Why hasn't the futuristic superpower of India made any good video games, or any games at all?

They developed a ton of shitty mobile games and Flash games.
India and China are the kings when it comes to shitty third-world mobile games.

They were building a district in the city of Hyderabad called Cyberbad (wish I had gotten a picture of the police car) which was supposed to have a lot of tech but when I saw it two years ago it was just a lot of construction sites.

WHAT THE FUCK DOES THIS MEAN AND WHY DO THEY KEEP USING IT?

POO
LOO

It isnt 2020 yet

What have video games ever done to advance our species for the better? maybe they have better thing to do than waste thousands and thousands of hours and workers just to develop computer toys.

Video games created more jobs

Indian men have such a bizarre idea of the concept of what "cool" is. It's an entire country of people who didn't progress pass the stage of an 8 year old boy.

better than shitting in the street Rajesh

A truly advanced and prosperous society can afford some resources for leisure, Ramajeet.

In India, it's considered rude to tell people what, specifically, to do. The idea is the person is probably an expect and they don't need any direction. In India, it is somewhat impoliteto say "Im looking to hire someone to shitpost on Yea Forums. Can you go though Craigslist looking for people to hire?" because you're giving them direction when they don't need it. Perhaps the best place to hire shiposters is on mechanical turk, not Craigslist. You don't know. Instead, a polite Indian might say say "Im looking to hire someone to shitpost on Yea Forums. Please do what is necessary."

But instead of "Please do what is necessary," they say "Please do the needful" for some God awful historic reason.

Because Indian people are primitive, the 2020 shit is just a pipe dream to keep people deluded and working for the rich kikes, they’re giving indian people mobile phone and data when they don’t even have toilets, it’s like putting bandage on cancer.

Pajeets with their white skin fetish, rape instincts and street-shitting are a level of subhuman that borders on insectoids

Because Indian people have Poop in their brain

or they cant speak english for shit

I agree with you user. Indians are the worst and India is the worst country. Literally every other race has a plethora of beautiful people. Asians, whites, Mexicans, natives, but not Indians. Sunny Leone? That's about it. I've seen Indian shows and the lead actress, who's supposed to be the hottest, is a 5/10 at best. Their men are the ugliest, nastiest guys. They wear ugly clothes and aviator sunglasses and demand for bobs and vagena. They're like incels but Indian so they're 80 times worse And India, don't get me started on India. Who ever said "you know where I want to visit? India". Imagine that worst person you've ever smelled, now multiply that by 50 and imagine 10,000,000 of those people walking down the street. Even if you do travel to India because you hate yourself, immediately as you walk out of the airport you're greeted to cows on the street and a gang of little orphans asking for Zelda money. Everything about their culture is disgusting. "Yeah let me just bathe and drink this dirty sewer river water for religious reasons". Their movies are stupid and horrible. India is so bad that The Beatles went there and fought so much they broke up. Would they have fought as much if they went to Canada? I doubt. Really just the shittiest country with the ugliest, smelliest, stupidest people and it should be nukes immediately. Stupid brown Jews I wish they'd all just die

Do they really have Designated Shitting Streets?
Sounds too memetic to be true, but then again...

"Please do the needful" was propper English when they were a British colony. The rest of the world moved on but it stuck in India.

This. I'm an IT manager and we have a large group of Indians working with us. Their emails are indecipherable and their accent is so thick that Skype calls are the worst things I have to sit through all week. Even the fucking Polish have better English.

A better question is why are indians so fucking weird? I see a lot if them in the casino i work in and they move in swarms. Its like they always have to be in a crowd. They also always smell like onions. Im not singling any one race out here but coincidentally about a week after they started showing up someone shit on the floor in the women's restroom too.

No. They just shit anywhere. There’s no designation.

>wake up in new delhi
>smell of shit violates your nostrils
>dead animal carcass on the streets
>guy shitting in the corner
>guy raping a woman in another corner
>pajeet steals your wallet
>mfw people still want to visit india on vacation

Attached: 1482968046-312e209a2d28c7dcc33205f0601c897c.jpg (500x281, 15K)

>Oldest civilization ever
>Eclipsed by America in every single away
How do you LITERALLY get a 5000 year head start and still get completely btfo by a country that only existed for 100?

if anything them only shitting on one street is a meme, India is a liter shithole with some areas even having festivals that involve people throwing poop at each other

Wtf is a "ludo"

Surely Africans are the oldest civilization

Google it, idiot

they celebrate shit

god I hate indians

>Africans
>civilization

Unlike China, modern India has pretty much nothing to do with the Indus River Valley Civilzation. Also, Sumeria was older anyways.
>WAAAH SPOONFEED ME
>WAAAH I HAD TOO MUCH ADHD TO PAY ATTENTION IN LATIN CLASS

thats just a normal thing women do

Some board game? How the fuck is that a board game

>Took Latin
>Claims others have ADHD

Attached: tenor.gif (344x426, 714K)

Do all the Indians that work as programmers and QA testers count?

