>Game is set in a dystopian future in which the government is evil
Game is set in a dystopian future in which the government is evil
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
helsinkitimes.fi
nrel.colostate.edu
theguardian.com
iopscience.iop.org
climatefeedback.org
rampages.us
youtube.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
do any games let you play as the "big bad government" and fight even worse rebels?
tropico maybe
just like in real life
So powerful, such a statement
FTL kinda? The bad guys are rebels that are human supremecists who hate the empire which is basically Star Trek's Federation and want to subjugate all alien species
Wow, you're back! What took you so long faggot?
Finally read 1984 the other week, some spooky shit.
Did they actually have mind reading tech or how did they know what he was thinking?
all people are evil
>Game is set in a dystopian future in which the bad guys have united the planet and are colonizing space while the good guys are committing terrorism and murdering innocents
But user, they are FREEING the people of the world by giving them free choice! Even if the free choice was that they were happy with the government and they were well looked after!
So real life?
Are you denying it? Blind bugman retard lol.
>being a slave to the man is okay as long as it's in space!
I suspect you might even enjoy bootlicking on the terrestrial plane. Also, sycophants are never innocent.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions
Yeah, I'm sure your shit-posting will set us all free from these evil tyrants. Maybe take that tin-foil hat off once in a while or stop visting /pol/
@472037249
>if I larp as a spastic antifa they HAVE to give me (you)s
Guess again!
it is
your personal fee fees are insignificant in comparison to the success of humanity as a whole
Are there any games which don't do this?
>government is my friend!
kek
Good boy. The enrichment of the man and the advancement of humankind are one and the same.
Based and redpilled
I'm sure you could do a better job, right user?
Good goy.
fuck off kike
I'm sure your paranoia of the jews would serve you well in office, user.
Le bump
Unironically, yes.
Why don't you run to help the people?
give this man an oscar
>game is set in dystopian future, but all your character wants is to fuck around in his awesome modified car and shooting people
Kinda wish there were more dystopian future games where the MC gives no fucks
Thank you, I would just like to dedicate this to all white people.
>game is set in the future
>wh*te """""people""""" still exist
He doesn't cause you have to be at least 35 with a certain amount of years in government. Or rich.
They don't, they just monitor and document every bit of a person's life to control them.
>and black """"""people"""""" don't
But we know that's not dystopian
>human supremacist
I’m sorry, I thought you said these were the villains
>rebels vs evil empire
>protagonist is true neutral
>rebels attack him for not joining them
>protag joins empire in retaliation
Fucking Killzone lmao
>but dude
>WHAT IF
>the ANGELS
>no dude
>the ANGELS
>were EVIL
>bet you never thought of that
're the one assuming he's not.
They really missed the point with Doom Eternal.
Name a single fucking game.
>game set in the future
>world is still habitable despite the obvious incoming cataclysm induced by global warming
yeah, ok
>he fell for the climate change meme
That is villanous. Even on Earth. We're holocausting the chickens and cows.
Warhammer 40k games
>Falling for the global warming meme
>Fell for GEE OH PEE spazzing
FO NV
>Real life is set in a dystopian future in which the government is both incompetent and evil
FTFY
That's it, keep consuming. There is nothing wrong with sucking earth dry until we all die.
>Game is set in a dystopian future in which corporations are evil
Who gives a shit about the next ones to come along? I had my fun and that's all that matters. Now fuck off, hippy.
They have experience with this sort of thing, the entire point was that Winston is but one of many.
>"everything will be fine!" says the Indian industrialist for the hundredth time
Peak boomer.
The Helghast are not human anymore.
Genocide is the only solution.
I'm going to dab on all my kids and tell them to clean up the shit I left behind for them.
Did they seriously make the Angels evil in Eternal?
omg summer is hot its the end of the world, thats what my heroes that random 12 year old girl and bill nye said
civilization is a whiteman's game, be careful what you wish for
You do know that after a while without white people that the world would collapse and they would all go back to living in mudhuts, don't you? But be my guest, you'll all die out not long after anyway when you regress to your natural state.
>summer is hot
>fall is hot
>winter is hot
>spring is hot
>obviously a ploy to promote protecting the environment
Stop being a fucking retard. You sound like the fat fucks in Wall-E.
ITT, millenials learn about the basics of the cyberpunk genre.
I don't know if you or the flat earth people are worse but I'm guessing you believe in both.
fuck you boomer and fuck Metallica
Okay, 39%er.
Holy shit, you do believe in both don't you? Lmfao
Go get laid you fucking loser.
I'm reading it just now but the effort they went through monitoring everyone and everything beyond the magnitute of what China is capable of times 100 is what kill it for me.
It works because it's a book, in real life people would just commit mass suicide bombings decades before anything like Ingsoc could become reality. I mean they deduced what his worst fear was with monitoring some throwaway notion that was shown only once
>Game is set in a dystopian future in which every faction you choose has its own immoral actions on display
Skyrim kinda but in reverse
>assumptions and strawmen all day
>personal attacks (on anons)
confirmed 39%er
>believe science when it disproves flat-earthers
>disregard science when it proves global warming is real
A special kind of retard.
do you live in UAE?
If it truly was a threat they would do something about it instead of bitching. It's to get you tinfoil wearers distracted so you leave them alone with your constant bullshit.
>science
when it comes to global warming, sure buddie
you probably also believe the government about the alt-right terror menace
>If it truly was a threat they would do something about it
LLLLLLLLLLMMMMMMMMAAAAAAAAOOOOOOOO
HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
Queck! Aha ha
JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJA!
>The worlds going to end! We will get round to fixing it eventually I'm sure.
Yeah, it sounds like a huge threat.
Yes.
weak bait
Keep trying friend, I'm sure the user hivemind will think you're cool one day.
>MUH SCIENCE
Full on cult.
Wew lad. Are (You) OP? You must be over 18, buddy.
Now you're sounding like a flat-earther yourself
>if I was somehow wrong scientists would've disproved me
China is doing something, more than any other country on earth, if that's not proof enough that even chinks sacrifice profits to halt climate change I don't know what is
Whe did the government talk about the alt-right terror menace? There were a few demonstrations then everyone realized the alt-lite are a bunch of dickless incels.
Better go back to your own bubble, stormnigger.
Oh, no argument then?
Wow, how interesting and original...
How come there can't just be a straight good and evil side anymore unless it's the most hamfisted shit out there.
Donating money to fix it will surely fix this invisible problem my friend.
No arguments are needed with imbeciles.
Theres literally no scientifical evidence that CO2 affects temperatures, but sure keep spouting what the TV and your school 'education' taught you about 'man-made climate change'.
And then you expect people to not call you brainwashed lmao
And no arguments are provided by fools either. I'll take my win and bid you good day.
Stop feeding this obvious troll, folks.
>invisible
Looks like we got Ray Charles over here
>H-He's proving us wrong, stop it before people find out!
I dunno about that win man. I spanked you gif style and you ran claiming a win after the entire thread btfo'd you repeatedly.
I looked out my window and couldn't see this global warming, what should I be looking for? Is it wearing a hat and fake mustache?
No, I got Tim and Eric'd by a child with no thought beyond what people tell him. Please forgive me.
