Why do these clown politicians keep coming for our vidya?

Because gamers are an easy target.

Because they're bought and owned by the NRA, so they need a scapegoat to blame instead of actually doing anything meaningful.

White male BAD

>Why does a party that is bought out by gun corporations always try to deflect blame whenever voters want more gun restrictions

idk user

Because video games don't pay them to go after someone else instead.

More like White Male TERRIBLE... Mixed Male... WORSE

Because they're too stupid to blame Hollywood action movies, TV, Rap & Rock & Roll, and not enough Bible study. Duh.

most mass shooters and domestic terrorists are white men

Video games are violent though.

I agree fellow citizen

Attached: 0E5FDE31-C130-48F3-8B38-BFF93C1FD0FF.png (300x309, 107K)

Based

American Liberals always try to make everything about politics.

They're also people with long documented mental illness issues that are rarely properly addressed, even though their local police and citizens know about it.

Yeah, shoving that L-block into place is REAL violent.

only if you carefully make some convoluted definition of "mass shooter" which excludes all the black mass shooters with excuses like "it's gang related so it doesn't count"

glow

because the republican party's base are old white boomers who are the sort who unironically believe in vidya being satanic/causing kids to grow up fucked up, so in this case it's a useful deflection since their base will eat it up and they don't have to confront the gun issue
>american liberals
>when it's the exact opposite people that brought up vidya in relation to mass shootings
based retard
though I am saging this thread because for fucks sake there is a board to bitch about politicians

Watching/reading the news is the #1 cause for bloodthirsty suicidal mass shooters. Never read the news lads

Most mass shooters are liberals. Even the one in El paso was.

Liberals make literally the same argument when it suits them, at least no one gives a fuck about what 80 year old christian boomers have to say

it's easier to blame video games than to take on the gun lobby

Can you fuck off back to tweddit, you underaged faggot? Thanks.

>Most mass shooters are liberals
Dont tell people that youre underage.

nope
mass shooters are conservative white males
the dayton shooter was a bernie supporter, but his motives had nothing to do with politics. the el paso shooter targeted hispanics specifically because he was conservative. the synagogue and mosque shooters killed people because of their conservative beliefs.
conservatism motivates people to commit terrorist killings. liberalism prevents people from committing crime and encourages them to be patriots and better people in general.

>most mass shooters are liberals
doubt.jpg
though that is entirely unrelated to the point of this thread which is some republicans deflecting to vidya causing mass shooters after the recent ones
>Liberals make literally the same argument when it suits them
true, but I was speaking of recent events which are why this thread was made
>at least no one gives a fuck about what 80 year old christian boomers have to say
are you high? why do you think they pointed to video games in the first place? because said 80 year old boomers are the ones that vote at every single opportunity

they are actually jews most of the time

Typcial liberal resulting into ad hominems instead of logical argument.

> liberalism prevents people from committing crime and encourages them to be patriots and better people in general

Liberalism destroy culture then people get mad and go on mass shootings.

fuck off tourist

>Grow up in the 90s.
>Constantly have to tell the right to fuck off with their moral bullshit.
>Peace for a time.
>Now I have to constantly tell the left to fuck off with their moral bullshit.
>They don't and fuck things up.
>The right senses the moment of weakness and starts attacking vidya again.

I'll never forgive the feminists. I can't wait until sex robots and artificial wombs cancel them.

Attached: tenor[1].gif (498x298, 484K)

I think what he's trying to say is most mass shooters are documented as white, but the issue of video game violence influencing this behavior is still discretionary and there is no actual standardized opinion on t twenty years later.

>liberals use ad hom instead of logic
>literal right wingers blaming video games for mass shootings
you are actually sub 70 IQ

>Liberalism destroy culture then people get mad and go on mass shootings
conservatism is by definition anti-american. liberalism is patriotic and pro-american. conservatives commit terrorist killings because liberals defend the freedoms and ideals that founded the country from conservative treason.

Fuck off you dense election refugee

Because boomers are a joke but they're still smart enough to realize that trying to blame TV,radio, or movies again in 2019 will get them laughed out of the room

its best to just avoid all political news as its what enrages people, george washington once said that the two party system would become aids incarnate for this country and its come true

>>literal right wingers blaming video games for mass shootings

Im not American but you liberals always blame whites for all the shit.

If liberalism is so pro american then why liberals try to destroy American culture?

*kills you*

Attached: C557CF2D-56FE-40E2-BD0F-3D01A4162C4B.jpg (698x399, 71K)

>If liberalism is so pro american then why liberals try to destroy American culture
they aren't, they are protecting american culture from conservatives. conservatives are trying to destroy american culture because the defining ideals of america, freedom and equality, are anti-conservative.

If liberals promote freedom why do they try to censor everyone?

Shut up bigot

>will get them laughed out of the room
the response to the comments tells me this basically already applies to vidya unless it's another senile boomer they're talking to
I mean think about the fact that at this point gaming was a part of childhood for at least a niche of 30-40 year olds and widespread for anyone under that, that's a pretty big chunk of the population
honestly the problem isn't keeping well informed, the problem is that in the last decade society decided to chuck away the
>don't talk politics except with close friends and family and if you do keep an open mind and be willing to tolerate people who don't think exactly like you
rule at the same time as politicians and the media have turned politics into a zero sum culture war in which your very way of life is at risk of destruction if the other side wins, which leads to the autistic shitfest of society today

>Im not American but you liberals
If youre not American, then why do you give a shit?
You 3rd world niggers need to shut up.

Because what i always hear from liberals is just stupid retarded shit. Non-stop. It actually makes me mad how stupid you are. So i have to talk.

they don't
conservatives are censoring people via violence and terrorism. liberals protect the first amendment.

These terrorist attacks are perpetuated by the federal government.

because they can't do anything about the guns, so they need a scapegoat being video games that way everyone gets mad about that instead.

it makes more sense than blm protesters suddenly calling for more reliance on cops, anarchists calling for more laws, and socialists giving up the means to resist tyranny

no, they are perpetrated by treasonous america-hating conservatives

>liberals protect the first amendment.