Hardly, considering how many games get released as buggy pieces of shit now.

>1 month until an Indian scientist learns how to use poo as a clean energy source
>2 months until the first poo-based power plant is built
>3 months until a manned poo-powered rocket is sent to Mars
>4 months until the Andromeda empire discovers India's poo rocket. Fearing the wrathful smell of their shit, they share their technology with India as a peace offering
>tfw superpower by 2020

Attached: 400.jpg (432x400, 192K)

Isn't a big share of the shitty mobile games made by them?

Literally conservativism. Being too attached to the old societal rules that don't work in the modern world does that to you.

Too busy techsupport scamming old people.

Attached: 1565864480.jpg (480x360, 21K)

>tfw you'll never see the Mahabharata adapted into a game
I feel more sorry for my Western friends who'll never get the chance to experience it

They're not really your friends

but i can, with fate

Attached: 1510520243129.jpg (1204x1060, 449K)

An indian helped me with obscure IT shit on a forum, I cannot hate them
Also, through the dirty sewer water drinking, the weak are culled from the gene pool

Inda must be more advanced than at first thought. Without their technology, George Washington would not have been able to take over the the king's airports.

Attached: trump delivering airport speech july 2019.jpg (300x168, 9K)

don't forget the hogs roaming the streets and eating fetuses

learn to wipe your add and speak proper English, streetshitter.

There's a game called The Unknown City Part 1. True kino. I believe it was developed in India.

At least India still has a decent amount of cultural remanants of their historical civilizations and remnants even if they've gone to shit; theorically if they ever get their shit together they could still be cool; it could be way worse

>Be Mexico
>One of the world's 6 major centers of civilization
>one of only 3 places that indepedently invented writing
>managed to reach a level of complexity comparable to iron age and classical civilizations like assyria, greece, and persia despite not having beasts of burden, metal tools, or other civilizations to trade with
>had multiple cities (Tenochtitlan, Teotihuacan (see pic), arguably Tikal and others) that BTFO the greatest cities of medivial europe

>modern day mexico is a corrupt shithole with a worse copy of spanish culture, the modern mexican national identitity and culture has only the most superificial of remanants to actual mesoamerican civilizations aside from in the more rural areas where people are too poor to do anything cool with it anyways.

I'm personally of the opinion what happened to Mexico and Peru due to the Spanish is the worst tragedy in human history. Not because of muh genocide or whatever but purely becaus it cucked us out of an entire third pillar of High culture and civilization alongside the West and East. Imagine igf they had been able to modernize like Japan so Mexico and Peru still had Aztec/Inca archtectural and artistic motifs outside of the big cities, still used their ancient history and culture in art and fiction, and in general those historical records weren't wiped out: People bemoan the loss of the library of alexandria but the spanish burned hundreds of libraries in Aztec, Maya, etc cities.

Asura's Wrath is more buddhist then hindu but it still has some hindu elements and does a good job matching the cosmic scale anime bullshit that the mahabharata has.

Attached: Teotihuacan map.jpg (1622x1264, 567K)

Attached: indians.jpg (999x915, 202K)

I had the displeasure of going to school with an adoptive indian kid, he professed his love to a new girl every week and never got any, the most pathetic race of creatures I've ever seen, and I worked with a skinny from somali who got bullied by other niggers for beginng a more niggerish nigger

>we wuz Aztecs n sheeit.
Mexico was already in a long decline long before the Spanish arrived, and it is likely their records would have been lost anyway without the work of Jesuit priests to record it.
historytoday.com/archive/contrarian/two-cheers-conquistadors

>high culture
>sacrifice prisoners from other tribes to keep the sun from getting angry.

I am an Indian and I agree with most of the things you said. Being an Indian is one of the worst starting points in this world.

>high culture

Attached: faggot_mexico.jpg (700x700, 127K)

I work at a hotel and sometimes I get these original right-off-the-airplane first timer Indians. They are hilarious. No filter whatsoever. Just pure honesty. They say everything as it is, and ask invasive questions and walk around reception barefoot, pikey fags off of other guests, the works.
They never caused me real trouble tho, they're just giant weirdos.

they're shitty people that are just playing naive because they're new to the place. fuck these stinking rapacious turds.