>what is the Greenhouse Effect
No it looks like a faggot and lives in your mirror
>the alt-right terror menace
the alt-right has committed terrorist attacks, therefore this menace is probably real.
Oh so it looks like you then? I'll just look for the biggest asshole with the most amount of cocks hanging out of it then. Thanks.
>what is empirical evidence
you have none, all predictions by 'climate change' scientists have been proven wrong
>but muh al gore movie
You take everything at face value if it makes you feel guilty dont you
Mirror's Edge had this premise, the difference is was that your character wasn't trying to raise a rebellion against the Government and was just trying to save her sister. Mirror's Edge Catalyst turned it into a standard rebels vs empire storyline.
>Theres literally no scientifical evidence that CO2 affects temperatures
perhaps not to you, because you cannot read the literature or understand the mathematics.
But just because you don't understand how something works doesn't mean that thing doesn't exist.
name one "terror attack" officially endorsed by the "alt right" official elected people
Dumb frogposter. Probably a mutt who lives in a country that revolted against the rightful government.
this
what officials?
It's a decentralized group of violent imageboard users.
>all predictions have been proven wrong
>you take everything at face value
Your posts sound automated, are you even a human or just a posting robot? Who built you? And don't you know you have to confirmed in the captcha that you're not a robot.
In any case, you didn't disprove the studies on the greenhouse effect, I conclude that you can't.
>has no evidence
nu-uh there is evidence you just wouldnt understand it
You can look up the studies yourself or post other scientific material to refute the greenhouse effect.
>en.wikipedia.org
read this very, very basic and introductory article and explain what it. That would prove that you are capable of understanding the science that led people to the conclusion you are denying.
Science is not for the layman, people who can't read things should not be allowed to have an opinion on them.
Not him but this is going to be a big yikes from me.
>he still posts dumb frogposter
NOOOOOOOOO DELETE NOOOOOOOOOO
THIS CONTRADICTS MY NARRATIVE NOOOOOOO
I'M SUPPOSED TO NOT USE A CAR, STOP EATING MEAT, NOT HAVE CHILDREN, NOT OWN A HOUSE, PAY IRRATIONAL TAXES, IMPORT BROWNS
FORFEITING MY RIGHTS IS THE ONLY WAY TO PAY REPARASHUNS FOR DESTROYING THE CLIMATE NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>all climate change deniers can come up with is a buzzword, frogposting and a wall of text from /pol/
I know that this is how you guys usually argue but come on, that doesn't work in the real world
>the church is evil!
>the clergy is a legion of doom and followers of the church are henchmen!!!
>RELIGION IS BAD!
>RELIGION IS BAD!!
>RELIGION!!!
>IS!!!
>BAAAAAAAAAAAAD!!!
Yes, /pol/tard, you think you're smart because you're against the "big guy", we get it.
The point here isn't that the temperature is changing, it's that they're blaming humans for it, which they cannot prove and which there a multitude of scientific studies against.
If there is no consensus, then it's pseudo science, you're a cult follower and global warming is your religion.
> this person has a vote
even letfies and centrists argue that rich corporations are too powerful, they just dont know who they belong to
The religion is actually white guilt, else they would atleast try to be realistic and let China and India have some of the blame for climate change, but that would be racist
Epitome of the NPC meme. There's probably nothing going on inside your heads.
>when the opposite side also has religion and heavily traditional
It's almost like your boogeyman doesn't exists.
And you're so hip for punching down. Does it make you feel like the big guy?
>russian
Exactly. China and India are the worlds leaders of pollution, yet we never hear anything about that do we? We just hear """scientists""" like Bill Nye say you must believe this or you're a republican retard.
Does anyone here actually believe these politicians care about saving the planet? It's about power and control.
Telling people to actually understand what they are talking about should in theory be the opposite of being an NPC. I think it is a far more NPC thing to scream opinions which you don't even understand, like you are doing.
>the opposite side also has religion and heavily traditional
You didn't play it.
Unironically a naive and immature perspective to have, which is why so many edgy 17 year olds would agree with you. Hopefully you're the same age as them.
>there is a multitude of scientific studies against it
>and also a multitude of scientific studies supporting it
>so if you don't agree with me you're a lunatic although even scientists aren't overwhelmingly agreeing on the issue
Oh wait they are. About 95% are agreeing on the issue.
People still going on about this NPC meme have to be ironic, there's no way you can't see the irony in blindly calling people you don't agree with not thinking for themselves. You could quote anyone ITT with your post and it wouldn't make more or less sense. Your post could've been written by a script.
atleast they're white than you, Ubungu
>Your post could've been written by a script.
Because it was, he's not a person. He's clearly a shillbot.
It's obvious that ResetEra and Reddit are here, so here's some advice: you will never be a woman, dilate, have sex incels, Yea Forums is not your safe space, communism will never work, fuck niggers kikes spics women muslims and fuck you for leaving your containment site.
Per capita, the US is polluting the world way more than anyone else. China houses 1 billion more people than the US and pollutes our planet barely more.
You forgot, fuck off back to /pol/ and stormfront
You're both wrong, because these people were reciting their, "science isn't for everyone, go read wikipedia" script without having done any thinking or research themselves. It's like you didn't even follow the conversation, or just want to rant about the meme. It's still popular because it's true.
Seriously, quit arguing with a 39%er like they have the capacity for it. You can report trolling and off-topic shit and not waste yoiurtime.
yuo can be my angle
or my demon
I don't really care whether global warming is real. If it is, we'll deal with the consequences as they come.
If it isn't, we'll have switched to renewable energy and stopped polluting our local ecosystems for nothing. How horrible!
>Unironically
Maybe don't call peple teenagers when you sound 11.
>he unironically thinks humans would be superior to all of the potentially trillions of alien races.
Kek. It's not YOUR safe space, snowflake.
Now I'm interested, have you done any research yourself, like what actual scientists would call research? Or are you just spouting the same shit all those NPC-memeshitters say? In the former case, please present your research.
I can tell you that I haven't done any research in that field, it requires years of acquiring knowledge that isn't available on /pol/ or reddit to come to reliable findings.
Please, share your findings.
They're certainly superior to the Mantis and Slugs.
>regurgitating the muh 95% meme
>current year
So where did that famous “consensus” claim that “98% of all scientists believe in global warming” come from? It originated from an endlessly reported 2009 American Geophysical Union (AGU) survey consisting of an intentionally brief two-minute, two question online survey sent to 10,257 earth scientists by two researchers at the University of Illinois. Of the about 3.000 who responded, 82% answered “yes” to the second question, which like the first, most people I know would also have agreed with.
Then of those, only a small subset, just 77 who had been successful in getting more than half of their papers recently accepted by peer-reviewed climate science journals, were considered in their survey statistic. That “98% all scientists” referred to a laughably puny number of 75 of those 77 who answered “yes”.
That anything-but-scientific survey asked two questions. The first: “When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?” Few would be expected to dispute this…the planet began thawing out of the “Little Ice Age” in the middle 19th century, predating the Industrial Revolution. (That was the coldest period since the last real Ice Age ended roughly 10,000 years ago.)
The second question asked: “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?”
