Why some people get so angry about sexualization of video game characters, it is only to make people happy...?

>2019
>liking woman is bad unless they're ugly

out, russian bots

It's difficult to reconcile the supposedly serious themes that the game wants to convey with Hur Hur muh tiddy and ass robot. It's either or. You cant have a cerebral experience when you're getting an ass shoved in your face. Or at least you can't take it seriously. Personally I didn't give a damn though. I spent the entire game daydreaming about what if I was the only human left on earth and how much the yorha would want to fuck me then.

Linking this game's art direction is being cumbrained?
This low test insult started last thursday or what?

Lol stay mad.

Attached: whore.jpg (520x588, 121K)

It's the latest piece of political pseudoscience

samefag

>Judeo-christians want it dead because their book says anything that leads to less childbirth is against god's will
There is literally nothing wrong with that sentiment

>You cant have a cerebral experience when you're getting an ass shoved in your face
Well, you can't.

qts thread?

Attached: 8b8c1f4b92daf5aaad1a5aaaeea745f4.jpg (2500x4000, 825K)

I don't mind sexualization of videogame characters. The truth is the people who consume sexualized videogame characters are not in the position to demand beautiful women, i.e. they are incels who need to have sex.

That said, I do mind when people demand every single videogame character needs to be sexualized. Then again these demands exist after the fact so it's not like they have an influence on character design either.

cant speak for everyone, but more often than not, the critique lacks objectivity, but claims its the only objective view, and everyone else is incorrect.

if its actually objective, lacking emotional spins, i'd personally love it.

It's never critical examination, it's just reflexive, mindless bitching. Critical examination would involve looking at the goals of the game both as a piece of art and as an entertainment product, and those usually would lead to sexualization being great. Yet it's always just bitching.

@everyone HAVE SEX

Attached: 1563354281131.png (334x506, 124K)

except when they apply it to africans. also don't forget that we need to ease their suffering by shipping them tons of food to artificially keep their population numbers higher. oh no their shitholes can't provide for their inflated numbers, now we have to be compassionate and open up our borders for them. I know, let's resettle them into our safe rural areas. they'll do great here
fuck you lutheran social service

>There is literally nothing wrong with that sentiment

Yes there is: Earth can't support 7 billion people, and we're soon going to have 8.

Video games exist to provide fun therefore getting angry about sexualization is plain retarded.

And I love vidya cosplay. Thank you, Yoko, for sharing this point (in case you didn't know, he asked for 2B costume to be simple so more girls would cosplay it without troubles. Based).

trannies are jealous of cumbrains because they can't cum anymore

>im a straight white male who is completely oblivious to the larger issue because it doesnt affect me negatively

What's so great about sex anyway? I think masturbation is enough to satisfy such drive, I literally don't want to have sex with anyone and instead I desire girl friends.

According to feminists men don't deserve to be happy.

I can't believe you were born a man.

>The truth is the people who consume sexualized videogame characters are not in the position to demand beautiful women
This is false. All men in general will be attracted to sexualized women are men naturally respond to visual stimuli. For example, I’m a guy, who is handsome and fucks girls on the regular, but I still enjoy drawing sexy anime girls, and stand firmly against the censorship of media. You want a more famous example? Kanye West.

> i.e. they are incels who need to have sex.
How can they have sex if they’re INVOLUTARILY celibate? Seems like there’s a bit of a misstep in your master plan. Or are you just looking to shit on omega males to feel better about your miserable self? You know you’re no better than the incels, right?

>the larger issue
What larger issue?

>t. Climate change cartel

Most people don't have a problem with it, but it gets shoved down your throat so much on Yea Forums that it ruins every genuine discussion you could possibly have about video games. Mostly the conversations start and end in sexualization, which makes people sick of it.

Most threads about games with good looking girls in it start with sexualized fanart of said girls and some abstract question like "why didn't you buy x game", "why is x game the best in the series" etc., which then leads to people making arguments like e.g.: "It's good because it has X girl in it", thus making people think the game is only good because of the sexualized content, therefor making people hate said game because there is no point being made explaining why it is a good game besides that. Almost nobody has a problem with good games that have sexualized content, it is bad games that are pushed with sexualized content.

Also people are sick of the waifu faggotry those threads attract. It is so prevelant that it spawned groups of contrarians/ shit posters that abuse the situation because they are either sick of it or are just doing it for the banter.

tl;dr: It ruins discussion on Yea Forums and puts the attention of a maybe good game on the fapbait content. But there is inherently nothing wrong with it.

Sexual stuff "triggers" people with mutilated genitals.

Speak fucking English, dipshit.

>All men in general will be attracted to sexualized women are men naturally respond to visual stimuli.
I think you don't understand what my point was, but then again it wasn't exactly implicit.
There's an idea that extremely beautiful women, showcased 24/7 on film, television and videogames, imposes unrealistically high standards on women. Why? Because if everything you see is beautiful women, then it stands to reason the "standard" is exactly that, as opposed to your neighbor next door.

What I meant to say is that gorgeous videogame women are harmless. The people who demand (the key word is "demand") beautiful women in their videogames are usually people who don't have sex and, even if they do, they aren't attractive people who are in the position to turn down pussy.

Your chosen example (Kanye West) is unfortunate as the guy is in a position to turn down pussy. He is a pussy magnet, of the best kind: the kind that attracts only hot women because ugly women know he would never give them the time of day. If the gaming consumerbase consisted of Kanye West clones only, then I would most certainly see a problem with sexualization of women in videogames.

>How can they have sex if they’re INVOLUTARILY celibate?
That's the joke. They can't get laid because they are unable to get pussy.

Stop spending so much time on Yea Forums. Seems like this is more your problem, than a problem with sexualized fictional characters. You’re spending most of your time with degenerate losers, yet blame the industry for it. Fuck off.

>Most threads about games with good looking girls in it start with sexualized fanart of said girls and some abstract question like "why didn't you buy x game", "why is x game the best in the series" etc., which then leads to people making arguments like e.g.: "It's good because it has X girl in it",

I’ve been on Yea Forums since 2007, and I’ve never seen threads progress this way. Discussion on these games carries on as normal while 2-3 faggots post lewds of their waifus and circlejerk over them. Learn to ignore them. Most people do.

And ugly bitches.

Feminism is affirmative action for ugly chicks.

Legalize rape.

>The truth is the people who consume sexualized videogame characters are not in the position to demand beautiful women
Actually, I'm a consumer, and thus have a degree of sway over the design decisions of the games I consume, through the power of the market. So when acting alongside a lot of other consumers, I am very much in a position to demand whatever I damn well please from video game companies.

There's no need for flattery, sweetheart.

It's just jealous women and male orbiters.

>There's an idea that extremely beautiful women, showcased 24/7 on film, television and videogames, imposes unrealistically high standards on women. Why?

