Why does Pokemon seem to have the most consistently high quality when it comes to their female character designs...

What the fuck, gamefreak.

go drink some bleach, shit for brains

Look at this faggot and laugh.

>first fairy type gym
waht

Because you are supposed to fap at the females, you sick fuck.

"fairies" dude. Fruits, cakes, fags, poofs. You should know, faggot.

cute and lovely design

twitter.com/sinsincossinsin/status/1153141730151002114

Doesn't look pokemon related to me

>what are those pink straps attached to
wikihow.com/Attach-Thigh-Highs-to-a-Garter-Belt

Attached: tenor.gif (478x352, 1.96M)

>actual design

Muh dikk approves.

Attached: 1565281087763.png (128x113, 29K)

I don't blame you for forgetting X & Y existed, but this is worse.

Attached: 424074104.jpg (1280x720, 181K)

>a dress and a bow is "good"

what is this even?

An open invitation, looks like

>Doesn't look pokemon related to me
BTFO

Attached: Galar Sneak Peek.png (945x1061, 1.58M)

>garter belts
>character looks she's barely trying to get out of pull-ups
What's wrong with Gamefreak?

UUUUUUNNNNNNNNFFFFFFFF

>Ash
Please post something else.

Holy shit just make the anime about somebody else. The League used to be the most hype part of the show a decade ago and now it's just the shitshow where they roll out their very worst writers to sap all the competition and joy out of every match so Ash can either lose - or WIN - to some complete asspull that has nothing to do with either character's skill or Pokemon team.

Just because it's Ash and Pikachu doesn't make it Pokemon related.

They're too good at character design that the rest of the games can never hold up.

bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/wiki/Margo

Oh, I see. It's still not a fairy gym leader in SnS.

And that excuses putting garters on a character that looks like they're still in diapers?

Attached: 1425281860716.jpg (2560x2880, 3.03M)

Yeah, the loli jokes and fanart were a lot more fun when it wasn't so blatant from the actual source. It's just mainstream, predictable and boring now.

It was a good run though

This movie made me tingle in some parts.

Attached: 1555989960424.jpg (1920x1080, 113K)

No jokes, this is just nasty.
Don't care if user thinks I'm gay or a whatever, a kid being put in garter belts should have never left the doujins it probably came from. Porn tropes don't need to be in the mainstream.

>Those hearts in the eyes.
My weakness.

>Don't care if user thinks I'm gay
user knows you're gay, user.

she looks cute and funny

Post the diaper one faggot

>a kid being put in garter belts should have never left the doujins it probably came from. Porn tropes don't need to be in the mainstream.

Well, you know what the say, user.

Attached: 247de385d6066d8613a111ea60e6bd21c172320c.jpg (640x640, 132K)

thanks for this.

Attached: 787a1132b7a32e3b17910e7a11b04443.png (1200x1600, 807K)

cute girl :3

I still need to watch it. Any decent streams available yet?

Sure are a lot of people bitching about porn and anything sexy on Yea Forums tonight. Did something happen, or is it just the usual raiding?

Fuck diaperfags.

Attached: 1425281907092.png (1280x800, 1.27M)

>boris

go download a torrent

Im not the one who posted a part of a diaper image set user, but if he's gonna post it might as well give the full set

Ash is doing more to me than that girl.

Attached: 131231.jpg (540x468, 48K)

Why do people think faces like this are attractive? It's literally nigger tier.

Attached: nigface.png (234x150, 51K)

aAAAAAAAAAA LITTEL IGRIL LOLE AFAFPAFAPAPFPFAPAPFPp

>what are those pink straps attached to
We live in a day and age where grown adults are not aware of how garters work. What the actual fuck? This isn't Rocket science, bro...

Attached: 69828190_p0.png (700x1260, 215K)

Ash is ugly and annoying as fuck. He's the reason I hate pokemon. And this is coming from a shotafag, I'd rather fuck the pink haired loli.

