Rips off spec ops the line for the campaign

i hear they are going to have bullet drop as well

Wow its like cod and bf switched places.

Yeah, there's physical bullet projectiles. Drop is mostly for the larger maps, but it'll be there. It's not totally BF, though- vehicles still seem to be gained by streaks.

And this looks like fun, while BF hasn't since BC2.

Buying purely because the juggernaut killstreak has a 'toggle music' button that plays music when toggled

its also radial so enemies can hear your tunes

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 103K)

Battlefield 1 is the shit, havent you got the memo?

>crossplay
yeah I'm thinking cod is back

giving the juggernaut a minigun was pretty dumb, they should've stuck with the kino M60 from MW3.

>Rip off two shitty games
>Awarded with one shitty game
Fascinating.

>No 3 lane maps
>New 'gunsmith' system
>No mini map
>Day and night versions of maps
>Some maps/areas of maps require you to use NVGs
>'Realistic mode'
>Killstreaks instead of Scorestreaks
>Nuke killstreak
>New 2v2 mode
>New 20v20 mode
>64v64/100v100 mode is being tested and considered
>Weapons have 30-60 attachments
>No hitscan
>Vehicles
Maybe an old dog can learn new tricks

how do i get good at multiplayer every team im on loses

I actually really enjoyed BF4(playbase was still pretty strong after they fixed all the shit) and miss taticool shooters.

>fucking wh*te m*le on the cover
It's 2018 you fucking pieces of shit

Specops is literally one of the worst games i have ever played and easily the worst third person shooter ive ever played. The gameplay is dogshit with endless waves of bulletsponge enemies and reaches critical mass of rng bullshit during the stupid ass vehicle mission on the hardest difficulty, the graphics are total ass even for the time, the level design is brown shit, the story is made for brainlets who have never read a book, etc

Are you retarded? Kill streaks have always been a thing

have not been hyped for a cod game since black ops 1. definitely gonna buy this

>100 player mode
So BR is a given, right? No way would they waste big maps and not go for the hottest meme genre right now, especially considering Blackout was more popular than standard Black Ops

also crossplay

based. i fucking HATE that game, and i really HATE the faggots that try to say it was good.

they said they're gonna put it in, but it's not their focus. honestly pretty based.

>the graphics are total ass even for the time
What?

>New 'gunsmith' system
This is one of the few things I don't give a single shit about. I never understood why people cared about slapping a bunch of different gun parts together.

Scorestreaks are gone, killstreaks are back.

the controls feel like you are controlling a bowl of lumpy 3 day old oatmeal. such trash.

Good
I dont see why it cant be an extra game mode. People hate on BR for no reason

Only questionable thing so far is that they're holding back on showing microtransactions

Even when the game came out the graphics were shit, retard.

They specifically said no BR

But activision might have something to say post launch

First COD game I've been hyped for since MW2. I might actually buy this one lads

Attached: 1513989667159.jpg (626x717, 34K)

Killstreaks haven't been a thing since MW3. They got replaced by SCORE streaks.
This requires people to actually get kills now instead of getting participation points for assists or destroying claymores and shit

So are:
>Vehicles
>Nukes
>2v2
>Day/night maps
>NVGs
But thats not the point retard

After tiring of WW2 in 3 months and tiring of Blops4 in 5 months, I am very excited for this. No more stupid specialist abilities, no more retarded map design. I am especially hyped for the large game modes. I haven't liked battlefield since 4, so this looks to be my new mainstay shooter.

What are they holding back for next year / next gen, Yea Forums?

You just know it's gonna be big. MW2?

They said you can turn the AUG (which is in the smg category) into a ar (where it should be)
using the gunsmith system

...The AUG doesn't have an SMG variant, does it? Why did the devs make it an SMG?

As much as I'd like to see a new good Call of Duty like the rest of you, you guys don't seriously think this game won't be excessively fucked over by Activision's business practices, do you? Look at how much fucking monetization is in BO4, lootboxes with duplicates, battlepass, paying to skip battle pass tiers, $50 season pass with less maps than usual, and half are remakes, plus a store with timed shit

i bought it hoping zombies would be good, but not only is it shit, they toss dlc weapons in the mystery box that are completely worthless since you have to unlock them through lootboxes to get attachments for them, and zombies doesn't even have tier progression or lootbox earning beyond daily contracts

At least wait a year after this game comes out, at least it will be cheaper then, oh wait, since now there is battle pass seasons, if you don't unlock some dlc weapons in the season, you have to hope you get it in a lootbox, good luck competing

Yeah just play multiplayer

No, I think it's going to get jewed hard. The open beta might be fun to play, though. Doubdtful, but the gameplay looks good to me.