No it doesn’t. I’m all in favor of beautiful women of all kinds being in media and advertising, but I still have my individual tastes. Pic related being a good example of the sorts of girls I normally go for.

People will still develop individual tastes for what they like, regardless of anything. The real issue is that we’ve developed a culture of accepting mediocrity. And thus, think it’s ok to not hold women to a higher standard. That they should be accepted for being fat, healthy, ugly, or unhygienic. No. Lowering the standards for anything only produces mediocrity. You want a bf? Diet. Work out. Dress well. Shower. Learn to do your make up. Attractive women are actually MORE merciless toward ugly men, than men are to ugly women. We just ignore you. Yet, what do men do? They get their shit together, work out, make money, and do what it takes to get a girl they find attractive. That’s good.

>The people who demand (the key word is "demand") beautiful women in their videogames are usually people who don't have sex and, even if they do, they aren't attractive people who are in the position to turn down pussy.

This is blatantly false. I like pretty women in my games, because I like attractive things. I don’t wanna be looking at ugly trolls trying to pass off as women to make screeching harpies. Sex sells. Give me sexy girls. I’m paying MONEY for your product. You want my money? Give me things that I like. Sexy girls being one of them.

Appreciation for beautiful things, especially women, dates back to the Renaissance. It’s not just “incels” sorry. It’s humans. Which yes, includes women.

Attached: 2EED7FD5-BAC1-4D2A-8611-8CF5471BD4C4.jpg (450x600, 194K)

That is not what I meant to say, see I meant to say waifu posters, as a whole, aren't in a position to demand real life beautiful women. Ultimately that is what the issue with sexualization is. Feminists wouldn't care if suddenly 30 million men flew to a different planet and consumed endless anime waifus and sexualized female characters. That's because it wouldn't have any effect on actual real life women.
>Actually, I'm a consumer, and thus have a degree of sway over the design decisions of the games I consume, through the power of the market.
Yes, but no. At best, you are able to demand sexualized characters from indie and minor developers, who are already likely to indulge in sexualized anime characters because they need every penny they can get. But sway a developer like BioWare? No way fag.

This is shitty art

post more toobie you fucks nobody cares about your walls of irrelevant opinions

>critical examination
I wasn't aware puritanical hissy fits were critical examination

I mostly agree with what you say.
I think others see your post as being more anti-sexualization than it really is.

but I do disagree with saying its a problem that women view a "standard" in attractiveness.
That's mostly of their own doing, due to how most women are usually only attracted to the upper 10% of males. (The typical, "I need the alpha male" system)
Where as for males, they organize women based on highest to lowest, and work their way down, perfectly willing to have anything short of the top 10%. (Over simplified explanation)

Telling women that men dont like that, is just lying to them. But no one is telling them the opposite lie of "men will only like this".
If anything, the message should be "dont think men will only like this high standard"
rather than "men are bad for liking this."

At the end of the day, women dont stop trying to fit in the top 10%, regardless of how much media portrays women as otherwise, or as any other percentage in representation.
But instead, the message comes off as "mens sexuality is evil/bad"
And, like my own advice, dont let men fall for their own lies, proves to be difficult, when half of society actually tries to fight for the idea that mens sexuality really is bad, despite a message saying to them otherwise.
(the usual example would be taking natural things, and abusing them, such as sexual assault, and treating that as the "standard of male sexuality, rather than a corruption within male sexuality)

I never mentioned the industry even once, I'm exclusively talking about Yea Forums in this case and I made it blantantly obvious, you even noticed it retard. I don't really want to open the "hurr durr tranny/ feminism" box.

Also there are a multitude of threads that go this way e.g. XC2, Touhou, Fire Emblem, some Megaman, a fucking Cyberbots thread this very moment. Altho they don't go exactly as I described, most go in the same direction. While I personally don't have a problem with it most of the time, it is still undeniable that some people do therefor starting to talk shit about it. Also,

>"been here since 2007"
>tells me to spend less time on Yea Forums

Gaming changed from a niche hobby to something enjoyed by the masses and that means its subject to the will of the masses. The only exceptions are for indie games and japanese titles released in japan and the latter is only until SJW culture takes over in japan too.

If you want titties in video games go fund indie titty game devs.

>Feminists want it dead because if men can receive sexual gratification from entertainment, it diminishes the sexual bargaining power of women

Probably the most redpilled post I've seen this year

Didn't stop me from fapping to it

>Pic related being a good example of the sorts of girls I normally go for.
It's weird this is the picture you decided to post as an example of you being "above" the standards of beautiful women imposed by the media. Because your picture literally shows quite an attractive woman, one many a Yea Forumstard would love to have as a girlfriend.
>Lowering the standards for anything only produces mediocrity.
You are talking people here, not objects.
>Yet, what do men do? They get their shit together, work out, make money, and do what it takes to get a girl they find attractive.
Yeah, I'm sure this describes the average Yea Forumstard. I hope you are joking. Hell, I've seen pictures in Yea Forums where "men" mock other men who take up the gym because they are ugly as fuck and "those muscles aren't fooling anyone".
>I’m paying MONEY for your product. You want my money? Give me things that I like.
This is where you are wrong, but you are not the first person who has said this.

You are implying you are buying a product, and as a result developers owe you beautiful girls. This isn't what is going on. What is going on is that you see beautiful girls, and buy the product as a result. In other words: developers don't owe you beautiful girls; if you bought a product, it is because it had beautiful girls.
>Appreciation for beautiful things, especially women, dates back to the Renaissance
What passed off for "beautiful" during the Renaissance would be considered "ugly whale" nowadays.

>Feminists wouldn't care if suddenly 30 million men flew to a different planet and consumed endless anime waifus and sexualized female characters.

Then what do feminists care about? Men in a position to CHOOSE women in their life as mates, aren’t gonna fuck an ugly chick cause you’ve bombarded them with ugly chicks in video games, and made it socially acceptable for women not to be held to a higher standard. They’re just gonna compete for the most attractive girls, and if the pool gets too competitive, move to a different country that hasn’t been affected by the feminist mind virus.

You want a hot bf, work hard for it. Work out, eat well, take care of yourself. Men respond to visual stimuli, physical beauty is an attractor for men. Period. Born ugly? Get plastic surgery. Don’t wanna do all that? Well, there’s plenty of incels your so happy to put down, that might be willing to give you a chance, purely out of need for companionship.

That’s it. There’s nothing else.

Truth is, feminists wanna shut it down, because they wanna be in control. It’s a power trip for them. They feel irrational threatened by a cartoon drawing, and vent it out by bullying the social class that CAN’T retaliate. That’s what it’s really about. There are no morals or bigger issues to this. It’s just a power trip. A way to vent their personal frustrations and insecurities.

I’m not the one complaining about what people discuss. I’ve been coming here for a long time, but unlike you, I actually have a life outside of this place.