Wow, 75 literal paid shills said yes to question 2 and 7,000 geophysicists didn't even bother sending that garbage survey back.
Kill yourself you fucking pathetic useful idiot.
The only people you can trust are of your tribe, with predictable behaviors.
>these people were reciting their, "science isn't for everyone, go read wikipedia" script without having done any thinking or research themselves
No, I am telling you to go read it yourself, because there is no point in an argument if it is just you teaching someone else about the fundamentals required to have an argument.
It's a waste of everyone's time.
>getting triggered over people not having their minds blown by “we live in a society xD” tier statement
It's called real life, faggot.
so do you think theres a conspiracy then? How do you explain every expert in the field of climatology around the world agreeing, and every data set we collect backing them up? Do you trust unsourced graphs over on-the-record scientists?
How many climate scientists agree that climate change is not being man-made?
>Scientists who do no research and just say "Sure, that sounds plausible, whatever" are more reliable than ones who provide evidence
Sure, that sounds plausible, whatever
so where are all the scientists who oppose it? Where are all the peer reviewed papers debunking climate change and explaining the real mechanism by which earth's temperature is regulated? If you were right and it was just a meme then you'd think these things would be everywhere, but the most you find is someone employed by the fossil fuel industry, but even they usually argue its not that bad rather than its not happening.
based finns dabbing on these global warming kikes
Call Of Duty
>around the world
You obviously mean in the West
>you think theres a conspiracy then?
You'd be a fool not to think so, considering the behaviour of politicians over the last 50 years
nrel.colostate.edu
heres an ipcc report from 30 years ago. hardly cutting edge, but theres plenty to dig into there if you are interested in udnerstanding the mechanics of how co2 concentrations impacts the ground temperature on the earth. If thats not enough there is a large list of references at the bottom, each of which is a peer reviewed paper showing the details of a small aspect of the larger issue.
your claim that theres no research is baffleing. Theres an overflowing amount of research. Just use google scholar a bit and you can find thousands of papers out there.
There were more entire studies dedicated to the consensus "myth", finding similar results and even a correlation between climate expertise and agreeing with the thesis that humans cause global warming
theguardian.com
>game is set in a dystopian future in which Yea Forums is taken over by redditers who post frogs and wojaks
The biggest dystopia is the current game industry. Goddamn I wish every day that I was back in the arcades circa 1991.
Wrong link, the paper can be downloaded from this site:
iopscience.iop.org
>not keeping unstable fucks known as humans bad
You say this but I bet you react violently over the notion of communism, which is exactly what you're proposing
2 seconds of googleing lead me to this.
>As the scientists who examined this claim explained, the document relies on circular reasoning to claim that cloud cover and relative humidity have caused the change in global temperature, and ignores many additional factors affecting global temperature—including aerosol pollution, volcanic eruptions, and natural ocean oscillations.
what you linked isnt peer reviewed and just full bore ignores every single factor outside of humidity and claims to create a whole new climate modeling concept based solely on humidity and then uses that to say humans aren't to blame and literally everyone but them are wrong. Its fucking retarded and would never get published in any actual journal with standards
That’s based obviously
Battlefield 1 in the Russian Civil War maps, if you’re on the White Army’s side
>the man
You’re an actual faggot.
Dystopian genre requires an evil government. I don’t know what you were expecting.
/thread
he was expecting to troll
i hate this trope mainly because it implies the author thought nothing was wrong with today's government
Governments were formed to place rules on their subjects, it's just a name change for feudalism no matter how the leader is determined, were you born to be a slave to someone else, if so keep sucking the dick of government because you were born cattle to one you fucking worthless faggot
I can (and do) literally prove it to a classroom of children with two plastic bottles, some alka-seltzer and a halogen lamp. Put thermometers in each bottle, and the alka-seltzer and some water in one while leaving the other.
After half an hour positioned about half a meter from the lamp, a 2L bottle of carbon dioxide will have gone up about nine degrees C more than a 2L bottle of air. You can do this yourself if you have the intellectual courage to face reality.
>MUH PEER REVIEW
Literally Mein Kampf was peer reviewed and published as a scientific paper. Look it up if you got the guts, tranny freak. I spit on you and your peer reviews. Fuck you.
Do you make these magical temperature detectors? Do you make the bottles? Can you see or understand this carbon dixide bullshit without some JEW scientist telling you it's there? The same one's that deny God? FUCKJ YOU science nerd, you grant grubbing government cock sucking FAGGOT
>Mein Kampf was peer reviewed and published as a scientific paper
LMAO who let you teach children anything you are obviously mentally retarded and have no understanding of basic chemistry whatsoever.
No, Mein Kampf was published as a book.
>be climate scientist
>existence of job depends on climate change
>well yes, there appears to be something happening
>please gibs more grant money for further studies.
You probably think that big bad fossil fuels are trying to shut down these poor underground climate scientists aren't you?
>Alka-Seltzer
>is an effervescent antacid and pain reliever
>Effervescent or carbon tablets are tablets which are designed to dissolve in water, and release carbon dioxide
>rampages.us
HAHAHA HAHAHA LMAOING AT YOUR LIFE NIGGER
youtube.com
OH NO NO NO NO GET FUCKING FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKED
GET FUUUUUUUUUUUCKED GET FUCKING FUUUUUUUUUUUUCKED YOU HUMAN TRASH GET A LOAD OF THIS MEIN KAMPF LITERALLY PASSED AS A LEGITIMATE SCIENTIFIC PAPER OOOOOOOH NO NONOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
That's Joe Rogan, the guy has basically no credibility and is just there to further his own conservative political agenda.
Do you have any better sources for your claim?
>post a video link that has nothing to do with Mein Kampf
? They’ll always have a job since climate will always exist
>In this activity, students will learn about endothermic and exothermic reactions. With the alka-seltzer and water, the temperature should decrease inside the cup, meaning heat was absorbed in the reaction
I don't see what the problem is. The fact that the temperature still increases under the halogen lamp despite it being endothermic is precisely the point
>That's Joe Rogan, the guy has basically no credibility and is just there to further his own conservative political agenda.
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
WATCH THE WHOLE FUCKING VIDEO BEFORE OPENING YOUR MOUTH YOU STUPID SISSY SUBHUMAN YOU'RE MAKING IT TOO EASY
>dystopian future in which the government is evil
>future
Trope in jap games because of Aum Shinrikyo, a japanese death cult/domestic terrorist group, whose leader claimed to be Jesus and incorporated christian faith into their shit.
It has caused disassociation from christianity, and the stigma of Aum Shinrikyo has perverted what little japs may know about western religion.
Now you know.
That's the beauty of it, I can test every part of it in multiple ways.
I can test the gas given off my alka-seltzer when it fizzes using lime water (turns cloudy), bicarbonate indicator (turns from blue to yellow) and with a flame (after collecting for a while, a container of the gas poured over a candle will put the flame out).
The thermometers are just alcohol in glass and can be shown to work simply by holding them in a clenched, warm hand, and can be calibrated by putting them in ice water and boiling water.
I can show the bottles have nothing unusual in them by running the test with no carbon dioxide in either bottle, carbon dioxide in both bottles, or by doing the tests sequentially with the same bottle, and by repeating all this with as many different bottles as I wish.