>another race war b8 thread
Why are Americans so obsessed with race? They're not even white.

Attached: 1563895623395.jpg (525x700, 86K)

Pretty much all non indie games have Indian studios working on them.

Aztecs were fucking savages, user
and I have no idea why you think Mesoamerica wasn't trading with anyone, the Maya had trade networks all the way into North America
>but those weren't civilizations!
read an archaeology text sometime

>Mexico was already in a long decline long before the Spanish arrived

No it wasn't, I don't know why I keep people repeating this meme.

The past few centuries prior to the Spanish showing up had seen a great deal of both technological and social progress in the region. Bronze metallurgy had just become a thing, having been invented in Western Mexico in the 1200's or 1300's. In terms of city sizes, political complexity, economics, military complexity, etc Mesoamerican socities already ranged from a match to exceeding bronze age civilizations; so it's not like they had only just reached that level of complexity, but it's still an example of a technological innovation.

Other examples would be demographic: The migiration of the Nahua culture into central mexico saw a giant population boom in the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries before the Spanish showed up. The valley of mexico had always been an important population center in Mesoamerica, with the massive, bigger-than-rome metropolis of Teotihuacan having been located there 1000 years prior, but the establishment of Nahua city-states and then their union into the Aztec Empire and it's subsquent prosperity with the tribute influx they got saw a gigantic population bloom, with the valley ending up containing around 30 or so major cities, and hundreds of smaller towns and villages inside of it (see pic) as of 1519, with a combined total of 1.5 to 2 million people; making it one of the most densely populated places on the planet at the time.

I'll break down the specific reasons why your article is bullshit later, but it's assertion that there was a "demographic crsis" is horseshit, the valley was still only at half it's carrying capacity and by all acounts the valley's populations were still on the rise, as was the size of it's cities, and as was the Aztec Empire's expansion.

1/?

Attached: The Cambridge World Prehistory Edited by Colin Renfrew, Paul Bahn Chapter2.19 - The Basin of Mexico (1655x2572, 2.07M)

Homosexuality is the hallmark of an extremely advanced culture, see the ancient Greeks, for instance. It must suck to be such an idiot.

Gotta agree with this guy in how Japan modernized itself yet it retained that cultural identity of theirs. Unlike most latin american countries.
Chile has the mapuches, sadly the mapuches were nothing like the Aztecs, at least the aztecs built something and could be called a civilization by right, mapuches were nothing but warmonger niggers, literally the niggers of latin american natives, and to this day, they remain warmonger niggers manipulated by political parties, burning forest, trucks, people, etc...

i always get to learn the best shit on Yea Forums. i could pass an advanced history exam if this thread stayed up for a good 3 hours, I bet.

hey you two anons, you're pretty fucking smart.

Attached: 1548229431133.png (514x514, 220K)

Homosexuality only manifests itself in times of decline, you faggot. Plato denounced queers.

Japan didn't modernize itself. It was modernized by the Americans after the war.

Because actual indians aren't humans. If anyone has the rare case of indian love then get yourself a west indian partner.

>america was responsible for the meji restoration
c'mon bro.

cont:

Alongside that population boom and political and economic propserity was an intellectual one: There was a huge explosion of the Arts and Sciences in Tenochtitlan and Texcoco both of which had large imperial libraries and had groups of poets, philosophers, theologians, musicians, and arts in intellectual circles exchanging ideas and their crafts, where they also taught at elite academices for the childern of nobility. We have surviving poetry (See pic) and even accounts of debates between francsciian friars and aztec theolgians during the early colional peirod; and records of what may have even been political satire.

Other parts of Mesoamerica were doing finre as well: I previously mentioned how West Mexico had invented bronze metallurgy, but the Purepecha Empire had, like the Aztec empire, recently formed there, and was actually arguably the most politically complex state in Mesoamerican history. Most empires and kingdoms operated on a hedgemonic or dynastic model for political rule where subservient cities still retained their own adminstrative, cultursal, relogious, and to an extent political agency, but the Purepecha Empire was directly imperalistic with it's emperor and captial city directly governing all of it's subservient cities. By european standards this isn't that unusual, but in Mesoamerica it was due to the lack of beasts of burden which meant direct imperial mananagement was a logistical nightmare.

