FACT: JRPG's are objectively better than WRPGS

>Get 10 hours into JRPG
>Combat becomes a tedious slog and I just mash confirm while reading something else
>Story is paced like absolute shit because they needlessly stretch out 30 hours of content into 120
No

Attached: 1543062007218.gif (400x225, 3.54M)

>JRPG's are objectively better than WRPGS
Care to explain why?

Nothing since Fire emblem is SRPG and the same for Valkyria Chronicles. Ys is ARPG
If you call them normalfag series you should atleast know that much.
A better comparison would be:
Trails, Star ocean and FF.

Dunno, i allways get the feeling that the design is better suited for multiplayer.
Wrpg feel like playing pen and paper alone, while Jrpg's design is better suited for singleplayer

ITT: Weeb games no one gives a flying fuck about

>Weeb games
>million sellers
>Western trash
>Can barely sell on indie PC market

started to play xenoblade chronicles 1 recently.
do i like it Yea Forums?

Attached: 1511715675467.jpg (451x432, 24K)

Japanese SRPGs are JRPGs. Japanese ARPGs are JRPGs. And Star Ocean is also an ARPG.

Sometimes i dont know

Attached: bait1.jpg (329x329, 8K)

>Damn why are there no good WRPGs anymore.
- Too much emphasis on """roleplay""" when most game writers are shit and their idea of "choice" in a videogame is having multiple choice dialog options.
- Even worse when all that awful writing is voice-acted or portrayed by uncanny character models (to be fair JRPG anime shit is not much better in this regard).
- Nobody seems to be able to implement a good turn-based combat system that isn't a translation of tabletop rules.