Each part of the process of science relies on repeatability. I can repeatedly show that the gas used in this experiment has the expected properties of carbon dioxide - if it didn't, that would contradict numerous pieces of already-gathered data, the invalidation of which would contradict an even wider circle of gathered data. Luckily, no matter how many times I test the gas given off by alka-seltzer it always has the same properties that indicate it's the substance we call carbon dioxide. What makes scientific knowledge valuable is its repeatability and its interconnectedness. Each part implies each other part through the things we call the laws of nature and the progress of science is marked by deducing those laws by gathering empirical data and formulating theories based on that evidence. Climate science is one region of that accumulated body of knowledge, and is also perfectly consistent. The combination of known chemical properties of carbon dioxide, known quantities of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and known laws governing the thermodynamics of radiating bodies show that the Earth MUST be gaining thermal energy as CO2 levels increase.
Nobody cares about your eceleb shit, provide a source in text. Or show me where your eceleb got that shit from.
You can very easily post the publication history of the it, why link a video?
Get cancer and die. Now stop replying to me, freak.
>THE CONCENTRATION CAMPS ON THE BORDER ARE *JUST LIKE* WHAT THE NAZIS DID TO THE JEWS, BRO
Skyrim?
Oh nice posting where you came from i see
You should go back and kill yourself
So you're saying
>NASA
>American Association for the Advancement of Science
>American Chemical Society
>American Geophysical Union
>American Medical Association
>American Meteorological Society
>American Physical Society
>The Geological Society of America
>U.S. National Academy of Sciences
are literally all wrong?
>THEY'RE NOT CONCENTRATION CAMPS BECAUSE THE CHILDREN AREN'T LITERALLY BEING GASSED!
They're meteorologists that study a specific area of land over a certain period of time.
>economic migrants that can leave at any time
>concentration camps
>get called out on eceleb garbage
>y-you're from r-reddit
Because of symbology attached to the sides.
Plus having nuance as to why x is good and y is evil in the game is better.
You know they get the same amount of money regardless of what the climate does while they're recording it right? Besides which pic related, besides besides which of course oil companies are going to start investing into renewable energy tech because a. the oil is going to run out eventually, b. the public is (finally) becoming aware of how much they've fucked the climate for their own profit and they need to clean up their image and c. renewable energy would be a sensible economic investment even if climate change wasn't real (which it is) and already employs three times as many people as the coal industry AND is growing rapidly, even without the literally trillions of dollars of historical investment coal has had
Why does everyone pretend that Trump isn't a racist?
He
>was sued by the Department of Justice for housing discrimination and had to pay a settlement
>has continued to insist that the Central Park Five are guilty and deserve the death penalty, even though DNA evidence has proved their innocence
>had to pay a $200,000 fine for discrimination because his casinos would remove black and female dealers to appease racist gamblers
>had a book published about him by John O'Donnell (which Trump himself admitted was accurate) where O'Donnell said that Trump didn't think black people could be trusted with counting money, calling them inherently lazy
>started the birther meme
>said that Mexicans are criminals and rapists, and that *some* of them are good people
>Pulled the "both sides" meme after the Charlottesville rally, pretending that white supremacists are morally equivalent to their opposition, even though white supremacists are responsible for far more violence and terrorist acts than their counterprotesters, also said some of said supremacists were "good people"
>started a ban for Muslim-majority countries just because they're Muslim majority, even though his own DHS admitted that that isn't an effective way to prevent terrorism (since much of it is homegrown) and that the countries that Trump targeted weren't even the country of origin for most terrorists
>told American-born congresswomen to "go back to your country" simply because they were brown
>demanded a judge to recuse himself from the Trump Casino fraud case simply because the judge was Mexican-American
>inb4 based!
Then why do Trump supporters disingenuously pretend that racist accusations against Trump and his supporters are illegitimate?
>imploring that climate change deniers don't get money from Big Oil
>future
America: socialism for the rich, rugged individualism for everyone else
>Trump Casino fraud case
I meant Trump University, my bad
>literally rounding up undesirables into camps to be detained without holding a trial
>the same shit that the Nazis did to anyone who opposed them
>bruh they can leave at any time! they're not concentration camps!
>deportation is now "rounding up undesirables"
Why is the US not allowed to enforce their border laws? Why are european and asian countries allowed to deport illegals and protect their borders but we can't?
Fucking Canada has stricter immigration laws
Yes, and?
No you didnt play it.
The other side also used religion and alien tech. They did everything by muh scriptures.
They used cheap tricks as well, deliberately encouraging rapid procreation so they would have more footsoldiers to send out.
It was that blind dogma and apathy are bad. Muh environmentalism good, destroying ecosystems so you might survive to destroy the next is a terribly flawed idea
Every apathetic, fundamentalist or nihilistic main characters died or suffered horribly.
Elro's family died from his own actions, died for nothing and he almost caused the world to be consumed.
Royal's only moments of strength was when he did what he wanted that wasnt just because it fitted the dogma. The moment he tried to cave into it again he died.
Black died and suffered a horrible life for nothing.
Chrome got exactly what his scriptures wanted not what he wanted.
The god all along was just a psychic space bird who needed a petrol station. THAT was how irrelevant everyone was to it.
Mina should have had more consequences thats the real wrong with he game.
because neoliberals benefit from abusing undocumented/unskilled workers from 3rd world countries
It is not deportation. It is locking people in camps, because you can't deport them legally, but you also can't accept them in legally.
That's literally the best case scenario. We aren't going to just let them roam the US while awaiting asylum. They can fuck off back to their shithole or they can wait in the camps.
Are you ok, retard?
Why is the US forcibly separating children from their families simply because they're undocumented? I thought Republicans masturbated all day long over "family values"?
Then the camps need to be up to a certain standard, the standard they apparently are up to is insufficient and is more in line with an internment camp, rather than a relief camp.
That is the core of this argument, the people are being held in unacceptable conditions.
>forcibly separating children
Oh, do you want children and adult immigrants to have the same sleeping areas?
The children are already getting raped in droves while they trek through Mexico, let's just make it worse.
>Then the camps need to be up to a certain standard
Then why do dems keep making it harder to fund it?
Wait hold on, I've heard a lot about these internment camps. CAN these people actually leave at any time? If that's the case, holy shit, this is absolutely nothing like the camps whatsoever.
No, surely it is possible to accommodate the children alongside their family.
Why would they make it easy to fund, this being an abhorrent situation hurts the opposition. Politics is not about feelings or even taking care of people, it's a very abstract power game.
But I understand that you are looking at this issue emotionally and so you cannot understand calculated, cruel moves.
It all comes down to the fact that they shouldn't be crossing Mexico. Obama himself told them NOT to come here, since they're risking their lives and their children's lives.
Mexico is a suitable enough country for them to live in. It's not the best country, but it's livable. You're not entitled to US citizenship.
It's all psychological. They've basically studied human behavior to the point of perfecting the ability to sniff out rebellion in one's heart. Thought criminals can't hide, the 1984 government knows them better than they know themselves
Yes. They can surrender their asylum request and fuck off back into Mexico whenever they want. But every 3rd worlder on earth thinks they're entitled to an automatic US citizenship just because they have a shitty life.
