If you play at anything below 1440p you’re a subhuman degenerate freak and you should fucking feel ashamed of yourself

Can't wait for the next thread in the near future to be championing 4K while shitting on 1440p. Resfags are hypocritical retards who just likes big numbers.

Tomorrow i get this. Been waiting a month

Attached: Screenshot_20190715-201531_Amazon Shopping.jpg (1439x2418, 1.06M)

Maybe, but 1440p isn't THAT much more expensive than 1080p. If the difference was really that noticeable, people would have jumped on it quickly.

i play at 1080p the perfect resolution for my 1080ti

People are slow to upgrade though, especially if you're a poorfag you're not gonna jump on the new tech train unless your setup is already like 5-6 years old.

Personally I feel like I need to upgrade my 980ti even though it does ok with most games 1440p and is fine with my triple monitor setup, but now is a shit time to upgrade gpus because of AMD and Nvidia scam faggots. So I just wait, like most people who are frugal do.

buy me a monitor then fucko

anyone else her unable to even tell a difference between 1440p and 1080p?

Im gonna pick one of those up later this year after I get a new GPU

1080p 144hz master race, 1440p is for chumps

1440p looks better. Cope faggot.

I think you might need glasses user.

How long until 4k 144hz 1ms input lag monitors become affordable?

>subhuman degenerate freak and you should fucking feel ashamed of yourself
after all i am here, m8

Attached: 12345678.jpg (901x451, 54K)

I just bought a Samsung C27HG70 on prime day
I cant decide if I should return it and buy the LG or not.
Im going to buy a 5700 XT in a few days, but the LG may be out of stock everywhere for another month, I only have 5 more days before my return window is up.

1440p 144hz

>have a friend who is the ultimate graphics whore tryhard
>always talk about the frames he gets on his 144hz monitor while playing shooters
>shooters are the only games he plays nonstop for years
>get my first gaming PC a few months back (had a mac from 2012 that broke in 2015)
>have a 60hz 1080p monitor and nearly always outperform him
>mfw

Attached: 1564893257495.jpg (1765x1885, 315K)

They seem pretty afordable righr now. The problem is you need 2x 2080ti to drive it

The only thing that matters is 60fps minimum. Everything else is secondary.

>He doesn't play at 4K 120fps
I actually vomited a little

1080p is objectively the better resolution since it'll always allow for higher framerates

Attached: a_predator_gazing_on_her_prey.jpg (1408x1072, 381K)

>he lives in a first world country
>His computer can't run every game at 4k 120fps

>Can't wait for the next thread in the near future to be championing 4K while shitting on 1440p. Resfags are hypocritical retards who just likes big numbers.
Based retard

144hz is more important than 4k res

> in the near future

Moderately priced hardware isnt going to be good enough for 4k for several more years.

1440 is achievable with moderately priced parts nowadays. Its why its so prevalent right now.
$400 GPUs will get you 1440 right now

its okay but I borrowed friends 1440 to test, can't tell the difference very well at the distance I sit from my 27" 1080p (about 2.5feet)

I have had the exact opposite experience
I had three 27" 1080 monitors, replaced the middle monitor with a 1440 144hz monitor. Its a very noticeable difference. Also 144hz makes a gigantic difference too.

I'm upgrading later this month to 1440p

Imagine this level of retardation and virginity

resolution doesn't mean shit if you're not at 144hz lol

They look the same, retard

I play everything at 1440p and still feel ashamed of myself. What about that OP

You wasted your money, monkey

But I play in 4k

> (OP)
>1080p 144hz master race, 1440p is for chumps
You meant 1080p 240hz

why play at 1440p when you could/should be playing at 5760x1080 instead?

>Play in 720p
>Never have to care about having a strong rig

>iFaggot calls others retards

Attached: 1541185358432.gif (191x256, 223K)

Finally coming home.

Weird artificial gatekeeping threads are making less and less sense.

240hz is a waste of money. You will never run anything at 240fps. You are a brainlet tool. Congrats. Also, enjoy your inferior picture quality.

>not gaming in 8k

Fag

2K is the sweet spot for 27in monitors. And I feel 27 is the sweet spot for monitor size anyways.

ever since my mother overdid the guilt tripping i dont care about the opinions of others and just do what i want

Why are you posting then fag

rocket league. as a 1440/165 user, rocket league or csgo are the two games where a 1080/240 monitor makes sense

are you me?

>Buying cheap trash
Enjoy your dead pixels and screen glare.

probably a trinitron

>this is what is considered cheap trash
What the fuck am I then with my $100 24 inch 1080p monitor?

Why are you posting

Still gaming at 720p, unlike Yea Forums I'm not a toddler who has to have the best tech NOW NOW NOW. I'll jump into 1080p when the prices are reasonable.

Attached: 1540354139772.gif (354x286, 60K)

Depends on the size of the monitor, retard

But i game at 4k 60 fps on my xbox one x

nah I'm fine with 1200p

Let me say this.
1440p is nice.
I got a 1440p 144hz panel.
I really appreciate the refresh rate, but I kind of wish it was higher resolution.
Even at 27 inches it's just not there.
I could tell but it's still not that big of an improvement.
You get less obvious pixel-stepping at shimmer but it's not a 100% clean image like you'd get on a 4k or higher monitor.

8k is likely going to be endgame for a lot of people for a long time.
Not only is it such a high resolution that AA becomes pointless but all the smaller resolution standards interger scale into it perfectly.

I recently made the switch from 1080p 60hz to 2k 144hz and the monitor was well worth the money.
Hopefully in a few years when I upgrade my PC again there will be a good 4k 144hz monitor

play games

you can literally get 1080p monitors for free offices get rid of them all the time how cheap do they have to be for you to take one?

But I just upgraded to 1080p last year

That's called stealing user.

Feels good man.

Im glad I gave up on a decades old standard in the modern day.

Shut up.

I didn't say steal it, you can generally just ask and they let you have it.
Or at least ask for a small fee.
I get so much tech in great condition from my work, the I.T dept is full of top guys that hook you up and the sustainability manager loves any form of recycling.

4k @ 27 in?

Not really.

