The Quality of Every Fallout Game

>Fallout 1-Great
>Fallout 2-Amazing
>Fallout Tactics-Okay
>Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel-God Awful
>Fallout 3-Servicable
>Fallout: New Vegas-Good
>Fallout Shelter-Mobile Game
>Fallout 4-bad
>Fallout 76-Borderline unplayable
Discuss

Attached: FO1Logo.png (380x200, 167K)

New Vegas is highly overrated because it's the best of the Nu-Fallouts and Fallout standards have fallen hard. The first two are still the best by miles. And no, Fallout 3 is not serviceable.

Is Great better or worse than Amazing?

Not him, but definitely worse.

Attached: Fallout Tiers.png (1996x820, 576K)

>Fallout: New Vegas-Good
>Fallout 4-bad

retard spotted

Perfect taste

No, everything he said is pretty accurate.

>Fallout 3-Servicable
retard

yep he gets it

If I've never played an old Fallout game should I just start with 2? I remember trying the first back when I was a teenager and it was 2old4me. But I might give 2 a try and claw my way through

>1 > 2
ftfy

This. And I say this as someone that enjoys New Vegas from the NuFallouts. The only reason it's highly regarded is because it's better than the Elder Scrolls with Guns mods that Bethsada does.

tactics should be above 3

Fallout in Bethesda's hands is like an autist with a gaming controller, it's good when they get it but gets worn down every time they use it

Are tits better than asses?

shittiest bait i've seen in a long time

>Bait this low effort

Attached: 1563200717523.jpg (482x424, 21K)

It literally was

The whole series is trash
Don't @ me either

Fallout 3 is so reliant on the first two it feels like Bethesda made a fanfiction into a canon game

>The whole series is trash
>Don't @ me either

Attached: 1564270857628.png (644x800, 14K)

Attached: 1540768913104.png (860x860, 157K)

serviceable doesn't mean "good". fallout 3 does the bare minimum (if you don't take the atrcious ending into account). it's a game where you can fuck around in the wasteland without feeling like pulling your hair out every second.

I'm still mad about what they did to Harold.

If you want to play the old fallout games I would suggest starting with the first one. It has a much easier start than 2 and it's also a shorter game.

Start with 1. It's a really short game and sets up 2.

Yes they are.

I love how anyone who steps outside of the hivemind gets written off as bait. Like not only is Yea Forums incapable of forming independent opinions or evaluating games on their relative merits, but it's actually beyond the realm of imagination someone could dislike NV in light of its many shortcomings. Every time an NV fanboy posts I swear they come off more brainless than the last time.

trick question. they're both equally great.

New Vegas isn't perfect, but let me give you run down of just a few of 4's many flaws
>Drawn out, boring intro
>Voiced protagonist
>Dialogue wheel
>Essential Characters
>The plot revolves around finding a character the player most likely doesn't give a shit about
>No skills
>WAY to many "go here and shoot bad guys" quests
The list goes on and on.

If 1 is too old then so is 2. They have nearly identical gameplay.

2's gameplay is much improved from 1's desu

This is mostly true, but 2 made a lot of QoL improvements and has more gameplay systems.

4 is so bad it's unreal, gunplay & graphics are nice but everything else is like work, i have zero fun playing it when not shooting baddies, the lack of skills are the final nail in coffin, there's no point to leveling up other than perks... Most the weapons are fucking lame, they even use same model for unique shotgun as a rifle ... what the fuck. the combination just completely deflates all motivation to play. Only real fun time i ever had with it was when i got frustrated taking time like rpg and made a new character shotgun blitzkrieger, just sprinting into every situation blasting everything upclose w/ justice & bloody mess, not even looting much at all except unique npcs or treasure areas, playing like that was not bad. Also used the sim settlements mod w/ no requirements and no leaders to not even have to touch settlements, they develop completely automated. if you try to play it like a real RPG you will legit get angry.

Whether you like him or not Joseph Anderson released a good video on Fallout 4. The problems with the plot sometimes border on stupidity.

It makes me wonder how anyone could be excited for Elder Scrolls 6. It's going to be even more watered down than Skyrim

Nu Vegas over any of the orignals.
Quit posting your shit tier list zoomer.

>d-do I fit in yet fellow 4channelers

I literally started playing Fallout 1 yesterday. I'm ashamed I only played FO4 and FO76, so I wanted to see how different these games are

the answer is: very
not the same way TES games shifted from Daggerfall to Skyrim

the roleplaying aspects are huge and very important, I wish 3d fallout games had more stuff like this
>inb4 play new vegas
I tried and it keeps on crashing

you don't.

Fallout is one of the biggest gaming IPs on the market.