Asylum generally has nothing to do with citizenship.
they can. Though they'll likely be killed by the cartel they're running from when they go back.
>No but you see, we're doing the GOOD thing by separating children from their families, what if their dads were all pedos?
Literally your mind on conservatism. Worship family values except when you don't, go on and on about protecting children except when you don't. Next up: complaining about "fiscal responsibility" while spending billions of dollars on the military, increasing the deficit to 1 trillion dollars, and subsidizing the farming industry because of a pointless trade war caused by Republican policy
There's no way to know that the adults transiting the border with children are actually their parents or guardians. If the children have been coerced through threat of violence or other means then separation is the best course of action.
You're supposed to request asylum at the first country you cross after leaving your own, which is Mexico.
You don't get to window shop for countries. That's not how it works.
thinly veiled politics thread
Say it then.
Say this: Asylum seekers should all be in the same living facilities, adults and children. They should not be separated by age.
This is what you want, yes?
Yes, but I referring to that last sentence "You're not entitled to US citizenship". Asylum does not come with citizenship, it's asylum.
Surely you can understand that.
So let me get this straight:
A bunch of people want to arrive here through illegal means, and when they get detained they can just go back to Mexico at any fucking time? How is this ANYTHING like the concentration camps?
I'll be honest, I watch a lot of leftist youtubers. I watch dudes like Destiny, Vaush, Thought Slime, and Philosophy Tube. The way they described it, they made it seem like we're literally rounding up legal Mexican citizens, locking them in cells, tearing them away from their children, and giving them some horrific life sentence. Holy shit, these leftists are fucking dishonest as shit.
Then you need to come here through legal means.
>if
so how do you prove that, or do you just assume that everyone is a bad person
don't answer that I already know
Because leftists truly and unironically believe the US should allow anyone into the country if they want to be here, and will use words like "nazi" and "concentration camps" to make you feel bad for wanting a secure border.
Say it then.
Children do not belong with their families because they're brown
This is what you want, yes?
if you're violating a law by illegally attempting to live in another country then in the eyes of the state you are and should be considered breaking the law and the law should be enforced.
I unironically don't believe browns and blacks are human
I don't want children to be raped while crossing Mexico. I don't want children raped in these camps because we can't verify who their actual parents are.
You're right, I just don't like the idea of children being raped. I guess I AM a Nazi.
>I don't understand what the concept of "seeking asylum" is
>I think "seeking asylum" is the same as demanding citizenship
Average murican retard, lol. No wonder Trump got elected
>purposely ignoring
asylum could've been sought at any embassy for any country in between their country and the United States. They choose to forgo this and the proper channels to apply for asylum and instead decided to embark on deadly treks through the dessert with children to illegally cross a border under the smoke screen of claiming asylum
I didn't ask you whether entering a country illegally is a crime or not, I am asking you whether it is valid to assume that everyone who does so with a child is coercing the child.
I'd love to see a source on that.
They're all in the process of deportation that means they were already declined asylum.
Renouncing your asylum would change nothing as you'd be in the same situation regardless, they're just waiting to ship you back to Mexico. Please correct me if I'm wrong
Then why isn't Mexico getting any shit for not taking them in?
Climate change is real. I know, I hate Big government too.
Because Mexico is hardly to blame if the people aren't applying for asylum there.
Another thing everyone neglects to consider is that if these people are really on the run from the cartels then Mexico is probably less safe than the US, which makes skipping Mexico a perfectly rational thing to do.
why not just let law abiding mexicans to easily get work permits to the USA? it would stop the stupid song and dance
bulgaria is literally the mexico of europe, you'd think they'd all move to other eu countries with their $300/month salaries however only 13% of them actually use freedom of movement
If climate change and CO2 is such a big deal how come
1. No one wants to sanction China and India for their reckless polluting that makes the West look like Saints
2. These same people promote mass immigration which will only increase the carbon footprint those people create since now they have access to all this tech
3. No one is willing to give up luxuries and scale back society and instead want to have their iPads and Amazon distribution centers
Like if you really wanted to beat climate change you’d need to stop all global trade. Because cargo tankers make more pollution than all our cars do.
Then you’d need to transition to a daytime society, because renewable energy physically cannot provide for sustained power at night due to how shitty battery tech is.
Then you need to break up all global companies and instead create local economies that don’t have to transport their goods across the country. So that means no more avocados or passion fruit unless that’s what your local farms can grow.
We also need to basically give up all our computers and phones and go back to only landlines because of how much environmental damage and pollution it creates to make touchscreen electronics.
We also have to ban all further immigration and use our military to stop the world from modernizing. Because Africa already produces more plastic waste than the west does by a factor of 50 and that’s only going to get exponentially worse as their population soars above 1 billion.
Are you willing to fix climate change, or are you just a moral warrior posturing from your premium brand name laptop wearing premium brand name clothing drinking premium brand name lattes, all of which have created a larger ecological footprint than me commuting to work.
White man's burden
These are just moot points because:
1. After crossing Mexico, they're now economic migrants
2. We WILL NOT let them roam the US free while waiting asylum
This is the best case scenario. Even your king Obama knew that
>future
meteorology is notoriously difficult, weathermen need an excuse for when they get things wrong. Every field needs a "great crisis" to get the saps united in giving their money away to the elites.
>if you'd get killed seeking asylum in Mexico you're an economic migrant
I see.
>2. We WILL NOT let them roam the US free while waiting asylum
how does this relate to anything I said?
>your king Obama
What does some retarded liberal have to do with any of that?
because USA BAD CHINA GOOD is the current globalist neolibcuck mindset
Having a problem with the government being slandered is the equivalent of thinking a big multimillion dollar company is your best friend and indicative of poor mental health.
>Hottest june in last 140 year.
>it is just political agenda
While global warming have cult level of defenders , you have to be retarded to not notice that something is going more wrong with the weather every new year
>how does this relate to anything I said?
Because at the end of the day, what's happening at the border doesn't have a solution. You can cry about it, but this is the best thing we can do.
>calling Obama a retarded liberal
oh you're one of those chapotrannyhouse niggers
it all makes sense now
go back to leftypol and take your meme ideology with you
Because
>a number of asylum seekers from Mexico are fleeing Mexico, sending them back there would defeat the point
>Mexico and other countries around it do not nearly have the same amount of resources that the US does to deal with people seeking asylum, and as a result no one applies for asylum there. Mexico literally only has 4 offices
>A number of countries that asylum seekers pass through are not safe, and thus they do not apply for asylum there (see Guatemala)
>Migrants have already tried and have been denied
>The US' own laws acknowledge that they need to allow any asylum seeker to apply to the United States
Last time I checked the average american was far better off than the average mexican. I might be mistaken though.
In all seriousness, Mexico has also built a wall of their own to stop immigrants from traversing their southern border but Mexico has enough problems as is and it's a purely political issue.
1. The per-capita pollution is by far the highest in the US followed by Western Europe with China being somewhere inbetween. Of course a country with more than 1 billion inhabitants will polute everything more. Also China has the fastest growing renewable energies right now and they'll get shit done if only to be #1 in something.