Again, I'm an adult so I don't beg for things like a child. Toddlers beg for sweeties at the shop, not men. Grow up.

4k @ 27 would probably be near perfect but I'd still hold out for 8k.
It really will be a golden resolution simply because everything scales into it perfectly.
You could use it with so many games consoles and watch so many different qualities of video and it will be scaled perfectly.

>I'm an adult so I don't ask for things
sounds like you have a confidence problem.
Just bee yourself, user.

nice counterargument. If you play esea (128 tick) or are on a predictive client like rocket league uses, 165-240hz can actually provide a benefit. There is a very noticeable jump from 165 to 240hz for higher level players.

1440p is nu-720p.
Directly go 4K, or stay 1080p.

And it sounds like you're a child.

playing at 144hz is way mroe important that resolution thanks.

It's okay user, one day you'll have the courage to stand up for yourself.

>work at office
>upgrading monitors for first time in forever
>ask boss if you can take an old one or pay a few bucks for it
How is this begging?

Name 50 games that run at stable 144 Hz @ 1440p without dropping ONE frame. One dropped frame = disqualified.
Yeah, didn't think so. Old games don't count either because they're not made for higher resolutions so playing at higher resolutions for them just makes them look extra shitty and old. RTX cards can't even run games at 60 fps @1080p, so who gives a shit if they run even worse at higher res. Rich people don't stay rich by being stupid with their money.

SHUT THE FUCK UP ITS NOT FUCKING FUNNY YOU FUCKING QUEER FAG

1440p is 2007 tier this a poorfag thread

yikes

Attached: 1544371038118.webm (1280x720, 2.93M)

>women would rather break their legs than be mothers

what the fuck nooooo

Not really. And I don't need to provide a counterargument for retarded statements made by retards. There's nothing to be gained past 144hz.

>1440p is nu-720p.
Are you stupid?

>work
It's an alien concept for many of Yea Forumss.

ironic shitposting is still shitposting

I see you learned your lesson then. Good puppy!

>Got my first HDTV in 2009
>Still using it even now
>Sony Bravia at that

I will upgrade when PS5 comes out.

Attached: 1565585032409.jpg (600x800, 93K)

you have to go back. I'm sorry your transgender furry porn was removed from tumblr, but that doesn't mean you have to ruin other places with your insanity.

Good puppy!! Good boy! Now shake!

Attached: 1557093847108.png (720x736, 390K)

>using gay as an insult in 2019
Are you 10?

It's literally twice (or rather fourfold) 720p, exactly like 4K is literally twice/fourfold 1080p.

What is this injury called? What actually broke here?

yes, because am dog

Attached: 1565491053335.png (1156x1084, 791K)

Jokes on you, I've felt ashamed of myself all my life.

Attached: 1362341612797.png (282x313, 39K)

>have 1600x1200 monitor
>nu games dont support 4:3 and default to 1600x900 and slap a giant letterbox

Attached: 1555834952791.jpg (890x1024, 134K)

same here

Attached: 1564416563748.jpg (850x850, 111K)

1024×768 master race

>What is this injury called?
The doublecast
>What actually broke here?
Her life

Only if your system can't handle more frames than your monitor's refresh rate at 1440p.

...

I have a 1440p 144hz but I almost want to trade it for a 1080p 240hz because all I use my computer for is shootys.

High resolution makes text and foliage much better to look at

Every game?
Everything looks so blurry now if I ever go down from 1440p.
4k is even nicer of course, but 144hz gsynch or (freesynch support) on a 1440p is more worth right now.

If you play games you’re a subhuman degenerate freak and you should fucking feel ashamed of yourself.
kys

Are you literally starving on the streets, user? Or is your last name Finkelstein?

Too bad pc monitors are all small as fuck. That's why I just use tv screens as my monitor. Cheapest way to get a nice 43 inch 4k screen.

What does my last name have to do with it? And no its Denenberg but I don't know what that has to do with anything.

Are you living in 2009? Gsynch and freesynch have existed for a good while now meaning any framerate you can get is smooth as butter. 1440p 123fps is imo much preferred to getting those last 21 frames on 1080p.

27 inch is perfect unless you're some kind of brainlet who sits too far away from the screen.

>not sitting a meter away from a 43 inch screen

Can't imagine having anything larger than like 32 on a desk, my eyes are generally only two feet from screen

4K 60fps...
Home...

>Not sitting outside with your 70 inch plasta up against the window
Fucking casual what are you even doing here?

My NEET money just had a big bonus so I'm ready to buy a big boy monitor. What fits all these needs?
>27 or more inches
>1440p or more
>Freesync compatable with gtx, or gsync
>Least 120hz
>Curved would be a bonus

Attached: 1558947709608.png (240x240, 49K)

>game only renders in 1080p
>resolution options only change window size
fucking nip coding

Attached: Application_2019-07-16_15-49-43.png (1920x1080, 2.53M)

I just don't want to see AA and Jaggies anymore. Give me 8K instead.

I've seen people claim jaggies are even visible at 8k. The ride never ends

just go backwards. play games on a gameboy micro.

Because jaggies come from pixel density and not from resolution.

>game runs in a window even when "fullscreen"
>gets scaled up because of windows scaling so you can only see part of the game window
>no in-menu way to fix it
>have to disable window scaling just to play the game

Attached: 1541784717758.jpg (249x249, 20K)

Is a 2070 enough for 1440p?

>t. Just got a 1440p monitor

Turn on FXAA and turn down the sharpness on your monitor.

yes

Can I expect ultra settings and decent framerates or is it on the lower end of that?

you can definitely expect high settings and hella high frames depending on the rest of the build of course too but that won't bottleneck you

thanks.

>what is dpi

my AW3418DW is literally all of that plus a superior aspect ratio.

Games aren't even made in 1440 you absolute retard. It's like playing a PS1 game on an HD TV, it does fucking nothing for the game.

Does a IPS 4k monitor with at least 144hz even exist?

I have a 1440p monitor and I play games windowed at 1902x1080 cause I can while having secondlife running in the background and swapping between them and a YouTube video going on my second monitor

Overpriced for what they are.