How are they protecting it by censoring people? I can't say anything in videogames and not to trigger liberals. Is this what you consider freedom?

No. They are perpetuated by the federal government. You are a traitor.

How about Las Vegas shooting? The shooter was liberal.

>muh reductionist mental health argument

If that’s so then every white nationalist is fucked in the brain.

the first amendment protects 4 separate rights, one of which is freedom of association. liberals protect peoples' and companies' right to not associate with you. you have no right to use other people's property as a platform for your speech. conservatives' sense of entitlement is the antithesis to the first amendment, and liberals protect americans from conservative attempts to infringe on americans' first amendment rights.

That shooting? Never happened

But this does not make any sense??? Why is it called freedom of speech in the first place?

no, they are terrorist attacks committed by treasonous amerca-hating conservatives

But it did?

freedom of speech really only relates to being able to criticize the government without being executed for it, though trump has said things that make it seem like he wishes he could execute people for it

Remember the wisdom said by owen cyclops:
>violence + crime is caused by a complex network of socioeconomic factors interwoven with the general flow of culture and history unless its a “mass shooting” in which case the causes are usually a single idea or just “guns”

"Blacks commit more crime" - well, it's a really complicated topic that goes back to slavery and is connected with modern societal context.
"Mass shootings happen" - it's white supremacy or video games, depending on what angle you want to pursue for your political capital.

you have freedom of speech. you do not have the right to force others to give you a platform to speak. your sense of entitlement to other people's property is not a right. and liberals will always protect other people's first amendment rights to not associate with you.

No. They are perpetuated by the federal government, which does not serve the people.

You’re a traitor

But the freedom of speech applies to everyone? Why are you liberals trying to make is so only corporations dont need to follow American laws??? Are you retarded?

they are trying to make us more miserable so we can start fighting one another instead of ourselves. Rich wealth fags doing what they so children...

gotta shift the blame on to something else.
taking responsibility would mean losing money.

Nope

Exactly. Fuck the rich and their faggot gaslighting attack dogs, the letter agencies

Yes it did? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Las_Vegas_shooting

>I'm not allowed to be toxic in videogames so my rights are being infringed upon

Pseudo intellectual posturing on a video game forum is my favourite pass time too, user.

That is right. Why i am not allowed to be toxic? Why do you need to censor me?

>responds with a prepped talking point that has fuck all to do with the post

actual npc

Why don't we just mass shoot the news?

UH OH

Attached: IUoThR3.jpg (1902x2048, 694K)

>NPC using NPC to bash legitimate points
l-m-a-o

your sense of entitlement to other people's property is not a right. not matter what you say, think, or do, this will never change. people and companies have the first amendment right to not associate with you.

no, they are terrorist attacks committed by treasonous amerca-hating conservatives

It's easier to blame video games than it is to take the blame themselves. It's why millennials get blamed for everything wrong in the world even though it's the two generations prior that truly fucked everything up for us and we're still cleaning up after the mess they made for us. Thankfully within the next 10-20 years all of those people will be dead, although we'll be dealing with the aftermath for at least another century.

Attached: 435B900D00000578-0-image-m-78_1503069888998[1].jpg (634x652, 166K)

the fuck are you even on about? Keep pretending what I said isn't the truth I guess

you should try thinking about it a little longer

It's not a mass shooting when a nigger does it, it's just gang violence from the mentally unprivileged

>4+ people
>doesnt specify that those shot in a vast majority of the black guys mass shootings were involved in gang shit

its not a mass shooting if they arnt innocents, user.

See
I know you're too retarded to understand it because your understanding of free speech is isn't fully formed, but that's the reason.

>that not me, that you

great response, I'm sure that counts as a high level argument on your home larp board

Attached: 1409371279956.jpg (498x640, 79K)

>people and companies have the first amendment right to not associate with you

So censoring everyone whom i disagree with is??? Not freedom of speech.. Yes?

But freedom of speech means. Freedom of speech? Am i wrong? What is my understanding?

>Am I wrong?
Yes.

>most mass shooters are white men
70-80% of them are niggers.

These attacks are perpetuated by the federal government.

The elite does not protect the masses, why do you think they do? Do you think they won’t kill you?

But this is not argument. Can you please stop being retarded libshit once in your life and use logic. Fuck sake im getting angry just to speak with you. Unreasonable trash fucking retard.

SPEAK NORMALLY FUCKING RETARD

FUCK OFF

Nobody wants to actually address the core issue which is the social malaise that is causing people to snap and go on shootings (something that has really only cropped up in the past few decades), so they just go around in circles and blame it on random shit that is, at best, tangentially related to the issue at hand.

freedom of speech is LITERALLY only related to government criticism. I mean you can say whatever you want anywhere but freedom of speech does not equate to freedom from consequences. Spewing nigger will get you banned on video games, you agree to it in the TOS

Because Boomers don't understand vidya and don't want us to have fun.

scapegoating, happened all the fucking time in nearly all countries

Only one law is seen as more important than constitutional law: contract law

Companies can do whatever they want to you as long as you agree to it with a contract and it is not explicitly against the law

And guess what the first thing is that you do before interacting with any company at all: agree to a contract.

u mad

you are not entitled to other people's property
you can speak as much as you want. no one is required to listen, and no one is required to give you a platform to speak on. the first amendment protects everyone. you are just mad that other people have rights too. which proves that you hate america and the freedom and equality that it stands for.

>Make a thread about video games
>0 Replies
>Make a thread about politics
>200 Replies

Yea Forums is dead

>why aren't millennials having sex
>promiscuous millennials are killing mcdonalds
lul

conservatives were the ones that perpetrated the terrorist anti-american attacks
the government were the ones that stopped the attacks
conservatives are mad that they keep trying to destroy america but the government and the patriotic liberals keep beating them

No, it's my constitutional right to speak how I want

>its not a mass shooting if they arnt innocents, user.
who's deciding who is innocent?

It's interesting you consider US liberals protectors of law when they wipe their asses with the US constitution on a daily basis.
Try to avoid harboring political bias for your own sake.

I wish millennials killed half this degenerate boomer shit.

