You would never harvest a little sister, would you?

This is the dumbest, most failed attempt at a "moral dilemma" ever seen in videogames.

If harvesting gave you something actually better, like a ton more ADAM or permanent boosts it would kinda make sense to do it. But not only does it give you the bad end, but also worse rewards, yeah there's no point.

It should have been the only way to get the second and third version of each plasmid

Why did they make her look like that bros

Attached: sally who.png (1136x640, 273K)

N

Really? All this time I assumed it gave you more.

This is underrated. I can't believe people think it's worse than part 1 or infinite

Attached: images (25).jpg (268x188, 9K)

>DUDE what if harvesting made the game easier but you were scummy for doing it
>jk bro here have some of the strongest plasmids in the game and MORE ADAM for rescuing
Fucking Ken Levine was always a hack

>trying to look up their dress when they climb into the vent
I'm not the only one who did this, right...?

Honestly no because it's not even profitable within the in-universe logic of the game, what a completely pointless addition.

It gives you more in the short term. The big problem is that there’s not enough stuff to spend it on in the beginning of the game, so it’s not at all tempting

per harvest yes, but if you don't harvest, there will be free Adam and other stuff left next to stats upgrading stations, however they were called

it's a doggy dog world OP

>Elizabeth gives Atlas the damn password for his own project
>Game want us to believe Fontaine would keep his words and not harvest Sally right after killing Elizabeth

>MY DADDY’S SMARTER THAN EINSTEIN, STRONGER THAN HERCULES, AND LIGHTS A FIRE WITH JUST A SNAP OF HIS FINGERS
>ARE YOU AS GOOD AS MY DADDY, MISTER? NOT IF YOU DON’T GO TO GATHERER’S GARDEN YOU AREN’T
>REAL DADDIES GET SPLICED AT THE GARDEN

is that code for "to creampie" in them?

What if harvesting is the better outcome for them overall? That's a lot of emotional trauma they live through, what if killing them spares them all the pain and probable suicide afterwards?

No, never. I don't even know what the animation looks like.

Nah. The game isn't hard enough to merit even considering the possibility and saving them all gets you the the maximum dad ending.

The get brainblasted and view everything as super clean and sparkly. They arguably have a better experience as children than most of us do.
Plus the ending of 1 and 2 makes it seem like they go on to have normal lives.

>Tenenbaum said the girls have already forgotten her in BS 2
>In BS1 Good Ending, the girl have grown into well adjusted women with families and a good education
>Little Sisters don't realize what's going on 89% of the time since they see a twisted version of Rapture and don't remember their past life with their parents and so would basically be blank states once you get them out of Rapture and erase their conditioning.

This part was so fucking good

Attached: 503698b55119c096d19be5daca146af3.png (1680x1050, 1.6M)

I found the angel!

Y

Id harvest her cunny

hehehehehe
hehehehehehehehehe

Attached: hqdefault (1).jpg (480x360, 10K)

never did

>WELCOME TO THE CIRCUS OF VALUES

>Harvesting gives you less resources overall so there is zero reason to ever so it
fucking this, since I've played videogames before I knew this might be the case and so I backed up my save and tested both outcomes, well hidey-hoo-fuck-you, only choice the games allows you is hollow and pointless. Fuck you Kevin you clown ass motherfucker

The game was never meant to be about the moral decisions. I will never understand why people complain about how hallow it is, when it was probably just thrown in last minute because why not

not in 2 but in 1 they're ugly as shit so maybe

Attached: doot.gif (343x276, 34K)

Sally got taken by Jack in canon.

>harvest little sister
>get more resources immediately
>get a different ending

theres your reason to harvest them

WELCOME TO THE CIRCUS OF VALUE
AH HA HA HA HA HAAAAAaaa
NO REFUNDS, NO RETuuuoooooorrrnssss

Doesn't mean it makes sense for Fontaine to not harvest Sally

>Murder is moral if their life would suck anyway

No I wouldn't. The altruist route gives better rewards anyways so you have to be some kind of monster to harvest.

Fontaine while a fucking massive asshole is still a businessman, he'd honor that deal.
Given he doesn't have much to lose.

it really messes up the "roleplaying experience" of a game when it has two distinct good/evil paths but the good path actually nets you more overall power
i think its important that the different components of a game line up to achieve the desired experience. if you're supposed to be playing as an evil power-hungry villain for the purposes of the plot and roleplaying then the game is at odds with itself when the good guy options give you the most powerful rewards.

i remember fallout 3 used to piss me off with this too

>get more resources immediately

Only slightly more, and then after a few sisters you get a massive amount of adam, other resources and free upgrades.

The Harvest/Save choice is stupid as the balance between the options is so broken.

this
also the game isn't really hard in the first place

no i'd force her to """harvest"""" me

You dont have to do any "good" options in fallout 3 to get the most rewards, in fact, a few rewards like the perks given by Android chaser and Ant researcher require you to help the "bad guy", even if you cheat the system and then murder them afterward.

Hell in broken steel and you can just straight up nuke the Brotherhood of steel and you are rewarded with a unique sniper pistol if you search the remains. Other examples include the Aqua Cura scheme, where allowing them to continue their con grants you caps every week.

Though I do agree that its retarded in an open world RPG that you are FORCED to do anothers bidding with no room for your own input. Which is why New Vegas gets its dick jerked every time this discussion comes up because you could make enemies of every single faction, rape all of their corpses and then dab on Vegas with Yes Man.