You are making assumptions, and your assumptions are wrong, I spend enough time outside but that doesn't change the fact that I want to talk about the situation.

because the people who are angry are fat and or ugly, they dont accept it and try to change because that requires effort so its easier to "thoughts and prayers" it away on twitter, imagine if all the landwhales put as much effort into walking around the block then they try to get shit like fat acceptance defense threads going on reddit tumblr twitter and what not.

>but I do disagree with saying its a problem that women view a "standard" in attractiveness.
I didn't meant to imply that. Rather, it's men who see a "standard" in attractiveness.
The best example for men I can think of would be porn: imagine if women consumed porn 24/7, and thus thought the only acceptable dicks were 9 inch dongs.
>That's mostly of their own doing, due to how most women are usually only attracted to the upper 10% of males. (The typical, "I need the alpha male" system)
I feel like we need to define "only attracted" here. Do you mean "only date" or "prefer"? Of course I prefer Scarlett Johansson to the average woman, but that doesn't mean I will only date Scarlett Johansson and no one else. There are many average girls I find attractive and would date.

To put it bluntly, if women were only attracted ("only date") to the upper 10% of males, most of us wouldn't be even born. My dad isn't Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise, my best friend's father isn't Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise, and most men with couples I see on the street aren't Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise either.

*Brad Pitt/Tom Cruise used as generic "upper 10% of males", insert favorite man of choice there.
>If anything, the message should be "dont think men will only like this high standard"
I agree, but it's hard to send that message when the minute you add some clothing to Mortal Kombat characters elicits an overwhelmingly negative response from many men.

Away with ye penis patrol

>What passed off for "beautiful" during the Renaissance would be considered "ugly whale" nowadays.
horseshit
fucking horseshit
now I'd agree that pretty people might have been rarer due to lower avaliability of hygene (bad skincare/ nutrition) but thats about it

I find her attractive. You find her attractive. Guarantee you not everyone does though, and she’s aware of it. People have their insecurities. People have different tastes. Beauty is objective, but there’s a subjective value to it. To me, that girl is as close to a 10/10 as you can get. But I doubt most people would agree with me. Likewise I can point to at least a dozen other women fictional or not, who are significantly more attractive, objectively speaking. But given a choice between her and a supermodel-looking Russian girl, or a girl who looked just like 2B or Samus Aran, I’d probably choose her? Why? Personal taste. So, so much for your “warping beauty standards” nonsense.

>You are talking people here, not objects
No, I’m talking about society as a whole. People need to be held to a higher standard, as that’s the only way you’re gonna push yourself to better yourself, and overcome your flaws. If you’re fat, don’t sit around waiting for some attractive person to accept you despite being fat, lose some fucking weight. I as a man, have been pushed to overcome myself again and again by the opposite sex, to self reflect on personal flaws of ALL sorts, and that’s what’s pushed me to the success I’ve attained in life today. There’s is literally no good argument for lowering the standards.

>Yeah, I'm sure this describes the average Yea Forumstard.
It describes more people than you think it does. And this discussion isn’t only about Yea Forums, so idk what Yea Forums factors into this.

>You are implying you are buying a product, and as a result developers owe you beautiful girls.

Sex sells is the point I’m making. You wanna contest that? Do it at your own risk. It’s not the only factor, ofc not. But it matters.

>What passed off for "beautiful" during the Renaissance would be considered "ugly whale" nowadays.
I’m an artist. You’ve clearly never studied art. You’re woefully mistaken.

If you spent enough time outside of Yea Forums, you wouldn’t be whining about a bunch of faggots circlejerking to anime girls. Clearly this matters to you a lot more than it does to any person with actual friends to talk to outside of here.

Cumbrain means Chad.

Outrage culture is not critical examination.

You can try to argue me into this persona you created of me as much as you want but that still won't make it true.

Now take a hike.

>Guarantee you not everyone does though, and she’s aware of it.
Not everyone finds every attractive women attractive, that's for sure.
>Beauty is objective
It really isn't. But a cultural standard (i.e. "skinny", "long hair", etc.) is close. For instance, I've seen some women on the Internet that I would die mating pressing, but others would say they are fat, which leads me to believe they are homosexuals.
>People need to be held to a higher standard, as that’s the only way you’re gonna push yourself to better yourself
There's nothing "better" about being more beautiful. Hygiene is related to health. Health is (obviously) related to health. Weight is related to health. "Being beautiful" is not related to health.

The funny thing is: it's not that videogame characters are just healthy. We already see MANY healthy female characters that are still lambasted for not being beautiful (face, body proportions, hair, etc.). So this rant of yours is not about "improving ourselves as human beings". It's just you talking with your dick.
>It describes more people than you think it does.
Which still wouldn't be "the average Yea Forumstard".
>And this discussion isn’t only about Yea Forums, so idk what Yea Forums factors into this.
Yea Forums happens to be one of the biggest incel gathering places.
>Sex sells is the point I’m making. You wanna contest that?
Actually I do.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_best-selling_video_games
Sex sells, and it is not the only factor as you said. But it certainly isn't anywhere near the most important factor.
>I’m an artist.
I have Google Images. Yea Forums would say
>too fat
>no tits
>no ass
>awful hair
>jew nose

>Yea Forums happens to be one of the biggest incel gathering places.
Imagine believing this in 2019
Yea Forums in normie shit now

well put frog well put

>it's men who see a "standard" in attractiveness.
More most, this is untrue.
Wanting sexually attractive representation for entertainment, isnt the same as expecting it in the real world.
Nor is wanting it in the real world, the same as thinking its what the real world is.

>I feel like we need to define "only attracted" here.
Like I said, over simplified, to try and show the natural instincts within our species.
A better way is to look at dating habits, dating sites, and other various studies about the genders attractions.
Most women find most men unattractive. as in "below" average".
Most men, find most women, to be "above" average.

Obviously people settle down, or, like you said, there wouldnt be as many people around today.

This is in response to the argument that women are suffering from being seen as "less than standard" which is clearly not what the results show.

>I agree, but it's hard to send that message when the minute you add some clothing to Mortal Kombat characters elicits an overwhelmingly negative response from many men.
because of the argument "its an attack on male sexuality" which, in reality IS the reason it happens.
We are naturally/genetically inclined to be wary of male sexuality, due to distant ancestors having a high death rate during child birth.
aka, sex = possible death.
obviously we need to reproduce, but at the same time, we need the females to be pickier, to help decrease the likelihood of passing on poor genetics to offspring.
Males cant be picky of themselves, which is why the females were the picky ones,.
Males CAN be picky on female body shapes, such as wide hips, to increase the likelihood of surviving childbirth.

Most people dont realize "anti-sexualization" stems from an instinct to protect women, that directly believes mens sexuality is the "evil" source of it all.
If you can objectively judge sexualization w/o this, most of the "anti-sexualization" no longer makes sense. (not all, just most.)