2. Nobody promotes mass immigration aside from far-left fringe commies and ancap ultra-libertanians.
3. Nobody wants to cut back on their lifestyle but some comparably minor changes would have a dramatic change in our foot prints.
What a long-winded way to say "Mexico is a shithole"
I guess it would be hypocritical to say something leftists lambasted Trump for saying years ago
So you endorse sustaining the appalling status quo? That's an interesting political position.
>Mexico has enough problems
So does the US. We're allowed to protect our borders just as much as Mexico is.
Cyberfascist?
>Game is set in a dystopian setting where the powers that be are evil
>Join the rebellion, take out the bad guys
>Become the new powers that be
>Sequel comes out
>Making a game where you are the powers that be is too difficult so they find some way to make you the rebels again
appalling status quo > socialism/communism which has never proven successful
It's not a profound insight knowing that Mexico is in a lot of ways worse than the US. That doesn't mean the US isn't a shithole too.
You can protect your border all you want, that's not the issue. The issue is that you detain people in deplorable conditions and despite baseless claims saying otherwise they can't leave those camps.
I am not saying that.
All I am saying is that post-modern neo-liberal cultural condition kinda sucks. You can say that "shit's fucked" without offering a concrete ideological solution.
Come on . Who are you going to listen to ? Trump or some faggot scientists?
>That doesn't mean the US isn't a shithole too.
a shithole where people trek hundreds of miles risking death and rape just for a small chance to live in
That was an incredibly retarded strawman and you should kill yourself for it.
>detain people in deplorable conditions
You can save me the appeal to emotion bullshit. We all get they're in a shitty situation. That still doesn't grant them instant access to the country.
They can fucking wait in the camps. The camps should be better, but they aren't coming in until they're granted asylum. Fucking deal with it, chaponigger.
Because half of China are medieval farmers. They’re going to quadruple their footprint in the next 30 years just due to modernization. And you’re just proving me right. Which among you are willing to make the USA not be the world’s biggest polluter and actually account for how much global trade pollutes? You’re deflecting and side stepping.
Either this issue isn’t as bad as you make it out to be or it is but you don’t have the balls to give up your luxuries. The Left in general is pro mass immigration. Yeah the commies want open borders but the Left refuses to consider mass deportation or policing the border. It’s a sham. They don’t care about climate change at all if they even consider net immigration on the table. If they care about their future voters like that it means they believe in a future.
>The issue is that you detain people in deplorable conditions and despite baseless claims saying otherwise they can't leave those camps.
The "deplorable" conditions are exaggerated; and I doubt you were crying under Obama's watch. It just got brought to focus recently and you'll forget it soon until the next trend.
Yeah but a shithole's a shithole, it doesn't matter how big or small it is. The US is just a tiny bit smaller than Guatemala. They'd all flee to Canada if they could.
>All I am saying is that post-modern neo-liberal cultural condition kinda sucks
The world is unironically much better than it was 100 years ago thanks to neoliberal capitalism.
>They'd all flee to Canada if they could.
Oh wait. I get it now. You're a fucking leaf.
For who? The corporations or the poor?
He's right though. Trump called Mexico a shithole (rightfully so) and everyone got mad at him. Now leftists are calling Mexico a shithole to justify them not taking in the migrants and it's 100% okay.
Both. The poor are also better off now than 100 years ago. You can't instantly bring the entire world out of poverty.
>the game has a survivalist faction
>you cant join them
NuFenstein?
yes, but it certainly is on the right trajectory to reach the state it was in about 100 years ago and that certainly is a dire prospect.
That sounds like heresy, friend.
Maybe over 100 years but not the past 40.
It's almost like real politics is more about winning and beating down the opposition, rather than concrete solutions, right?
>1. No one wants to sanction China and India for their reckless polluting that makes the West look like Saints
Because the people in charge who even have the capability to do that in the first place literally do not believe that climate change is real to begin with.
>2. These same people promote mass immigration which will only increase the carbon footprint those people create since now they have access to all this tech
Nobody promotes mass immigration, with the exception of literal commies. And even literal commies will acknowledge that having countries with no borders is an extremely long-term goal that won't ideally be realized for centuries
>3. No one is willing to give up luxuries and scale back society and instead want to have their iPads and Amazon distribution centers
Because a number of people in Murica do not believe climate change is a real phenomenon and there are no laws to enforce this anyways. What laws we did have ended up being rolled back by the Trump administration
>Everything else
Dealing with climate change is complicated and isn't easy but there are way more steps that can be taken than what the Trump administration is doing now
>Investing into R&D into new technology that allows the storage of clean energy, or that reduces CO2 emissions altogether
>Investing money into revamping America's infrastructure and transportation systems to make them more energy-efficient
>Implementing either regulations or strong incentives for corporations to reduce CO2 emissions, instead of removing them
>Making international agreements with other countries (that are enforceable) to reduce CO2 emissions
Instead Trump literally claimed that climate change is a hoax invented by the Chinese and nearly all Republicans in Congress don't even believe it's a real phenomenon
>having nuance as to why x is good and y is evil in the game is better.
imagine believing this
wtf i want communism now so we can be even more poor
rejoice, you don't need communism for that, capitalism is gonna take care of that for you!
>this still doesn't grant them instant access to the country
Nobody argued that you single digit IQ nigger.
They should be better fullstop. There's no need to argue that they're shitty. Trump wants to build a useless wall for billions but the US can't afford a higher standard of living than in Eritrea.
I'm not crying, Obama couldn't change shit because that's not his call just like this isn't Trump's call. The actual political power of the POTUS is incredibly small.
You just jumped to the conclusion that it was stated by leftists that Mexico is a shithole. If you can't tell the difference between saying that someone has a learning disability and calling him a retard then you should unironically kill yourself.
Die you fucking IPCC shill.
The democrats have controlled one or both houses of Congress for the last 80 years and have had 8 year presidents repeatedly during that time and all of them have completely sidestepped climate change, at most throwing some funding at green energy companies they’ve had shares in that have produce 0 new tech to show for it.
Shut the fuck up and stop blaming Drumf when it’s abundantly clear no one in the government except the Squad actually cares about climate change and even then they still don’t care about foreign pollution. Just American.
>You just jumped to the conclusion that it was stated by leftists that Mexico is a shithole
Oh sorry. Then you agree that Mexico should be taking these migrants? Glad we agree!
Trump didn't call Mexico a shithole, Trump called Mexicans "rapists and criminals" and then said that "some" of them are good people
The "shithole" comment refers to African countries like Haiti, and he also said worse shit afterwards (like how all Haitians have AIDS and Nigerians should go back to their huts)
>MEXICO IS A SHITHOLE AND CAN'T TAKE MIGRANTS
>OH WAIT NO THEY'RE NOT
>THE US SHOULD TAKE THEM
>BUT THE US IS A SHITHOLE
make up your fucking mind jesus christ lmao
leftoids cannot accept whether the US should be the world's bastion for the global poor of it's it a total shithole
the metal gear solid games, usually, with the protagonist being an unwitting pawn of ZOG
I can't tell if you're being ironic or just 12 years old. It's probably a combination of both.
>but the US can't afford a higher standard of living than in Eritrea.
So then migrants shouldn't be coming here in droves?
assblasted mad LOL
You keep contradicting yourself.