Why don't you homosexuals get off the board

"come and get me onii-chan"

excuse me her panties are off

K

Y

S

C

U

M

B

R

A

I

N

P

E

D

O

hol up so u be sayin is we pokegirls n shit? Wonteesha gon love dis this namsay

nothing wrong with being a pedo

ahh, I love lolis too

>loli
>garter straps

Attached: 587.jpg (712x706, 27K)

shes pretty cute

Attached: eacad3f7075c316b1f3b9be7ea6bd494.jpg (1234x1662, 1.04M)

There's nothing inherently sexual about garterbelts/straps though, user. If anything, they conceal more skin. Just like how thighhighs are considered fetish-wear, yet they cover up a large portion of the legs. All it is is Stockholm's Syndrome wherein people find some perverted pleasure in something that was originally meant to tone done the sexuality of the subject in question. So stop sperging out, and relax, my nigga.

and funny

Attached: fe4548c55b5bd23e104f7ae06f24b261.jpg (1000x1000, 393K)

Still doesnt

Nothing lawfully wrong anyway, morally wrong yeah.

I would love to raise her to be the best daughter ever

shut up nigger

The eyecandy must be good to keep attracting buyers.

This is why hijabs are maximum lewdness.

Attached: 1515133523195.jpg (1500x1000, 231K)

I would love to make her raise the best daughter ever

>image set made for pissfags and diaperfags
shame

morally and cientifically you are designed to take the younger girls, opposite of what modern feminist tells you, to go for the used and expired ones

loving little girls isn't wrong

Please post the diaper version

>morally wrong yeah.
Depends on where you extract your morals from. Contrary to popular belief, both Judeo-Christian and Islamic religions are perfectly fine with straight pedophilia in teenaged~adult males (assuming the girl in question isn't TOO young; the borderline is around 8 years old).

Attached: istockphoto-931698620-612x612.jpg (612x305, 13K)

why would a loli need garter for?

Attached: 74b41ddaefdde192badde5fdf3c5ff92.jpg (1374x2444, 1008K)

to keep her stockings on you dingus.

Wait, do underwear go over or under the garter?

>both Judeo-Christian and Islamic religions are perfectly fine with straight pedophilia in teenaged~adult males (assuming the girl in question isn't TOO young; the borderline is around 8 years old).
isnt this just islamic?

underwear goes over the garters if you are planning on fucking, under if you aren't.

>Judeo-Christian

kek nice brainwashing. The two are not connected besdies "Judaism" (Talmudism"'s hatred of Christianity.

>morally and cientifically
>cientifically
You got a new Macbook too, bro? My "s" key is pretty fucked as well. Goddamn butterfly switch bullshit ;_;

>kek nice brainwashing. The two are not connected besdies "Judaism" (Talmudism"'s hatred of Christianity.

Attached: ahem.png (1163x347, 68K)

See:

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-08-13.png (727x833, 330K)

jesus literally condemns jews in The Bible. It's a running theme of the new testament. At least you admit to never reading it

>Doesn't look pokemon related to me
This, she looks like a girl from Precure.

I'm not saying both religions are identical, bro. What I am trying to say is despite their numerous differences BOTH do not condemn straight pedophilia. I could have listed all three, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, but i decided to group the former two in the umbrella of "Judeo-Christian". Enough with the semantics.

Get back in your "grave" Mr. Epstein

he told them to escape to the mountains.

Christianity is against pedophilia (pedophiles are to be drowned with an anvil tied to their ankles)

Islam is fine with both loli and shota pedophilia.

(((Google)))
(((Wikipedia)))

there wasn't a single religion a thousand years ago that condemned pedophilia. It's literally a new-age feminist concept

What scripture.

It said something like ''those who desacrate the little kids who believe in me, throw them in a lake with an an anvil tied to their ankles''. Look it up.

Asspulls 9:11

>Depends on where you extract your morals from
retarded concept, all of morality is based on the objective reality of hurting others against their will

>(pedophiles are to be drowned with an anvil tied to their ankles)
In this context, they are referring to adults who wish to fornicate with "children". Children by Biblical definition being well below the age of your typical, modern-day "loli". It also refers to attraction of both sexes equally, implying these pedophiles in question are not only toddler fuckers but also bisexual.

Attached: Checkmate.png (654x660, 506K)

>a character that looks like they're still in diapers

Even better.

>first fairy type gym
even gamefreak are trying to forget x and y existed lmao

based

what about the verse about a rapist paying a rape fee if he took the woman's virginity and forced to marry her if you were caught? wouldn't that literally contradict that statement if they meant desecrate as in sexual intercourse and not mutilation or some form of torture?