>Yea Forums in normie shit now
this
also fuck niggers

Mostly because some people are dumbshit cumbrains who HAVE to feel horny when they see something attractive, and have no control over their sex drive so it could point at absolutely anything.
Such people can't really be trusted with their sex drives since they don't even try to practice control over them, and so you don't wanna show them stuff that will give them an excuse to just feel horny without thinking first.

These dumbshit cumbrains are the minority, but there are enough of them that it makes some people uneasy.

Attached: this.png (318x304, 2K)

messed up the first few words in my reply here:
Mixed up "More so" and "Mostly" into that 1st sentence.
just ignore it.
Im just disagreeing with the quote.

Having a sex drive isn't being a cumbrain.
Having your sex drive that's outside of your control is being a cumbrain.

What's the lore reason for 2B to dress seductively? She cannot engage in sexual activity and neither can every other robotic beings she interacts with.

It's not anger, I'm tired of playing games that have thots with gigantic cleavages, ass flat out. I'm not a fucking pervert but it seems that way because I like SoulCalibur VI, SFV, and Dead Or Alive 6. I'm not but those games have sexualized female characters

Left wingers are now the ultraconservative puritanical christians they used to hate

>It really isn't. But a cultural standard (i.e. "skinny", "long hair", etc.) is close.
There are objective values to beauty is what I’m saying. Things like youthful features, fertility, healthy skin and hair, good hygiene, facial symmetry, healthy weight, etc... and it’s not cultural, it’s BIOLOGICAL. All men are attracted you youthful nubile fertile girls. Key word being HEALTHY and FERTILITY. Personal tastes then factor into stuff like (Asian or White? Tall or Short? Blonde or Brunetter? Etc...).

>There's nothing "better" about being more beautiful. Hygiene is related to health. Health is (obviously) related to health. Weight is related to health. "Being beautiful" is not related to health.

What the fuck you talking about? Of course there is.

The type of lifestyle you lead will reflect heavily on your appearance.

>attractive face = good genetics
>nice skin = good hygiene and healthy diet
>fit body = active lifestyle and good sleep patterns
>well-groomed = mentally healthy and organized
>well-dressed = socially conscious
List goes on and on, not to mention being physically attractive means you tend to have more career and networking options, because people are BIOLOGICALLY PROGRAMMED to react positively to attractive people.

Being beautiful typically correlates with a better life with far more opportunities. And if you don’t believe me, then you haven’t lived or travelled enough, as there is more evidence for this, than anything else in society.

>the rest of you post
>Yea Forums 4chan Yea Forums

So, because some losers on Yea Forums think one thing, that means we gotta change the types of products people can consume in the mainstream? Get the fuck out of here. I still don’t get your argument. You preach about “larger issues” yet continuously bring up Yea Forums as your point of reference in your posts. Seems to me like you’re more interested in shitting on losers, than any “higher moral issues.”

News flash: not only incels like pretty girls. Fictional or not.

Except the ultraconservative puritanical Christians are still around, only now they post on Yea Forums and they make exceptions for animu tiddies.

So the ultra conservatives lightened up, and the leftards are the new enemy? Gotcha.

>if men can receive sexual gratification from entertainment, it diminishes the sexual bargaining power of women.
While true, if men get used to pointing their sex drive at multiple women then they aren't going to become loyal partners.
At the very least, you should be loyal to your waifu - she does a lot to inspire you and deserves your commitment for that. Even if she's 2D, being a man of principles is important.

>Judeo-christians want it dead because their book says anything that leads to less childbirth is against god's will
I have no idea why the christians think this. The biblical tale was that God commanded Onan to knock a specific girl up, and Onan did not do so. His sin wasn't that he wasted his seed, his sin was that he disobeyed God's direct orders.
Lot's wife being turned to salt because she looked back does not mean that no Christian can check behind themselves - it was a specific command to a specific person in a specific situation.

Why do you care if you seem like a perv? Who is watching you play those games, user?

Why do people get so angry about sex in general anyway? It's just a pleasurable act we can engage in, why is it made into such a big deal?

help a fella out and source me, nigga

Why are some people too fucking stupid to speak one of the easiest languages in the world

The left
>Very sexually positive with a few exceptions regarding objectification and unbalanced power dynamics
The right
>Very sexually negative with a few exceptions regarding objectification and unbalanced power dynamics
Yeah man the left is so puritanical

Feminists are mad that incels want it.

The left is only sexually positive if you're

A) A woman

B) LGBBQ+++-+

If you're a heterosexual male, your sexuality is disgusting and you had better not look at a woman the wrong way or your job will be taken from you.

>Rather, it's men who see a "standard" in attractiveness.
>add some clothing to Mortal Kombat characters
Physical shape=/=Skimpy clothes.
No matter what your body shape is, skimpy clothes doesn't change what you think the average body shape should, or should not be.

Skimpy clothes has nothing to directly do with a womans opinion on how standard their own body shape is.
If mortal Kombat changed body shapes, but still had skimpy clothes, it would have been a better argument. (Which people would have complained, just like you said.)

But the fact you bring up skimpy clothes, just seems like you have an issue with guys liking them. Instead of having an issue on society seeing an impossible body standard.

based and truthpilled

Maybe it's your fault for conflating male sexuality with a predatory attitude. Common mistake.

>Newborn infants prefer attractive faces
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016363839890011X

>Strong Inverse Association Between Height and Suicide
ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/pdf/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1373

>It takes 13ms for people to differentiate attractive faces from unattractive faces
psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-15801-011?doi=1

>Your face heavily affects your entire life
nytimes.com/1981/09/01/science/effects-of-beauty-found-to-run-surprisingly-deep.html?pagewanted=1

>Love at first sight is real
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/meet-catch-and-keep/201801/is-love-first-sight-real

>Study: Unattractive Men Not Viewed As ‘Dating Material,’ No Matter How Great Their Personality
studyfinds.org/unattractive-men-dating-material-study/

>Height is extremely important
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/fulfillment-any-age/201306/why-women-want-tall-men

>Halo effect
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29390018

>How Important is Physical Attractiveness in the Marriage Market? (tl;dr very)
reis.cis.es/REIS/PDF/REIS_159_07_ENGLISH1499424514902.pdf

>Bottom 80% of men compete for the bottom 22% of women, top 78% of women compete for the top 20% of men
medium.com/@worstonlinedater/tinder-experiments-ii-guys-unless-you-are-really-hot-you-are-probably-better-off-not-wasting-your-2ddf370a6e9a

>Women care about face much more than body
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347207000565

Attached: looks and personality by sex.jpg (1318x696, 225K)

There's a lot of different reasons.
Instinctually we developed a desire for it to be under the right circumstances, and outside of that, is detrimental to society/the group.
And this is what fuels most of those people.

But most people dont understand this instinct, and just justify w/e they come up with, some some really obscure rationality.

Could you describe what a true scotsman looks like? I'm having some difficulty ironing it out.