>ad hominem attacks
triggered? :^)

But mass shootings and even school attacks go back well over 100 years. It's probably a mix of things that by themselves are innocent. Individualism is extremely strong in Americans, our culture has always glorified war and soldiers and violence in general, there is a level of fame you get from it that most of us can never get otherwise, etc. But no, games aren't the problem and to some extent guns aren't either. A LOT of people here own guns that never shoot anyone. If ownership itself was the problem we'd see a lot more shootings. One of the big changes that coincides with shootings becoming more common is letting the Brady bill expire. May not be causation but it's awfully coincidental. Before that you weren't seeing assault weapons used in every single one.

I love you

like? I'm genuinely curious :^)

>Millenial Thanos kills half of all boomer things in the universe.

Not him but when libshits get all giddy and start using "snowflake" or "triggered" it makes you look like teenage girls attempting to get their own back on someone who called them a mean name. It's not witty, it's not effective.

Attached: 84c547f8178d96ef18940cc7989ae9eef202e8ea02b1fae42b9098089b74d5c5.png (454x453, 54K)

Can't answer to so many libshits so let me ask you.

Platforms on which i can express myself including banks and other shit created huge liberal oligarchy where i cant express my conservative views or critize liberal goverment and action.

So im asking you my dear fucking libshits. Will someone get mad? Are you still pro freedom of speech? Hmm?

No wonder right wingers are mass shooting your ass when you deine literally fist american law.

>>>/cuckit/

The only reason to say this is if you aren’t sure yourself
it’s called empathy, trust in the judgement of others, you’re right but leave the social pressure bullshit to the subhumans

They literally want to die user, it’s a cult of death

It's more insulting that they can't even properly insult you. Which would be pretty fucking clever if they do that intentionally but we know they aren't.

most school shooters shot bullies so its fair.

The elite does not protect the masses.

These attacks are perpetuated by the federal government.

The elite does not protect the masses, defending these traitors will bring you suffering

because they are destroying an entire generation that government needs to pay taxes and enlist into army.

its hard to find motivated workers when majority is only motivated by videogame reward systems.
its hard to find eligible servicemen when majority is limpwristed neets.

its that simple. thats all there is to it.

I think we've all come to agreement that video game violence does not make you violence in real life. However, does underage girls in video games make you a pedophile?

Attached: 1564034237746.png (428x850, 238K)

That's not what an ad hominem is. Please actually learn what that term means before using it.

It's funny to me. How do you not know how to curse, swear or us other known deregatory words? It's like you're trying to make a joke, not piss someone off.

To be fair their original “slurs” are pretty fucking shite like chud or reactionary

ALSO increase in gaming probably correlates with declining birthrates. something that government REALLY abhors.

actually there is no proof against violent video games => violence.

The studies for it got debunked recently. That's why theres a movement for it again.

why didn't they ban feminism?

Some people are very susceptible and can legitimately turn into mass shooters if they're really addicted to violent games, i know this is a very minuscule minority and of course banning violence in video games for it would be retarded but thinking that violence in media has 0% to do in the making of a mass shooter is also retarded and factually wrong

oh my god can you, like, actually try to use your own_brain for like 5 seconds?

The government fucking loves declining birth rates are you seriously? Just replace them with immigrants who’ll do the same shit but cheaper

cant its at the cleaners.

should probably ban violent films, music and literature as well then. Those are all consumable forms of communication and therefore influence.

Respond to me liberals. How are you for first admememnt if you wont let conservatives talk and cirtize your liberal goverment action.

Answer me how are you for PRO AMERICA. Or are you just trying to make everyone mad? Im from Europe and you to me are completly clueless retarded faggots. I support right wingers in America because at least they have clear image of what was America before your multicultural oga boga trash.

video games are a good scapegoat to keep brainlets away from the fact our most basic rights and the entirety of western civilization are being infringed upon by massive corporations and corrupt glowniggers like the ones ITT.

Attached: 1562563696527.jpg (960x540, 90K)

this. No one NEEDs to see someone mutilated on television.

This is going to happen though

why are you guys mixing vidya boomers with the actual boomer generation? blame trump for this.

liberal doesn't actually mean "Freedom" by the strictest definition. read a pol sci book bro.

>How are you for first admememnt
>he doesn't know

they're already turning against it.

Because the vidya industry makes more money than hollywood but doesn't bribe the government as much.

why can't you stay on your fucking containment board you literal mouthbreathing retarded mutts

Which is why they won’t get censored

Yea Forums - stephen crowder comments section

>But mass shootings and even school attacks go back well over 100 years
Yes, but they were -EXCEEDINGLY- less common, despite a period where guns were arguably even more accessible to the general populace, and attitudes towards guns were generally far more lax (for instance, teenagers bringing their rifles to school for shooting clubs). Generally speaking, state and federal laws, as well as public attitudes, are significantly more strict nowadays than they were 50-100 years ago.

>One of the big changes that coincides with shootings becoming more common is letting the Brady bill expire.
You're thinking of the 1994 AWB. You can loosely argue the point that shootings are more deadly as a result of the greater proliferation of "assault weapons" (a term which is, quite frankly, a meaningless misnomer), but to say that mass shootings are occurring at a greater frequency -because- of "assault weapons" is kind of a silly point to make.

School shootings have only existed after violent video games came out. Guns have been common for centuries.

wish it would, Once upon a time in hollywood, harry potter, trippy red. ban it all.

>(((debunked)))
By who and who was their sponsor?

Do you not consider blacks people?

I'm finally going to ask after seeing this word around for like 3 years: what the hell is a glownigger?

I said that i don't want anything banned (would be hypocritical of me as a supporter of the Constitution) all i'm saying is that to someone who is fucked in the head to see violence being so normalized and glorified to them murdering innocent people en masse would seem "cool" and "heroic". All i'm saying is keep children and edgelords away from violent shit

some rando I saw him a few years ago on tucker and started screaming.
In retrospect he must be doing pretty well.

