Pic related

Shit taste

>simcity
>sim city 2000
>sim city 3000

Skate

Dark Souls

Sly Cooper
>EZ

You must have brain problems if you think hitman 2 is the better of the first 3

Why the hell not?
What, you think bars would do a better job?
The line represents a single change in the overall quality across three parts of a trilogy. A bar graph is more suitable to show three different quantities of something.

Kingdom Hearts, except the 3rd one's quality tanks to 0.

MGS
>tfw zoomers who started with 3 disagree

i totaly agree
metal gear 2 solid snake is better than metal gear solid

Attached: 220px-Super_Danganronpa_2_Cover_Art.jpg (220x272, 33K)

I've started with the first MGS game, and I can't for the hell of it decide which games are better. All three games have unique strengths and weaknesses. I enjoy them all equally, I'm afraid.

MGS1 has great setting and atmosphere, MGS2 provides quality social commentary and has the best villain (?), MGS3 takes the cake gameplay-wise.

Look at this smart ass, pretending the OG MG games were a trilogy.

arkham

Attached: bitches-dont-know.jpg (600x704, 74K)

Crash Bandicoot. I think that's the only one.

Donkey Kong Country

MGS is just a rehash of MG2SS in 3d

kojima made the same game 3 times in a roll

DKC3 has better stages than 2

Xbox.

Suikoden

Evil Dead

in b4 some asshole says mass effect

mass effect

Dark Souls

Age of Empires
Borderlands (counting presequel as 3)
Mount and Blade
Call of Juarez for it's story (not counting cartel)
Saints Row
Call of Duty original trilogy
Command and Conquer Red Alert
Just Cause
ATV Offroad Fury
The Witcher

Tony Hawk's Pro Skater.

Oddly enough, Sonic works twice. The originals, along with the Advance series. Hell, if Adventure 3 ever gets made that series will probably follow the same formula.

Tomb Raider

>CoD
3 wasn't better than 1

My nigga.

>Saints Row
Respect.
>Borderlands with Presequel as 3
GOOD GOD, NO. 1 was the best, 2 was several step lower, and 1.5 was a single step up.

Fatal Frame. 1 should be lower but only because I hate it.

Persona

Mass Effect

Heroes of Might and Magic
4, 5, 6, and 7 don't exist

Idk man I think 5 is better than 4

also works for Hashino's trilogy

Phoenix Wright

>borderlands 2 was better than the first
just fuck off

Reverse it and you have the bioshock trilogy

>Bioshock 3 is a 6/10

Halo

Mortal Kombat

Shitposting is against the rules.

The people who dislike Max Payne 3 are the same people that dislike Miami Vice 2006

Civilization III IV and V

Halo 3 was better than Halo 2 tho

Attached: 1565992169396.jpg (849x899, 127K)

Prince of Percia, if you count SoT, WW and TTT as trilogy.

SMT

this is unironically why we never released a third installment of any of our series

t. former valve

This is probably fair.

Game doesn't have to be better than its predecessor to be enjoyable tho.

Ignoring the fact that you're wrong, you're also not funny.

Attached: 1530872654767.png (271x210, 66K)

I like MP1 over MP2, but you're based for liking MP3.

Witcher

every time to you release a game, you're significantly raising the bar for the next game

you need to provide significantly more value for the sequel to feel even slightly better to the customer

with the second installment, this isn't an issue - you can gauge what customers latched on to in the first installment, and then focus on building on that. eventually you reach a cap on what can be done, either due to deadlines (non-issue at valve) or simply due to industry trends marching on (a much bigger problem at Valve), so you release the game, and, raise the bar again

there's generally little reason for a third installment since you've already done everything you could in the second, and all that's left to do is superficial improvements which don't add enough value to warrant a release - under most studios the third game still gets released despite that simply due to the publisher ordering it, but at valve it just means the project gets archived

Runescape

>Mount and Blade
So is what is third one?

Metal gear solid

The matrix

so Asylum, City, Origins? what about Knight?

MGS and Uncharted

DKC and Trails in the Sky

Fossil fighters
Yes I'm still mad that Frontier potentially tarnished the likelihood of future games

Attached: Shit chart.png (400x300, 12K)

Max 1 was decent game but 2 improved on it in every way. 3 wasn't as good as 2 but slightly better than 1.

Same applies to Gears of War.

Attached: 1566059484996.jpg (1608x1080, 321K)

Just Cause

>frontier
god, way to fucking ruin a series
how the fuck could they have messed up more than removing 2/3 of the gameplay
cars are forgiveable, even the shitty plot was forgiveable
taking away support effects was fucking shit too

Spyro

but the first was the best game

Pokemon Gens
Suikoden games
Megaman games
Monster Girl Quest chapters

What really fucked me over was the fact that I was limited to fight with one vivosaur and forced with using the buddy system and out of the pitiful 38-vivosaur roster (Not including the AR or boss vivosaurs like Yutyrannus) 14 are just clones with a regional coat of paint. That's like almost half the roster! The redesigns are atrocious too! I mean I like SOME of the redesigns like Nychus and Dimetro's kinda cute but what have they done to Carchar?
And what's even worse is that if you check the fossilary it says that it's only 13 fucking feet long. But if you check their wiki page it says 13 METERS, so apparently the localizers fucked up big time and forgot to convert from meters to feet leading me to believe that the vivosaurs were very small.

Attached: CarChar Marco.png (952x626, 843K)

opposite of dark souls desu

Pikmin and Donkey Kong Land

Okay so it's not half the roster but it's still pitiful how few vivosaurs there are in the game