That being said it's arguable that the hedgemonic political systems actually led to greater overall political complexity, since ypou had insane webs of diplomatic relationships even internal to a given empire, often with reapolitk games and schemeing by different cities to subvert each other's authority (which is the actual reason the Spanish got allies, not MUH AZTEC OPPRESSION which is mostly a meme)

2/?

Attached: aztec poetry.png (612x2286, 777K)

>they had big cities and metallurgy
Good for them. They were still cannibals with a waning population crippled by disease.

Long ago I played an indie game made by an Indian who lives in the US or Europe, and it was about colonial india.
The game is in English but the characters had a really weird logic and way of talking. I don't want to make comparisons because it was so long ago but it was a tiny bit similar to pathologic dialog, but not on purpose.

Attached: 9809da9acf1337ab31ebf82a73ec8e01_original.png (700x394, 626K)

no one cares, you assmad spic.

>meji restoration
You mean the one made possible by foreign influence and trade?

yeah, british and french trade. do try to keep up bro, you're looking stupider by the post.

No he did not. Plato idealised pederasty, he only denounced sex. Make of that what you will.

You're the same beaner from /his/ that info dumps this shit every time someone says something bad bout those cannibal savages, aren't you? This is Kangz-tier revisionism.

I learned history from Tom Cruise himself so you must be wrong.

Attached: MV5BM.jpg (675x1000, 112K)

Okay, in the face of such overwhelming and compelling evidence, I must admit that my thoughts on the matter have been wrong.

cont:

Nahuatl, the Aztec language, outright had like 3 different, increasing flowerly, symbolism ladden layers of sub-dialects specific to nobility, diplomacy, and royalty, as seen in the bottom half of the pic here. SImilarly, political complexity had also increased in that political rule was increasingly secular: In the Mesoamerican classical period (200-800AD) and even to a lesser extent in the early postclassic (900-1200AD), most states and kingdoms had theocractic/dyanstic rule woith the priestly caste having the political power, but the postclassic and especially the late postclassic (1200-1521 AD) saw a shift towards more formal monarchial and olgiachrial goverments, even republics and democracires: Tlaxcala was a unfiied republic of 4 main city-states with a collective senate, while the league of Mayapan was a political union of a dozen or so maya states a la the Delian League/

I could go on but I think i've demonstrated my point enough. I'll come back to your post in a bit after I reply to other posts to break down the specific errors in your linked article further then i've already done so; though i'm sure a lot of it's errors and misinfo i'll address in the process of replying to other posts.

I said Mesoamerica wasn't trading with other civilizations, which is correct.

>read an archaeology text sometime

Maya coastal trade networks went as far north, at most, as the Carribian and maybe had contact with the Taino, but they were cheifdoms at best. As far as land trade networks, the Maya and other Mesoamerican groups had direct trade all the way up in Oasisamerica with Southwestern US groups, and while i'd accept the claim they qualify as proto-civilizations, they definetely weren't comparable to the Epi-Olmec, Sumerians, Old Kingdom Egypt, the Shang Dyansty, Indus River Valley Civilization or the Moche. Maybe the earlier Olmec and Chavin but that's at best.

3/?

Attached: Cortes Quetzalcoatl debunk.png (459x2006, 720K)

America wins again. Dog bless.

Attached: 7a5.gif (482x800, 29K)

To be fair, it's a nice movie.

They're too busy being shit at cricket.

Point is, japan only modernized with considerable western aid.

they do bollywood movies instead

When the autism hits hard

[Citation Needed]
And they still ate people.

Too busy shitting in the streets and scamming people who dont know how to use computers

they should do more to export their culture before the vultures in the u.s. do it for them, badly

cont:

There's zero evidence the Mesoamericans had direct contact with the Mississipians. By the time the Mississipians had become a thing direct trade up into what's now the US had mostly died down and even when it hadn't there's no evidence direct trade ever reached that far. The furhest an item of Mesoamerican origin has reached would be just on the edge of what's considered the Mississiian cultural sphere and even that by all accounts only got there via indirect trade.

>Aztecs were fucking savages, user
No moreso then other civilizations and the nations of the time which I will address below.

Firstly, as I mention above, Mesoamerica was filled with urban state socities and had been for like 1500 years before the Aztec were a thing. There weren't "tribes" aside from thousands of miles away up in North Mexico in bumfuck nowhere deserts, or all the way down in Nicaragua and such in bumfuck nowhere swamps and juingles. Pretty much everywhere inside the region itself was formal states in cities or towns, or smaller rural settlements between the larger political and demographic centers, same as in europe or asia. In fact Mesoamericsa as a whole had between 20 and 25 million people, which makes it as densely populated as an equivalently sized piece of europe, the Aztec empire itself was more densely populated then SPain itself was.