Attached: ROG SWIFT PG27UQ Monitors.png (1152x375, 274K)

amazon.com/Dell-27-Inch-LED-Lit-Monitor-S2719DGF/dp/B00N2L5CXO/ref=mp_s_a_1_2?keywords=dell 1440p 144hz&qid=1565593811&s=gateway&sprefix=dell 1440&sr=8-2

This one is near perfection

1440p 144hz is the best gaming experience on Planet Earth.
>pic related

Attached: 1549461597058.png (1750x1285, 1.95M)

you've never played gta 5 in 4k I take it

3440x1440 120hz is the shit

Attached: 1565594062030.jpg (527x482, 63K)

So what was the 1080p of 720p?

GTA wasn't made in 4k you fucking retard. You're literally being meme'd into thinking a brighter screen means the game is actually running in 4k. Just because I can emulate the original tetris on my computer with a 4k monitor doesn't mean I'm experiencing the game in 4k.

you seriously cannot be this braindead

1440p sucks for everything non-gaming since most shit is still in 1080/720p

>playing video games
the only subhuman degenerate here is you. Mentally ill retard

> lg 27gl850 release in 2weeks
> 580 euroshekel

reeee

Attached: 1526162698743.gif (657x527, 122K)

You're actually retarded for getting sold on the 4k meme. No games you play are developed in 4k. You have a special meme monitor that's overly powerful for 1080p games.

That monitor is 1080p TN panel, fucking garbage

>LG

?

Attached: 1534458847112.png (403x310, 16K)

>>LG

what?

Attached: schwitzen.webm (986x720, 2.62M)

my bad they used the same fake image for the 27 version
>XQ

Are you saying the textures and effects aren't in 4k? Or what the FUCK are you even meaning by "made in 4k"? You do realize the computer on your end is the one rendering in 4k correct?

They're not made in 4k retard. For example, playing NES games on an HD TV doesn't make them HD, they're still at the same shit resolutions as before you're just displaying them on a TV that is capable of displaying higher resolutions. Just because you put an old game on an HD TV doesn't suddenly change the very nature of the game and it magically becomes HD.

It literally just shows you more on the screen, but not a clearer image. What's the point? The only thing that makes it worth it is that it looks better on bigger screens.

>Dell
What did he mean by this?

>2019 the year of our lord
>Not even curved
Laughable.

Oh, you're a console tard.

I swear to fuck I am not memeing here but 90-95hz is the soft cap for actual noticeable jumps motion clarity. It's why the mid to higher end VR goggles have a native refresh rate of 90-95hz, that's the bare minimum needed to trick the average human brain into believing the motion on the screen is reality.

Of course you can prove that 120hz+ is smoother with slowed down footage, but at the intended speed of any game on an LCD screen there is barely any difference at all between 95hz and 165hz (assuming both screens are the same panel type).

You're genuinely retarded. It's the same with TV shows and movies. Watch any recent movie and they're all made in 1080p, putting them on a 4k monitor will not magically make them 4k movies because they were not filmed in 4k.

If you use anything that isn't aspect ratio * 2^x you are a subhuman retard.

>They're not made in 4k retard
fucking hell this board

epic troll hehe me stupid
no more yous for you

I still play on a crt suck my dick

I hope you're not buying it for HDR user or a proper brightness setting
Brightness: 350 cd/m2 doesn't even quality for Vesa HDR400, which is the most basic HDR level

Attached: 27GL850.png (2005x1040, 895K)

>, that's the bare minimum needed to trick the average human brain into believing the motion on the screen is reality.
that'd be the 24 fps of movies

>wanting curved shit

LMAO

You're retarded. Keep buying your useless meme monitors that literally do not do anything for your games because your games aren't 4k. GTA 5, like you mentioned, is a game released in 2013. They did not develop the game in 4k resolution. This is a simple fact. Putting it on a 4k monitor will not make the game 4k, it was not developed in that resolution.

curved and ultrawide is the retard filter.

Tell me when 8k and 120 FPS becomes the norm. Otherwise everything else is just filler and that doesn't hold up.

>Watch any recent movie and they're all made in 1080p
But that is absolutely incorrect you complete drooling retard, even film is in high resolution than 1080p before its processed for viewing, let alone digital media which nowadays is rarely done below 4k, and most releases nowadays have that as a standard option for blu ray discs. Are you literally a retard?

t. mad poor niggers

>processed for viewing
Exactly, the product you get whether you're buying blurays or torrenting them is not in a resolution above 1080p.

4k60 vs 1080p144

what should I buy faggots?

is there even a single real hdr monitor in the 500-600bucks range?

displayhdr.org/performance-criteria/

>we'll never have Display HDR500 TrueBLACKED in a PC monitor

Attached: DisplayHDR_SpecChart_Row.jpg (2543x3230, 921K)

Second user was agreeing with you, stooge. Curved looks like absolute shit. At my local wifi cafe everyone avoids the curved setup like the plague and it's 1440p ips.

I have a no frills Dell S2419nx, it's only 1080p 60hz but the image quality is immaculate and there's practically zero BLB and much better than average contrast for IPS. I'm not throwing it away for some gritty matte finish 1440p gaymer monitor that will have shit image quality. I'll wait until they make either a 1440p or 4K OLED monitor or an OLED TV that doesn't have image retention issues.

Okay so you ARE a brainlet. FILM (Thats what you had before digital media, zoomy) is higher "resolution" than 1080p, let alone digital media itself, which is all done at 4k nowadays as an industry standard unless its literally a college film where all they can afford to film with is a sony handheld. Going to just leave you be now because honestly I think you're just baiting at this point, nobody is this retarded.

No, not even that HDR doesn't even work on PC because its all software related and up to the developers to implement that shit.

>Curved looks like absolute shit
Curved is objectively better
>ips
>Implying ips is good
IPS is absolute trash, there is a reason so few screens use it vs TN and VA.

Attached: 1561738705597.png (278x259, 63K)

As a gay man, should I try to lose most of my extra weight through cardio and light weight lifting before I try to get a boyfriend?

Attached: 1558595809190.jpg (564x436, 51K)

For VR you need at least 90hz, otherwise your susceptibility for motion sickness increases dramatically because your brain realizes the motion is off if you're under 90hz and 90fps.