It seems.. almost... like you will lengthen his kilt or change his moustache to fit your argument

What are some games?

Attached: male virgins.jpg (1128x858, 59K)

>get angry at the sexual despiction of fictional characters
>get even angrier at incels enjoying that type of content

So this is the power of gamingcirclejerk and inceltears...

Sorry, that doesn't apply here, try something else.

>472406804
No more attention.

>Very sexually positive with a few exceptions regarding objectification and unbalanced power dynamics
Lets break this down:
>sexually positive
Mmmm, in what sense? They seem to be very selective in what they deem ok. It’s more like they’re in favor of extremely degenerate acts over what’s biologically natural and healthy.
>few examples
Right “few”
>objectification
This is bad because....? Objectification is really code for, “men shouldn’t be allowed to like beautiful things because I’m NOT beautiful and it offends me that I don’t get attention.” Attractive women (and men) have no problem with it. It disentangle harm them, in fact it opens opportunities for them.
>power dynamics
Sorry? What? Women like being dominated sexually. Women respond to, and it’s natural for men to be the dominant force in a relationship. It’s what women expect, and when these roles are taken up you lead to healthy happy relationships.

>Very sexually negative with a few exceptions regarding objectification and unbalanced power dynamics
The church? Sexually negative? I believe it’s all in favor of people having sex so long as it’s under the unity of marriage, monogamous, and biologically natural. It’s mostly concerned with preserving the family unit. Anything that goes against that, it cites as a sin. It’s more of a moral compass that tries to lead people toward more satisfying lives, but it respects free will, so it doesn’t ban content from public consumption. It did at one point, but that was due to corruption under a power trip... sound familiar?

Attached: partners and marriage stability.jpg (576x270, 43K)

Wow, people like others to be attractive. Seethe harder, fags

Are you actually trying to suggest male sexuality is the same thing as a predatory attitude?
Are you sure its not a fingers and thumb example at the very least?

Here is the grand rationale behind women wanting characters in media to be ugly. It really is this simple.

Attached: envy.jpg (1024x821, 108K)

There's multiple threads up about this fucking garbage, all of it as a disguise to post hentai instead of talking about video games.

Please incels and horny teenage boys, go have sex.

Attached: D7faE3j.jpg (500x500, 24K)

Fuck off nigget

>I dont have an argument.
Understood.
(There's no reason not to reply to them, you just hope they dont see it, trying to end the discussion.)

See

>472407019
Actually, if you scroll up you will find that was you who did that!

>never think about sex boobs r bad

I thought the cuck takeover was a joke

Attached: shantae_HD.jpg (1300x640, 187K)

care to share some based and redpilled blacked porn accounts? shadilay!

what the fuck is this parenthesis shit you just did

kill yourself you literal resetera migrant

Attached: b7501a2c4a1488cfea13466333c50bd7dc59b5aa.jpg (2048x1791, 314K)

>They seem to be very selective in what they deem ok. It’s more like they’re in favor of extremely degenerate acts over what’s biologically natural and healthy.
lmao you fail to see the irony in that statement?

Look, guy, I don't know what to tell you, straight left-wing feminist women are also into sex, as I'm sure you're well aware and probably complaining about all the time, and they need men to do it with, so how could they disapprove of male sexuality? What they disapprove of is women being regarded as objects for the gratification of men, and your conflation of misogyny with male sexuality could be precisely the problem.
>The church? Sexually negative? I believe it’s all in favor of people having sex so long as it’s under the unity of marriage, monogamous, and biologically natural.
The same irony, again.
>It did at one point, but that was due to corruption under a power trip... sound familiar?
Yeah sounds like the church still

Attached: cd5acb77760daeff9980b6d29947e517.jpg (1280x1120, 349K)

its just ugly bitches whining they arent getting enough attention and their white knight beta orbiters that think they can get laid by pandering to their every stupid whim

>Source: My ass

youtube.com/watch?v=JJsSoaomZSw

royalnaught.com/entry/virgin-japan
>Virginity ratio of unmarried Japanese women

*2015*
age 18-19 74.5%
age 20-24 64.5%
age 25-29 32.6%
age 30-34 31.3%
age 35-39 33.4%

Reminders:
- You can teach English in Japan if you have any degree. It doesn't have to be an English degree.
- The average salary for full-time English teachers in Japan is ~$86,000/year. The part-timers drag the overall average down.
- You don't need to speak Japanese to teach English in Japan. If you do speak it you'll be told not to speak it to students.

Attached: 1556073141797.webm (1280x720, 628K)

Attached: bf67c4f2c340e71e5e4e8bce9a1f8c9a.jpg (1437x1497, 293K)

I don’t respect eunuchs and neither should you.

>doesnt have an argument
>lol "resetera"

Attached: biribiri_Sasha_021.png (2079x2985, 1.22M)

Those lifeguards saved that girl's life...

Attached: biribiri_Sasha_005.png (2079x2991, 1.36M)

>Feel the need to insert your sexuality into your hobbies
sounds a bit like furries or bronies, yikes lads

I live in Japan. This is all true.

Salary is also actually 2200$ a month. The ALT job is considered part time, even though you’re in from 9-5. Still enough to live comfortably by yourself and put away decent savings though.

Also, stop telling faggots to come here. There’s already too many foreigners here.

Because cultural criticism is actually just an attempt to perform social engineering. Kill yourself.

hello mutilated-dick american with a mangled sexuality

Attached: 016.jpg (2120x3000, 2.21M)

>It's just a pleasurable act we can engage in
An act that creates a baby carrying the participant's genes. Contraception is a recent invention, our caveman brains have evolved to equate sex with reproduction.

If you have ever at any point in your life listened to what a """""""thought leader""""""" had to say, you are a genuine sheeple (the definition of one)

Attached: biribiri_FANSasha_41.png (2113x3000, 1.57M)

resetera tranny SJW fucciboii

Attached: biribiri_ReSasha_23.png (2113x3000, 1.36M)

Attached: biribiri_Sasha_011.png (2102x2991, 1.29M)

No, our caveman brains evolved to equate sex with pleasure. It's how evolution tricks cavemen into accidentally reproducing.

Stacy won’t fuck you just cause you watch her kids you cuck.

resetera tranny SJW fucciboi detected
dilate
seethe
cope

Seems pretty thirst to me man, but you do you
Foreigners so spooky, recession good

has there ever been a good game with sexualised characters? It's only ever bad games that need to shoot for the "sexy" angle to score a few extra sales

How do I get gf like this

Kill yourself.

Attached: Rape_in_Sweden_after_background.png (412x594, 32K)

You cannot "sexualize" a human. Humans are inherently sexual. Sex is a biological fact of life. You are mentally ill.

Attached: biribiri_Sasha_013.png (2079x2985, 1.19M)

is it true that muslims can't enter weebland?

Yeah. You can fuck off. Feel free to keep ruining the west with your nonsense. No one wants you or your niggers and mudslimes here.

