What games follow the statement

What games follow the statement
>easy to learn, difficult to master
White to move and win.

Attached: Fischer v. Benko (1965) US Championship.png (677x677, 63K)

Other urls found in this thread:

lichess.org/18wwauvy
youtube.com/watch?v=LfEVcZ3anG0
youtube.com/watch?v=gF22SQ7Yrkk
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

sac queen on e8
rook takes queen
bishop d5 and its ogre

wow i was right, just looked it up
but black has some counterplay if instead of taking the queen he moved his knight to f8, that opens up h7
not smart enough to analyze that tho

oh wait the pawn lmao

guitar hero and rocket league

Fighting games

After rook takes queen, couldnt it simply interpose infront of the bishop?

Kaween to E-8
Rook has to take, which moves it out of position to defend against the bishop moving to D-5 The king can only move in places where the pawn or bishop can take it.

only fighting game that was easy to learn for me was smash.

>easy to learn

Attached: 1544749854583.jpg (1416x792, 137K)

>After rook takes queen, couldnt it simply interpose infront of the bishop?

Yes, and when bishop takes you're still in check and the bishop is protected by the pawn. The only legal move is queen takes on e6, followed by pawn takes on e6. Now white has a passed pawn that cannot be stopped and black is left with a useless black knight.

When Fischer (white) played Queen e8, Benko realized that the continuation would force him to lose his rook and queen and leave Fischer in a completely won endgame with checkmate in a few moves, so he resigned. It's a brilliant deflection sacrifice to reach a completely won endgame position.

Attached: chess-staunton-king.jpg (852x480, 19K)

Im not disagreeing this is brilliant, but couldnt black then go f5, then knight to f6 to capture the pawn if it moves to promote?

Assuming the pawn goes to f5 after it becomes a pass

e5 I mean

>queen to e-8
>Rook has to take
Black horse infront of black queen

black king*

Attached: h.png (225x388, 84K)

rocket league, one of the best competitive videogame ever made, and unique

>Im not disagreeing this is brilliant, but couldnt black then go f5, then knight to f6 to capture the pawn if it moves to promote?

Unfortunately white has rook g6, paralyzing his the black knight. Now he has the (equally terrible) choice of either sacrificing his knight to stop the passed pawn, or "winning" the rook but allowing the e-pawn to promote to a queen.

I imported the game on Lichess and it confirms the same. Everything black tries is just dead lost.

lichess.org/18wwauvy

Attached: chess-staunton-set.jpg (900x598, 117K)

This. It's easy to pick up and play but a true master can pull off all sorts of aerial bullshit it's not even funny.

necrodancer

How the fuck can you not press 3 buttons in sequence?

gxf8 with double discovered check and a promotion to queen, and after the black king goes to h7 (the only legal move) queen to g7 is checkmate.

so much wrong with this shitpost

I don't like this Baba Is You level

Please explain.
I consider myself a brainlet in terms of fighting games and even I can do basic movies in most fighting games.

what does vertical black bar and joystick mean?

The combo is undoable without almost-perfectly timed usage of air buffering, charge buffering and negative edge.

What does that combo has anything to do with the "easy to learn" part?
It's easy to learn any fighting game, hard to master, like the combo. So it's within OP's parameters.

everybody knows combos, it's as basic as knowing how each chess piece moves.

Ye, checked it out aswell. Cant see a wincondition for black either.

Are you high?

try coming up with an argument next time, fgc nigger

Oh, I see. You're retarded.
Carry on then.

>mub da mo bidda te dat tum muhfugen bix nood
typical fgc

The problem is that fighting games are retarded and they're hard to master in the same way balancing an egg on top of your head is "hard to master".

Black makes one move, and white resigns. Can Yea Forums find it?

Attached: Levitsky v. Marshall (Breslau 1912).png (679x679, 50K)

WE

No. Knowing fundamentals like blocking and punishing is like knowing how each chess piece moves.

charge move probably

quake3

Black Knight to f3. Right?

I don't know, I'm not good at chess.
But, I'm good at google things.
Queen to G3

You can't win against people without combos.

>You can't win against people without combos
youtube.com/watch?v=LfEVcZ3anG0
Please, refrain from talking about stuff you know nothing about.

>groups stage

>T-That one doesn't count!

broodwar

If you weren't a core-a gaming tourist you'd know why it doesn't count. Fighting game tournaments allow literally anybody to come up and play in group stages / pools, meanwhile you're here acting like that Rufus player knew even half of what he should be doing.

>"You can't win against people without combos"
>Posts video proving that statement wrong
>"WELL, TOURIST! THAT DOESN'T COUNT BECAUSE IT'S NOT A REAL TOURNAMENT AND THAT RUFUS WAS BAD, TOO!"
Calm down. All I'm saying is that you can beat someone who's just as bad as you without combos. You can even beat someone who's a little bit better than you without combos as long as you understand the really basic shit. THAT basic shit is the chess piece patterns, not the combos.

A pidgeon could sit at the other end of a chess board then kick the pieces around, causing them to move around the squares.

Sure it may look like chess for people like (You), but it's not chess.

