Can this series be saved?
Can this series be saved?
No, it's doomed
Swan song or nail in the coffin?
>GTA Online has literally everything any previous GTA had
>GTA V is forgotten and neglected
>Any new GTA will be stripped of features compared to the current abysmal Online
It's totally fucked. Rockstar has DLC'd themselves into a corner.
>iv is the only one that nearly killed the franchise
haha but no, cockstar will milk the whale teets for every cent in their next game which will be built from concept to be a massive cash shop.
only if they go back to campy careless bullshit like san andreas
>like Vice City
Fixed.
No wonder IVfags always seethe over V being more successful and well liked
gta online is absolute dogshit unless you have 2-3 bros to play with. matchmaking is worthless. no drop in. 5 min missions totally wasted if 1 player quits/dies then you get 20mins of loading.. endless homing missile spam and hackers. entire game is ruled by players who have explosive snipers/oppressor mk2 anyone without these is fucked and cannot fight back at all so dont even try.
fuck san andreas. fucking gimmicky boring missions and takes forever to unlock the whole map. vice city got it right by unlocking the whole map pretty early on. in san andreas it takes so goddamn long with so many shitty missions
you know saints row 2 and 4 are a thing.
id argue saints row 4 is much more enjoyable than gta v
>finally play GTA V online
It's so good, why did you lie to me Yea Forums?
making 'boomer city 2' will save the series, Florida is full of decadence and freaks.
Swan song, the peak of criminal simulators
shouldn't IV be doomer tier?
You got in at a good time, rockstar just started cracking down on hackers and people abusing the passive system to score ez kills
>making 'boomer city 2' will save the series
Only if it's set in the early 90s and shits on the 80s.
So you want san adreas 2?
yeah of course, they also need to bring back gta sa role playing aspect like getting fat and building muscle.
Unironically both, but more of a nail.
>Perfected the gunplay
>Perfected the on-foot movement
>A proper cover system
>New ragdoll physics which have yet to be surpassed in terms of realism
versus
>Driving is butchered
>Map is colourless and depressing - nothing interesting going on
>'Gritty' story and characters (one of the few things that 5 changed for the better)
>EXTREMELY long but with no really memorable missions
>Blandest main character in the series
>Stats from SA were axed (re-added in 5, but neutered)
It is okay, better than 5 but not as good as the older games.
if they can bring RDR2 levels of kino to GTA, then yes. I think the serious tone with comedy more in the background worked well for GTA IV
San Andreas, like VC, was a very superficial take on the 90s.
>>'Gritty' story and characters (one of the few things that 5 changed for the better)
>>EXTREMELY long but with no really memorable missions
>>Blandest main character in the series
THIS I fucking loved Trevor XD
It is still fine, at least it hasn't reached call of duty mediocrity tier levels
IV has the best story and characters of any GTA, though.
The fuck is a doomer.
Wojak meme but its about depression
But IV is the game where that shit fucks you over. Niko being the hypocrite who holds on to his burden fucks him, Roman and his loved ones.