Zelda

>Ocarina of Time: Link wears the green hat and tunic because he grew up with the Kokiri who all wore that outfit
>Minish Cap: Link wers the green tunic in honor of the Hero of Men but the hat is just Ezlo in disguise, who gives link an actual hat at the end as a token of their friendship
>Skyward Sword: The tunic and hat are a knights uniform and the color green just represents his class at the academy.

Why are there three different origins to Link's outfit? This means we have to accept that SS Link got his outfit, someone else wore it but dropped the hat, MC Link unintentionally reinserted it and the Kokiri just coincidentally dressed the same way.

Attached: LinkSmash.png (1265x1920, 2.35M)

Other urls found in this thread:

zeldalegends.net/index.php?n=interviews&id=2002-12-06-gamepro-miya-aonu-twwsummit&m=html
zeldadungeon.net/wiki/Interview:SuperPlay_April_23rd_2003
zeldadungeon.net/wiki/Interview:Game_Informer_May_17th_2004
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Better question, why is OoT Link's Kokiri outfit different from the others? The rest wear more convincingly foresty type outfits but Link just has an oversized polo shirt and brown boots instead of green (which looks better on him, to be fair).

>the female Kokiri are the ones that wear the brown boots

Attached: 1470607680052.gif (320x240, 2.12M)

Because there really is no timeline/connected lore, nintendo only scrambled one together to appease autists

Where did the tights come from when he pulled out the Master Sword in OoT?

>given women's shoes as a kid
>wears tights as an adult
>still ends up one of the more masculine Links of the series
What a fucking chad. Only TP Link can dare to compare.

Attached: 845fda1c9ffb18de4b1e7db80c0ab9f8c9415fcd_hq.jpg (750x861, 71K)

Rauru noticed Link's dong started to peek out the skirt and put on some pants while he was in a coma.

>Link's outfit in SS is an original design of skyloft
>Link's outfit in MC could be based on the hero of men's oufit, which is an original design
>Link's outfit in FS could be based on the Link of MC or the hero of men, but it's not confirmed
>Link's outfit in OoT and MM is an original design of the kokiri
>Link's outfit in the adult parts of OoT is an original design of Rauru based on the clothes Link wore as a kid
>Link's outfit in TP seems to be the clothes of the Link from SS (can't be the clothes of OoT Link because he never became an adult in this timeline)
>Link's outfit in FSA could be based on the Link of MC, the Link of FS or the hero of men, but it's not confirmed
>Link's outfit in WW and PH are based
on the Link of MC, the Link of FS or the hero of men, but mistook as the clothes of OoT Link
>Link's outfit in ST are based on the Link of WW and PH, so it shares the same origin
>Link's outfit in ALTTP, Oracles, LA are original designs
>Link's outfit in ALBW is based on the clothes the blacksmiths wear, and considering the dwarven swordsmith from the previous games they probably are part kokiri or something like that and Link's outfit would have the same origins as OoT Link's
>Link's outfit in TH is confirmed to be based in an old hero so it's based on the Link of MC, the Link of FS or the hero of men (not FSA Link because that game didn't happen in this timeline)
>Link's outfit in TLoZ and AoL are an original design
>Link's champion outfit in BotW is based on the hero of 10,000 years ago
>Link's green outfit in BotW is based on the outfits of TloZ/AoL Link

That means the only original outfits are
>SS Link's outfit
>Hero of men's outfit
>MC Link's outfit (maybe)
>FS Link's outfit (maybe)
>OoT Link's outfit
>FSA Link's outfit (maybe)
>ALTTP/Oracles/LA Link (maybe)
>TLoZ/AoL Link's outfit

...So there IS a connected lore, then.

>Everyone knows the timelime wasn't planned.