Secondly, using sacrifice as evidence of them not being a "high culture" is fucking retarded, considering that the Assyrians were notoriously brutal and used shit even more gorey then all but the worst sacrifice rituals regularly as punishments for even mundane crimes, and that Medivial Europe itself was embroiled in religious purges and wars, and it's absolutely moronic to claim that

>killing people for being heretics and not worshiping god the right way

is somehow any better then

>killing people to honor and sustain your own gods

4/?

>No moreso then
It's than.
Common mistake desu,

why is this thread a magnet for an assmad spic that thinks he's an aztec

>killing people for being heretics and not worshiping god the right way
>is somehow any better then
>killing people to honor and sustain your own gods
Yes, and you'd understand that if you weren't a godless savage that eats their own dead.

>tfw no Indian gf

At least you're not a nigger.

cont:

Also, the majority of Aztec sacrifices, up to 75% by archeooloigical studies, were enemy soldiers captured in battle, so it doesn't even make sense to treat those as distinct from war casulties. And judging by the same archeological findings, it was found that the primary skull rack in the city only held "thousands" of skulls at it's maximum extent; so you;d likely only seen dozens to low hundreds people sacrificed total, including enemy soldiers. This is consistent with the total you get adding up the sacrifices in Sahagun's Florentine Codex

The idea that the Aztec empire was actually raiding the civillans of cities and dragging people off is a meme: As mentioned previusly, the Aztec Empire was hedgmonic in structure, and left it's own cities to self-rule and administrative provided they paid tribute of economic goods. As long as the taxes got paid, they were left the fuck alone. By the standards of European empires this was notably more hands off, a Aztec controlled city or town would almost certainly have more adminstrative and cultural indepedence then a roman controlled city or town did, and any sacririces it did would be of it's own local religious customs, which would be only a fraction of the amount sacrificed that Tenochtitlan did

But whatever, let's take Cortes's estimate of 3000 sacrifices a year at face value, AND include all other Aztec cites: 3000 a year for tenochtitlan, let's say another 3000. For most of the empire's history, it was at less then half it's max extent, but let's use half it's max extent as the average, and only 60% of them being enemy soldiers rather then the max 75%.Keep in mind these are all high end, inflated assumptions

That's 180,000 civilians sacrificed across the empire's 100 year history. France's purge of the cathars in the early 1200's killed more people in 1/5th the time, The Thirty Years War, which was religious in motivation, killed over 10x that much in 1/3 the time. etc.

5/?

>overheard coworkers talking about going overseas
>a girl said the moment they board a plane to India, the smell within the plane assaults their nasal cavities like a train

Is this a stealth /int/ian thread

>stealth
nah, it broke cover long ago

>poo in loo thread
>some /his/ autist spergs at length about the fall of south american civilization because ????

just dropping this here because i know someone needs it
youtube.com/watch?v=mPne-q4ynts

hey don't talk shit about based Aztecposter

cont:

I'll also quickly address the claim the article in brings up, that being the notion that the 1487 re-consercation of the Great Temple of Tenochtitlan involved the sacrifice of 80,000 people in a four day period.

There's a few problems with that alleged occurrence.

Firstly, If you actually run the numbers on it, it becomes obviously absurd: There's 4 altars at the Great Temple, and it was said to take place over a 4 day period. So assuming the 80,000 total'; that's 20,000 people being sacrificed per day, 5000 per altar per day. Even assuming that you had nonstop sacrifices, 24/7, which is completely incompatible with the actual specifics of how sacrifices occurred (they were highly formalized, drawn out affairs with specific ritualistic steps, sometimes lasting weeks) that would mean each altar would need to be sacrificing 1 person every 17 seconds.

That'd be litterally 3x the rate of deaths then Auschwitz was able to gas, since Auschwitz was said to be able to only kill 6000 people a day. So unless you think the Aztec's had better logistics then the Nazi's; it's bullshit.

Even more damning is this: Recall I previously just mentioned recent archeological findings that showed that up to 75% of sacrifices were enemy soldiers, and that Tenochtitlan's skull rack only held "thousands" of skulls at it's maximum extent, etc. That same archeological dig also specifically uncovered the specific phase of deposition of skulls in the skull towers (which the skulls in the skull rack were cycled into once the rack was full) from the years 1486 to to 1502...

....and only 600 skulls were deposited over that 16 year time span, which would have included the alleged re-consercration of the great temple.

6/?