Red Dead Redemption 2 Expansion will be announced in the next month

It's obviously gonna be more space for online paypigs, with fuck-all to do for single player, much like New Austin.

The most likely scenarios is either you're looking at new DLC for the single-player portion of the game or a new release of them game. Which presumably would be a PC port

Having New Austin in the game and doing fuck all with it was one of the most disappointing things in the game, along with no mexico

>It's mostly likely gonna be the worse case scenario because I hate the game and rockstar

Dude fuck off

>online failed
>so they actually have to release DLC now unlike with gtav

hahaha

Why couldn’t we go back to the old map as Arthur? I tried riding a boat to get there but it just sunk. In SA that shit didn’t matter and you can ride a train until you hit the Vegas block and just swim to the construction and get the jet pack.

It’s going to be the Wild West casino island, out of federal jurisdiction so you can spend real money of course

No, I love significant parts of the game, I just hate rockstar and the parts that their corporate office influenced.
If you aren't completely jaded from rockstar games since gta5 came out, you must be a zoomer.

It's most likely alternative DLC like UN, where instead of going back in chapter 5 you go further South.

Makes sense why it failed. It was always developed with single player in mind.

WHERE THE FUCK IS MY STORIES OF LOS SANTOS

not it wasn't
battlefront 2 has stayed more relevant than rdr2, that's how fast that game was forgotten

Bonaire is just a placeholder. Like with most rockstars codename projects, the name will have nothing to do with the content that drops.

I hope its true, Been bored out of my mind lately

Caribbean......zombies?

Attached: 7a9f467de2f98e03c5eb837e930bb556.jpg (650x338, 51K)

Actually it's a bait and they'll release a GTAV story expansion

Attached: IMG_20190820_141229.jpg (581x748, 200K)

yeah and?
this shit hasn't been installed in on PS4 since mid november
i'm not fucking paying 20 quid for more of that

GIVE ME A PC PORT DATE

>Bonaire
NOW THIS IS A STORY
ALL ABOUT HOW

It's probably a new game, possibly Bully II. People shouldn't really analyse codenames, RDR2 was codenamed "Fiyero" and that name is in no way related to the game at all.

Maybe it involves John using Arthur's journal and following Charles Chatenay to TAHITI for a final stranger mission.

Where would it even fit in the story of RDR2? Sorry but this is either for other game or just some online shit.

They have sucked post-San Andreas. They pulled their foreskins over their heads and vanished up their arses.

100% single player expansion. Most of the zoomers and fags here probably don't remember how the original Undead Nightmare was announced 1 month before it dropped and leaked a month prior to it's reveal was well.
Basically, history is repeating. This will probably be another supernatural expansion.

Tahiti isnt in the Caribbean, boooooooooo

If they're doing a single-player DLC (which you currently have no confirmation of you boot-licking faggot) it's only because their online for this game wasn't even remotely as lucrative as it was for GTAV.

Attached: 1540323757705.png (500x500, 178K)

I hope so, actually. Roanoke Ridge and the Bayou were spooky as hell.

>rockstar
>possessing foreskins

Attached: 1514241861623.png (967x890, 80K)

It's either an expansion or a new release of the game (PC). Else the Australian board would not have classified it. Why can't you fags understand this?

The campaign is legitimately the worst part of the game though.
>Pretty cool tutorial stuff
>Do some odd jobs for petty cash, but also rob a bank to get more money than a reasonable person will spend all playthrough
>Do more odd jobs for like $12
>Do more jobs for like $15
>Stupid, fucking terrible detour to the island
>Pretty cool chapter desu
>Lose all your shit, do odd jobs for like $8, but it's dope to be Marston
>Do some more stupid shit, but the final mission is kino
90% of the missions are just "ride your horse on autopilot for like 5 minutes" anyway

>Where would it even fit in the story of RDR2?
It'll follow Williamson in the time period where he builds up his own gang, in New Austin. They'll make a second about Javier, set in Mexico, that shows what he was doing and how he ended up siding with the government by 1911. Somebody screencap this.

Ah, but you see my smooth-brained friend, they haven't said whether it's an online expansion or single-player expansion.

They are definitely masons or some shit, Benzies said they recorded employees doing illegal stuff for blackmail reasons.

t. only cares about gameplay and not story, and also didn't put the campaign on pause regularly to explore extensively

Considering they didn't expand on their characters even a little bit in rdr2 makes me think this will never happen, but a man can dream

That bugged the shit out of me.

>next month
>October is 2 months away

Bros..

Attached: C8679AC2-F8F4-428E-9FF7-D1AE259903DF.png (1000x1287, 1.79M)

I don't think you get what I was clearly implying user, but you're probably right about that. I've heard the stories of the drug parties and the rapey shit.