Getting a new monitor soon. I mostly play DCS World which benefits hugely from ultra wide . But I also want to play some needed games coming out like BL3 and Doom. Should I get an ultra wide 2k, @ 100hz , 4ms. Or a non ultra wide 2k 144hz, 1ms. I don't play much competitive fast paced shit so I'm wondering if the extra refresh rate and response time really does much more for me.

As a gay man you should kill yourself.

yep, that’s a based

Absolutely false. It's a great time to buy computer components right now. Compare anything to last summer and you'll see what I mean

That won't get me what I want silly user.

>21 inch 1080p 60hz monitor
>Still better at shooters then 99.99% of the population.
1440p/120hz+ won't make you better at a game, and I'll still completely and utterly shit on you.

>so few screens use it
IPS is the most common screen type you fucking mongoloid.
TN and VA are only used in "Gaymeng" monitors for higher refresh rates.

>60 hz 1080p
>500 fps
>60 hz 1440p
>400 fps
Ok retard

IPS monitors pop more than VA and TN. They're also more uniform than VA and TN with all shades of color, and they have better gray uniformity than TN and VA.

VA monitors in my experience are mediocre. If you're getting a display because you want deep uniform blacks then get a TV, almost all TV's have good quality VA panels and VA monitors are the exact opposite. Stay away from VA monitors especially cheap 144hz ones, they all have shit contrast, almost none of them actually have 3000:1 like the companies claim and even worse is that they almost all have terrible black uniformity.

good goy'in

Wrong
WRongwrongwrongwrong
only good post in this thread

I just bought a 1080p 27" VA monitor. How did I do ?

>VA
based
>1080p 27"
bluepilled

Have you even seen anything in 8k?
All that you should care about is ppi. Anything beyond like 400 is fucking pointless.

i play on $10 monitors i got from goodwill

Attached: 4.png (320x75, 28K)

>1440p
it's called WQHD or 2560x1440.
Naming resolutions by scanlines is for televisions, not monitors.

ITT: Monitor manufacturers pedaling their soon to be obsolete shit panels so they can upsell you to 4k in a year or two.

Yet you knew exactly what he was referring to. Funny how that works.

based

What kind of autist would make such a post?

yeah, a really nice 1440p monitor is around $300/$500 and a 4k one is around 2k.

Hello, 1080p here, I own a 2080TI but still prefer sticking to 1080p, and will stay this way untill I get larger resolutions monitors with smaller screen sizes, as well as better hardware to run the games at a minimum of 100+ fps. I feel no shame and shall continue to be this way for as long as I see fit.

Attached: All smiles.jpg (750x430, 23K)

not falling for your stupid meme.
agreed 100%
WQHD
What is 768p? Is it 1024x768? Is it 1280x768? Is it my dick in your mouth?
What's 480p? Is it 720x480 or 640x480?
Fuck you.

Its harder to find a 1440 panel than a 4k panel as it is. Problem is 4k is shit for PC. Its too close to make much difference and is usually worse at everything else like color accuracy or refresh rate.

Until 4k panels are better and are getting pushed passed 60hz without fuckery then 1440 will stay better.

Absolute autism.

>being closer to a screen means the ppi matters less
do you faggots even read what you write

everything about this post is wrong, what a retard

1080p and ultra low input lag>more pixels

What does it make me playing 1080p @120hz. Am I still subhuman? or does my refresh rate qualify me?

A $120 GPU is enough for 1440p you dumb 144hz faggot.
1080p60
1440p60
4k30

>steam hardware sales
doesn't mean shit. Most people are normalfag plebs running old-ass hardware on their 1366x768 laptops with integrated graphics. This is the equivalent of being a /fit/izen and thinking you're strong with your six month noob gains because you're comparing your strength to the average untrained population rather than sizing yourself up with other gymbros.

Agreed. I've been holding out with my ancient hardware (2500k, 7850, 1080p/60hz monitor) from 2012, and now is finally the time I upgrade. Gonna get me a ryzen 3600, 5700xt, and a 1440p/144hz monitor.

Okay retard, keep thinking everyone else falls for hz memes and 4k then.

1440p@144Hz master race.

>LG

Attached: 1565500035535.png (658x543, 606K)

>1080p now too blurry
>60fps now too choppy

1080p monitors are dirt cheap now
Have you not checked the prices in 7 years

How would a 2080 TI & 9900k go for 1440p 144hz?

Where i can get 1440p/240hz/g-sync/ips?

>PLEASE BUY NEW MONITORS PLEASE DO IM DESPERATE FOR MONEY PLEASE YOU FUCKING DUMBASS IDIOT PLEASE BUY IT PLEASE I BEG YOU I DONT WANT TO LOSE MY JOB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Attached: laughing spanish man .jpg (480x360, 22K)

Dis true. Many games look like complete dogshit below 1440p because their AA sucks. Only solution is higher res

Did you know LG are refurbished garbage?

Are you fucking retarded?

I think 1080p is already overkill. I use 99% of my programs in small windows because it's just wasted space with things uselessly at corners.

bretty gud

>gamey lines
Fucking faggot

Yeah if you like playing at low settings

>true black
You mean an OLED monitor?

Damn, what a fucking qt

>1024x768
>1280x768
>1366x768
This kikes love this 768 resolution ain't it?

>bought a 34" dell ultrawide 4 years ago
>two and a half years later, got a free replacement upgrade because some dust got behind the screen somehow
>still using it
>3440x1440, SDR, 60hz, calibrated
>still compete in every game I play (fps and racing games) no problem
stay mad hertzfags

high refresh rates are generally more beneficial
that being said if I had anything newer than a 970 I'd buy a 1440p120hz monitor

I'm currently playing on a 24 inch, 5ms 1080p monitor but looking into getting a new one. I've got a GTX 1060 6Gb and would like to go for ultrawide but i know i'm not going to get any good frames in modern games. Maybe it's better to stick with two monitors instead.

Attached: bigenough.jpg (610x534, 46K)

>this faggot plays games with such bad graphic design it can't be played in 800x600
Pathetic

why you want a new monitor?