>The game was never meant to be about the moral decisions.
Then why make such a big deal about the tragedy of Little Sisters?

And it absolutely is about moral decisions. Sparing/harvesting the sisters is framed as a binary moral choice.

>friend says "here try bioshock 2" and hands me controller
>he's out of the room for a second
>get to a little sister
>don't know what to do, hit harvest
>he comes back and loses his shit when he find out
>autosave meant he couldn't go back on the decision
>almost a decade later and he hasn't touched bioshock 2 because of me

It was horrendous dogshit that underwhelmed on every conceivable layer and you're a fucking trash-eating goblinoid for even considering it was better than anything, ever. I would rather ram my fist into a jar full of barbed wire, salt, and AIDS infected blood than ever touch that huge heap of trash again.

Does he not realize that the neutral ending is the best one anyway?

Get help

r-rupert sciamenna??

Better than part 1 and infinite. Get over it

COOL game mechanic

>knowing a game's ending before playing it

Based.

Only one. Mark Metzer's daughter, so she can be with her father in death.

what about her mother

Better than part 1 but I fucking hate all the shitty retcons

>Daisy became a dindu nuffin
>Liz is responsible for everything in Bioshock 1 and is also responsible for Little Sisters being able to bond to Big Daddies

Fucking god damn you Levine you absolute hack.

>Daisy became a dindu nuffin
This was the worst one of the bunch. Turned a morally grey character into a dindu just because.

>Liz is responsible for everything in Bioshock 1
Eh. She sets the plan in motion but really somebody had to at some point, so I have no quarrels of it being her. In fact, I almost prefer it because it justifies the existance of Infinite at all, when before this point it was really just a completely irrelevant side story that had nothing to do with Bioshock.

>Responsible for little sisters being able to bond with big daddies
This also bothered me a bit, but assuming 2 is still canon, I take solace in the fact that she wasn't TOTALLY responsible, but probably made Suchongs work a bit easier

>it justifies the existance of Infinite at all, when before this point it was really just a completely irrelevant side story that had nothing to do with Bioshock.
The original plan for Bioshock was to feature a different city in each games, so... and even then, they had found a way to cram Rapture in it just because.

And honestly Daisy gets nothing from the deal. The Lutece's just show up and tell her to let Liz kill her so her revolution can succeed and she just goes along with it because "You guys helped me in the past."

They're the most poorly implemented idea in the entire game so yeah, I harvest them every time.

I thought the original idea for Bioshock was just you deprogramming the daughter of a cult leader or some shit. 2 and Infinite used this idea.

Let's talk about the real most useless ennemies ever : The Boys Of Silence

Have you materialistic fucks ever considered I might harvest them for my own enjoyment, and not for mechanical rewards?

Attached: smiling seal.jpg (640x640, 106K)

>The original plan for Bioshock was to feature a different city in each games, so...
Well that's a stupid idea so I guess we lucked out

I'd harverst her c*nnyjuice.

Western lolis look like this...

This is the face of the voice of the Little Sisters in Bioshock 2

Attached: 67364523_347542389481901_1149578866536883613_n.jpg (1080x1345, 209K)

At least they, in all their horror, aren't the little sisters you see in Burial at Sea 1. God damn those little girls were spookier than anything in this franchise, more than the fucking unexplained glowing thing in Bioshock 2.

this is a western loli

Attached: 4245645.jpg (1406x1690, 446K)

I hate their fucking dresses. Like they couldn't stay consistent, huh? You had to turn them in White and blue/pink dresses! AND SALLY BLACK AND RED DRESS WHY DOES SHE GET TO HAVE A SPECIAL ONE?!

what are those pirahna teeth about jesus christ

An evolutionary advantage. If a fat old bald man tries to fuck them they can bite their dick off.

She's actually an ancient evil.

Attached: scylla__smite__by_h0mez-d7bofmg.png (1024x905, 1.31M)

Of course I wouldn't; the rewards for harvesting over rescuing are fucking garbage. Nice moral choice, fucking retarded ass game. It'd be neat if there was an alternate ending or some new area or some shit if you harvest every Little Sister in the game, but the complete opposite is true. What a fucking shitshow. Oh, but it's such a good game, right?! What happens when you die? You just respawn right fucking there and the enemies don't even regain any health. Oh my god, how groundbreaking! I fucking hate this game.

Someone get that woman a role

She doomed a city of over 20k people to save a few children.

You mean this.

Attached: Jodelle ferland (58).jpg (1269x1600, 389K)

Also a plane full of innocent people, and all the little sisters who died before Jack's arrival

Not a shame. 2 is the most soulless unnecessary sequel of all time

No, because there's literally no reason to do it. It's neither rewarding nor an interesting moral choice.

Looks like tenanbaum

Why was Liz on the plane at the end of Burial at Sea?
Why was she flipping through incarnations of herself?

I genuinely can't figure it out

Attached: images (26).jpg (280x180, 7K)

>choose A or B
who in their right mind thinks this is deep
games reviewers are talentless hacks

Who the fuck knows at this point, all I can think of is the fact she's been dimension hooping for a while killing every comstocks she can find

Because Levine is a hack who wants his daughteru to be the most important girl in the franchise who is witness to all the events and has magic powers and is a Disney princess.

>this