>you can also go without underwear if you prefer
L-lewd

>you can go without underwear if you prefer
wikihow knows whats up

>Judeo-Christian
Fuck off Ben Shapiro

Attached: judeo-christian-comic.png (1000x500, 115K)

>there wasn't a single religion a thousand years ago that condemned pedophilia
You may very well be correct, but I can only speak on the religions I am intimately familiar with.

Pokemon designers know their audience well
Cunnysseurs rise up

>(((judeo christian)))
Kill yourself.

Okay, he's a Jew, but is he wrong?

How's that morally wrong for me to think little girls are sexy? We live in the age where they post stuff like picrelated on instagram (they're 11 and 12 by the way). They want to post it, their parents allow it, it's fair game to at least fap to them. LOOK AT THEIR DELICIOUS FLAT CHESTS GOD DAMNIT, I WANNA GET THOSE BRA TOPS (LITTLE GIRLS SHOULN'D BE WEARING THEM ANYWAY) AND LICK THEIR CHESTS UNTIL I RUN OUT OF SALIVA AND DIE OF DEHYDRATION!!

Attached: 68709092_2374620465979085_8888996555162169384_n.jpg (1080x1350, 187K)

Why is there no /rel/ board? It's clear Yea Forums has pent up religious themed frustrations built up over the years playing games that put you in charge of killing God and the like. Hell, even Persona 5 had that angle to it, and that shit is barely 3 years old.

>Why is there no /rel/ board?
Over redundant since /x/ exists

>Micro tube top
>some low waist mini bloomers
>trick or treat

JAPAAA-

Attached: 1535493765888.jpg (500x707, 88K)

Based and redpilled

I can already see the Muzzies and Jews shitposting each other.

Attached: 510.jpg (367x500, 19K)

their mothers take those pictures to live vicariously through the compliments they get from creeps. I'll never understand women. These things are too petty for me to wrap my head around

What’s the point of playing pokemon if you don’t want to fuck the pokemon.

based
people took the jewish feminazi pill and actually think girls aren't "mature" enough for sex until they're 18 years old or some arbitrary age where they can magically "give consent"
the truth is little girls (as in girls starting puberty) are horny as fuck and want to explore that side of themselves
I just want to marry a 12 year old girl and have 7 children with her damn it

Do you want an actual answer? If you would rather not hear it I won’t post it.

>This game got localized without any hiccups.

Attached: 1554327070462.jpg (610x622, 418K)

>Draw a child
>Make her super sexy
Why is this allowed?

It is for now anyways. I guarantee you that there is going to start being a pushback soon as the internet leaks more.

Not him, but I do. Feel free to be as brutally honest as you'd like. While the thread is still up ffs

Yes. Christianity and Christ are the polar opposite of judaism.
They despise Christ, call him a fake messiah and say that his mother was a prostitute. How do you share values with someone like that, fucking retard.
That’s the point of new versus old covenant.

Attached: F1792EB1-336D-412F-A8BC-5B47F15ACB1E.jpg (670x680, 300K)

>internet leaks more.
Like wi-fi to your skull more?

and then normalfags unironically legalize actual pedophilia in some twisted nu-wave degeneracy.
drawings will still be banned for some reason, though.

The government is always careful to not accidentally give more freedom

I remember them trying this a few years ago. Didn't do well but after the little boy pole dancing for those gay men was called okay maybe it's time for them to try again.

>Why does Pokemon seem to have the most consistently high quality when it comes to their female character designs?
To keep older demographics interested. Only kids and autists care about the monsters, outside Gen I anyway.

Give me a reading that denounces the pedophilic portion of his statement.

Attached: 1550069434367.jpg (940x1100, 175K)

Attached: 1534301302977.jpg (530x730, 156K)

>legalize pedophilia
maybe for rich jews and faggots. but for regular goyim? I seriously doubt it. that's basically the case already

Literally who are you quoting?

The girls aren’t doing it to actually attract males beyond simple compliments but to prove something to their female peers. They feel insecure about their looks and need to feel better than the other females around them so they post these pictures. In their minds the males only exist to give them validation that they are attractive to settle their insecurity with the competitive nature of looks between girls their age. All they want from males is attention in them saying “wow you’re so cute/hot” to help their stifling insecurity. If an adult male actually went through with attempting to be intimate with them it would traumatize them for years to come. At best therapy would just make them have occasional awful memories of it and at worst they go full psycho slut from it. There are no instances in the modern day of girls that age having relationships with adult males that don’t leave them at least slightly fucked in the head. If you want to do something that you know would damage another person for the sake of your own pleasure that is morally wrong.