FUCKING LIBERALS ANSWER TO ME. WHERE THE FUCK ARE YOUR ARGUMENTS NOW. FUCKING TRASH RETARDS WITH NO LOGIC. NO WONDER PEOPLE ARE GETTING MAD YOU MAKE THEM MAD BY YOUR RETARDNESS AND THEN YOU WONDER WHY MASS SHOOTINGS HAPPEN. FUCKING SHIT.

IF EVERY LIBSHIT ON THIS PLANET DISSAPEARED NO ONE WOULD NOTICE IN FACT EVERYTHING WOULD IMPROVE! REDDIT FAGGOT NIGGER! IF I GET BANNED THE LIBERALS MADE ME TO SAY THIS BECAUSE OF THEIR ILLOGICAL SHIT ARGUMENTS

Attached: 1564397454847.png (318x303, 148K)

on the other hand, public platforms like twitter have a number of important legal protections separate from the first amendment that they can only have if they operate as a public platform rather than curating the content that gets hosted in any biased way. recently, they've been enjoying those protections while ignoring the responsibilities included in favor of censoring political opponents, and thus they are not exempt from criticism.

this is technically separate from the first amendment, but i need to clarify: your rights are not given to you by the government, and the amendments are there to restrict the government from infringing on them, not to grant you anything. the context of "the government can't hurt you for speaking" is because it's a document of how the government works. regular laws are how they would protect your rights when it comes to other citizens trying to silences you, and there are plenty of those.

its actually about vidya too, why do you think the thread is still up?

My whole thing about that is "edgelord" by who's definition? For example, maybe I think you sneeze in a very violent and disconcerting way. Maybe in that, I consider you to be an edgelord because you cannot temper your sneezes. You can really make the definition as insane as you want to if the right people are in power.

Why do people support political parties that actively sabotage their voter's lives? I'll never understand americans

A fed, or CIA Agent, to be more specific. It is derived from the late Terry Davis, who was a schizophrenic programmer well known on /g/ for creating his own operating system (which he claimed was divinely inspired) from scratch and being pretty insane. He used to talk about how "CIA niggers glow in the dark" and how he would run them over with his car. This was eventually shortened to the term "glownigger".

the complete persecution or removal of ideas that certain special groups consider problematic is easier and draws less attention than direct government intervention. it's subversion 101

where do you live, bro?
can you carry a butter knife in public?

Americans voted in Abraham Lincoln knowing that the election hinged upon slavery and the rights of Africans countrywide. They elected him knowing that he would cleave the country in two and cause a massive disrupt. It's just something that had to be done, I think.

>abloobloo mass shootings
>abloobloo that doesn't count

gee It's like you don't even care about mass shootings

Attached: 1522543810335.jpg (1164x712, 355K)

>Crowder
I keep seeing millennials and boomers with his channel open in tabs or in their bookmarks.
He should die or something.

>He should die or something.
or why?

Even easier than that

You can just beat the human psyche down into submission with violence. That’s what’s going to happen with these scheduled tragedies.

he's being facetious

right on the money

Why do you blame boomers ? The carebear attitude originate from zoomers,not boomers.

You're going full autist here. What i'm trying to say is that as a parent you should know when your kid is not right and you shouldn't expose him to violent things and take him to the shrink even if he's a teenager. Also severely punish parents and people who overlook the ESRB ratings and give/sell M games to children, can't be good for a child to grow up playing COD and GTA, and yes not evry child who played those games as a kid grew up to be aass shooter but still it can harm an impressionable child's mind forever

>facetious
is it contagious?

That came from boomers too. You think little Timmy actually wanted or gives a shit about a participation trophy? No but his cool wine aunt does

>it's another american who doesn't know his own history episode
fun fact: there is not a single government in the world of that size that has ever fought for something morally good like "slave rights".

>Why don't you trust the government?
>give away your rights designed to stop the government to the government

>no they're bought out by evil gun salesmen

well that and if he had let the south do its thing all that sweet carolina clay would have been to the benefit of some hispanic fucks. Yanks couldn't have that, and I don't blame them. Fuck those latinos.

Is that an If-By whiskey?

How can you type something so politically charged and expect a social answer?

This post made me clap. God bless my country, who has done no wrong and fought for good. May all our evil enemies be damned to hell

This is a caricature, this has to be a semblance of overblown qualities at the expense of comedy.

Americans
Lying to themselves about themselves to protect themselves from themselves

That's, what do you call it, a Catch-22!

Agreed fellow good guy, all opposition is either an act of evil or clever caricature at the enemy's expense.

Attached: 55.gif (482x800, 29K)

yes yes a very big brain statement, however that doesn't explain why video games are large all over the world and only america has mass shootings

Attached: 1555741119709.jpg (640x640, 49K)

Well I don't understand politics too much, but I do have a ear for the arts, and that definitely looks like a political cartoon waiting to happen!

Attached: foamy.jpg (1280x720, 229K)

Video games are far too economically efficient.

With a good game, I can spend $60 for 400+ hours of entertainment.

That's untapped spending. Big Business can no longer afford to let this happen. That's why they're pushing MCT. Unfortunately for them, most gamers don't give a shit about MCT. So they wanna kill games, so we have to spend more money per hour of entertainment. Big Business gotta make sure they're hitting their numbers after all.

Sorry I'm half asleep but hopefully the point comes through

Attached: anthy.jpg (500x500, 109K)

Not everywhere is as diverse as us either.... lol

Marilyn Manson is not popular anymore

So are vidya violent or sexist?

Attached: R9WHaXap_400x400.jpg (400x400, 23K)

>t-those dont count! stop proving me wrong!

A far left leaning person would say that they are both.

Boomers blame video games for 2 reasons:
>old good new bad
And looking to shift the blame of mass shootings to things other than guns, because owning guns are part of the american “ideal.” Because it’s written in the constitution it shouldn’t be changed, and boomers, and conservatives for that matter, don’t like change

Violently sexist

Who are you quoting?