>"Q: Where does The Wind Walker fit into the overall Zelda series timeline?
>Aonuma: You can think of this game as taking place over a hundred years after Ocarina of Time. You can tell this from the opening story, and there are references to things from Ocarina located throughout the game as well.
>Miyamoto: Well, wait, which point does the hundred years start from?
>Aonuma: From the end.
>Miyamoto: No, I mean, as a child or as a...
>Aonuma: Oh, right, let me elaborate on that. Ocarina of Time basically has two endings of sorts; one has Link as a child and the other has him as an adult. This game, The Wind Waker, takes place a hundred years after the adult Link defeats Ganon at the end of Ocarina.
zeldalegends.net/index.php?n=interviews&id=2002-12-06-gamepro-miya-aonu-twwsummit&m=html

>"SP: How does the Zelda games get together? Is there any connection between the different games or do you take tell us a new Zelda story each time?
>SM: For every new Zelda game we tell a new story but we actually have an enormous document that explains how the game relate to eachother and bind them together.
zeldadungeon.net/wiki/Interview:SuperPlay_April_23rd_2003

>"BB: That's something that, you (Bill Trinen – Localization Team) and I have talked about with the release of the Zelda compilation disc, cleaning up some of the spellings like Ganon, and making sure everything is cohesive. Maybe that's an American thing – us wanting to know how it all works together. I guess that leads me to my next questions. How do the Links in The Four Swords Adventure relate to the overall story line? Or is it just a subchapter or something like that?"
>"EA: The GBA Four Swords Zelda is what we're thinking as the oldest tale in the Zelda timeline. With this one on the GameCube being a sequel to that, and taking place sometime after that."
zeldadungeon.net/wiki/Interview:Game_Informer_May_17th_2004

The most Chad is easily the Hero of Legend, who has LttP, Oracle of Seasons, Oracle of Ages, and Link's Awakening all on his resume.

>Hero of Legend
You mean "hero of essences".

Why not?
Having an official timeline was a retarded idea and should be retconned

The one with pink hair?
I agree

pink hair can be pretty fucking manly

He also killed Ganon without the Triforce. They basically had to retcon that to hold back his power.

>retcon
?

Ocarina being followed by wind waker and its sequels was planned. TP coming after ocarina in the other timeline was planned. EVERYTHING else is horseshit. Especially trying to shoehorn in the fucking four sword games.

That's the brim of his hat

The brim of his hat is orange, user, the pink shit is his hair

Attached: tunics.png (328x132, 23K)

>Zelda lore
*pukes*

>N-NO THEY ARE LYING
You are fucking retard, user.

Also WW is clearly connected to the Four Sword saga

*cums*

They are fucking lying.
>Also WW is clearly connected to the Four Sword saga
lmao what? Sure, FSA shamelessly reused WW art assets, but there's no sign of actual continuity.

>cumbrains are zeldalore fags
checks out

>yes they are lying trust me I can't be wrong
What a pathetic crybaby

>lmao what?
Go back to r/eddit.

>no sign of actual continuity
FSA has a new Ganondorf and descendants of the 7 sages from Ocarina of Time, confirming it happens after OoT, that alone already confirms it happens after OoT in some timeline and WW happens in other timeline but that Link inherits a shield that happens to be family's heirloom and something an ancient hero used long ago, this is the same shield MC Link has so you can easily place MC before OoT and FSA and WW after OoT in their respective timelines, the only thing that wasn't 100% was if FS happened before of after Ocarina, but they already confirmed FS happens before OoT too so everything fits
>SS (before hylians found Hyrule) -> MC and FS ("the oldest tales in the Zelda timeline" until SS was made) -> OoT -> WW (adult Link ending) / FSA (young Link ending)

Quit projecting.

I'm not wrong. The official timeline doesn't make any fucking sense and attempts to retroactively sequelize games with no continuity. The rest of your post is utter fucking nonsense. I ask for evidence of continuity between four swords adventures and wind waker and you start ranting about completely different games. And really? "This game has the hylian shield, therefore it's a sequel"? Also your suggestion that the FSA sages are decendents of the ocarina of time sages is pretty fucking retarded considering most of them weren't human. What FSA ACTUALLY was, was a retelling of LTTP in the four swords universe.