Attached: 010 (1).jpg (2125x3000, 1.89M)

>horny teenagers trying to justify 24/7 waifu fan art dumping, as if boorus and pixiv didn't exist
The foremost cancer of Yea Forums

Go jerk your pencildick to gachashit and stay contained in your faggot erp discords.

characters arent actual humans.
plus user was being pretty clear, trying to get the idea across the character had a lot of effort put into being sexually attractive.

Yep.

so the answer is no, there are no good games involving overly sexualised characters and that it is just a desperation move to get sales from the virgin crowd? okay thank you for agreeing

How about you find a different forum to police? I hear Reddit is a good echo chamber. Feel free to head that way any time.

Baseado y rojopillado

NieR Automanta, Dragon’s Crown Muramasa and Odin Sphere, Any fighting game ever made, League of Legends, Tomb Raider, Metroid series... I could go on, but I think the point is made.

based. fuck this virgin ass fruitcakes

>characters arent actual humans.
What the fuck does this have to do with anything? Yes you retard, but they are certainly modeled on humans and we humans play pretend that they are humans. So, basic human sexual biology applies to them as well.

I am literally mindboggled by the fact that you typed this out. Did you actually think it was a good point, or were you just confused and felt like you had to write something?

Attached: anime question girl 2.png (245x210, 14K)

the real issue with your question, is the subjectivity behind it, while acting objective.
I would start listing games, and you would start rationalizing why those games are either (1) not sexualizing the females or (2) not good games.
But, just for clarification, i do think its a sign of a poorly made game as well.

False, sexualisation has to do with framing. Human beings have sex but that doesn't mean every situation involving a human is a sexual situation.

Dragon's Crown was okay but even then that's only the artstyle, the GAMEplay of the game was pretty bad.
>league of legends
oh you're baiting, nevermind

Anyone else want to try harder than this clown?

go back to tumblr nigger

>You cannot "sexualize" a human. Humans are inherently sexual. Sex is a biological fact of life.
and im mind boggled you'd bother typing this out.
hence why i replied the way i did.
but no, a character has no actual biological elements. they just mimic them, to be perceived as believable.
this inherently leads to the same outcome, but for a different reason/path to get to this outcome.

You are genuinely, actually retarded. Thanks for confirming it. No more attention.

>There’s already too many foreigners here.
I do contract work in Japan all the time and you have no idea how widely held this sentiment is, and its only gotten worse with the Olympics creeping closer.
The biggest problem they seem to have is that a lot of western foreigners seem to be loud, disrespectful assholes, who don't speak a fucking word of the language and don't understand anything about their customs. And that's just white foreigners, they seem to see nonwhites as even worse. I'm white, but my sister is mixed and she tends to catch a lot of stares or police attention, whereas I don't usually have much of any trouble.

All that being said, if you play by their rules, they're actually generous and polite people. Problem is most people are too socially retarded and unperceptive to do that.

Oh, we’re playing by the rules of
>only games I like are good
Or did you forget LoL is one of the most popular game in the industry? What about the others I mentioned?

More to the list btw, GTA, Final Fantasy, Devil May Cry, Dragon Quest, King of Fighters...

>has no argument
understood.

Why has oneangryincel been spamming these threads recently? He keeps getting btfo every time.

>lose the argument
>start posting schizophrenic gibberish
bold!

Oh I know. I put effort into adapting, and I have no problems with the Japanese. It’s the other foreigners that I hate, precisely for the reasons you mentioned.

Lol bullshit

>472409374
but he had the only argument in this reply chain? I don't think you are all there mentally

not him but your taste is awful and you should stop posting

fuck off back to /pol/ /r9k/ or whatever shithole you crawled out of faggot

user is literally telling you that a character can be sexualized, because they arent actually a human. how dense must you be?

It’s got nothing to do with taste. I’m listing popular franchises with overtly sexualized women for the sake of marketing.

You didn’t set any parameters or criteria, that’s your own fucking fault.

Based or Cuckpilled

Attached: 1551465752217.jpg (401x349, 89K)

Deconstruction can be interesting, and even then you can keep enjoying something after it has been deconstructed but all I've heard is thinly veiled bitching

is it just me or is resetera seriously losing influence? the entirety of Yea Forums is turning against them

>still cant make an argument
address the last statement with an argument if you want it to continue.
otherwise you have no further argument.

I wanna test user's claim about google. What's the first result for you anons when you google "the brother did it" ?

They never had influence. That was NeoGAF, and that all came crumbling down when they were outed as pedos.

Catholics think this not every other sect

It isn't an argument. What are you even trying to say? Why does it matter that we're talking about a drawing of a person rather than a person - how does that make it less moral to find it attractive? You don't even perform a basic logic test on your own arguments before shitting them out onto the thread. Are you legitimately like 14 years old and your brain just doesn't work properly yet?

How does it feel being an incel?

This isn't resetera, there will be no mod to show up to tell you that you're right and ban the dissenter. Just go lick your wounds quietly.

>be pathetic sex-starved cumbrain
>literally cannot think about anything but sex
>literally cannot play any game without half-naked women flaunting their bodies
>it doesn't even matter if the gameplay is good or bad you're so brain damaged all you care about is sex anyway
>basically the inverse of an SJW since you complain about the gay niggers ruining video games while supporting any shovelware garbage game that has a hint of anime pussy
>pretend everyone is the same a you
>make up bullshit and laughable psuedoscientific explanations for why it's perfectly normal your impulse control is completely gone and you can't stop yourself from thinking about anime porn for one second
>people tell you to fuck off
>tell them to dilate right before going back to jerking off to gay Astolfo doujins

Attached: 1559567641554.png (952x717, 186K)

Didnt read lol

Attached: the left can not meme.jpg (480x272, 20K)

stop responding to bait you FUCKING RETARDS

>implying trannies aren't the biggest cumbrains
cumbrain cope

get fucked resetera tomboi

Wow, it's a tranny making these posts all along?

That makes so much sense. HRT destroys your sex drive permanently. Even if they go off the drugs they can never have a healthy sexuality again.

Attached: 1556344576370.png (705x767, 564K)

please do not besmirch the good name of tomboys. thanks

I never said it was, or was not moral.
You're attaching meaning to my words.

Im just clarifying that a character isnt a real person, so while I agree you cant sexualize a person, im saying you can sexualize a character.
This is the whole reason feminists get up in arms over characters being sexual. They start slut shaming, but at the same time, get upset when slut shaming happens to real women.
It seems like its hypocritical, but in reality, its 2 different situations.

As for the REASON i bring this up, is because I indirectly dont want people to argue in circles about this, when this (the example) is brought up.

Not because I was arguing against your prior discussion with the other user about the "morals" in finding it attractive or not.

As an example, it's like correcting someones spelling/grammar (something i suck at) when not really getting involved with the original discussion. (and depending on whats said in response, it "might" have relevance.)