>only america has mass shootings

You mean only America classifies more than one person shot as a mass shooting. Shit tons of other countries are known to fudge their crime statistics to make themselves look better to the international community. I forget the exact country, England I think, reports a given crime as what the convict is convicted of, America reports a given crime as what it goes to trial as.

true, I guess one cannot simply go on tv and say that there are too many spics and niggers, so they say disingenuous shit like vidya is the issue

>the south:we're the dindu nuthins of north america

america.
Do you walk around with a knife in hand?

why can't they just tell people to fucking lock their gun cabinets, I doubt little timmy was able to buy a gun himself

Not just boomers. Zoomers who aren't wealthy, educated or empathetic. Zoomers who live in percarious situations often associated with lower class living. Those niggers LOVE guns. black niggers, white niggers, yellow niggers, grey niggas. All those poor fags think about is playing king of the hill. Which often happens to involve guns.

sexually violent

You are wrong.

Gaming like everything else was fine until 2010’s and then once zoomers grew old enough to tell 1 from 2 all went to shit. Shit like mobage and carebear moderation didn’t exist before 2014you are either having Alzheimer’s or are a zoomer yourself.

the funny thing is that america honestly has one of the cleanest histories.

democrats keep pushing this baseless fear of guns as the cause of mass violence so republicans use high intelligent debate tactics to say it's video games

now they are making liberal manchildren who cling to their precious video games arguing for why this isn't the cause of gun violence and distracting them from complaining about the same thing gun ownership

The South was just as bad as the North in terms of racism, it's just that Northern racism is secular while Southern racism is a little more church friendly. For example, segregation laws in the 1960's were all the rage. In the north, black people had shit job opportunity. In the South of the 1800's slaves were being whipped and fucked in the ass royally and literally. In the North, black people had to drop all their culture and adopt Anglo lifestyles.

They're both racist, but the kind of racism is different between the two extremes.

>only america has mass shootings
yep, no one gets shot en masse in any country. isn't that what the media is telling you? south america, africa, the middle east, russia. every country is quiet

I honestly hope we can double down on it and get normies upset.

>you don't need blood in your video games, do you user?

violently sexy

americans are pic related

Attached: 10.jpg (782x714, 71K)

>black people had to drop all their culture and adopt Anglo lifestyles
I don't see how getting them to not be backwater cretins is so bad.

this is also ignoring all the shootings in europe and australia.

lol, south america has some of the craziest gun violence. brazil is like a john wick movie with their news on violent crime.

>why do these clown politicians keep coming for our vidya?

Because blaming inanimate objects is easier than admitting that they've destroyed the economy and the society and damned future generations to a life of servitude to our corporate masters.

Attached: road to serfdom.jpg (400x600, 29K)

the heart of the civil rights movement and black panthers were largely urban and northern in nature. I don't get where you see white washing in all that

Well it's just, that if you don't have a culture to hold on to, it can be hard to adopt a new one. It's basic sociology. If I ask a Scottish person to be more like a British person, he knows... what not to do, and as a consequence, what TO do. But, if I ask a black person (probably from Africa), to drop his culture, and pretend to be more like the civilized whites, he doesn't know where to start. So it can, in effect, keep him exclusively out of specific events and specific social circles.

when you consider all the years they didn't even exist into the equation, yeah, their record is pretty clean.
Didn't take them long to start one of the greatest genocides history has ever seen, and then start one of the bloodiest civil wars history has seen as well.

>americans
You mean any country populated by humans.

Lol you play minecraft.

because they're on their "team". even if you don't agree with them you have to support them since you're all on the same "team".

the countries with the highest vidya revenue have low gun violence, like korea and japan, just because third world shit holes like brazil and columbia have gun violence doesn't prove a fucking thing

Unless you compare the short time that the United States has been a country to the shit ton of fucked up things the country has done. The US is literally the "muh 13%" of countries.

Americans are easily manipulated

>Didn't take them long to start one of the greatest genocides history has ever seen

*snort*

or in a history book. control the knowledge of past and you can control everything.

>As the wartime and post-war jobs which drew much of the black migration "fled to the suburbs along with white residents", the black population was concentrated in poor "urban ghettos" with high unemployment, and substandard housing, mostly excluded from political representation, top universities, and the middle class.[29] Northern and Western police departments were almost all white.[30] In 1966, only 16 of Oakland's 661 police officers were African American,[31] representing less than 2.5% of the force.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Panther_Party#Origins

The racism endured during the 1960's was largely social and probably even psychological. Which contrasts heavily against the backdrop of culturally and religiously segregated communities like the south had endured.

korea and japan don't have blacks and hispanics, they also have a strong culture of following rules

I mean it makes sense, the sheep are starting to wake up and turn against big pharma and the FDA for forcing death pills into peoples guts over low side effect shit like weed simply because if weed was legal it would ruin their business

>ctfl+f america 1/45

As a european, can you guys go like one day without freaking out over america.

pretty stupid wording there m8. the better way is to point out that many western countries don't have as much mass shootings as us despite consuming just as much violent vidya

Politicians know what is a real reason of mass shootings and that's fucked up system in murica(aka shitty educational system, people suffering because of political correctness powered bullshit, not solving problem with bullying etc.)

They just don't want to say the truth because that will instantly oblige them to Fix the system what is a main source of reasons why some people just can't handle it mentally and go rampage. And politicians are just lazy and spoiled fucks who know fixing the system is a real time taking and hard task and they don't want to deal with this.

So for them it's easier to find a Scape goat what is not related to real source(today is video games) to make people don't look at real source of problem. They will just declare some shit like banning video games, talk alot but then swipe this under rug when people stop talking about it.

They won't ban video games because even in ancient Rome rulers knew that people won't rebel as long as they have "Bread and circuses" and today video games are like "Circuses" for many people. Worst case scenario there will be bigger regulations around game ratings(PEGI, ESRB etc.) And for example make video game shops to ask for I'd when you want to buy game rated for adults.

Attached: 72762727.jpg (500x487, 83K)

everyone has to talk about the popular kid

this.

same reason Bush went to war with terrorism.

Every major chain that sells video games voluntarily asks for ID when buying M rated games and all of them refuse to even carry games rated for adults. The rest of your post is on point though.

The US has had more mass shootings in the past few years than all other countries have had in recorded history combined not counting wars and revolutions.

>and all of them refuse to even carry games rated for adults

yknow before the hentai craize on steam, someone brought this up to gaben. its kind of funny how they just forgot there was a market for that.