No, not really.

Stop being assblasted just because you didn't like it.

They said no season pass and free dlc maps

So expect lootboxes and weapons varients

You lost me at overwatch

>No SJW bullshit
>no women screaming like fucking bitches
It's an instant fucking win. Can't wait to pre-order to be honest

WHAOW DOOOD WATCH OUT FOR THOSE TANGOS
*tactical roll behind wooden cover*
AW SHIT NEED TO RELOAD
*mag flips*
FRAG THAT CHARLIE!!!! FRAG OUT GUYS!!!
*tactical grenade toss*
SHIT MY COVERS GETTING BLOWN COVER MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
*runs out into the open*
heh.... ITS AKIMBO TIME
*whips out dual SMG's*
TAKE THAT COMMIESSSS HAHAHAHA YEAAA
*gets shot once*
FUCK I GOTTA GO PRONE BEHIND THESE SANDBAGS FOR A MINUTE DUDEZ
*jacks off*
AW YEAH IM BACK BITCHEZ AKIMBO TIME YEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
*hip fires indiscriminately*
AIR STRIKE TIME TO GET PWNED NOOBZ
walkie talkie:"pfff tactical airstrike incoming danger close"
BAZINGAAA! WE GOT EM BOYS

*play link for full immersion*
youtube.com/watch?v=IxHLr8AYHCM

>>no women screaming like fucking bitches
Did you not watch the multiplayer trailer?

3 lane maps are a staple and when done right you can't go wrong with them. The best FPS maps outside of quake have all been three lane.its a low iq Reddit npc parrot screech to claim they're a bad thing.

No...should I?

>no women screaming like fucking bitches
You watch the gameplay? There are female soldiers

If they do last man standing its the same minus the gay finding aweapon

>DO I FIT IN YET GUYS

If you don't want to hear female soldiers, regardless of how stupid it is, probably not.

Yes because it's fucking based and the editing is well done

Who the fuck cares?

Not me but that dude obviously does since he mentioned

Whats the point of grinding/paying for ingame items in COD if a new game comes out every year and makes all your progress/money void?

Attached: 1553955260674.png (500x466, 135K)

it won't stop me from playing the beta but female soldiers is retarded as a concept, even if it's real although small.

who /dudebro/ here
non gay (sci fi) CoD and Metallica unironically gets me pumped

Night Witches were pretty based tho

there are 9mm versions but they're pretty uncommon. A lot of gun choices are odd, they chose an AK-47 when the real ones are museum pieces now.

Attached: 1480541171211.png (635x257, 98K)

There would be more people screaming if they didn't

>the real ones are museum pieces now
Still used in the middle east and Africa

Some 'freedom fighters' still use mp40s

It's the journey not the reward

there's still a few around but they're pretty rare now, most true AK-47s were worn out decades ago and there weren't that many of them to begin with (relatively speaking). The majority of AKs in circulation are either some kind of AKM or Chinese Type 56s. Pic related

there are always exceptions to the rule, dudes in Syria are running around with STG-44s because a small cache was uncovered and the ammo is still produced in fairly large quantities. That doesn't mean they're common, though.

Attached: 1491186394066.jpg (1200x1500, 563K)

BLOPS4 just released a new update, adding a sniper to the lootboxes, which is way stronger than the ones available in the game.
How come nothing has replaced this joke of a franchise yet?
Just a friendly reminded how greedy these assholes are before you buy another cod.

based

The worst part is Activision is literally skeeving for good launch reviews by having no microtransactions at launch, and then slapping people with them a month or so later so they don't influence scores or opinions from first-buyers and pre-orders.

Yeah. They even introduced this fortnite-like battlepass thing where we could earn every single weapon through playing, but then they suddenly changed their mind and now new weapons are in the lootboxes again.
IW's games usually aren't as bad, but with no season pass this year, it'll probably be even worse.

