Why do you old faggots overrate this garbage so much?

Why do you old faggots overrate this garbage so much?

Attached: 5454B606-0F82-4F68-BACE-21F0E8997F8D-589-000000ACEC3FEC5B.jpg (190x266, 16K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=zSAJ0l4OBHM
youtu.be/O0ikW7pVa_I?t=8
myredditnudes.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Something to do with it being the last great gta game. dunno i prefer vice city personally

Everyone here owned a PS2 and is brown

The last actual great GTA was CTW

straight busta

Never played it, so you might be right, but it's sort of spinoff game

If this was made on the new engine no one would play the GTA5

Attached: 367b219dccfdc4129db318c46ad0488c.jpg (640x640, 308K)

I played so much SA on the PS2 back in the day but after replaying it recently, holy fuck has the game not aged well.
>tiny environments
>can hardly interact with anything
>very few unique interiors
>nothing to do while waiting for missions, everything is time gated
The original trilogy has aged like moldy cheese.

Attached: 1548743107237.png (843x517, 517K)

Have you not play 5?

this is a zoomer game.
the truth is gta was never good

I was kind of let down by CTW way back when. I expected it to have a lot of connections to IV's story and setting, but they were pretty negligible and I could barely recognize the map as Liberty City's due to how flat and simplified the terrain was.

Because all my exes live in Texas.

Attached: 1565048487807.gif (398x400, 1.6M)

>overrate
nah nigga it's the best gta, has a good story about gang-violence and wanting to get the fuck out of it instead of perpetuating it because muh honor, nails the silly-serious story ratio, good location and great lines everywhere you look, has customization options that haven't been repeated in the series yet

Attached: ZOOM ZOOM ZOOM.png (480x360, 258K)

>I played so much V on the PS4
FTFY

gta V was alot better but this was one of the best feelings in video game history
youtube.com/watch?v=zSAJ0l4OBHM

>old
S.A is early zoomercore not boomercore at all

>very few unique interiors
>meanwhile, in V and IV, there is pretty much little to no enterable buildings

It's the best gta. The scale, the ancient mystery videos it spawned, the servers, all of it.

>Downgrade from VC in literally ever way except muh gwafix
>"Best GTA"

Attached: 1565045440920.gif (416x414, 1.63M)

Downgrade? What the fuck are you on about

The gunplay in San Andreas was abysmal.
All guns felt unsatisfying, npcs were mannequins that barely reacted to your actions, shootouts were boring and tedious.
San Andreas was a good game for many reasons, but the gunplay was still one of the worst I've ever seen.

gta 3, vice city, and san andreas, while tongue-in-cheek, are sincere and soulful games

gta 4 was decent but too self-conscious and pretentious

gta 5 is cynical garbage and I quit at the torture mission

The best way of rating a gta game is the quality of the humor.

>has customization options that haven't been repeated in the series yet
What customization options does SA has that V doesn't?

>tfw used movie servers to make gta videos
Made air crash investigation videos getting thousands of views, and a zombie series with some other dude.

youtu.be/O0ikW7pVa_I?t=8

The gunplay in V is even worse.

Same reason you new faggots overrate GTA IV.

It isn't you contrarian buffoon.
Don't get me wrong it's shit but no fucking way dude.

I thought Zoomers loved Minecraft and Fortnite?
Yet more proof that this meme doesn't actually mean anything.

In my opinion it was the most fun to play. The world was fun to explore and it still felt like a GTA game. Don't get me wrong, I like IV. But the PS2 era GTAs have a different feel to them. That combined with the youtube videos and urban myths surrounding the game. It felt like the world was a lot deeper than it was.

I'm not trying to be contrarian. Shooting people in V with an assault rifle feels as if the weapon has barely any impact, barely any recoil. It feels like a water pistol and only when there is the red cross, you know that you've hit somebody because you sure can't tell by feeling the impact.

I agree in a sense. For its time and a while after it was great. But it is very dated now. Its like when people say the Beatles are the greatest band of all time when they clearly aren't. They might have been great for the time but there have been so many better bands and musicians since then

Games are ranked like this;
(The games not included aren't worth including)
>SA
>VC
>IV
>III
>V

>better driving
>much better shooting
>bike cops (how it was not a thing in VC?)
>multiple flyable planes
>moddable cars
>3 cities AND boonies for each of them
>fuckton of character customizations
>radio stations running on templates rather than entirely prerecorded
>gang wars

>"downgrade"

This

>the last great gta game

Attached: gtaiv.jpg (460x215, 31K)

Zoom zoom zoomie

fun factor (gameplay + content)
SA
IV
VC
V
III

story mode
VC
SA
TBoGT
III
TLaD
V
IV

What do you mean by running on templates?

that would be expansions. Campaign in base GTA IV was boring as fuck

People under the age of 18 wouldn't understand. You kids are used to pay to win Rockstar games instead of good ones.

songs, commercials and DJ voice are not prerecorded into one audio file, but stored separately and radio runs via scripts. This allows to mix them at semi-random fashion, and for example, make DJs or callers relate to current story events.

It’s scale was impressive for the time, but if you look past the vast amount of content, VC is a more tight and focused game with better mission design to boot.

>pay-to-win
You can't buy or use shark cards or any microtransactions in V's story mode.

>THAT ESE PUT DUST IN MY WEED

Attached: 1559766630011m.jpg (804x1024, 79K)

Very very good game for it time.

Had a lot of feature that people thought were cool, map was the biggest yet and felt more expansive, likable characters, great missions, decent story that made you feel something for the characters, great cheats, customisation aspects (clothes and cars), progression aspects (gangs, weight, health bar), neat little shit like 2 player mode (although clearly lacking), neat little tie in to previous gta (doesn't actually do much for the game itself, but allows it to remembered more fondly).

Why do you think it's garbage? And no meme answer too.

Attached: 1553995458631.jpg (450x319, 15K)

>Why do you zoomer faggots overrate this garbage so much?

Attached: actual_1364906194.jpg (640x783, 210K)

>Getting buff
>Getting fat
>Being a dyel skelly gangbanger
There were also a retarded amount of clothes, haircuts and tattoos, and you could buy way more locations (most pf them were exactly the same, tho)

He's right though. GTA literally downgraded from the game before it, GTA IV, for whatever fucking reason, but it doesn't even matter because you just flick the stick up and BOOM! headshot, insta-kill. it's ridiculously easy and requires no effort. Gunplay isn't even a thing in 5 because of this

*is white.
FTFY

Ah, I see. The radio was always a big part of GTA games, but with IV and V, the radio seemed lacking. Not many standout tracks or even interesting DJs/adverts.