They won't ban video games because they literally can't, unless they convince SCOTUS to overturn Scolia's 2011 ruling that vidya is protected under free speech. Fun fact: this ruling made it legal for minors to buy AO video games. If they want to undo it, that's probably their go-to.

If you're talking about the mid and southern natives, that was almost entirely through pathogens. The 'conquistadors' barely put any effort in to their genocide, and the majority of it was unintentional.
Colonial and later independant americans had to really work for their genocide of native americans, a very deliberate and methodical genocide. Not even the romans, mongols, or the huns were that thorough in their elimination of native populations.

I'm not arguing about segregation. I'm just pointing out that black people up north were not being white washed. The northern black has a different mindset on thing just like a north or southern white
You could somewhat make the argument about that with the harlem Renaissance. It was evident that the movement really didn't address the issues that blacks faced during the time (harlem was still a shit show despite the fact that black singers were making gangbusters). But you can't argue that northern blacks became white washed during the 1950s-60s

Lincoln also lost the popular vote and violated the rights of states that just wanted to do their own thing

>ruling that vidya is protected under free speech.

wow I sure hope no one just ignores the bill of rights and makes it illegal.

Is this a Hunter x Hunter reference?

yeah but the civil war was really about some rich fucks owning slaves.

If you are playing vidya you aren't watching TV, missing out on your mind control dose.

doubt

Attached: 1556288795112.png (610x613, 107K)

But some of the main influences that brought the Black Panthers to power were racial and social aggressors. They were feeling the pinch, which led to the creation of the gang.

oh, and gang related crimes, i forgot those

>Fun fact: this ruling made it legal for minors to buy AO video games. If they want to undo it, that's probably their go-to.
So is porn considered free speech? was my local movie rental place just fuckin with me when they said i couldn't rent anything behind the curtained room?

Tax is theft

Thanks

Blaming vidya and gun access is a lot easier than solving any of the underlying issues that even cause someone to resort to lashing out.
Look at the psycho in Japan who burned down an animation studio recently. Nobody in the western media said anything about it. They even fucking ignored the antifa nutcase that did something prior to the most recent faglord simply because the recent one could be attached to infinity-chan and fit their narrative better.

And these assholes have to conveniently crop up shortly after dem debates and Epstein getting arrested.

>ignores the bill of rights and makes it illegal
Congress makes it their job to skirt the constitution instead of consider it during lawmaking.

Welcome to capitalism.

>saucy is a liberal or a nigger (is there a difference?)

The first amendment only protects you from the government. Privately owned stores can still elect to enforce them if they choose to, and they pretty much all choose to. The ruling came when California tried to force stores to enforce the ESRB. But no, porn isn't covered unless it's a video game

West europe is full of niggers and sandniggers, but they don't have even near the amount of shootings that USA has, maybe is the guns? Nah it must be the niggers in Europe are a different species or whatever bullshit you want to believe to continue licking the weapon industry's asshole.

When boomers were a kid in the 50s and early 60s the South of America was still racially segregated and lynching was almost a pastime. Their parents grew up with minstrel shows and nigger as the word of their day for blacks.

Like, this wasn't even that far ago in terms of human history from that to here.

Are there any political parties that don't?

Its what most governments do.
Centralize power and arbitrarily rrstrict freedoms.

Attached: JitWXobkfiE06s0wfyJJaZBGCGgACxjBGCuAduVXTt4.png (640x480, 445K)

For some more perspective, I'm in my 20s and my mom was in school when there were separate water fountains. Not my grandma, my mom.

Tribalism

its funny how people argue and bring slavery with america when literally only 1% of the country ever had slaves, meanwhile no one says SHIT about places like brazil which had a 90% slave ownership rate

The ones in their infancy don't always. Why do you think america's founding fathers said the trees of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants? Occasional overthrowings of power are necessary

how many grenade attacks has the US had? hope you realize that your countries are actively lying to you about your migrants and crime. they probably don't know how to use guns yet, lucky you

Before the National Firearms Act you could mail order fully automatic weapons and have them delivered to your doorstep. Yet mass shootings were extremely rare. Perhaps it is not the guns that are to blame, and it is something about society that has changed in the intervening time period. Perhaps we should attempt to treat the disease, not just it's symptoms.

>when other countries are more civilized, it's simply because they "have a strong culture of following rules"
>when white countries are more civilized, it's because they're white
when will whites admit that they're literally niggers compared to asians?
>bigger dicks
>more violent
>etc

The concept of violence in video games is absurd for the simple reason that the concept "violence" is indefinable in the context of virtual worlds. It is a concept fundamentally linked to reality. It was invented to designate a process that can only occur in reality, and makes absolutely no sense outside of it. Outside of it, the word itself simply becomes illegible and meaningless. People who use the word "violence" in connection with video games are either using it metaphorically, or, if they are trying to use it literally, are plain simply idiots.

Video games or media in general doesn't manipulate and change the nature of a person, that's just not how it works.

No one has ever "become" a good person because they played video games, so no one is going to just become a bad person by playing video games. If someone shoots up a school and they also play Doom, maybe they were attracted to Doom because of what it is, not the ridiculous notion that Doom took a totally good kid and turned him into a killer

Attached: halo.jpg (1080x1023, 94K)

>that spoiler
extremely autistic even by law standards.
I also remember that,fuckin arnold shilled that gooks bill till the second he signed it. He was a shitshow and is largely the reason why my state is never going to vote a republican governor ever again

Attached: 1530198368554.jpg (787x1024, 67K)

gay and namefagpilled

Who cares, you think corporations are gonna let politicians devalue their product by labelling them as dangerous and unhealthy? Fuck no, for once, the corporate agenda works in our favor. Nothing's going to happen

of course its the society, but I can promise you nothing will change the society. Corporations are not about to start paying people more money and improving the quality of life of the country, we literally live in a country where you live to work, not work to live. The reality is that more and more people are going postal

Cr*p...

Why try to push a ban for video games when daily dopamine hits to the commonfolk is what's keeping 300 million Americans from setting the corporate and political elite on fire?

gamer culture and the internet in general is problematic. The easiest, cleanest way to eliminate opposition is to eliminate the culture that formed it.

