Is Ray Tracing actually worse it for video games, Yea Forums?

Is Ray Tracing actually worse it for video games, Yea Forums?

Attached: bedf.png (1080x1204, 1.39M)

Other urls found in this thread:

worldofbuzz.com/netizens-are-going-crazy-over-this-girl-in-a-judges-robe-and-we-found-out-who-she-is/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

bacot anjeng

I have no idea what ray tracing is.

Frame rate and stability > shiny graphics

Remember how voxels would change video games forever? The same thing is happening with raytracing

how did that loli become a judge?

It's basically throwing decades of efficient techniques out the window because nvidia needs to sell more cards that are barely better than the last lot.

Well I still don't know what ray tracing is

good for gaming but we don't have the power to use it yet

trace rays of light. Basically simulating real light. Which should make games look very realistic.

Nah
Games just need to utilize it better and video cards have to improve for a while to maintain playable framerate with rtx enabled

Attached: 1556602646021.jpg (455x423, 50K)

Really accurate light calculations vs bespoke rasterization tricks. It's the standard for pre-rendered CGI but barely ready for use in real time applications.

She's 40 years old

Attached: Im+not+here+right+now+but+please+enjoy+this+trash_a67b58_7168580.jpg (1200x1128, 190K)

Attached: 1522512369762.jpg (604x613, 51K)

48 actually

Attached: t_5d2bff64edab3.jpg (700x525, 61K)

Its been used in real time, note that anything over 1FPS is real time technically so getting 60FPS at 1440P with metro exodus with my RTX 2080TI, would you not quantify that as real time?

RT performance could improve a magnitude more for each generation from here on out. Currently RT Cores only make a small amount of the die, a little less than 10% of the die is relegated to RT, that's 75mm squared on something like the 2080TI. If NVIDIA were to scale down to 7nm they could theoretically have a die size half the size of the 2080TI because 12nm isn't actually 12nm it's an improved 16nm process that was developed to compete with Samsungs improved 14nm+ process. NVIDIA could relegate a larger portion to RT on their 7nm process that could see a level of performance more than anything we currently have with RT.

Attached: c20bf97e19127f77941c967d4bc352815fcf55edfecc1cedc9866297b8738f90.jpg (960x686, 308K)

>exhentai is still fucking dead

Attached: 1564141747167.jpg (1440x900, 178K)

okay thank

>voxels will change everything
>never heard from people claiming they were great ever again
sounds right.

Could you stop reminding me.
It keeps making me upset.

Attached: hamasho.jpg (704x396, 57K)

Pengen ngentot gan

Who the fuck is this 3D bitch?

You didn't see that guy on /g/ that made a 47terabyte backup?

Anjay masuk Yea Forums. Mabar skuy

I thought he was just memeing

has she had stalkers?

What a faggot. All my porn is stored in the greatest computer my brain.

Not really, it's just that you need huge amount of power to run it. Look at Minecraft for example, the ray tracing looks crazy there and runs really good because it's so java shit. Real raytracing like in movies won't be a thing for like another 2 years but at least Nvidia made a push for it and the RT cores can be used for reshade RT and soon some programs.

I NEED A NAME

Kim Waliu

Im surprised there hasnt been an >IMAGINE post yet

you can stalk her if you want
worldofbuzz.com/netizens-are-going-crazy-over-this-girl-in-a-judges-robe-and-we-found-out-who-she-is/

Just curious if the basement dwellers pedos from the land of the rising sun are drooling over legal age loli.

god I want to shoot jewcob in his filthy face

wasnt that a fluke?

Who's Ray?

for the weebs that are worried about ray-tracing vs cel-shading, you don't seem to understand that you can have both, the bottom line is that ray/path tracing means lighting will be more realistic.
There are two principal reasons pre-rendered stuff looks so good; denser/more detailed geometry and ray/path tracing

Attached: dragon-quest-hero-smash-ultimate-dlc-image.jpg (1796x879, 211K)