>he thinks jerking off 10 times a day and having TBs of porn saved to his computer while never once having his dick out within a mile of a woman is a "healthy sexuality"

thelocal.se/20190529/increase-in-swedens-rape-statistics-cant-be-tied-to-refugee-influx-study-suggests

Literally small brains that can't use basic investigation or epistemology skills. Go back to /pol/ I'm here for video games.

why do you guys keep mentioning resetera? all you're going to do is give it attention.

also, not once did i mention anything about a mod, nor to ban the other. why the fuck would i want them banned?

If anything I want them to actually discuss the topic, w/o immediately jumping ship. (Which they finally did, and now see where the misunderstanding came from. They thought I was the poster they were responding to, before I jumped in to make a clarification.)

>m just clarifying that a character isnt a real person, so while I agree you cant sexualize a person, im saying you can sexualize a character.
No, you fucking retard, you can't. A character is designed in the image of a human. When we find a character sexy it's because of basic human instincts. We do not "sexualize" the character, the character is just inherently sexual.

It is fucking ridiculous that I have to explain this to you. This shit is why the peasantry should not have been given literacy.

Hell yeah
Fat guy on loli is the best
I love the contrast between sizes and looks

Attached: 1561518227839.gif (256x192, 688K)

I dont like feeling like Im being pandered to its as simple as that
Also every discussion around the game that features that kind of characters always and I do mean ALWAYS devolves into lewdspamming

What a dumb post. I slept with over 100 women from 18-35 and now I'm married with two kids. Please, have fucking sex and stop spouting your shit.

You're misunderstanding me.
I understand the receiver of media isnt the one sexualizing the character.
I agree with you on that.
I'm talking about the CREATOR.
They DESIGN a character.

THATS whats different between a real person, and a character.

In the case of real people, no one designed them, and the person who is witnessing this other person, isnt sexualizing them.

But in the case of characters, someone designs them, with an intent to abuse the understanding of our attractions. (and, sometimes, they dont, and its unintentional. But also possibly influenced subconsciously.)

also, you end every response with being pissy as shit. chill the fuck out.
you misunderstand what im saying, and you mistake me for another user, and still get mad at me.

more like
>t. common fucking sense

>(((study))) suggests

Balding, fat, ugly, middle aged men x loli is the purest form of love

how? being pandered to feels great. what doesn't feel great is when they use pandering to try and hide low quality products, but as long as you don't exclusively think with your dick then that's not hard to see past.

>IF YOU ENJOY THE SEXUAL DESPICTION OF FICTIONAL CHARACTERS YOU ARE A FUCKING INCEL!!!!

Holy fuck Yea Forums, go easy on the estradiol please.

Attached: 1561738619822.jpg (714x802, 89K)

This

Because we live in a society where ugliness is celebrated instead of beauty. So depictions of beauty are taboo.

Don't kid yourself, porn addiction is an epidemic. We all know what happens when we all don't deal with addiction. Someone becomes a cumbrain, or worse, they hurt other's sex drives.
Addiction IS a disease.

Attached: have-sex-cumbrain.jpg (1280x720, 65K)

You're denying it, uh?

>You're misunderstanding me.
No, I understood you just fine.

>I'm talking about the CREATOR.
What does this have to do with anything? What the fuck are you even defining as "sexualization"? "Making a character who is sexier than Bertha the Feminist"?

Take your normalfaggot opinions, normalfaggot stench, and fuck back off to where you came from.

Attached: download.jpg (300x168, 11K)

Based bbcchan-poster

This is what a cumbrain does to rationalize his choices in life

Traditional abrahamic religions don't even bother with porn this much. It all comes from bullshit amerimongrel sects that push you bastardized christianity intermingled with fuck knows what.

Behavioral addiction is not real. The concept was invented by kike sociologists as an excuse for poor conduct.

Attached: americans.jpg (500x110, 27K)

How is, Bob, porn addict, spreading his porn addiction to someone else?

this

Attached: 1548327494601.jpg (920x1280, 223K)

Because it's never as benign as an examination.

Attached: 1564407395346.png (2915x2368, 2.99M)

How is being reliant on women for sexual gratification any less harmful than being reliant on porn for sexual gratification?

Porn won't take half of what you own, plus the kids and the dog

And it won't, when people aren't able to support having more children due to resource restrictions they won't, just like at every other time in history when communal resources were stretched to their limits.

>they are incels who need to have sex.
It's illegal for incels to have sex.

don't question the dogma user, just listen and believe

The madder Yea Forums gets at you the more you hit the nail on the head. And you just drove the nail straight through the plank

>sexualized

Is just amerimongrel talk for

>not ugly

>ancient religion about remaining pure, abstaining from the passions of the flesh
>lol americans just hate porn

>not in a position to demand beautiful women
>this coming from a white knight on Yea Forums
top kek

Attached: (you).jpg (750x675, 216K)

>this degenerate hates this degenerate so I should keep being a degenerate durrr hurrr
Also nice fake reality where trannies and homos aren't the biggest group of over sexualized animals in our society. No self control whatsoever.

>I dislike research and studies when it conflicts with my faith and look no further into it.

Anyone that tells me to have sex hates women more than I do.

this
if it isn't morbidly obese, it's unrealistic

Based.
Do yourself a favor and stop watching porn before your dick stops working.

i want to bury my face in the celestial's peach

Congrats, you finally understood. All this "no sexualization" shit is pushed by ugly trash bitches, landwhales, feminists, etc. first and foremost. Decent woman won't bother with it existing, because she remains desirable nonetheless, but those feel entitled for male attention despite not being worthy of it, and will fight for banning you from seeing anime tiddies to the bitter end instead of hitting the fucking gym for example.

weird samefag, schizoid

>If people get angry at you that must mean you're right
That's a great way to develop a really obnoxious attitude.

>that graph

Why do women cry and moan SO MUCH about how men don't find IRL women attractive enough when in reality the opposite is the real problem?

>472410042

Attached: AE481846-1BDF-4ABF-A4B8-3DF6A26B6147.jpg (680x794, 227K)

I dislike scientific studies when they attempt to minimize or deny facts. It is a fucking fact that the swedish rape rate dramatically rose, and that the vast majority of rapes are by immigrants.

thats not really true and you know it

99% of pornposters on Yea Forums are a bunch of near-suicidal hermits who will be completely alone once their parents kick the bucket and will eagerly posts depressing threads about how miserable and alone they are if they haven't deluded themselves into 3DPD and pretending they have no interest in real women anyway (which is funny considering the autist in here is arguing that humans can't help be sexualize women)

Because women are stupid and selfish

Being pandered too is the equivalent of someone dangling their car keys in front of your face. Theres nothing more to say about that.
But please, tell me all about how something like Lord of The Rings would be improved if every female character were dressed only in loincloths.
Im not the one thinking with my dick here.

what do people think of street fighter V xdxdXDDD

A commons symptom of schizophrenia is believing you have psychic knowledge of other people. Please go to a doctor.