They're right though. 90% of videogames are directly about violence.
Either shooting people/monsters or killing them in other ways.

And before you ask, no I dont think that games make people violent. But its stupid to argue that theyre not largely about violence, which is why many people played them in the first place.

Porn isn't considered protected speech in the US. It's one of the few exceptions to the 1st amendment since it falls under obscenity. Video games were ruled as protected speech by SCOTUS, but just like books movies etc they're not allowed to sell obscenity to children.

Porn games aren't protected either.

They're wrong though.
It's stupid to argue that they have violence in the first place

The government has tanks and nukes. Your piddling little machine guns won't do jack shit to overthrow the government when push comes to shove.

So you agree that access to firearms has not ever been the problem. Good, then stop trying to take mine away because of what some asshole that is not me did.

Attached: 1557164695251.png (1387x747, 650K)

>tanks and nukes

Good luck maintaining popular support when you roll tanks down mainstreet and nuke your own land. The second any nuclear capable power nukes their own land, is the second they cease to be a legitimate government in the eyes of the other world powers, and said powers join forces and zerg rush them under the guise of protecting the poor innocent victims from the would be dictators. Also, you know, unacceptable collateral damage to vital infrastructure.

I don't give a shit about guns, what I care about is that I live in a country that will do anything in its power to not address a real issue, I have mental health issues myself and have to go through hoops to get medication because of some faggots that abuse it. I want to kill myself almost on the daily and then I see political bullshit like this constantly bringing my mood down even further, all this shit makes me not want to live at all.

Some faggot liberal might be coming for your guns but I'm not, I literally just want to live a single day of my life without wanting to kill myself, I actually understand people going postal.

I'm sure that the government that invests trillions in high tech weaponry is scared of a few folks with guns they bought off of walmart.

The US will never nuke it's own. The Second it does they have lost the civil war and other countries will come to "liberate" the us from it's own "repressive regime". Additionally, if any general, minuteman, nuke tech, or nuke sub captain, decided to side with the rebellion is the second the US government is SOL.

>Good luck maintaining popular support
The idea of the second amendment is to allow the states to defend themselves against an oppressive and tyrannical government. Such a government wouldn't give a single fuck about popular support.

>everyone getting their panties in a twist over this scapegoating when they know nothing will come of it anyway
I hate reddit.

>billybob won't give up his gun, sir, what should we do
>run his house down with a tank and fire the nukes, all of them

>nothing will come of it anyway
If we're lucky, gaming will stop being socially acceptable and normalfags will go away. If that doesn't happen, it might shine a spotlight on the shady shit like underaged gambling, and gaming will be saved from some microtransactions.
Only good can come from this.

95% of mass shooters are black men, specifically teenagers

>vietnam
>korea
>middle east
>but the government can handle shooting their own civilians
>implying foreign aid won't pour in instantly to topple US

Theres always one person that "lol america would just nuke its citizens".

where would you even nuke if they're planning to overthrow you

>civil war happens
>one foreign nations rushes in to "liberate" us far sooner than the others
>it's isreal with 'borrowed' forces from the rest of their pawns

Attached: 1529145688056.jpg (1280x1556, 452K)

it's just to take attention away from rape-island for awhile and this shit will blow over for the 400th time in like 3 days. We all know media and news is control and manipulated but can't do shit

People who say shit like this just show they're braindead and have no clue what they're talking about.

>LEL WHY ARM URSELF WHEN MILITARY HAS GUNS
insurgent shitkickers have fought back the US and the UN with guns from the 70s and homemade bombs for the last 50 fucking years, it would be double worse on home soil because the US obviously wouldn't want to bomb their own infrastructures you ABSOLUTE FUCKING RETARD.

I wonder how badly they wish they could just mind wipe us all and pull a hard China on the population

The other user talked about nukes, not me. That's a bit too drastic, even for America. Specially since a single nuke has the obvious issue of Mutual Assured Destruction. If America shows willingness to use nukes on its own people, it obviously makes other countries consider that they don't have an issue with using it on them.
What I'm talking about is simply high tech weaponry, high tech espionage equipment, etc. Even if the entire white house was surrounded by a an attempted coup, how many protocols do you think the american government has in place to deal with it? I'm sure they have protocols for the most sci-fi shit imaginable.

What large organization doesn't? The entire world is seething over how much control china has over its people, countries and coorporations alike are absolutely analravaged they can't get that good.

there are some real fucking weird people on this website

at this point I'm convinced our protocols aren't actually that impressive, we've poured money into fighter jets that don't fucking work and the test pilots fucking hate even though the odds of two countries with competent air forces actually engaging with one another is incredibly low because of how costly it would be for both involved. Our military is filled with barely 18 highschool drop outs and the bar is being increasingly lowered because of this. Active combat within American cities would be an absolute fucking nightmare, even in shitholes like california and new york where the population is largely unarmed except for active criminals it's a more complex network than sheepfucker caves. Let alone getting into the deep south and midwest where its not only a geographical hellhole but every bubba redneck learned how to shoot even if there weapons are inferior to that of our military.
America is babyshit weak now and we keep up a facade of strength

user drones can't police a country.
and you're hoping every single soldier is ready to shoot their own famillies and friends.

basically this. but not israel.
probably canada if anything.

>I'm sure they have protocols for the most sci-fi shit imaginable
i think you're greatly overestimating how competent the government is

In a full blown civil war situation? Simple us vs them mentality takes over. A bit of propaganda handles the rest.

Dunno. Darpa is fucking absurd.
its likely we have some crazy gadgets, but retards at the helm.

>In a full blown civil war situation? Simple us vs them mentality takes over.

yes
Us : the citizens
vs
them : the fucking government killing your friends and family

If there /was/ a revolution in the US the rest of the world would get involved fast. And depending on the type of uprising. there is a large chance that it would not be a quick affair. It would be brutal. It would be bloody and the US Government and it could start a global scale war.

This but unironically.