Dont think anybody here hopes it's going to be competitive and balanced
CoD was the one multiplayer that started the trend of rewarding retards for doing bad with killstreaks and cheap perks

It's not about being competitive and balanced though, it's about a $60 game with a $60 season pass having microtransactions WAY worse than in f2p games (e.g. fortnite).

No season pass this time

So microtransactions are going to be worse

I thought they said DLC was going to be free now?

v64/100v100 mode is being tested and considered
>considered

I thought it was already confirmed?

Some Syrian manufacturers are still licensed to produce STG44s. Kinda want to frankenstein one with some modern optics/custom laser or grenade systems....

They tried 10v10 in the multiplayer event and it crashed
I wouldnt bet my cards on the 100v100 thing yet

I was talking about black ops 4, but anyway DLC for them is just maps, so no season pass doesn't mean there won't be lootboxes.

It's like you faggots are taking opinions (which by the way are from different points of few) at face value and making them sound basic, without asking for the actual context.
Because otherwise there should be a "why" to statements and opinions in the first place
>Wow you said you want games to be art, but then you don't want them to be art
This is just a lazy version of being "insightful".
It's not even just retarded, it's "fake smart", which is more offensive.
Fuck centrists and fuck fence sitters.
>Error: You seem to have mistyped the CAPTCHA. Please try again.
I DID NOT FUCK.

Attached: fuck off.png (85x85, 1K)

20v20 is, but 100v100 probably wont since they most likely can't have it run consistently without crashing

if they fucking add 100v100 or even 64vs64 i will buy the shit out of this game
i fucking miss large scale FPS multiplayer games in a sea of nothing but 5v5 or 6v6

10v10 has been in the game since COD4

>Franchise accused of being repetitive, recycling elements and being basic enough for wide, mainstream appeal
>Never dead, always has a game every year that sells a lot
>Being an yearly release based series might as well mean "ditch the current game for the next one, consumer" and devaluate its own games
>One of its most important entries gets a remaster a few years ago
>Said game being a 7th generation title, making it rather a "modern classic" and not the same thing as something much older
>New game is a "reboot" sharing the exact same name as that entry (Not even just the name of the whole series/brand) and recycling a lot of aspects of that already remastered "modern classic"
>Regardless of whether or not the game performs great, it might not affect the series that much
What's the meaning of this game, again?
Taking it back to "its roots"?
Appealing to an wider audience that already fit the demographic of the original?
Since when was Call of Duty of all fucking things even fitting for this?
I swear, this franchise has became a self perody and Activision are the greatest fucking comedians.
At least most soulless reboots are meant to be based on much older shit that was dead for a while, that didn't had a reputation of being market grey paste/video games equivalent of Michael Bay.
It might have something new that the original MW didn't at least.

BC2 is the most overrated game in the BF franchise, and is easily one of the worst. It's good really good sound design, and a great "feel" to it, but that's literally all it has. I have no idea why it's treated like the greatest thing mankind has ever seen.

test

i hope they allow custom servers so i wreck all of your asses. we can have a game night, like tf2's party van but cooler

It's got really good sound design*

We’re going home bros

Attached: 37490251-7BB2-4E79-B743-A415697B5C37.jpg (211x238, 15K)

Is this the only non-f2p game with crossplay?

Rocket League.

I, the sonic totem, have been following the development of this game.

Ask me any question and I will answer

Attached: 2c068ce3369a378993278ae4c32996fd.jpg (1790x2117, 272K)

>473206058
Spec Ops was shit and only faggots like it. Holy shit I have never been bored by a game so bad before.

The maps are some of the best laid out in modern military shooter game history, it had a "if everything is busted its balanced" approach to balance, every class could deal with armor or air support in there own way sans medic, who had the best primaries and the paddles where so good you could zombie medic squad, lmgs where the shit and not garbage like every other game, its the most destructable levels of any AAA shooter ever, no jets, teams where the exact right amount for the maps sizes, voice lines where good to fucking hilarious, dog tags, snipers would kill with a headshot always, bullet drop felt right.

I could go on forever

That's treyarch doing that shit, not Activision.

Will there be a next gen port next year?