>Hey remember that section that was the absolute worst part of RDR2? Let's make a DLC out of it!

Attached: 1542658519256.jpg (376x500, 36K)

>>new Story expansion practically confirmed
>practically
that's a nice word for "not at all"

Again, you're being an idiot. The Australian board has never classified online expansions for games like GTAV for example.

do they even give ratings to DLC?

I'm aware TakeTwo's CEO Strauss Zelnick is a jew, But are the Houser brothers jews too?

Attached: 1562282397332.jpg (521x487, 26K)

Bully
Out
November
And
Its
Really
Educational

This better be it

PC release it is then.

Whatever it is is, it's rattled Australia jimmies and they've banned it. So it's violent.

November 2020

It's not just that the gameplay is lacking, it's that "do stupid shit for $8" is the story. Which is doubly frustrating when I have $6000 and the campaign mission is just "We are poor, go rob a man." At least in 1 the stupid shit was like "acquire this special item that will let you fight Bill." It serves the same purpose design wise but you don't wind up with what amount to mandatory side missions. Also, "The joy of the game is the story, but don't do too much of it at once." is the stupidest shit I've heard today

We need a comfy 1899 New York setting.

Attached: 4cd0fad36ee1b494f38ef7850c2bbe42.jpg (1280x1073, 354K)

I'd be fine with this. But it's also dropping this fall. Which in the past has been rockstars favorite time to drop dlc.

>the saint denis vampire
Kek.

multiplayer matches are actually fun, no idea why anyone would want to free roam though

I wouldn't be surprised after what a failure the online was.

For me it was a weird case of actually liking the story for the most part but hating the slow and unresponsive gameplay so much that I hated the overall experience.

This better be true, I can't handle my hopes being crushed once more

Why not? Sounds like fun, get a few friends together and canoe down rivers, rob trains properly, etc.

People have already talked extensively that the only way they're going to get people back in the online would be to drop single content that also feeds over in the online. In that regard it would be similar to the original Undead Nightmare.

Fooled me once with RDR2, Rockstar but you won't again. If it's single player dlc, I will watch it on youtube this time.

Then it's not for you fag, it's for the fags who aren't ass mad over a good game.

Attached: 1560800375412.jpg (882x863, 235K)

The only thing I really want is for them to just release Red Dead Redemption again but with the updated models and engine and shit from 2. They don't even need to do new voices or anything, just a shot for shot remake.

R* gotta get them buffalo bucks somehow

Will never happen. Time wasted when that effort could have been put elsewhere. Emulation is the only way RDR will stay alive

> wild west game
> not set in the wild west
Rockstar is so fuckin' up their own asses lmao, nobody wants more islander bullshit in this fuckin' game.

Attached: image.jpg (327x327, 73K)

>wild west game
It is explicitly not a wild west game

>Puts in the effort to make more single player and online
>Dude they're still Jews, I'm better than them because I sit on my ass and bitch about things

Yikes

>We'll give you DLC
>Oh but the best revolver is still forever locked in Online lmao

Attached: lemat.jpg (1570x883, 236K)

> set in the American frontier
> cowboys, outlaws, and indians
> not a wild west game

Attached: image.jpg (1078x1360, 295K)

Damn, this is going to be some good DLC.

It's a placeholder name cuck. RDR2's project name had nothing to do with the setting.

Hi Rockstar

Hi faggot. Don't you have some SOI infused steam greenlight or nip game to play?

>set in the American frontier
It is explicitly not set in the American frontier. It is neither wild, or west

Sorry, not giving you my money. Get over it.

And RDR2 was inspired by Witcher 3.

inb4 muh deserts

>BU BUT ROCKSTAR DOESN'T CARE FOR SINGLE PLAYER OR DLC
they dont, but they care for monetization of released games, and RDR2 MP is fucked, so nobody will buy their gold. cue the one thing that they know people will buy, which they only do begrudgingly.
>Get fucked faggots.
you are a lout. grow up.

>>Puts in the effort to make more single player and online
Only because their current online failed.

Half of RDR2 was spent lampooned on a Caribbean island you retard, fuck off faggot nobody wants to play this filth.

Attached: image.jpg (900x750, 202K)

And TW3 was inspired by RDR and GTA?

> cowboys riding around shooting each other with revolvers all day
> not wild
Fuck off you homophile everybody's laughing at you again retard.

Attached: image.jpg (960x605, 494K)

Rockstar has zero talent. Their games were only semi-good because of their time and budget allowance.

>spineless bootlicker who thinks corporation is his friend accuses someone else of drinking soi
Here's an anime reaction image to trigger you further.

Attached: 1563722992540.gif (380x496, 2.56M)

>Here comes the Yea Forums "culture enthusiast" to make sure everyone hates this project leak and everyone has a negative view of it.
Grow up cucks.

