back to plebbit you go! ->

jesus the cdpr fanboys in here are literally saying this looks good?

What exactly does that mean in that context? Smaller than all the different areas of Witcher 3 put together? Those that only include landmass or also the ocean in Skellige? Does it include Toussaint from Blood and Wine or only the vanilla map?

whatever it means, it's a humiliation
the map should be at least 2 times bigger than TW3

i'm a CDPR fanboy and everyone who saw last year's demo knows the graphics will be far from jaw-dropping
which is fine by me as long as the visual design is cool
i'm much more worried about the shooting and the character progression, from what we heard so far it has every chance of being BL tier spongy shit

why?

kek you just got banned at karachan again
mr God is good

Are you people THAT retarded? Take GTA out of your fucking head, go learn first how graphics and facial animations works in an rpg on that scale
youtube.com/watch?v=NmLPpcVQFJM

Attached: 1546486547849.jpg (500x667, 39K)

are you defending andromedas graphics now?

bump