Attached: Untitled.png (375x421, 183K)
What the hell
Connor Parker
Other urls found in this thread:
chiark.greenend.org.uk
twitter.com
Michael Kelly
top left, bottom right
Jacob Brooks
The square touching both 3's is safe. Do the math, there's only 2 mines left.
Dylan Rodriguez
i have no idea and no amount of explaining can make me understand how to figure it out
Nathaniel Harris
It's a 50/50 OP
mines are either bottomleft & topright or bottomright & top left
Jordan Gonzalez
Send in young paki child to check
Carter Powell
Hey user I hear you like guessing games
Lincoln Sullivan
am i retarded for STILL not knowing how the hell this game works?
Carter Long
How?
Ian King
8 Bit Brody has a fresh tutorial video up.
Wyatt Barnes
There's one of you in every fucking thread. How about instead of seeking affirmation, you decide whether or not you want to learn and then look for that knowledge yourself?
Mason Nguyen
No. The number next to a square is the number of mines adjacent to it (including diagonally).
Anthony Gray
Top left and bottom right could both be 2s and the other squares are mines.
Jaxon Sanders
I mean outside of moments like this that appear to be a guessing game, the game isn't that hard to figure out. Look up videos about it if you want to learn.
Oliver Lewis
I fucking hate getting minesweeper boards that end up giving you true 50% chances to either win or lose.
Luckily, I found a really cool minesweeper game that gives you games that "ensure solubility" which basically means that they remove the random elements to it. Check it out if you're interested and hate the 50/50 bullshit of traditional minesweeper
Parker Scott
Noah Kelly
Why do you think the one touching both 3’s are safe? It’s opposite corners, but it could be either corner. It’s 50/50
Jaxson Rogers
Because top left is a safe square otherwise the two 2's wouldn't make sense. This leaves the one adjacent to the 3's the only choice to fulfill the 2's.
Isaiah Jones
TOP RIGHT NOT TOP LEFT**
Hudson Howard
>playing the easiest mode possible
oh come on.
Charles Bailey
who in their right mind can defend that artificial difficulty bullshit
Lincoln Stewart
>He doesn't play Minesweeper.io
Kevin Taylor
The twos make sense as they're adjacent to both possible mine locations -- either they each touch a separate mine, or both touch the same one and the second mine is adjacent to neither of them, making the other squares also 2.
Christopher Robinson
>not starting every game by clicking all four corners
Tyler Hill
Dude just trust me.
Nolan Campbell
but the true beauty of minesweeper is the grace of a system that is not inherently perfect but often works well enough to be solved despite it
It's interesting
Gavin Sanchez
This is actually a legit strat
Tyler Phillips
The luck based portion of minesweeper is a reflection of real life. Logic and skill can get you very far, but at the very end, your success may be decided by a 50/50 coin flip.
Anthony Adams
only first click is safe and even free corners doesn't save you from rng
Easton Adams
Just flag all four and call it a day.
Computer can't tell me when I've won or not.
Luis Sullivan
The 4 corners have the highest chance of causing ambiguity like in OP's situation. One strat to reduce guessing situations is to keep rolling for fields where the 4 corners are empty.
Zachary Murphy
You know at least one is in the top right, so going by that then bottom left must have the other one
Jose Brooks
wow
so deep
Jeremiah Wright
Just be rich retard
Hudson Thompson
That depends on yr luck at the start
Julian Smith
>One strat to reduce guessing situations is to keep rolling for fields where the 4 corners are empty.
By blindly pressing on 3 tiles? Shit strat.
Ryder Peterson