Why can't the Switch run this fossil over 30fps?

Why can't the Switch run this fossil over 30fps?

Attached: 3max.jpg (497x808, 114K)

its a handheld you moran

its a ten year old game

From soft are shit at programming

The port wasn't handled by From

Not to mention the Switch version uses the old graphics as well.

Why couldn't they just make it 60fps so I can have my PTDE with dsfix on the switch.

They are also are shit at outsourcing

>buying non exclusives for the shitch
what even are you doing?

I was on a meet-n-greet business trip in Germany last Halloween. Spent my evenings sitting on my hotel balcony, overlooking Darmstadt and playing Dark Souls on Switch will sipping a chilled Redeberger.

Literally now one of my most cherished gaming experiences. Kiddies like OP are so far beneath me.

>not wanting a by-now-classic game on your handheld
are there even other handheld options? I heard the GPD WIN could barely run DS1 with DSFix

because the bing bing hardware is made of sticks and bubblegum

The original ran at 25 barely.

Yeah, made for a vastly different system. Switch could run it in 60 fps, if this wasn't a third party game, but a title made for Switch. As ports go for third parties, Switch runs PS360 games with better fps, resolution or textures, and some PS4/Xbone downgraded titles. Pretty fucking great for basically a system the size of maybe two credit cards if you discount the battery, screen and controller taking space.

>implying it wasn't Bamco

Attached: D5WrwF2W0Ac7zlu.png (600x600, 349K)

jesus christ this board is full of faggots

>shitch
Hey Eric, how's Monday?

because Switch hardware is fire sale'd Shield hardware from 2015 with a heavy underclock even in docked mode, so Nintendo is taking shit mobile hardware that was already obsolete when it came out and is making it even shitter by downclocking it. This is further compounded by shitty devs porting games to it shittily for a quick buck because they know Nincels will eagerly slurp up whatever sloppy thirds and fourths that are tossed in front of them because first party is barren as fuck outside of one or two bi yearly actually worthwhile releases.

Switch and the 'people' who keep it afloat are just embarassing and a testament to how low gaming has fallen these days.

This post was paid for by the SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT Incorporated.

seething as fuck

So?
If the Switch can't run an 8 year old game at 60 FPS, it shouldn't be on the system in the first place.

Switch cant even run a game from 2004 at a half decent stable 60fps

>This is further compounded by shitty devs porting games to it shittily for a quick buck because they know Nincels will eagerly slurp up whatever sloppy thirds and fourths that are tossed in front of them

Except when a shitty port flops and then its back to "Nintendo fans don't buy third party games"

Because that's not Dark Souls Remastered. It's like some weird port of the original and labeled "Remastered".

The port was done by Virtuos, a chink port studio well known for fucking up the Batman Arkham games on PS4/X1 and making Switch audio sound like it comes from a tin can

>Blaming the system for incompetent programming

this lmao. if you're a tendie who has no other option, go ahead and cope saying "it's the FULL VERSION!!!!" and stuff, but as long as you can play it on pc and ps4 in full HD, why would you even consider playing the cardboard version?

wut
it's a pretty good port
I love the old graphics better than the remastered

This. Port isn't good though, the sound is fucked, see

>the switch is underpowered
It's a handheld
>it's too big to be portable
It's a console

The switch is the perfect platform for contrarians.