Which game has the best physics and could solve this millennium problem?
Which game has the best physics and could solve this millennium problem?
Owen Bailey
Other urls found in this thread:
streamable.com
youtu.be
twitter.com
Luke Ramirez
Portals are fucking fake so you can't apply physics to them get fucked atheists
Juan Campbell
You don't even need portals to prove this, it's A.
Nolan Morris
That answer is literally nonsense. Portals are what make this a problem. Without the portals there's nothing to prove.
Jaxson Clark
the cube isn't actually being touched, the space around the cube itself isnt being affected at all. its placement in space is being changed, but it's not being affected at all by physical touch. its gotta be A
Ryan Allen
Fuck off with your shitty bait thread already
streamable.com
Jason Scott
It should probably be A. I imagine it would be like a doorframe moving over the cube, I don't think it's momentum would transfer to the block.
Parker Wilson
In order to move like in B, box has to have some kinetic energy. Nothing in proposed situation suggests that box receives any energy that could then convert into kinetic one. It's energy concervation, plain and simple, Einstein would have told you the same. Btards can get fucked.
Gabriel Adams
It’s A.
Dominic Ross
The answer is, logically, B. The cube cannot possibly emerge from the portal without movement. It makes sense when you consider that movement is relative and the movement of the portal causes the cube to move relative to the universe (or, more precisely, causes the universe to move relative to itself). You can ask where the energy comes from but it is plain that it must exist.
Zachary Flores
Portals break the laws of physics in the first place.
That said, objects keep momentum when going through the portal, and B is the only possible answer.
John Murphy
Isaac was a man of God so I'm going with A
Dominic Allen
It's like being on a train in motion. As long as you're on the train, you don't feel like you're moving. But if you jump off and hit the ground, you notice that you were. Only instead of a train, it's the entire universe, and the only way out is through the portal. That's why the cube looks entirely stationary until it comes through the portal and you notice it was moving.
If you're going to ask why, if the cube is in motion already, it isn't catapulted through the portal if you stop the portal before it reaches the cube, that is because literally everything else is undergoing the same movement, including the portal itself.
Evan Campbell
I have conducted a real experiment to test this problem.
For this purpose i used following setup:
Instead of a fixed cube, I utilized one of my lovetoys that I firmly attached to the ground. My butthole served as the portal in question. I positioned myself few millimeters above the toy and then dropped to the ground, mimicking the portal. Once the thing fully passed my portal, it did not move any further due to no momentum and this A is correct.
Xavier Flores
The answer is obviously A.
If the portal and the box were reversed the answer would be B.
Christopher Adams
seethe
Asher Peterson
Hmm
Dominic Taylor
>It's a hula hoop argument
Afags really don't have anything else, do they?
Those are functionally identical. It's always B.
Eli King
Elijah Robinson
A literal physicist from Harvard already answered this. It's B
youtu.be
Jace Cox
Why yes, I do think the answer is clearly B, how could you tell?
>gigachad.webp
Jeremiah Cooper
>destiny
Fuck off
Sebastian Wood
Neither. It would simply stick out of the blue portal.
Christopher Ramirez
It's A.
>t. INTP
Brody Long
what a complete brainlet
Luis Russell
this
Liam Carter
Juan Richardson
it's B
>t. non-retarded INTP
Zachary Diaz
Go ahead and refute it
Eli Hernandez
how is INTP and INTJ related?
Easton Barnes
No force is being applied to the cube so B defies conservation of momentum.
A defies conservation of energy though, so either way portals aren't real and there is no real answer.
Chase Hughes
Depends on how fast the top panel is going. If it was slow it would definitely be A, but at faster speeds it would probably cause the cube to bounce to some extent (though if the cube was heavy enough theres a chance it wouldn't go that far) due to a sort of trampoline effect
The full extent of the reaction depends on a lot of factors like the weight of the cube and what the bottom is made out of but at a high speed and with a less dense material on the bottom it would probably be more like B but the sudden shift in gravity would likely launch it in an arc.
Hudson Howard
David Parker
Reminder to identify
Reminder to shame hoopfags
Reminder to make fun of hoopfags
Reminder to disregard hoopfag arguments
Anthony Reed
Once again, fuck hoopfags