I'm going to get a new desk that's wider which looks much nicer and so that i can fit more things onto it. I'm looking to get a second monitor primarily so that it's easier to do multiple things at the same time, like watching a video and browsing. I know it's probably better for me to get a second 24" monitor instead of an ultrawide, but damn if they arent beautiful.

>What is 480p
>Is it (Widescreen resolution) or is it (Standard Resolution)
Bitch did you fail math?

>getting a second monitor
Sounds like a plan.

I've been looking into making the jump to 1440p, but as far as I understand the best monitors on the market are still 4-5 year old stuff like ASUS PG279Q vs Acer XB271HU.
At this point I don't feel comfortable buying 5 year old technology because by now I would expect to have something a lot better for the same price, or the same thing but cheaper.
But as far as I can see, it's not the case and these are still the best you can buy if you want the same things from a monitor as I do (144hz+, 1440p, IPS, G-Sync).

So now I kinda don't know what to do, and that's why I'm still stuck with 1080p 60hz.

1920x1080 has done the job for me since 2011. My monitor hasn't broken and I have no need or want to upgrade. A bigger monitor wouldn't fit on my desk anyway.

>not having free sync2
>free sync2 is not at least 30 FPS at it's slowest
>not having 10 bit
>not having HDR
Why not get a cheap 1080p panel until the good ones start to show up?

Is the Ryzen 5 3600 just a meme, or it is 2019's budget CPU? Really fucking thinking of getting it this week

Attached: 1565469988271.jpg (900x900, 169K)

Because when I'm buying a new monitor, I want it to last another 6+ years, preferably more. Definitely not buying another 1080p, and I'm still a bit iffy about 1440p because I would have preferred 4k with all the stuff I have written to future proof it, but I'm not about to drop ~$2000 for a monitor.
The things you mentioned are nice, but only on top of 144hz+, IPS, G-Sync (I don't want Freesync if I can help it since I won't have non-Nvidia cards anyway), and definitely none of them can be sacrificed in favor of those you mentioned.

>Bad pixel scaling for any 1080p content
>good
You got memed
4K or nothing

Unfortunately 4K gaming monitors will not be a thing affordable in the next 3-4 years at least, so you either but 1440p now or you don't buy anything for years.

Depends entirely on what you play, you dumb autist

Your eyes are fucked m8.

>1080p content
like what? netflix trash?

>you're a subhuman degenerate freak if you're not using 1440p
>b-but 4k monitors aren't affordable so 1440p is p-plenty guys
You are a retard.

could do without the name-calling user

As said, get a trinitron, they were also sold as some gateway monitors, so i shouldn't be too hard to find.

No it isn't. You'll get the same functionality out of 800x600 as you will anything else.

>have a 60hz 1080p monitor and nearly always outperform him
Well yeah, you get lower fps on a 1440 than on an 1080 with similar hardware. That's not something you should be proud of.

It won't take that long I think., and it's worth the money honestly
I want a 4K ultrawide with good colors for work too though, now that could take a while

Or anime

I bought a lg 27ud58, which is a 27 inches, 4k ips monitor with freesync for 300 euros, and it wasn't on sale.

No, it is in fact you, who are a retard.

>60hz
No.

That's why 4k is so great, it's exactly 4x 1080p and 9x 720p, so you get a perfect integer scale when displaying lower resolution content.

why would i need 1440 monitor when most of the games i play doent even support 720?

Ok you but you currently can't buy any 4K monitor that is worth its price or will be worth it for many years, unless you are a pleb and are willing to compromise critical features like this idiot

Works for me, games look great and can run between 40-60Hz without any stuttering thanks to the variable refresh rate. But again, i don't play anything competitive aside from fighting games, and mostly racing and single player games, mostly with a controller for anything that isn't a shooter, so i wouldn't gain much from a higher refresh rate, i'm not good enough to put these extra frames to good use.

Is IPS really that noticeable compared to a TN monitor?

except he goes well over 144 frames so I don't really get what you're saying. I'm saying he cares about graphics and frames and stuff but that doesn't change the fact that he's a shitter

I am that idiot btw. I have both my computer and my 360 hooked up to it.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-08-12_11-53-00.png (935x100, 13K)

This
Plus tickrate in most shooters is too shit to take advantage of the frames

Yes, colors won't go completely out of whack when looking at an ips monitor at an angle like they would on a tn. Contrast and color accuracy are also much better on ips.

Alright, so? If he had a 1080 you think he'd be better?

>Avarage of $100
>"dirt cheap"
Shut up child you have no concept of money.

They are pretty cheap since they're an investment for a couple of years.

No, he's saying he wasted his money since he'll never take true advantage of it

imagine not gaming in 240hz 1440p

Attached: 1383921639191.jpg (409x393, 32K)

>An investment
An investment is expanding your stock options or buying real estate cheaper to make a return, buying an over priced screen so you can play your toys "better" is not an investment, toddler.

If you had any concept of money at all, you would have a job by now that lets you afford it easily, because if you think $100 for a 1080p monitor is much, then you have no idea what you are doing with your life financially or otherwise.

>To invest is to allocate money in the expectation of some benefit in the future.

So it's an investment if you get to used it for about 5 years or so. That would round up to having spent roughly $20 per year. If you're an adult anywhere in the developed world and yet you believe this is somehow a hard deal, then you're a massive retard and you fucked your own life up somehow.

calling wqhd "1440p" is some serious two digit iq shit

there has never been an interlaced wqhd monitor

The fact I don't waste my money on such things says more about my maturity than yours. I have a family to provide for, college funds, a wife. Car payments, a morgage, taxes. None of these a child would understand. You just see money and think it grows on trees.
Again, me and my family understand money and how to invest and manage it, you don't become rich by spending your money on needless toys.

*my family and I

how important is gsync?

Attached: maff.png (993x765, 672K)

Do not correct me. Not everyone is a native English speaker. English is my sixth language, and I speak it better than thou.

Makes no difference if you're capping your frame rate, makes all the difference if you're midranging it. Basically removes the horrible stuttering unevenness you get from not having a steady frame rate.

yeah I'm thinkin quentin's back

Is it true freesync works fine with NVIDIA gpus so you don't even need to buy gsync monitors?