I didn't have a console to play IW (it was very bad on PC), how was it at launch? I did play it a couple of years later, and it looks like you can get pretty much every weapon through playing and crafting?

will it be fun
microtransactions and lootbox guns don't mean shit in a game where 3-4 bullets kill fast anyway

there will be a new cod already when the new consoles come out

Yes, most certainly

Will it finally have dedicated servers?

what the fuck
is that my nigga Price?
i thought they werent touching on those characters famiglia

>rips off spec ops the line

You cant rip off a blatant copy of a book that's a hundred years old you fucking uncultured swine.

Give it to me straight bros.

Can I run around in TDM with nothing but a movement speed loadout with a single Revolver + knife and just insta knife people while they rage me because they couldn't kill me with their akimbo 1887s?

If so, I'm pre-ordering today.

Picture so fucking obviously related.

Attached: 1874a1874178274.png (566x431, 297K)

>rips off other franchises
>actually becomes better because of that
that alone should tell you how shit the CoD franchise is

Yes, for a time. But you will become frustrated from losing to surprise mechanics

It's a reboot. Since WW3 happened in MW3 they're basically just restarting the Modern Warfare verse so they could use it and Price again instead of having to deal with a post-WW3 world.

Yes.

>it looks like you can get pretty much every weapon through playing and crafting
No. There are some variants that cannot be crafted and can only be obtained from supply drops.

Yes, Battlefield with 32 players on linear, mostly small maps, is just what I want. I also just love that they removed jets, because since when is BF about vehicles and INF gameplay combined lmao? Yes the shooting feels good, the destruction is nice, but at the end of the day, it's a shitty overhyped console spin-off that misses the entire point of Battlefield.

CODbabbies are gaming's MCUbabbies.

Yes

>M.A.G. will never come back

Attached: 1564684896904.jpg (1000x666, 259K)

Yes

>variants
not actual new weapons though, right?
how different are those variants?

No

They might be variants or they might be new guns, no one will know until the game comes out

I hope it's actual dedicated servers and not that hybrid bullshit.

Base versions or dlc weapons were available to anyone with the season pass or required you to complete in game challenges to unlock them. I don't remember much about the variants since I didn't enjoy the game much and dropped it fast. I remember the nv4 had a variant with no damage dropoff and one of the dlc weapons changed the way the weapon worked with each rarity.

Shame they fixed the 4-killstreak drop marker bug. When MW2 came out it had zero weight and while holding it you were faster than with a pistol while still being able to knife.

were talking about iw

Is COD the only modern FPS series that still has bots? I'll give them credit for that. It's always been a good way to learn the maps and fart around with friends.

>IW
I liked the campaign but hated the multiplayer. It was a reskin of that awful BO3 multiplayer.
>you can get pretty much every weapon through playing and crafting?
Supply drops and crafting.

OPs argument is either shit or didn't elaborate enough to make him look like he has an actual opinion besides "This bad cause you can jump in call of duty and battlefield, whoa, totally a rip off bros." Yeah I'm sure there's some kind of grand opinion that's irrefutable in OPs head.

Attached: 1564200575892.jpg (251x196, 6K)

>"new 2v2 mode"
>he didn't play mw3

What's the campaign about if you're comparing it to The Line?

why would anyone want to at this point

Wow you're a fucking glue sniffer, huh?

so far a pair of known campaign missions involve:
>breaking into a terrorist-filled house rigged with bombs, and the person carrying the detonator is a woman with a child
>being a daughter of a family attacked in the midst of a military takeover of their region, who ends up having to grab a knife and hit-and-run a soldier to death before she and her brother become freedom fighters that use guerrilla tactics

Reguler battlefield has too many players for the bare bones command and squad structure. Go you want big arcade battles play an arma mod because everything after bf2 is garbo when it comes to big battles. Also jets are cancer period. If ground troops can't deal with vehicles as a single person you might as well be playing arma.

which part of the world

All we know so far is that it's some middle east shit, though i'm sure with those mission data info bits at the beginning of things looking up tweets and reports of the campaign previews probably cite more exact details. The trailers also imply full on riots and civilian chaos, so I expect an inevitable No Russian equivalent.

Wow! You know a high school tier book????????? How do I get as cultured as you FUCK !!!!!!!!