The US can't be a shithole hellscape and the world's poor people daycare center at the same time.
Which one is it?
Even people on /pol/ can argue on a higher level, that shit's just embarassing to watch. Trump didn t even call Mexico a shithole, that was Haiti
Why do you keep ignoring his point? It's pretty valid.
Yeah.Sure buddy.
I am sure jimmy working his ass in summer to pay for that college fee while his father is dying in front of an hospital because he was hit in an accident and didn't prepare enough money.
If the fact that corporation like disney , google,apple and others got bigger than ever and almost swallow the whole world isn't scaring you, i dont know what will.
Even a fucking anonymous weeb website for losers like this one isn't safe from google influence.(To share a fucking post , you practically helping to improve their computer vision algorithmes)
You're still stuck on the "shithole" portion. They've moved on and are talking something else.
Keep up.
>being this mad that your cognitive dissonance has been put on full display and you can do nothing about it
kek
go back to your chapotrannyhouse subreddit, faggot
I said the US is a shithole but less of a shithole than Mexico or Guatemala. Why can't you Trumpniggers read?
So everyone on earth is entitled to live in any country that is "better" than theirs?
You're fucked in the head.
Also, individual people giving up their phones means jack shit if there is no actual domestic policy enforcing this. Why should I throw my iphone in the trash if there are going to be millions of other people doing it anyways? It would literally make no discernible difference. This is why laws need to be created, so that everyone plays by them instead of a select few
I can't possibly keep up with schizo /pol/tard futuretrannies, you simply don't make any sense.
>I am sure jimmy working his ass in summer to pay for that college fee while his father is dying in front of an hospital because he was hit in an accident and didn't prepare enough money.
This is literally a modern problem. 100 years ago, people were dying from diseases and street violence to care about this shit.
>orange man bad
that all you got, dipshit?
Didn't claim that, try again tranny.
You're literally saying "They should be allowed to live in the US since it's less of a shithole than their own country"
>It is people fault to be born somewhere
just say that you are into nazi ideology and spare people the trouble
OH SHIT
WE'RE ALMOST THERE
HE'S ABOUT TO ADMIT HE JUST HATES BORDERS AND THINKS EVERYONE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO LIVE ANYWHERE THEY WANT ON EARTH
BOY HE BOUTTA DO IT
Strawmanning. Not what I said. I said why is no one drafting those laws?
>You're literally saying
I was explaining why those people seek asylum in the US and not Mexico.
Are you pretending to be retarded or did someone split open your head and masturbated into your brain when you were five years old?
>tranny
your leftist friends would "cancel" you and shun you from their sissy meetings if they knew you used that word
Dragon Age Inqustion
Astral Chain
Not same guy as the one you was talking with before . But yeah, i do.
Not that i think that criminal losers and successful people should live togather. But It is not a hard to grasp concept that everyone deserve equal chance in life .
Calm down and dilate, /pol/tranny.
>But yeah, i do.
oh no it's retarded
NA/Europe wouldn't be desirable places to live in if borders didn't exist in the first place.
Nigger I've been on Yea Forums 10 years before you discovered the first faint hair on your ballsack and nobody in my circle of left-center friends has a problem saying "faggot" or "tranny" in a joking manner. You're thinking about SJWs who are maybe 0.5% of the whole population and are every bit as obnoxious as you /pol/trannies, that's why I'm calling you a /pol/tranny, because you're essentially the same as a mentally ill, easily triggered and irrational tranny.
Borderlands: The Pre-Sequel
>haha we're leftists that say bad words, that makes us not cucked!
Back to chapotrannyhouse, faggot
Leftoids who act edgy to seem like they aren't SJW cucktards just make me cringe.
But you are an SJW.
You're arguing in a very WARRIOR-like manner about how central americans suffer from SOCIAL inequality and deserve JUSTICE by being granted asylum in the US
You may not call yourself a duck, but you do quack like one
You're an incredibly giga-coping /pol/tranny reurgitating things that were relevant on /pol/ 2 years ago and is deperately trying to fit in. I would advise you to remove yourself from the genepool but you're such cringey incels you'll never fuck anyway.
Reminder that this is the face of /leftypol/ and modern western leftism
>if i keep saying bad words, i'll seem like less of a cuck!
It's not helping any. We've already seen you bow down to economic migrants like a true cuckold. It's over for you. Just kill yourself.
>leftypol saying pol won’t get laid
Ironic
Reminder that this is the face of /pol/ and the "redpilled" superior Aryan """white""" race
>incels
There it is. In case you needed any confirmation he's from reddit, he just gave us their calling card.
He has more balls than leftoids, that's for certain.
Ironically not from /pol/
OH NO NO NO NO
youtube.com
t.
The real dystopian future is where the populace is dumb, complacent and non-white
Why are antifa bugmen so weak?
>eye witness accounts
>tons of written documents
yeah like the roller coaster in Auschwitz
We know you hate white people, leftypol chapobabby. You don't need to keep repeating it.
>antifa are actually weak and pathetic guys
>antifa are literally super soldiers who are threatening the existence of our country, BOTH SIDES
Conservative double think, yet again. LEL
I've always said antifa are weak faggots. People who are afraid of them are cowards. Leftists are too afraid to even own guns and the few that do buy them to LARP don't even know how to use them properly.
Leftists don't get anything done. Having any ounce of worry or fear about them is pointless.
That's because they're in his mouth.
>I'm not a weak faggot I own firearms
Why are scrawny school shooters always like this?
What's your beef with that chaposhit? Do you watch that or something?
>reading comprehension
>What's your beef with that chaposhit?
Chapo is basically the "The_Donald" of /leftypol/
/leftypol/ is already annoying, but their reddit friends over at chapo are even more faggy somehow
This is what I'm talking about. You're making fun of me for owning firearms, but according to Marx I'm more armed for the revolution than you are.
This is why communism will literally never happen on a grand scale. Leftists are too afraid of guns to make it happen.
>everything beyond the magnitute of what China is capable of times 100 i
I think it's always astounding just how much people insist on arguing in bad faith and just want to fling shit at each other.
Almost like politics is seen like a sports event of "my guys" vs "your guys" and what either side represents is completely meaningless. Just like in sports.
I have had sex with over 20 women
I’m not a right winger but I’m definitely not some lefty faggot either. Go be a Virgin somewhere else.
>bad faith
just go back, retard
The post you linked isn't denying climate change you corporate galvanized clown. It's saying that there is no anthropogenic factor for us to be panicking about and that maybe people are lying to you for money.
This is so fucking cyberpunk.
You want a dystopian future where the government is good?
Leftypol only exists on 8/chan and is just as cringey as you. I don't frequent leddit or /pol/ since it's full with faggots like you.
>you're making fun of me for owning firearms
No, I'm making fun of you because you're a subhuman internet tough guy thinking he's hot shit because he has firearms.
You can't give /pol/trannies one since inch or they think they're accepted. They're essentially the new furries.