I bet it didn't even occur to you that everyone has all these expenses as well, not just you. Yet everyone else manage to afford a $100 monitor while being on top of their finances, while you can't.
It's up to you whether you will admit that you fucked your life up if spending $100 on a monitor will throw a wrench in your finances, or you will keep digging deeper in showing everyone on the internet how much of an inept fuckup you really are.

I heard it's still not as good as "real" gsync monitors that have the actual modules, only close.

You are pathetic. A child who is begging his father that its 'not much; or that he 'needs' it. When you grow up you'll start to understand how the world works. Till then I am done with you, begone.

They recently patched in support for Freesync but I haven't tried it yet. I'd google whatever monitor you're thinking about buying to see what other people say about it

Heh, classic. Plug your ears in, go lalalalalalala, you can't hear what I'm saying - that will surely make your problems go away.
I'm satisfied that deep down you know I'm right, and it will keep eating you from inside long long after this thread 404'd.

>He fell for the 2K/4K meme
>He fell for technology that doubles the rate of necessary upgrades just to get a decent framerate

Attached: 1564925939006.jpg (735x765, 54K)

>he has nice things

RTX 2070 on 1080p 60hz reporting in. Fuck the high res faggots, next upgrade is 144hz and same exact resolution.
If you want me to go higher res, make devs implement fovered rendering and then I'll buy a tobii eye tracker.

Attached: 1555489944271.webm (1280x720, 1.32M)

All I hear a child having a tamper. Feels bad not getting your way, doesn't it? Welcome to the real world, kiddo.

>when you learn english from google translate

Ultrawide masterrace. 1440 x 3440 represent.

I learned English at Oxford University, you pathetic boy. They wanted me to be a Professor but I decided to go a different path...

Attached: 1564426477957.gif (190x190, 1.98M)

Enjoy your pillarboxes. Standards exist for a reason.

Attached: 2a1b8d1a67d5ad537e955acf7b9f4059.jpg (280x280, 15K)

>learned instead of learnt when referencing a british institution
you fucked up

>having money and not being a giant fucking neckbeard

Attached: 1303713909390.jpg (300x168, 6K)

So RPG Maker games can look even smaller :^)

>learned
kek

Attached: gold.png (600x580, 572K)

Hahaha, you wish. Instead, he will never acknowledge that his non standard resolution is in fact...non standard, no. He will go on a crusade on every Steam forum and harrass developers for not supporting his meme resolution and it will be literally everybody else's fault that his idiotic meme isn't supported, instead of his own fault for paying hundreds or thousands of dollars on meme.

he's a noob, 60 fps is max you need for shooters. the lag is too great anyway.

>I learned English at Oxford University, you pathetic boy. They wanted me to be a Professor but I decided to go a different path...

Attached: 1543444256052.gif (311x223, 1.52M)

Ah.. Yes. Here it comes. The jealousing.

god im sick of them crying to devs about that. Fucking suck it up, you bought something besides the fucking MAJORITY 16:9 standard, hell even 16:10 was dropped.
Not even the fucking movie industry was enough to change UHD into 21:9. Its still 16:9. And they've been trying 21:9 since like 1960s.

Attached: 52.png (350x350, 118K)

>1080p is a meme
>mp3 is a meme
>blu ray is a meme
What are some other memes that failed miserably?

$100 monitor isn't cheap? You must be one of those NEETs

He is most likely underage and his allowance isn't enough for him to afford it. So now he is on a projecting rampage to compensate.

Children.

Cope.

why would i when most of my switch game run at 720p

Cope

Checkmate PC virgins, Nintenchads win again.

Attached: 2f7.jpg (601x508, 31K)

Good luck playing a paradox game on 800x600 retard

Very important. On a fixed refresh rate display If a frame takes more than one refresh(16.7ms at 60Hz) to be rendered, it will be displayed for multiple refreshes(multiples of 16.7ms at 60Hz, so 33ms, 50ms and so on), leading to visible stuttering. With a variable refresh rate, if a frame takes say 20ms to be rendered, it will be displayed for 20ms, framerates dictates refresh rate, or rather frametimes dictates refresh times, so if framerate drops, refresh rate will drop with it, keeping things smooth and avoiding the stuttering you get with a fixed refresh rate.

r8

Attached: Speccy-140719.png (783x570, 56K)

Not him but i have a question. Nvidia has an option for me to use 'fast' vsync. Normally I turn vsync off entirely and frame limit with RTSS at about 62 fps unless the game itself has a frame limiter which I assume will use less overhead.
Is it better to use this 'fast' version?

never change, Q

it scales better than a 1080p screen :^)

So... the two games coming out that RTS?

Fast sync effectively lets the game run uncapped, like without vsync, and will always display the latest frame available. It lets you avoid tearing while getting rid of the input latency inherent to regular vsync, which caps framerate to your refresh rate. If you want to use it, it is better to disable vsync in game. If you want to reduce input latency further, set maximum pre-rendered frames to 1.

Whats the difference between that and just capping the max framerate with RTSS

Fast sync doesn't cap framerate, the game will churn out as many frames as your computer can handle, but only the latest completed frame will be displayed, so you won't get tearing.

>play PC/PS4pro/Switch on same monitor.
PS4pro super sampling is a good idea on 1440p or I should stick to 1080?

Attached: DkalFJSVAAI7uBy.jpg (707x712, 101K)

>1440p
>when all content is either 1080p or 4K
Heh

i bet it's at least 30ms input lag and has some shite panel resolution like 1360x768 instead of 720p or 1080p

1440 is a pointless half (if even) step. If you're too poor to get 4k you might as well stay at 1080 and start saving up.

I just purchased a smart 4k TV and I do errything on it. Its good for flight sims too because its big.

It's what the others said but if you don't have a constant surplus of frames it will stutter. So it's great in games where you shit out frames but if you're barely above refresh it can be problematic.

At the same screen size, 1080p to 1440p is a bigger jump than 1440p to 2160p visually speaking.

so downscale 4K content, what are you a hard drivelet?

Attached: 1500305440102.jpg (618x619, 95K)

Or use madVR.

Agreed.
4k 144hz is the sweetspot.