Attached: Screenshot_20190726-100115__01.jpg (1440x1818, 456K)

Wrong.

Actually according to Take Two CEO Red Dead Online has exceeded expectations and is doing much better than GTA Online was at the time. Not to mention they recently said that a lot more substantial content is coming to RDO. If Rockstar indeed announces a SP dlc soon then they had it planned and in works long before the release of Red Dead Online.

Undead Nightmares 2 would be ideal for RDR2 since you'd have a lot of ways to expand upon:
>Automatons, werewolves, ghosts, vampires and other gothic horrors
>Add in Mexico with monsters relating to Mexican folklore
>A full bestiary to fill with drawings, info (weaknesses, strenghts, locations etc.)
>Different ammo types like silver bullets etc. for different beasts
So I'd pretty much just want a RDR2: Witcher edition + horror to be honest.

It’s the shortest chapter in the game and that still doesn’t mean the code name is unrelated. Someone already pointed out the RDR2 code was like fiyero which arguably could have been linked to a gta game instead

Reminder that this will never ever come to PC due to not having the desired playerbase. Slowburn and methodical gamers tend to be found on PS4 these days. Personal Computer users are more inclined to instantaneous dopamine rush experiences like Fortnite or playing vicariously by watching “celebrity streamers”.

Don't samefag.

Right

Tell CDPR to keep sucking that Houser and rockstar cock boi

Attached: Screenshot_20181126-091734_Chrome.jpg (1058x1540, 188K)

Campaign was weirdly unsatisfying, especially after the midpoint

Source?

Single player Hunt: Showdown basically. Would be kino as fuck for sure

I>magine supporting this franchise for 7 yrs by buying ALL the DLC

Oh wait this isnt GTA V

There's no DLC to buy in GTAV

That's right. Lick it, incel. Now.

Attached: image.jpg (1674x854, 237K)

Good discussion you really brought ideas to the table

I know.

Attached: image.jpg (224x225, 37K)

eurogamer.net/articles/2019-05-14-red-dead-online-is-performing-better-than-gta-online-at-the-same-stage-says-take-two
Googling a source isn't hard.

I thought killing Arthur was a big brain maneuver for saying "hey you fucks get ready for Undead Nightmare 2"
If I were directing it, it would start with Jon dropping off some coffins in Tahiti and saying something like "here Dutch, you finally made it now get some rest" then night falls and inexplicably all the bodies start reanimating. Arthur is the last to wake up and even after he does he still coughs the entire game but you get to play as him because jon fucks off after bringing you guys to the island, enemies could include Tahitian spirits and creatures from folklore but the plot is basically Arthur going after undead Dutch and undead Micah, the music could be old "beach rock" like elvis and stuff in that vein to complement the Tahitian setting and juxtaposing it with the time period similar to the music selection in undead nightmare. Gib me my fantasy

I accept your admission of defeat.

You're so lame. Fuckin' pea brained shithead with your zombies, you're no better than a capeshitter.

Attached: image.jpg (684x529, 127K)

A DLC as Dutch and Micah being pieces of should would be very cool

Mmmhmm yep totally bro.

Attached: image.jpg (491x334, 254K)

based

It would be awesome if they did this game

>Possibly

>No fucking source at all
>he thinks rumors are true

fuck off, I'll wait for Rockstar to announce something and I'll start to believe

That sounds awful

The source is the fact the Australian board is classifying something from Rockstar. They only do this when there's new dlc or a new release of a game. Something's coming

My guess is it's to do with children.

Vampires & the kids of Saint Denis were things that were never developed upon.

Insider here. It's RDO DLC. We'll never release single player games again

Thanks based insider. Will top up my RDO currency accordingly

yeah
in like 4 years from now

good luck getting your hope up

This. All the fags thinking it’s a Sadie Adler SP DLC are retarded

Javier never sided with the government.

>online failed horribly
>make single player dlc
>GTA online was a success
>cancel single player dlc that was being worked on and focus only on online
Fuck Rockstar.

It’s definitely Undead Nightmare 2 or some horror related shit. We will have an announcement next month.

are they going to add any gameplay this time or is it still going to be a shitty movie?

Based rockstar dabbing on consumers

why the fuck would you want RDR1 with the shitty input delay and sloggish animations of 2?

>A year after game release passed
>Still no pc release
ohnonononon PC BROS WTF

It's going to be Undead Nightmare 2.

And will probably have its own online mode

No classifying happens2-3 months before release dipshit. Why do you faggots want everything to be the worst case scenario?

Now they can make prequels and sequels for both of them without conflicting with established lore, because there's hardly any lmao

The story in RDR2 sucks hard and is only carried by Arthur's VA.

Ok you fucking idiot. Not Dutch and John aren't also deeply loved.