An estimated desertion rate in case of a civil war is 75% in the case of a left wing president. 50% of that would be assumed to immediately betray the president. The army would be fighting it's own. Yet another front created in this war. Additionally. there is an assumed 25-50% desertion or outright betrayal rate in three letter government agencies. Additionally there is also an assumed 5% of the 50% betrayers would stay in their job and become saboteurs. Additionally 10% of that 50% would contain key information that would be of critical danger to the US government. Of that 10%, 1% would be able to deliver that information to the US's foreign enemies. The second the US declares war on it's own- is the second it ceases to exist as the state we know it.

The US powergrid could be taken down by a series of “surgical strikes” with the exception of the texas grid. By surgical strikes. a few marksmen (IE US army tier Marksmen- the min requirement) hitting certain spots on the grid would fuck a lot of the military and government because they need the grid more than bubba and friends do. Additionally. while ALL government agencies have backup generators- they will be hard pressed dealing with the resultant looting and other madness that would come with power outages. This would effectively create another front for the military. It would also turn the people against the government quicker and paralyze the government's propaganda machine . Worse still- the key paints of the US powergrid are public obtainable information and not only are the points too many to be effectively guarded- they are not guarded anyways.

>is incredibly low because of how costly it would be for both involved
Good point. It'll be interesting to see what the fuck some future world war looks like since every bit of military tech is now in the billions.

You're forgetting that roughly half of "Us" is going to be on the side of the government because their "team" is currently PoTUS, and they will consider "them" everyone who isn't supporting their team.

future war is all espionage and dick waving. It would take some catastrophic shit for two first world active militarys to engage with one another again because of the aforementioned dick waving that's been going on since the cold war

They are getting paid by gun manufacturers to divert the public's attention. They'll go after everything BUT the guns. America is a dystopian shithole.

>What large organization doesn't?
This actually makes sense why everyone here is basically saying it's hip to hate China. The whole "if we can't have it, then neither should they" idea. I was already paranoid about evil corporations and this thread sure as hell isn't helping. I want to live under a rock so badly.

>Thankfully within the next 10-20 years all of those people will be dead, although we'll be dealing with the aftermath for at least another century
>Implying that the next generation of shitheads haven't already been groomed by or are taking advantage of the elite boomers to take over their positions and continue fucking things forever
Mark Zuckerberg is a bit outstanding but still an example. It's never going to end.

And you're forgetting the other half of "us" along with "them" already have people working inside the government.

that really depends.
if they take away guns his opposition that hates him might not fight him. and his drooling fanbase will likely support it.

actualy if there was ever a time for the government to take away guns, it would be now.

The USA really is a third world country.
Imagine living in a country where you can't even be safe in public

Economic and proxy war like we've been waging for 40 years now.

we were just in an economic war with russia a few years ago, that's the whole reason they invaded ukraine to cut off oil flow to europe.

Us - the team I voted for or the team I didn't vote for
Them - the team I didn't vote for or the team I voted for
If there actually was some sort of government mandate massacre, how many people do you think would celebrate just because the guns were aimed at the "enemy" aka citizens who disagreed.

>California, Chicago, and Newyork really is a third world country.

I believe they stopped that.
but I still find it funny how the country shooter didn't use a bumpstock, he used a rotor.

>how many people do you think would celebrate just because the guns were aimed at the "enemy" aka citizens who disagreed.

about 50% duh

That dude actually looks like the Adoring Fan

Attached: adoringfan.jpg (1280x720, 76K)

This. They want to ruin anything white men enjoy, so we get frustrated and kill themselves or commit crimes.

No it's a third world everywhere. Extreme poverty, crime, murder and no healthcare

>fighter jets that don't fucking work
Literally boomers at the military corps running the show, and not passing down knowledge to new hires when those boomers are retiring. Doesn't help the gov't just makes up and changes what it wants nonstop

>highschool drop outs
Considering how trash public education has become, that's not even a thing to be concerned about as University is now being treated as $20k highschool 2.0 and barely makes many suitable for work, which exacerbates the first issue of tech that doesn't work.
Advancement requirements were relaxed during Obamer's tenure, which is how we ended up with all those naval accidents and lots of "generals" being insubordinate to the sitting President.

But just like everything else Trump has done, it got tied up in courts immediately. Alphabet soups even cave up on that original case because it was their doing, so it was dumb to even try to put that through.

lol no

Attached: right_wing_white_terrorists.png (835x1020, 75K)

>Extreme poverty, crime, murder and no healthcare

you need to go outside and get off the computer.

Those would be the first to go in a civil war situation. Getting rid of the people within the government that disagree. Only then do you turn your eyes to the people. That's just basic logistics.

I doubt many people would be on the governments side if it had to rely on the military to keep control in such a heavy handed way

>Source: ADL

Attached: 1558819102254.jpg (438x292, 27K)

>tfw we're headed to a dystopia without any of the cool tech shit
>we don't even have decent monitor-on-face VR yet, let alone full-sensory VR

Attached: Overshame.png (352x390, 136K)

I have been to the USA twice. I know more than enough

Ooops should have sourced breitbart

Attached: 1552623032261.jpg (1080x1246, 281K)

oh boy its one of these list.
>2009-2018
really interesting time frame chap.
>total deaths include ideologically and non-ideologically
wait what the fuck

You are severely underestimating how easy it is for sabatours to remain in the government, especially in a civil war against its own people. And you are severely delusional if you think the US could effectively win a civil war even just based on logistics.

Overlord sadly won't happen in our lifetime

let me guess, you went to some shitty city?

>seething over Brietbart
It's not the election anymore buddy, Trump already won.

>total deaths include ideologically and non-ideologically motivated killings
Finish reading, tard

yeah they are lol
youre late to the party pal

>be white supremacist
>shoot white people
america wat r u doin?

Attached: confused kot.png (353x332, 89K)

It would have been just as good of a source as the ADL

I don't see how. Most people could disagree but they would never act on anything. Most people will endure going with whoever has the gun currently aiming at their heads.

I fail to see anything wrong with killing amerimutts. America is a traitor nation that does its best to undermine the rest of the west and specially white people. If, not only are mutts dying, but they are killing each other, this is great. The world wont find stability as long as the USA exists.