Attached: mc.png (1282x641, 898K)

>or
i assume it's what you would be using to downscale 4K to 1440 already, i hope you aren't suggesting upscaling from 1080 when 4K is available you bitch nigga.

>still using the same 1080 Asus monitor I got in 2012
>still using the same 1080 Dynex TV I got in 2009 or something
if it ain't broke

Attached: 1527625208742.jpg (650x897, 384K)

Rather play on 1080p ultra settings for the next 4 years than 1440p high settings.

Name 10 screens that are affordable and can do both.

Why not playing 1440p Ultra?

I've been using 1080p for two years and I still think it's too big
I like my second 1280x1024 monitor a lot more for web browsing, and I'm considering downgrading my main one to 1680x1050

Because it's way more demanding? My 5700 XT will hold 60 FPS at ultra settings for the next 5 years at least, on 1440p it won't.

Then what exactly stops you from lowering the resolution to 1080p I dunno 3 years from now on when games stop being able to hold 60fps on 1440p on your setup?

But my PS2 can only do 480i and at best 480p

Attached: PS2 (1).jpg (1992x1084, 474K)

poorfag

Was it really able to do 480p? I thought the absolute best it could was 480i.

I'm not even denying it, I'm poor as fuck, but I would still be interested in which screens exactly do you think would be worth buying right now if money wasn't an issue?

I un-ironically play on a 32 inch tv. I'm 32 and have been gaming all my life. Pretty easy to avoid all these memes if you just play video games.

1. I'll be accustomed to 1440p and it'll be a lot harder to go back.
2. Using a non-native resolution looks like shit, monitors have shit scaling for whatever reason unlike TVs and 1080p/1440p aren't 1:1 like 1080p and 2160p are, rendering 1080p content on a 1440p monitor would look like shit compared to just using a 1080p monitor.

How good some of the games looked in 480i always amazes me

>1. I'll be accustomed to 1440p and it'll be a lot harder to go back.
lol
>2. Using a non-native resolution looks like shit, monitors have shit scaling for whatever reason unlike TVs and 1080p/1440p aren't 1:1 like 1080p and 2160p are, rendering 1080p content on a 1440p monitor would look like shit compared to just using a 1080p monitor.
Is it really such a big deal that it's worth worrying about? I mean if it was that much of a big deal, then all those 1440p faggots who already have a 1440p monitor surely would say something about how bad it is, but I never see anybody mention it.
Sounds like an excuse to me, rather than a legitimate concern.

Any thats 4k +120hz

4 years ago something like this cost me 799 lmao :(

>then all those 1440p faggots who already have a 1440p monitor surely would say something about how bad it is
They do, google "1080p games on 1440p monitor".
>It didn't for me. Everything looks blurry when I switch the resolution to 1080p on my 1440p monitor. I don't mean blurry as in compared to 1440p, I mean it looks terrible. Looks like something a GameCube would put out. I'd strongly recommend only getting a 1440p monitor if your machine can handle it.
So yeah, it is a big deal. Only retards buy 1440p monitors, if I cared enough about resolution I'd buy a 4k monitor and render 1800p and then use Radeon Sharpening if I felt like upgrading my GPU every 2-3 years.

360p is superior than your shitty 1080p

Am I edgy to play at 3440x1440?

Post a photo of yours.

This is literally the first time I have ever heard about this.
Can anybody from this thread who has a 1440p monitor right now confirm that lowering the resolution to 1080p really is such a big deal, I don't really trust random google reddit cherry picked comments.
If it was such a retarded thing to buy 1440p, I would expect more buzz about it.

>mfw people buy 4k tvs but don't even have 4k content

lmao

I dont have one ,I play 4k 60hz while I wait for an Nvidia Series capable of it
>GTX 1080ti owner

>Doesn't know what anti-aliasing is.

since this is a stupid thread anyways
is having a monitor with 10 bit color actually useful? like does the game have to support 10 bit color for the display to actually show them?

This video goes into detail, the blurriness is extremely easy to spot.
youtu.be/XvQYsG8n1tQ?t=321

Be sure to increase the video quality settings.

Hear about Samsung C32HG70, does well in every test.
>1440p
Also hear about Samsung C27HG70. Identical specification apart from size, $100 less.

Why would you want 32"?

I have a 4k monitor. I have a good PC so I can run most games at 4k 60fps. Just not the newest games like RE2 Remake or Metro Exodus.
Do I regret it? Not one bit. I play a lot of older games and emulators most of the time. I can easily do 4k in those. I played Dead Space 2 again recently in 4k, and it was so goddamn beautiful.

There might be less banding, but can cause stutter in some cases. I have a choice between 8bit and 12bit. 12bit causes a slight stutter here and there, 8bit doesn't. Took me forever to find out what was causing the stutter. Just moving the mouse caused ~20% gpu usage in 12bit.

k.

plenty of games do 480p, and a fair amount that don't natively can be forced to.

>want to play an old game at high resolutions
>it only has hacks to work specifically at 1920x1080, no higher

Attached: 1551409480853.jpg (540x513, 88K)

My rtx 2060 has been able to play 4/5 year old games at 4k high/ultra no aa. Its impressive. I want to sell my 2060 and get something better but all the faster cards just pull soo much damn wattage

I got an Acer XV272U for $360 a month ago.
It has all the specs of that LG one, so they're essentially the same, except that Acer is on new Innolux panels so response times are (apparently) a little worse than AUO panels.

Not sure what panel this LG is using. Never found any info on it.

Be aware it's not real 1ms at all. It's closer to around 4-9ms average G2G.

Lg is using lg panels... lol
Nano ips is what they call it. Very fast and 98% dci-p3 color

It is 1ms but only with the overdrive set to fastest. I plan to set it to fast

I'm actually in the market for a new monitor. Looking for 1440p, ultra wide, above 27 inch, gsync. Budget is ideally under 1k USD. Any suggestions?

I hope TFT makes a review on that monitor considering how popular it's getting. I want to see real response times.

Setting overdrive higher means overshoot like crazy. I know for a fact fastest has crazy ugly overshoot that's way worse than any ghosting could ever do, as seen from the LTT review on it.
Not sure about fast, but I guess it's alright.

Is "gaming monitor" a code word for shitty colors and contrast?