No shit, retard. Every piece has a function and a set of moves it's able to do within the rules and those moves are tools that can be used for bigger things.
Just like fighting game fundamentals and their combos.

>Black Knight to f3

That is a very good move user, you gain a useful check that allows you to save your rook and queen. This allows black to maintain equality in what could easily become a lost position otherwise.

In chess annotation books, a good move is signified by a single exclamation point "!", like your Nf3 move. Really good moves get a double exclamation point "!!". But what Marshall played has been said to be one of only a handful of moves in chess history deserving a "!!!" triple exclamation point.

Wait, is this the match where some guy sacrifices his Queen to a pawn and his opponent is so fucking confused by it he loses? I remember this shit mentioned in some Ben Stiller movie

Wouldn't queen H7 also work?

The only thing I can think of would be Kasparov getting unsettled against the IBM supercomputer Deep Blue after it made a weird move due to a bug, and he thought it was some super intelligent move he couldn't figure out.

Ok, so once again because I'm a retard:

Ne3+ - Kh1
Ng3+ - Qxg3
Qxg3 - f2xg3
Rf1#

fucking hell

My best guess is queen to A-3 because then the rook has no good options and you'd probably have to give up a pawn. With so much stuff missing white has no win conditions.

How does one get good at chess? Like where do you even start? I've barely played

Explain why black would resign. Black moves now.

Attached: black turn.png (776x776, 45K)

I dont understand how people cant do this

Attached: WeebSpurg.gif (300x300, 655K)

Queen g3

Oh god wait I see it now. It's rook to F-5. You either have to give up the queen or the rook. That's devilish.

Is it because black has no way of stopping that pawn before it can promote and and checkmate?

Easy to learn
Hard to be competent enough to play against humans

No way to stop promotion of that pawn

>Ng3+ - Qxg3

I can just play Kg1 and keep going back and forth until it's a draw by three move repetition. If you take my rook on f1 then I get to take your queen.

If we liquidate a bunch of pieces this is still slightly winning for black actually, but it's not resign-worthy for white and you have no checkmate.

>muscle memory is hard

what does it mean when they put an N in a chess move
like Nc3 or also exd5

Yep I made a retard and didn't realize the Black is fucked because even if you could get the King out of that annoying position, you would end up with TWO promoted queens.

rhythm games

I do believe that blacks can stop that pawn

-Black Pawn f6 -> f5
-White Pawn f6 -> f7
-Black horse h7 -> f6

This only works if whites are so thirsty for getting that sweet new piece tho

Right. I didn't think that through. No need for the knight moves then. Move the queen directly with Qg3

id give up because rook lead

if black moves the pawn he can move the knight out but all white has to do is move the rook

this. Groove Coaster is super simple but level 15 songs on Extra are insane

king takes lol

>easy to learn, difficult to master
2hu.

Attached: 1547084940139.gif (506x380, 122K)

>White to move and win.
Based and redpilled

>what does it mean when they put an N in a chess move
>like Nc3 or also exd5

The capital letters indicate pieces
>N for knight
>K for king
>B for bishop
>Q for queen
>R for rook

After that the board has particular ranks and files. The files are listed alphabetically going from "a" through "h". The ranks are 1 through 8. The white king always starts on e1, for example.

So "Nc3" indicates the move is moving a knight to the 3rd rank and the c-file (c3).

If no piece is indicated and you just see a move listed like "e4" that signifies a pawn move. Since tournament players are required to physically write down their moves it's kind of a pain to right down a "P" every time, so it's understood that omitting the mention of a piece in chess notation means that it's a pawn move.

and "x" signifies a capture. Say that black has a bishop on the c4 square. If my knight captures it the notation would be "Nxc4".

White moves are always listed first, and if you're writing out a series of moves (like in a chess book), you might write something like this example, which is the exchange variation of the Spanish Opening.

1.e4 ...e5
2.Nf3 ...Nc6
3.Bb5 ...a6
4.Bxc6 ...exc6

Attached: e4.png (585x583, 33K)

I was gonna say and then promote g7 but rook would take so disregard I suck cocks

>How does one get good at chess? Like where do you even start? I've barely played

Study Morphy games and try to play like him. Get all of your pieces out and castle quickly. Your rating will go up quickly as most low-rated players like making 20 queen moves and leaving all of their pieces on the back rank.

youtube.com/watch?v=gF22SQ7Yrkk

Attached: Paul Morphy.jpg (188x250, 10K)

This is why chess is a shitty game for computers and memorizers who think they're intelligent.
It eventually devolves into a forced sequence of moves that nobody has any choice over. Thats boring as shit, might as well just read a list of moves someone else made.

NRS games are unironically easy to learn but hard to master

Play chess960

Good, next you'll understand that not even quantum fluctuations are random.

>It eventually devolves into a forced sequence of moves

Nothing is "forced" if you don't see it, like 99.9% of chess players wouldn't as in the OP. Being good at chess actually requires good calculating skills and positional understanding. high rated players can play zero moves of theory in an opening they don't know, and they will totally crush an autist who's memorized it out 30 moves but is a shit player.