Was Joseph Anderson right?
Was Joseph Anderson right?
Other urls found in this thread:
yes
Who?
Yes theres way too many filler moons.
I gave up half way through the video because the whole thing can be boiled down to "there's a lot of repeated content." This is the kind of autistic fucker who would play games he hates for hours on end just so he can make a miserable hour+ video on how much he hated himself while playing it.
The sandboxes themselves were not good. New Donk City felt like the only one that was designed around platforming.
He couldn't even do the circle thing lol
yes, we do have to secure a future for white children
>When you're so autistic you sit down on a single unique bench in a single level, get a moon, and now you have to sit on every bench in the game
He was right about the transformations. Repetitive content is fine if the game is good, but Odyssey's issue is the filler stuff is 100% braindead and thus not fun to actually do. Also, the game's objectives are mostly very linear and you've only got one path to do everything, so it's not even open-ended like 64 or Sunshine, which makes it less fun too. It's my least favorite 3D Mario honestly.
>Sunshine
>open-ended
More than Odyssey, yeah. Think of how many levels in Sunshine you can travel horizontally in any direction you want. Now imagine the same thing in Odyssey, and realize you're essentially blocked off into a path 90% of the time and there's little actual free movement to be found.
Hes retarded
Based Matthew dabs all over shitty content while managing to say far much in less time
No he's an idiot moron on the Internet. His credentials for artist critique are as relevant as any idiot on this board. i.e. fucking ZERO
agreed dude the only ones who should be allowed to criticize games are IGN
90% of all missions in Sunshine are "spray thing with water". It doesn't matter how many directions you can go if there's nothing to do in them besides stopping and using Fludd.
Still more fun than Odyssey's gimmick
MISTER ANDERSON lol
Who is Joseph Anderson and why should i care?
>2 hour videos of nitpicking
Does anyone watch this for any other reason than shitposting material?
No, the town made him stupid.
I played Mario Odyssey myself and though it was fucking amazing. One of the most flat-out unashamedly fun games of past decade.
I always laugh people try and tell me I'm wrong.
I honestly, genuinely don't understand how you can think that.
Sunshine is "stop and shoot Fludd" over and over again for the whole game.
Odyssey's Cappy gives you different powers and abilities for each world you visit. It's objectively better.
>spraying water is better than transforming into different enemies to gain their capabilities
Epic
Was Jim Sterling right?
Based Jim.
Who the fuck is Joseph Anderson.
I think the game was pretty good but I don't like the way it handled the difficulty curve.
Cappy sucks because it limits your moveset down to two moves at best and you can only use it exactly as the developers intend, on one specific thing in one area. They also don't usually relate to platforming unlike powerups in prior 3D Mario games, and what they do offer is lame. FLUDD is unbalanced but still way better in its respective game.
Filler is fine, they just needed to have more variety in moon rewards so bigger challenges gave more moons or smaller ones gave just fragments of moons.
>Cappy sucks because it limits your moveset down to two moves
Ah yes because Fludd allows for much more moves..
>They also don't usually relate to platforming unlike powerups in prior 3D Mario games
Yes slowly flying over shit with Fludd truly is peak platforming
>Ah yes because Fludd allows for much more moves..
It literally does, FLUDD adds to your moveset rather than restricts it. Please play the game before you discuss it.
So does Cappy, and way better than Fludd. Maybe YOU should play the game.
For platforming, it allows for hat throw/jump combos, which is fun, but actual transformations (the main focus) leave you with two moves which usually aren't funny and only give you like one object to use them on in one area. It's anti-fun. I would forgive it if the level design matched up, but Sunshine's is still way better too.
This logic is retarded. Each Cappy enemy has one or two move, but it's not the same move for each one. They all do different things. You're constantly trying out new things in the game.
Meanwhile, in Sunshine you're stuck with Fludd who does the same thing over and over. And in those levels where you lose it, you see just how much it limited Mario. He doesn't even have a fucking long jump.
>I would forgive it if the level design matched up, but Sunshine's is still way better too.
>the pachinko
>the sand eagle
>the manta ray
>the blue coins
>the lava river
>the ghost hotel
>I'm a Chuckster
Fuck no, Sunshine has the worst level design of any Mario game.
Yes, who can forget genius level design like the pachinko level, the lilypad red coins level, the "clean everything within a limited time" missions or the unforgetable "propel your boat on lava using your shit water spayer". THAT is fun.
^It's not my favorite either, but it's still more fun than SMO. Odyssey plays it way too safe, it's too easy, there's not enough platforming, and the bosses are a nuisance - not to mention the inferior worlds.
>mentions some questionable mechanics and 3 specific short stages
>the whole game's level design is bad you guise!!
you're trying to be taken seriously?
>Watching youtube crituques
Yikes.
Odyssey was PURE FUN and SOUL and the only people who disliked it are people who HATE FUN VIDEO GAMES and want everything to be SOULLESS GARBAGE LIKE BOTW.
He mentionned 6 stages. Truth is at least half of the game is frustrating. Trying to 100% Sunshine is pure torture because you can't just skip the bullshit by trying another mission. Even then there's some unskippable bullshit.
>he
About there being too many moons that are too easy to get? Yes.
He's a fucking idiot for spending ages trying to explain his point.
Sorry I assumed your gender user.
I think Sunshine is overall really fun, but whenever I think about it I remember the gorillions of blue coins that were hidden fucking everywhere and you had no way to see which ones you were missing.
No, he literally made that video to shill himself on Yea Forums
Did he actually do this? Did he just completely ignore the hint system the game has that directs you towards moons? Or not read any of the titles which generally indicate if a moon is one in a series of similar ones?
Is he that dumb?!
He's also a fucking idiot for pretending that is some massive problem, not a nitpick
He said he did.
Yes, but sonyfags will fellate him anyway, because shitposting.
No matter how often people point out everything he says is retarded, they will always worship a man who can't run a circle
worst 3d mario outside of sunshine.
hope they don't go the quantity over quality route for the sequel
...
do not 100% Sunshine, just play through it without worries instead, the game is way better that way
even Odyssey is fucking garbage if you try to 100% it
Ah yes, Mr Anderson.
youtu.be
I don't like how much New Super crept into this game. It felt sterile in places because it had to include things established in the New games for some reason. It also sorely needed true DLC. Maybe it will get the Galaxy 2 treatment but they way things are going at Nintendo now I doubt it.