The issue isn't if they are sexually active or not. Weird strawman.

The guy answering my question of if was actually wrong about his notion outside of
>>>>>>>>>judeo-christian

>GF: *snaps* Nothing personnel, XY

Thank you for taking the time to compose that wall of text, user. I greatly appreciate it, even if I do not fully agree.

Attached: (You).png (244x98, 16K)

>There are no instances in the modern day of girls that age having relationships with adult males that don’t leave them at least slightly fucked in the head.
What a load of nonsense, if some 30 year old guy who is well to do was at leisure to have a relationship with or marry a young girl, I'm pretty sure she would much prefer that to someone her own age who is still at the same level of social standing. This also assumes that a relationship with someone her own age is completely infallible and would not leave her with mental anguish, which growing up I saw plenty of instances to the contrary.
Yes, when you have sick fucks like (((Epstein))) doing it it's a different story, but there's not only no corroborating evidence for this claim, it's just an outright fabrication.

Cant wait for nalvas doujinshi

>it would traumatise them for years to come
Pretty sure I've seen studies that show the damage is done by others making a big deal out of it than the actual "damage" done. You can't argue with 100,000s of years of mating user. If they can have babies they should. That's how animals work.

>if some 30 year old guy who is well to do was at leisure to have a relationship with or marry a young girl, I'm pretty sure she would much prefer that to someone her own age who is still at the same level of social standing.
If you replace "30" with "20", I'd agree completely.

A 20 year old is much less likely to be well to do though and in most cases is just as immature as when they were still teenagers themselves

Nah, user. If you're an adult going after 12 year olds, you don't have any social standing and the 12 year old is just too stupid to realize what a loser you are. That guy was right, and boys also want to show off to friends how cool and grown up they are, it doesn't mean they want to get groped by a greasy creep obsessed with preteens because they never got a kiss when they were a teen themselves.

No user, you've just chosen to interpret some theories on suggestibility like a retard as a coping mechanism because you know how pathetic you are.

If you want to marry a child you are not mature full stop. Literal definition of socially stunted.

>billions of years of animals fucking as soon and often as possible
>nah you're just a smelly creep because it aligns with my world view
Nothing wrong with a wholesome relationship with a pubescent girl.

They look normal to me, what appears to be wrong with them?

>immediately resorting to ad-hominen
like clockwork

Well, yes. Otherwise she would be putting the garter belt over the panties, and you don't do that.

So all of those various aristocrats and feudal lords from a bygone age who married young girls and had heaps of children with them had no social standing? And those girls were too stupid to realize what losers they were?
You're either a woman or just a retard, and the two aren't mutually exclusive.

>mankind reproduces by having sex with girls who are ready to bare children, usually at around age 12 for practically its entire existence
>"uhhh dude that's like not cool bro, dont you know that uhhh you're immature cus... yeah..."
Even if I was socially stunted, at least I am not mentally retarded like yourself.

What was this thread even about again...? Jews vs. Christians? Nah, that wasn't it. Balding 30 yr olds wanting to marry "tween"-aged girls? I don't think so... hmmm...

OH YEAH, NOW I REMEMBER!

Attached: Mod-friendly version.png (817x1304, 760K)

>Wholesome predatory relationship
wew
That's not how biology optimally works in tons of more advanced animals including humans. Getting pregnant as early as possible can have severe detriments and it's absolutely not the best approach even from a purely utilitarian standpoint where efficient breeding is all that matters.
it's earned
They had inherited wealth and power, they weren't a bunch of super chad rock stars. They bought, kidnapped, and raped people who had no power.

Based.

Attached: 1426105650277.jpg (646x993, 367K)

That's a long torso.

I know right?

Attached: 1426105727035.jpg (955x1351, 169K)

>They had inherited wealth and power, they weren't a bunch of super chad rock stars. They bought, kidnapped, and raped people who had no power.
And that changes what exactly? That's still high social standing and if you are a young girl being married to someone with such standing, it elevates you and your family beyond what you originally had. It's no different today, aside from laws dictating the contrived "age of consent" and the nature of power being derived solely from one's monetary worth and holdings, rather than nobililty.