Sometimes. This lg is has good colors though. Its an ips though so contrast will be shit but i dont care. Would have went for a VA if i wanted contrast but they are too slow

>I'll jump into 1080p when the prices are reasonable
how much of a fucking poor fag are you holy shit

fps and hz are more important

What were old CRT reaction times? Less than 1ms?

Fpbp. I could actually care less. As long as it runs good, I'm happy.

display lag? yeah probably 1/100th of the best lcd

god, rich fags are insufferable

4K = 3840x2160

Don't you mean
>you fuckt up
?

they look like shit on PVM or BVM with a lot of lines. Really makes me sick.
t. 800 lines bvm

Me too. It's comfy

>1440p
Are you playing on a phone? 4k is minimum for a computer monitor

>4k
>Implying
4k is absolute shit, the pixel density is way too much for a computer monitor, you're never going to notice it, all it will do is eat your frame rate, which you'll never get 140. 4k is for TV screens, not computers.

1440p on 27" or 32"?
Curved or not curved?

Yuck lol

27" is the only choice. Curved is dealers choice.

I'm a poorfag and only have a 2060...
I could play at 1440p i guess, but then i'd need a new GPU in a year.

I would rather have 1080/144 sorry

If you fell for the 1440p viral marketing, you're an idiot who doesn't know about view distances and proper resolutions.
You're probably using some ultraHD shit on your tiny fucking phone, too.
Dumbest Generation.

tell me what monitor to buy right now, marketer-san.

1440p at 32 inches is the same pixel density as 1080p on a 24 inch
it means you can have crisp image quality but a physically bigger screen
27 inch 1440p is super crisp though
32 inch 4k is super duper crisp

Usually except this LG one is IPS with fast response time and 144hz and 1440p to boot. Usually you had to trade in colors and overall visual clarity for fast monitors, this one is suppose to combine both for once.

Games are made with 1080p in mind. Anything else is irrelevant.

So going from a 16:10 24" to 27" 1440p would be big improvement?
I just wonder if my 2500K/GTX970 is up for the task...

That literally means nothing you idiot.

imagine buying a decent monitor for $400 and lowering the settings just for screen real estate

Attached: 95AB927B-94AC-4EA4-A76B-A017D4AE7F51.jpg (4032x3024, 1.75M)

I just do 1080p/240hz. The perceived sharpness is a function of your screen size + distance. I don't want anything bigger than 23 inches to keep the entire monitor easily in view, and I don't sit like a hunch back with my face right up on the monitor. While the distance I sit at still doesn't give me the same sharpness as 1440p, its pretty close (~80-90%). At the end of the day I'm playing a video game, not judging the fine minutiae of the picture, so FPS wins out.

1080p also gives a lot of headroom for them frames. With all settings maxed, I was getting no less than 200fps on REmake, DMC5, and that walking simulator Plague Tale.

I'm waiting for the VG27AQ

Attached: 1537794979665.jpg (500x500, 46K)

I play at 1280x1024 in Counter-Strike.

Eh, I'd rather have more frames on 1080p and future proof my rig a bit more.

1440/144fps is the comfiest combo. anything below that is trash tier and anything above like 4k is a meme and for faggots

Attached: 1554378758387.jpg (192x263, 8K)

It came, bitches

Attached: 20190812_113056.jpg (4032x3024, 3.96M)

Just bought a second budget 1080p 60Hz freesync monitor, what you gonna do about it?

Attached: :o).png (491x585, 56K)

2048x1536 here. Feels nice with all that space.

remember to set up the gsync properly.

based

i play most games at my desktop resolution: 2560x1080.

Attached: basedgraham.jpg (1360x768, 453K)

Where'd you get it? It's sold out everywhere.

oh god that backlight bleed is horrendous

Everyone above this post is objectively poor.

If you do not own at least 3 1440p@144hz monitors, you have no place here and need to go back.

Attached: Untitled.png (453x586, 33K)

>Look at new monitors
>All these fancy specs
>Requires latest generation graphics card
What's the point to buy a bigger and better monitor if you can't use the things that makes it good in the first place?

>multiple monitors
>all that wasted vertical space
user you know your eyes are arranged side by side and not one on top of another right

Gsync just werks
Preordered it a month ago on amazon
Lol that the camera pricture not the monitor

You're in no place to tell me anything unless asked, I use my shit the way I see fit faghead. Point of the entire thread: Prove you're not a subhuman casual shitter and poorfag. Step up and show your game, or go fucking back and kys. Poorfags should be legally banned from buying vidya, I wish we had a vidya tax like in Brazil.

Attached: Capture.jpg (740x453, 22K)

You fucking tard, 4k gaming isn't like scaling up movies. Even if a game doesn't have 4k textures, you can still play the game at 4k and receive the tangible benefit of increased detail. You don't "develop games in 4k", at least concerning modern 3d games.

You sound like a fucking poorfag retard.
>i dont waste money on toys
As you post on a video game forum in a thread about high screen resolutions being better. Cope more faggot. Lmao
>ill be rich someday because i saved 100 bucks once.
Hahaha.

Attached: 1565202395906.gif (320x240, 1.76M)

it's code for good response time and high refresh rate, which usually means TN-type LCD

My 144hz GSync monitor uses IPS LCD and looks fine.

>I wish we had a vidya tax like in Brazil.
user are you trying to get stoned to death by Yea Forums

These days the only reason to go TN is cost since VA and IPS are now capable of high refresh rates.

Not really
t. GTX 970 3.5GB

TN looks like shit. Vg looks like shit. Oled is too expensive. IPS looks good but can have light bleed issues which are common enough to warrant consideration but you can always return a shitty monitor. I shop brick and mortar for monitors so can view them in store without having to come back and return one. Ive owned 3 ips monitors and none of them have had light bleed, though.

That's enough horsepower for 1440p 144hz with room to spare, retard. What is the point of wasting money on a powerful card only to not use it?

VA looks find (assuming Vg meant VA). The only real picture problems come from viewing angles which is nearly eliminated by curved screens.

4K GTAV looks fucking fantastic at 30fps

Attached: Grand Theft Auto V 8_8_2019 10_06_22 AM.jpg (3840x2160, 3.22M)