Attached: 1564436683787.gif (200x150, 1.65M)

I watched some youtuber who got invited to play it with others and they said that the multiplayer didn't feel like classic CoD at least. Whether it's good is another question.

>haha you know thing and i don't, so i'll own you over that
Imagine thinking lack of knowledge means something.

they're gonna depict assad as a literal butcher

Scorestreaks were superior.

wow... You seriously dounled down on trying to sound cool for knowing heart of darkness, which you probably either didnt finish or skimmed through for a high school assignment

Simply fucking emberassing LOL imagine being this token faggot in every thread.

Attached: 1562437705941.gif (286x258, 3.53M)

Unironically go play COD. BF has always been about the large scale battles. In 1942 you can drive the fucking ships, even submarines. The whole point of the series is large scale battles with vehicles and infantry.
>If ground troops can't deal with vehicles
Are you saying that you can't take out a tank as infantry?

>Call of Duty has never tried the "ohhhh no war is so gritty and real and bad"
>Call of Duty has never had vehicles in MP and large team battles before

Attached: 1561696017150.png (654x477, 375K)

On Yea Forums atleast it seems you either like it, thought it was meh but appreciated what it was wanting to do, or are apart of the faggot camp who thought the game was talking to them personally and got all offended and now just shitpost endlessly because they're too much of a weak willed bitch to actually think about why it struck so close to home for them.

WaW and Cod 3 had vehicles in mp

>preorder and get shit for the last game
Surely that's not the only thing they offer besides beta access?

They have a open beta

Absolutely correct. The only appeal of the game is for illiterates who play it and go, "Woah, is this one of those 'themes' I've always heard about?"

>Rips off battlefield 4 for the multiplayer
HHHMMMMM...... I'm interested now. But it's Activision, I don't trust any major publisher. I'll wait for a sale later, buy the ultimate game of the year edition for $20.

Attached: Battlefield 4™_20190715001657.png (1920x1080, 2.74M)

Yes, and arma dose it better. Bff was to be an arcade experience then makes some aspects mil sim horse shit making the arcade nature null and void. If it was a proper arcade experience you would be able to do as much work in boots as you would in a tank or jet, but as it stands only about 6-12 people really get to affect the match and the rest are just window dressing. Also jets having infinite ammo without landing is fucking retarded, period.

Why anyone would play that shit over arma is beyond me.

Inb4 you suck at fighting vehicles. Of the driver has anything over 30 hours you are not gonna kill him on your own.

Battlefield is more fun with general tank and vehicular accompaniment to infantry boots-on-the-ground warfare, aerial combat / vehicles just drag down the Frostbite games

>ArmA does it better
These two different game series have different audiences, can you guess why? How realistic would you consider the BF games? What are these mil sim aspects you're talking about, bullet drop? It's a pretty straightforward shooter with inf + vehicles. It is very much an arcade experience, it may have some elements that are a bit more realistic than say, COD, but nobody in their right mind would refer to BF as anything close to a mil sim. Jets having infinite ammo is bullshit, but would you prefer them having to land and reload? Sounds like a full-blown mil sim to me. It also sounds like you unironically need to get good, one tank is not hard to deal with, and besides, if you're running around by yourself as a medic, then you've only yourself to blame for getting blown up.

I will pull of my wallet only if they can make something that surpasses the mayhem and fun of 64 players in metro/lockerl.

That's it.

this game is like the closest thing you can get to escape from torkov, the fact that triple AAA developers are capable of this is only because Fortnite set a standard.

Attached: rere.png (1339x710, 173K)

>ignoring the inb4 and everything else I posted

I was a bf that is an arcade experience on a large map. Jets and tanks are too strong and, like I already fucking said, affect the battle too much for ground troops to do anything other than fight other ground troops and cap points unless the entire squad dedicated itself to jet or tank hunting. If I feel like I can't sway the battle with my rifle, boots and kit exclusively its a shit battlefield game.

T. Been playing battlefield since 1942.

Also post proof of killing competent tank drivers single handedly. I think bf3-4 had pro leagues so you can look for footage there :^)

You cucks were saying this game wouldn’t even have multiplayer a few months ago. I wouldn’t get my hopes up just yet faggots