>mfw someone says Banjo-Kazooie is not Nintendo
Mfw someone says Banjo-Kazooie is not Nintendo
Banjo-Kazooie is Rare. Rare is not Nintendo. Banjo-Kazooie is not Nintendo.
Retard.
rare is owned by microsoft
stop denying the truth
Nobody gives a shit what some dumb paper says about rights and ownership. The spiritual home of Banjo-Kazooie is on Nintendo. They are Nintendo because they belong there, even if it isn't where they are at.
Even Banjo's own character designer said that Nintendo is their spiritual home. I think I'll take the word of Banjo's own father rather than some retard faggot wearing a suit and sitting in a corporate boardroom doing nothing with the IP because they don't think they can make money with it.
Nintendo has never personally developed a Starfox, Kirby, or Pokémon game. Those aren't Nintendo either.
That's not how it works, Banjo is legally Microsoft's property
And I'm saying that doesn't mean shit. Banjo-Kazooie didn't stop belonging on Nintendo and being beloved by Nintendo's audience just because Microsoft bought the rights to it.
Do you think someone's working on a Banjo-Kazooie game right now? Maybe even a remake like NSane trilogy or BFBBR? Those seem to be all the rage nowadays.
>sell it as an XBox Scarlet exclusive
>no one buys it because all the banjo fans are from Nintendo and have a switch
The court of law wouldn't give a single shit if Nintendo fans love Banjo, he is still Microsoft's in any single way
Court of law is just a bunch of people enforcing their arbitrary rules and social constructs. It might be a fact that they'll punish you for doing something with B-K that Microsoft doesn't approve of, but it still isn't a fact that the IP belongs to them just because they say so.
Considering both Joker and Hero were obviously included at least partially to help promote upcoming releases, it's probably safe to assume that something similar could happen with Banjo.
Star Fox 64 was directly made by EAD nibba
While we're at it, they also made SF, SF2, Command and Zero, they just had other companies like Argonaut, Q Games and Platinum help out with development.
this game exists.
And not including re-releases it's the only Banjo game that Microsoft ever put out on their own platform.
>Court of law is just a bunch of people enforcing their arbitrary rules and social constructs
Okay, then you won't mind if me and some friends shoot you in the face and take your house? Those silly laws against murdering and stealing are just arbitrary rules after all.
You know, we had courts and law long before copyright was ever a thing.
Copyright is basically a government-granted monopoly.
>You know, we had courts and law long before copyright was ever a thing.
Yeah, so if you created something there was nothing stopping everyone and their grandma from ripping it off and ensuring you make no money off your creation. It's easy to say that "art should, like, be free, maaaaaaaan" when your livelihood doesn't depend on you making money off your art.
so? it's still microsoft-made.
see the bottom right corner?
Another ugly bear cunt threa....oh it’s not a smash related one, for once.
Either way he should have stayed dead.
Calm down, Fidel. That's just how things are.
Wasn´t owned by them back in the day.
Banjo is Rare, nor Nint nor Mcsoft
Kys banjoke
He is fucking dead. No new games.
Rare is owned by Microsoft so by extension Banjo is Microsoft.
Do people literally not know Rare was with Nintendo before Microsoft bought them? He was once as much Nintendo as Kirby and Pokemon are. Literally a lost Nintendo character.
once is not now.
And now he is legal property of Microsoft,he belongs to them
Moving to another country doesn't change the place you were born.
Man, this whole thread is kinda stupid and pointless.
But he wasn't born, he's not even a person, he is a fictional character from a series now property of Microsoft
Maybe I read too much into what this thread is about, but I say this because there's people complaining about him being in Smash for being yet another 3rd party instead of a Nintendo character when he's the only one that actually was actually a Nintendo character once.
Smash fags will complain about the smallest, most insignificant details when something gets in over the thing they wanted
Maybe you shouldn't apply concepts of ethnicity and nationality to intellectual property and companies.
Just saying, Disney might own Marvel and Star Wars, but they'll never really be "Disney" the same way the classic animated Disney movies are Disney.
What if I just take this concept further and say anything not created by walt disney isn't disney? You can't apply such human concepts to intellectual property and have it match up exactly.
Like I said, this is just my dumb Smash autism bubbling up. I feel like the only people who don't think of him as a fellow Nintendo character must have not been alive during the N64 era, but to be fair, at this point the IP has been with Microsoft far longer than it has with Nintendo. Generations after me will see no divide between Mickey Mouse, Iron Man, and Darth Vader.
Nice, OP. 37 replies
this fucking autist actually counted it
>counting
do you know how to use this site?
There's a reply count on the bottom right
They are of Nintendo Heritage, but going around spouting it is basically the "IM 5% CHEROKEE" of Video Games or whatever.
Cope.
>Banjo is Nintendo because I say so
They used to be Nintendo like how ROM Spaceknight used to be Marvel
>Nobody gives a shit what some dumb paper says about rights and ownership
Ok Banjo Kazooie IP is now mine and you cant do anything about it
Truth.
I think the banjo kazooie IP belongs to me actually. I played all their important games.
go back
This might be the best use of the word 'cope' ever.
So, COPE
No. And if it was made it would be inferior on the switch by a wide margin.
He hasn't had a nintendo game in such a long time he shouldn't matter.
That's not going to make him any less in, let them seethe like the animals they are
He's in a party fighter grave.