Why is randomness bad?
Why is randomness bad?
Alexander Wright
Other urls found in this thread:
Jacob Williams
Because I'm severely autistic and uncertainty triggers me.
Henry Cook
Randomness is only fun if there's something substantial on the line, i.e. gambling. Randomness is not fun if you're trying to play a reflex and action skill based game like Smash.
Aaron Davis
It isn't bad, it just isn't competitive.
Jose Fisher
randomness is cope for players who can't admit they did mistake
Oliver Jenkins
Because most players enjoy games such as Smash for their competitive nature. This does not necessarily mean competitive as in "e-sports professionalism". Just as in two or more players challenging in each other for the fun of trying to overtake your opponent. This only works of course if the game allows for a competition to be had, which is not the case if it's dependent on luck. Nobody enjoys rolling dice against a friend, that simply isn't engaging as your input doesn't matter if the output is random. By introducing random elements, you move the game away from competition and closer to a dice rolling game.
Brayden Smith
This and it isn't competitive because the player has little to no control over it.
Hunter Perry
Too hard
Same reason they bad anything else like levels or items
Smash is the game where all the players pretend they are hardcore only after babyfing it to be as easy as possible to play
Adam Ross
It's not, its a party game. Only autist have a problem with it in smash. Do yall niggas turn off items when playing with friends too?
Brayden Wood
This.
Smash faggots are autistic. You saw how buttmad they were over tripping in Brawl, and that was one of the better games.
In competition randomness is awful and can turn the direction of a match. Randomness anywhere is totally ok and fine if you aren't on the spectrum.