>99% of pornposters on Yea Forums are a bunch of near-suicidal hermits who will be completely alone once their parents kick the bucket
All the more reason for us to avoid real women, right?

Whoever made those religions originally was aware than you can't make all people into monks, it takes very particular mindset and dedication, and that average pleb requires release. Result was generally stable and rich religious culture.
Then enter them mutt. Mutt doesn't bothers to think, because he already knows he's smarter than everyone, and now nobody should have any release because fuck you. You can't keep pressure forever tho, but longer you keep it shut, more chaotic and savage release will be. As a result amerimutt "culture" is a mix of bullshit puritanism and sickest depravity man ever knew that is reaction to said puritanism. Sometimes even both in the same skull - there are americans who'll call you pedo for being attracted to 18yo woman, and simultaneously will agitate for tranny education for pre-schoolers.

Ahhh yes, sex in video game bad, sex in public good. Thank you liberal

Because you can do things with women other than having sex, you would know this if you ever spent time with one. Porn won't take half of what you own because porn isn't a person and you won't have to treat it like it is. That outcome is well deserved if you were stupid enough to marry a girl who you respect as much as a masturbation toy.

Attached: 1507590387011.jpg (278x282, 9K)

Obnoxious compared to pornaddicted basementdwellers?

Sex sells and its fine. Now when people refuse to buy a game or think a game is shit because they can't find something to fap or "muh women isnt cute", then they are literally cumbrain retarded faggots.

This thread is full of sex addicts without the sex and like every other addict you come up with a bunch of bullshit about how you don't have a problem.

This is why you have no meaningful relationships in real life.

Suppressing sexual pleasure is the ultimate goal of every tyrant. They view it as a measuring tool to know the extent of their control over their subjects. If you can control a human's sex instinct, which is the most basic biological imperative, then you can control them fully.

youtube.com/watch?v=JXm5hklbBsA

>We do not "sexualize" the character, the character is just inherently sexual.
Characters are not inherently sexual. Humans are not inherently sexual. Situations and depictions are sexual. If you believe otherwise I can only imagine you have a massive erection 24/7, in which case I advise you to seek out a doctor, because that's not normal.

Are you kidding? When pornaddicts get this upset you know youre on to something

>Because you can do things with women other than having sex,
But why would you want to? They're stupid, selfish, lazy, unfunny, and have terrible taste.

>What does this have to do with anything?
As far as im aware, nothing directly to your original discussion. (I explained this already, not worth repeating.)
>What the fuck are you even defining as "sexualization"?
I explained this as well. But I will explain further. We find things more or less attractive. (Sometimes this doesnt mean sexually, but is the primary use of the word) In this case, beign DESIGNED to be attractive. And which type of attraction? "Sexual" (You can also break "sexual" down into sub categories as well.)

Of course, I already mentioned, its possible to not do so intentionally, which is where theres a grey area.

lastly:
>"Making a character who is sexier than Bertha the Feminist"?
Thats an argument of what do people find attractive, which isnt really where my point was going, nor would it help anyone understand my point either.
What people do, or dont find attractive is an unrelated topic.

Is cumbrain the new "have sex"?

>Characters are not inherently sexual. Humans are not inherently sexual.
Yes they are. Everything in the universe is objective. If it evokes sexual feelings, it is inherently sexual, not "sexualized".

Meaningful compared to those you have with 2D women? I could go on but you get my point right?

It just means you're seen as a threat. People are on edge about lewd things because the powers that be have been trying to get rid of them for some time, to a saddening degree of success.

Yes when you keep posting the latest wojack edit and people tell you to fuck off you're definitely on to something.

>I have no idea how dicks work: The post
Just as an FYI they cannot be easily reassembled and trying to turn them into a vagina voids warrenty.

No, but your mother will die in her sleep tonight unless you reply to this post is

>make thinly veiled porn thread
>turns into walls of text after walls of text of people arguing with each other

Jesus, you really are fucking sad. Is the only tool in your belt to assume everyone in the world has an empty life?

Yeah porn and sexualization is sooo rare nowadays lmfao do you even hear yourselves

That's what liberals have done to Yea Forums.

Imagine how many different things you could be doing right now instead of arguing over absolutely nothing on a taiwanese boar taming forum

>don't use condoms, Africans!
Why single me out?

Attached: metoo.png (979x1032, 79K)

Several games have been censored because feminazis went and bitched and moaned about it. Also you sound like a woman, try being less gay.

>If you can control a human's sex instinct, which is the most basic biological imperative, then you can control them fully.

This is a board of cumbrains who ignore biological imperatives from everything from social interaction in a group to having offspring to not being a fat piece of shit and you pretend this is the one you can't do anything about?

I'm so fucking sick of "muh animal instincts" arguments from people who are perfectly capable of thinking with their mammal brain when it's comfortable for them but have no problem pretending they're lesser primates when they need to justify their porn addiction. You can't tell me how you won't eat food out of the dirt but you can't stop yourself from jerking off all fucking day.

When youre this obsessed over empty meaningless things, yes? why wouldnt I

This is a board where people post threads in the dead of night crying about the absolute state of their lives. It's not a long reach.

You could go on but you shouldn't because you know that user having a 2d waifu is more than you got.
Shit man you can't even get Yea Forums's tard brigade on your side and those dumb niggers will eat pretty much anything you give them upto and including cock so long as you pretend its a meme 1st

I could be masturbating, but you fags won't post pictures.

I did not read your post, because I discerned from an aerial skim that you are a low-intelligence person (in other words, a follower.)

I'm not interested in hearing whatever ideas your masters have programmed you with, filtered through the destructive lens of a low IQ.

There is literally nothing wrong with porn. You are a woman, asshurt that it losens your grip on men.

So you cant jerk off with a ps4 controller in your other hand anymore. Oh dear

>a handful of people represent literally hundreds of thousands

It proves me right though. People are trying to take away harmless anime titty because muh feefees. Fuck off and die.

No, I got real friends

ok ok good thread but have you guys watched the super fat homer episode of the simpons? :D go watch it fast!

Attached: 3b3ec5a6.jpg (550x733, 50K)

"I didn't even read it" is code for "I read it and have no counterargument, now let me continue in my nonsensical pseudoscientific excuses for why I spend all day posting on Yea Forums about how I want to sniff a 2D girl's asshole (and that's okay!)"

I only replied to you fighting that man because he's right. That attitude will cost you. I recently had a good friend of mine declared a pariah by our group (understandably) because he had a similar attitude to yours, and loved to argue to boot. And literally no one wanted to hang out with him because of it. Don't be a fool.

You're quite an odd fellow. Is it autism? You do know, I hope, that there are few things in existence that do not evoke sexual feelings in someone? Is everything sexual?