Each nipple

Dude, she'll most likely die from childbirth.
It ain't the stone ages anymore where you needed to fuck preschoolers to have your genes survive the black plague.

Lots of women died from childbirth until modern medicine. I agree though, there's nothing wrong with pubescent girls getting dicks but it's largely unnecessary which is why we no longer do it. Calls to nature are irrelevant now that we have established ourselves as outside nature.

yikers

Attached: 1565407895565.png (600x600, 27K)

Anons argument was that the children want to marry 30 year olds because of social status, and children being sold by their parents to wealthy predators doesn't support that. Maybe some "chose" that kind of situation in the face of destitute poverty and starvation, just like people "choose" to take predatory loans and be taken advantage of. You could get a toddler to willingly wander away from their mother with a chocolate bar, that doesn't mean it's not predatory or that society doesn't have an interest in preventing you from doing so.

What you don't seem to get is that the problem is not strictly biological, it's about the power imbalance inherent and necessary for that kind of relationship. IDGAF what fantasies and cartoons you jack off to, but seeking out a relationship that's entirely reliant on such an extreme power imbalance is purely predatory and it's that's what I mean when I call you socially stunted. I would say the same of aristocrats that grow up surrounded by servants and without consequences for any behavior and thus freely prey upon those they have power over.

You just chafe at the age of consent and call it arbitrary because it puts a check on that power imbalance, but no matter what smoothbrain "grass on the field" argument you make, it will never be in a childs best interest to have a romantic relationship with you or and grown adult, and this isn't debatable at all. Child brides have pretty bad lives and as they grow up, that power imbalance that enables the relationship strains and any illusion of consent evaporates.

To seduce older man and have sex for money of course.

Lolis are truly a menace to civilised society.

In christianity god is literally a pedophile because Mary was around 9-12 when he raped her.

I am not sure how I feel about this Ash. What the fuck?

videogames

>Hurhurhur guys did u no god is into GILFs? He knows what every single grandma pussy+asshole looks and smells like and he's in them literally all the time what a perv

the age of consent is an issue of rights just like the freedom of speech. The point is that after the age of consent passes the government stop involving themselves in peoples personal lives and the father gains more authority over his children that he can individually find when they are ready to date and who they can date. That's literally one of the reasons why feminist raised the age of consent in america it's because single mothers would be screwed if the government didn't babysit their children while they were off fucking chad

>add in europe region
>they also added a loli that wears garters
In b4 team yell has a token shit skin member that is really into explosions

why are children so sexy bros?

Are you seriously trying to use the omnipotence paradox to counter his literally impregnating an underage?

>All those billionaires who make love to little girls are immature and socially stunted
>unlike me, a greasy neet from 4channel!

if the majority of america, britain and australia are christians why are the under secular rule?
It makes no sense.
Are christians pussies that can't stand up for their beliefs.

There, now they're mostly covered.

Attached: Largo's Boxers.png (1000x1915, 438K)

>why
Yes, (((why))) indeed.

>Shouldn't they be putting that level of effort into their creature designs instead?
They did and it was disastrous to my dick

Attached: 250px-282Gardevoir.png (250x250, 44K)

Post the mod-unfriendly version please.

They are cute and funny.

They aren't christians anymore. They're just really damn slow at changing anything that doesn't seem relevant to the modern day.

This is a pinnacle of character design. What are you talking about.

>People unironically fell for this bait

It's not Opal. The girl in ops pick is from one of the movies

Attached: 1565142334223.png (353x334, 141K)

I like how Twitter detects this as "sensitive material" if you're not logged in. Amazing, she's even too cute and funny for western platforms.

Kek and hot

GOD WHY COULDN'T I HAVE BEEN BORN LIKE THIS AAAAAAAAAA.
I just want to be a cute little girl that gets her cunny slammed with dick every now and then.

Attached: 1445978177967.png (660x807, 323K)

Same. Just hold on until VR, immortality or robot transplants.

You pokemon fans just have extremely low standards or rose-tinted goggles, none of what they do is novel or distinguished in the slightest.

Transition then, faggot.

trannys aren't even 3d girls, let alone cute 2d lolis

what game?

he said he wanted to be a cute little girl, not a mutilated ugly hairy man in a dress

What has to happen in a man's life to get them to even contemplate submitting to a cock and getting penetrated?