>look at me and how successful I am with women this totally isn't made up and I'm not insecure because I've posted a vague estimate of women I have slept with
bootlicking faggots
this is really just hysterical claptrap, grow up you stupid child
You can read it as literal mind reading, but I always figured it could be some kind of truth serum that works so well he doesn't realize he's thinking out loud.
t. licks any boot that opposes the US
t. babydick faggot who can't accept his shitty amerilard ways are terrible
>and what either side represents is completely meaningless
What each side represents is actually core. Sports have their own representations -- like cities or countries -- much like politics does with issues.
But, you tried.
What are you talking about you misquoting troglodyte.
amerilard ways > authoritarian communist ways
B-BUT THE HOLODOMOR IS A LIE!!!! FUCKING KULAKS DESERVED IT!!!!!
Name one government in the Western world that doesn't deserve to be dismantled and overthrown.
you can live a place without either pretty easily now
Commies can't call anyone else bootlickers considering you go an extra mile and suck the actual dick of any dictator that LARPs as a commie (Xi, Maduro, Stalin, etc.)
Are /leftypol/ actual tankies or do they just use stalin in memes like normal lefties
The CIA already has shit like that. Look up MKULTRA. In 2019, 1984 is basically a look into our not so distance future. While you're going down that whole may as well look up Operation Mockingbird.
No, in sports whether the team from city A or the team from city B wins has little actual bearing on anything. This representation is only aesthetic, it doesn't mean anything.
Similarly in the modern online political discourse, the actual reality of what "the left" or "the right" actually stand for is ignored in favor of the aesthetic and the identification with them as "your guys".
Every worthwhile country on earth is either the US or part of the overall US hegemony, so not really.
No.
The top quote in the post that I quoted has pictures in it that are commonly called graphs. The person responding to it implied these graphs were from a 'climate change denier.' I pointed out that the pretty pictures post says in the opener that the climate is, of course, in flux, ergo the climate IS changing. If you need me to bridge more connections for you, just let me know.
some yes some no
>amerilard ways
>better than anything
Yeah boy, enjoy your child lunch debt, your sky rocketing medical expenses, your unaffordable cost of living and housing, and your fucking oligarchy.
/leftypol/, like any other leftist community, is made up of unironic anarchists and marx-leninists that can't decide on whether authoritarianism is bad or not
which is why leftists don't actually get anything done, they don't have a unified goal beyond MURRICA BAD
I always find it weird that you "good old days" faggots only ever complain about /pol/ and never complain about the blatant redditors and progressive twitterfags that browse here and shit up the board twice as much. Or how you conveniently forget how Yea Forums was always like this.
>>Game is set in a dystopian future in which the government isn't evil
>Yeah boy, enjoy your child lunch debt, your sky rocketing medical expenses, your unaffordable cost of living and housing, and your fucking oligarchy.
Uniroincally all preferable over living under communism.
That being said, I'm not a poorfag and have been benefiting pretty well in the US under capitalism. Don't assume everyone is a poorfag like you.
the worst conditions in the US are better than the best conditions under communism
even the poorest niggers in the US are fat fucks because food is so abundant and cheap
Anything Warhammer.
Frostpunk (pic related)
>they don't have a unified goal beyond MURRICA BAD
spot on, it's all like a big sissy hissy fit
absolutely SUPERB video game thread, Yea Forums (/pol/)! You did it again!
>future
>shitty countries like rebels, non-shitty countries like the empire
makes you realize "rebellion" and "muh revolution" is just an extension of "gibsmedat"
>3rd world sides with Rebellion
>1st world sides with the Empire
Sounds about right.
>Muricans go on and on about "freedom"
>secretly wish to be ruled by a fascist dictator
>you're only "free" when you're living in a shithole commune with no order
kek
I'm from Chile and now I realize why this country is so shit, we don't respect the government or the police. That makes most people pieces of shit who want to cheat and steal from others.
OH NO NO NO NO
Yes, also because Jews are attracted to men with money and power and the Empire has both!
THIS IS IT GUYS
THIS IS HOW TRUMP WILL LOSE 2020!
>checks approval rating
>45%
oh...
There are very few countries where the govt is not evil.
Would they? Many huma d have openly accepted smart phones that could be easily used to monitor everything you do. The systems are put into place for a single party to watch over us all. You don't hard shift into 1984, you slowly do it over generations and make sure each new generation is more accepting of the measures.
Good thing Tim Sweeny already bought me a copy.
>literally has never gone above 45% in a single moment of his presidency
>presidency's almost over
OH NO NO NO NO
Trump is on pace with Obama's approval rating during his 1st term.
Plus based Russia will help out again.
Trump is most likely going to win again and you know it. It's going to be fucking hilarious. The tears will be delicious.
If Australians can survive on a regular basis, they can endure the apocalypse.
no it's more like
>he fell for the climate change apocalypse meme
lefties don't believe in nuclear power, so it's obvious they don't believe their own memes either.
you are a massive retard. do you actually think sports teams are made up of people from that particular city or whatever? they're bought and sold. team names are meaningless. you've unintentionally proven the point you were disagreeing with correct.
Nuclear power is inefficient and completely incapable of replacing fossil fuels
Are you retarded?
Nuclear power is literally our only option to slow down climate change. Everything else is taking too long and with feedback loops taking over, we need to become carbon neutral within 10 years to have any hope.
>that Russia-Austria-Germany pro-Empire Axis
You think the other is not funded by powerful corporations?
Yes user. I do believe the fossil fuel industry does thing to control the narrative.
>incapable of replace
it's not about replacing, it's about reduction.
>inefficient
Isn't a vast amount of the energy in France nuclear-generated? I forgot the exact figures but it's something like 70~%
It's only 20~% in the states because of the stupidly protected fossil fuel industries.
Dunno.
evil Government and egocentric politics obsessed with money and power are more forgettable.
On year 2500 nobody remember about Trump, Merkel or that chinese guy.
>feedback loops taking over
?
en.wikipedia.org
tl;dr the damage global warming is causing also causes further global warming
One of the great pleasures in life is watching a retard say something really fucking dumb, born out of pure ignorance, and literally everyone regardless of their creed can agree it was objectively idiotic... and then they finish their point with a really condescending comment like "you tried"
Can you simpletons not read? It shows that it's pretty much 50/50 everywhere, with only slight leanings in either direction.
But of course idiots can't look at any image without pushing their politics onto it. And you used to claim only the left did that.
>hmm there are very slightly more people playing as the rebels in a fucking videogame in chile, this just goes to show how those LAZY FUCKING COMMIES don't respect the LAW and why they will STARVE TO DEATH
I mean honestly, step back, take a look at yourselves.
>climate change
>man made
Haha so just like real life
Man accelerated might have been a better way to put it but the left are tards, the right are tards and they all misuse science for political gain.
Ironically man made climate change should be name of the solution not the problem.
When the government IS the bad guy in games, why is it always a conservative government and not the more historically evil left-winged government?
Crackdown
I like you user
What is often called "supremacy" isn't about being inherently superior, but to subjugate others to keep your kind on top and thus be prosperous and improve survivability.
Honestly if there are aliens out there with whom we share no common ancestor it would be pretty unlikely we could coexist with them.
Cool, controlling the environment should be marketed as a super villain grade move that shows off the power of the west, china will follow suit and the world would be a better place because some powerful niggers have a degree of control over the fucking global weather and can bend it to benefit people.