The objectively worst game in the series has the best villain

>the objectively worst game in the series has the best villain
Why does this happen so often?

Attached: FO01_NPC_Master_B[1].png (803x414, 491K)

people stop trying

>the objectively worst game in the series
Care to explain what your opinion is on Brotherhood of Steel?

sneed(FEED) sneed(FEED) sneed(FEED) sneed(FEED)

see fallout 76, its just about "give me loads of money for barely scraps of a game"
and fanboys will suck their dick
like apple fanboys or nike or anyone who glorify a specific brand. They will be treated like cattle

>the objectively worst game in the series
How can the worst game be at least better than FO3 & FO4?

lmao FO1 has like 10 hours of content AT MOST

Do everyone a favor and die.

Imagine believing that Fallout 1 is somehow worse than Fallout 3, 4, Tactics, Brotherhood of Steel, Shelter and 76

Attached: 87.png (474x311, 151K)

This

You can't say that when New Vegas, Fallout 3, 4, and 76 exist.

They got lucky probably, not that I even like that villain I played that game for 5 minutes only because it was stupid cheap

Maybe he means main series.

Still strange to put 4 above 1, but whatever floats their boat.

Fo3 is a fantastic game, possibly one of the all time best. That and Fo1 is just so painfully outdated and clunky that it makes sense why OP would prefer 4

Literally the only flaw with 1 is the timer system. Mod that out? It's kino as fuck.

ya i honestly couldnt believe what i was reading
then i realized i was on Yea Forums

Okay virgin

This
Wrong sorry

>the worst in the series

>existing in the same series as fallout 76

I dunno if you've thought about what you are saying

Fallout 3 is fucking amazing, lads

Attached: duck.jpg (683x1024, 252K)

BoS was developed and published by Interplay, it's arguably more of a main entry than anything Bethesda has put out.

Fallout 1 lets you punch children in the balls until they die. Fallout 4 ain't gangsta.

but can you do it everyone tho?
i think not
*jingle jangle*

So? BoS still was made and designed as a spin off. Like it or not Bethesda's games are *the* official successors to 1 and 2. And fallout 3 in particular does the OG games way more justice than interplay ever did with those two atrociously bad spin offs

OP, be honest, did you want to talk about Fallout 1 and knew that the thread would die if you didn't start it Monster Hunter style?

No.
It isn't even close to arguable. Bethesda determines what is canon or not now.
1 is
2 and Tactics the high level events are canon
BoS is no longer canon
Everything from Bethesda is
NV is in a gray area.

You're free to believe this if you want.

NV and 2 are completely cannon, only BOS and Tactics were made uncannon

1 and 2 are main series, 3,4 and NV are dogshit fps games that have nothing to do with Fallout.

Yes because I am right. Sorry your bellyfeels say different snowflake .
Sucks to be you.

It's the voice actor that makes it really
fallout 1's VAs were top-tier

Fallout 3 started at 3, just like Persona. Deal with it.

Attached: moira.jpg (564x764, 64K)

I'm sorry to hear so much of your self worth is derived from whether or not you're "right".

Who gives a shit what Bethesda considers canon? Fallout is dead now. Play the good ones and then move on. Star Wars still considers Episodes 1-3 canon. Does that mean people should watch them?

I thought tactics was canon. Didn't somebody in 4 mention that they built airships before?

People shouldn't watch star wars at all.

It's simple: that game does not exist. That and Bethesda games are just a nightmare, those are not real.
Games that actually exist:
FO1, FO2, FO Tactics and FO3 canceled build.

>seething this hard

Attached: 1522347674209.png (258x544, 130K)