>I'm not wrong
Stop reading here. You are stating something that goes against what the devs say, you are wrong and you will always be wrong you fucking retard, you literally can't win.

>the devs
lmao. How many thousands of people worked on all these different games? How many of them were actually involved in the creation of the "official timeline"? There are 4 zelda continuities. Zelda 1 and 2; lttp, link's awakening, and the oracle games; OOT, followed by wind waker and its DS sequels on one hand and by majora's mask and twilight princess on the other; minish cap and the four swords games. Neither skyward sword nor BOTW share any actual continuity with any of the games, with BOTW going so far as to suggest that the other games are actually "legends" only tangetally representative of things that actually happened. And that's FINE. Why would you WANT games that have fuck allll to do wwiiith eachother to be considered actual sequels? It's kingdom heart's tier nonsense, and makes the plots of the individual games worse.

>Especially trying to shoehorn in the fucking four sword games.

Dummied data within the game implied that the original plotline was intended to tie in to the Imprisoning War that was alluded to in A Link to the Past. Most of these were cut due to Shigeru Miyamoto suggesting a simpler plot.

So blame Miyamoto for that.

Go play Mario then if you want simple stories.

Dummied data within FSA implied that the original plotline was intended to tie in to the Imprisoning War that was alluded to in A Link to the Past. Most of these were cut due to Shigeru Miyamoto suggesting a simpler plot.

If it's not in the game it's not in the game. If FSA HAD been written as the imprisoning war, that would have been pretty neat. But it wasn't.
>Go play Mario then if you want simple stories.
You don't know what a good story is. In wind waker, ganondorf is a relic of a dead world, attempting to resurrect the past at the cost of the present, and so link kills him, in spite of his understandable intentions. He and zelda then leave and establish a new civilization full of its own merit and challenges. THAT'S a fucking story. But no, now, gandondorf isn't a character, he's just the reincarnation of satan. His genuine nostalgia and regret were fake. He's just Evil itself, and CAN'T be killed for good. And link and zelda didn't escape the conflicts of the past, they just moved them over a bit, and then the fucking ocean they left dired up on its own, apparently

Imagine actually seriously thinking there's a connected lore between Zelda games

Between some there is, and it genuine depth. For example, consider OOT, wind waker, and twilight princess. In wind waker, ganondorf's reign resulted in the destruction of the world he coveted, and so in WW he is generally more mellow and remorseful. He spares link multiple times and actually didn't kill a single person in the entire game, and seemed to have benevolent intentions.
In twilight princess, ganondorf was caught before he succeeded in OOT, captured, sentenced to death, and then banished to hell. This filled him with rage and spite. While in OOT, ganondorf was a dickhead who wanted to rule the world, in TP, he's a monster who would rather destroy it, and plunge those who rejected him into the same hell he had experienced. Together, the three games paint an interesting picture of the degree to which our past experiences shape who we are as a person.
But you certainly are right that cross-game continuity and lore in and of themselves are not important, or in the case of zelda, usually even present. Any two zelda titles picked at random likely have no continuity at all, which is actually good.

Breath of the Wild Link doesn't even get the hat until much later. His iconic champion outfit is a single blue shirt.
The hat is at least important for SS Link in the sense that the hat keeps his head warm while flying around in the sky. Women get a round beret so it's also a gendered outfit too.
So you could at least make the case that the green tunic itself was more important than the hat in regards to SS Link, and then as a kind of retroactive syncretism incorporate MC Link's adventures with Enzo into it.

Or maybe the outfit just wasn't that important until it had to be. WW and TP both derive their outfits from OoT, it doesn't need to be some massive legacy thing.

Attached: Zeldaprotect.jpg (1200x672, 61K)