What the hell

Attached: Untitled.png (375x421, 183K)

Other urls found in this thread:

chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/js/mines.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

top left, bottom right

The square touching both 3's is safe. Do the math, there's only 2 mines left.

i have no idea and no amount of explaining can make me understand how to figure it out

It's a 50/50 OP
mines are either bottomleft & topright or bottomright & top left

Send in young paki child to check

Hey user I hear you like guessing games

am i retarded for STILL not knowing how the hell this game works?

How?

Attached: Capture.jpg (1676x1129, 343K)

8 Bit Brody has a fresh tutorial video up.

There's one of you in every fucking thread. How about instead of seeking affirmation, you decide whether or not you want to learn and then look for that knowledge yourself?

No. The number next to a square is the number of mines adjacent to it (including diagonally).

Top left and bottom right could both be 2s and the other squares are mines.

I mean outside of moments like this that appear to be a guessing game, the game isn't that hard to figure out. Look up videos about it if you want to learn.

I fucking hate getting minesweeper boards that end up giving you true 50% chances to either win or lose.

Luckily, I found a really cool minesweeper game that gives you games that "ensure solubility" which basically means that they remove the random elements to it. Check it out if you're interested and hate the 50/50 bullshit of traditional minesweeper

chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/js/mines.html

Attached: Untitled.png (375x421, 182K)

Why do you think the one touching both 3’s are safe? It’s opposite corners, but it could be either corner. It’s 50/50

Because top left is a safe square otherwise the two 2's wouldn't make sense. This leaves the one adjacent to the 3's the only choice to fulfill the 2's.

TOP RIGHT NOT TOP LEFT**

>playing the easiest mode possible

oh come on.

who in their right mind can defend that artificial difficulty bullshit

>He doesn't play Minesweeper.io

Attached: always.jpg (480x360, 17K)

The twos make sense as they're adjacent to both possible mine locations -- either they each touch a separate mine, or both touch the same one and the second mine is adjacent to neither of them, making the other squares also 2.

>not starting every game by clicking all four corners

Dude just trust me.

but the true beauty of minesweeper is the grace of a system that is not inherently perfect but often works well enough to be solved despite it

It's interesting

This is actually a legit strat

The luck based portion of minesweeper is a reflection of real life. Logic and skill can get you very far, but at the very end, your success may be decided by a 50/50 coin flip.

only first click is safe and even free corners doesn't save you from rng

Just flag all four and call it a day.
Computer can't tell me when I've won or not.

The 4 corners have the highest chance of causing ambiguity like in OP's situation. One strat to reduce guessing situations is to keep rolling for fields where the 4 corners are empty.

You know at least one is in the top right, so going by that then bottom left must have the other one

wow
so deep

Just be rich retard

That depends on yr luck at the start

>One strat to reduce guessing situations is to keep rolling for fields where the 4 corners are empty.
By blindly pressing on 3 tiles? Shit strat.

Attached: Untitled.png (1095x803, 709K)