Why are game developers allowed to violate and refuse people who buy their online game basic human rights?

Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction.

Have sex

>free speech is a human right by the UN
Putting aside your grammar for a moment, prove it.

That doesn't apply to private entities

I am sure if you will screech nigger in front of the UN nothing will happen to you.

It does not?

Thats the same as allowing murder because a game terms of condition says it

Lol

Human rights are a law above some company rules just like a murder law

>to articulate their opinions
Saying "nigger" on the chat doesn't fall under "articulate opinions".

corporations are literally states
hope you're looking forward to the military industrial complex controlling everything
i unironically am

Freedom of speech is also -not- a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or community to articulate their opinions and ideas within a private medium.

Shut up ESL, you don't have any rights.

The UN is a powerless entity.

>UN

Attached: 14476511815350.jpg (1280x784, 242K)

Being banned from an online game is not the same as having your freedom of speech violated though.

It's not even close, user.

>false equivalence
Sorry, I agree with you that getting banned for hurting someone's feelings is wrong but there's really not anything you can do about it from a legal standpoint. Your "human rights" might interfere with someone else's "human rights" and you leave it up to whatever powers that may be to moderate the situation.

>this thread again

Don't play games that threaten to ban you for shit instead of spending 24/7 on Yea Forums making the same thread over and over.

>why do the owners of private IP putting that private IP on private servers on a privately-owned connection have the right to revoke access to their private property at any time for any reason
because until we hit post-scarcity property rights are more important than civil rights

Attached: serioustarfire.png (602x609, 487K)

Kys

Locking people up is a human rights violation! The police have no right to send you to prison for murdering people!

Are you retarded?

Not the same
Since murder is not a human right

It's the same fucking logic. You're basically saying "nobody has the right to punish me for breaking the rules because muh human rights!"

Ding dong, important message of the day:

Freedom of speech doesnt mean that you can say whatever the fuck you want. Sadly, tons of mouthbreathers think its their "get out of jail" card to pollute their surroundings with mind-buzzling stupidity and ignorance

Next up: why cant I see my own forehead no matter how hard I look up? Stay tuned!

We don't want idiots like you around. So we remove you.

Spotted the sjw libtard

Dilate tranny

That's not how it works. Free speech is about government prosecution for political dissidence.

Free speech means you get to say whatever you want but it doesn't mean your mouth diarrhea can't be subverted by everyone else using free speech against you to fuck you in the ass.

No! Free speech means I can say whatever I want, whenever I want, wherever I want, and everyone else has to deal with it! My rights are more important than anyone else's rights! The world revolves around MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

see businesses are governments
didn't you learn from the east india company?

free speech doesn't mean immunity from consequences its also not a free pass to careless slurs.

Imagine being such an easily triggered child that you have to scream NIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGER every time you die in a game, and then having the compkete lack of introspection required to blame other people when your lack of self control gets you in trouble.

Mommy said I don't have to obey the rules because I'm her special miracle baby! She had me when she was 56! Now I live in her basement and she cooks my tendies!

Human rights laws haven't caught up with the advancement of social media as of yet, but the big SoCal tech firms are really trying their hardest to have their assets seized and nationalized

Are you ok libtard?
Have sex

Seething

Cringe the post

Property laws are more important than free speech laws. Would you rather not be allowed to call people niggers or would you like to have niggers in your house without the right to defend yourself or kick them out? You are on the virtual property of a company. If they say they want you out they can do that.

>Free speech means I can say whatever I want, whenever I want, wherever I want, and everyone else has to deal with it
This but unironically

>establishments shouldn't have any rules

This is the logic of a rowdy nigger who doesn't want to wear shoes in a restaurant

Get raped twice and kill yourself, you retarded fucking tranny faggot sack of nigger shit with down syndrome.

Having a right to free speech and opinions is different from everyone wanting you to fuck off for being a cunt

Businesses are people retard

well yes but I'm a white republican so I'm allowed to say it

Sure, legally.
Not in reality.

OP is whining about the free speech LAW so counting legally is all that matters.

fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction FROM THE GOVERNMENT

Attached: free_speech.png (566x577, 52K)

Whether you like it or not private entities have the right to make their own rules which include banning people for whatever reason they see fit.

>xkcd
opinion discarded

>go to movie theatre
>pay for movie
>start yelling obscenities during the film and arguing with other viewers
>get kicked out before the movie even finished
WTF DUDE THIS IS VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS

any ban is because either of age restrictions (for better marketing) or straight up liberal faggos triggered by mean words

Attached: 1563875915640.png (1000x432, 165K)

Attached: 1559275967462.jpg (907x894, 211K)

Yes.

You are allowed to say anything you want. You also have to deal with the consequences.
This is especially the case when you use online platforms. If you are deliberately trying to upset other users, you're making the platform less valuable for them. Therefore you get banned.

Protip: Private enterprises and individuals are not obligated to provide you a platform for your temper tantrums. By using their services you agree to their rules; if you don't like them, you are free not to use them.

Hmm...who should I believe? XKCD or John Stuart Mill?

You're baiting, right?

of course they can. we females need to know the law better so we know how to exercise our rights, and free speech just means the government can't ban you IRL for saying things unless it has to do with threats or if they feel like it.

Kys

>we females need to know the law better

youtube.com/playlist?list=PLA2qWzxlUXcC7ajGgRkT5_bpDG59KYMIt

>Thinking spamming the word nigger and kys is "freedom of speech"

Children go fuckin sit down.

We can still break the law. Everybody knows murder is illegal but incels and jealous husband/boyfriends still do it.

Video games are not a public forum. It's a private forum, and you have to follow the rurus.

>tell someone to fuck off
>they murder you

>WTF..... muh freeze peach...

Standing in the middle of a privately owned store screaming at people isnt a constitutional right you fucking ape

>go to crowded movie theater
>yell "fire" in the middle of the show
>get arrested

So much for free speech

Cope incels

Youre legally protected from the government, not private entities. Learn the law dipshit

Then go invent a country where that's the law

Look at how stupid Republicans look when they try to argue lmao

...

>"NIGGER"
>Get banned

BROS??? LIKE WHAT THE FUCK MAN. My freedom of speech is VIOLATED.

Well you're technically correct which is the most reddit way. I agree, it's how it should be, words are for civilized people, but that ain't how it is.
You take any regular ass joe blow NPC normalfag (90% of the population) and they'll resort to violence if you use words. It may take a while, or you might have to get creative, but you'll piss them off until they want to hurt you, because it turns out a lot of people can't give it back. You're in the more powerful position because you don't give a fuck what they say, they're just words, and they can't stand it, so they try to do something that you do care about, punching me in the face.

Ahem... I am here to present you with this (you) signed for by user.

i've been called a gay nigger at least twice a day since 2000. anybody who has thin skin on the internet should be required to take a 4 year course on old IRC, chatrooms, and forums. You could say whatever the fuck you wanted and you might get a warning for "flaming".

Player hosted servers would fix this.

And immediately the bootlicking begins

Player hosted servers or any type of IRC had some strict fucking rules from what I remember.

From the government. You also seem like a 3rd world ESL that doesn’t have freedom of speech.

This a million times

Fucking this.

Attached: 1531931229090.png (1200x1200, 2.2M)

Only when it comes to speech because in the US money equals speech. Not even shitposting.

>Yea Forums.org/rules
>Break the rules
>Freedom of speech violated

BROS. THIS AIN'T COOL MAN.

summer of samefags

>I am unable to understand what freedom of speech means
The service provider reserves full rights to terminate your access to their services

The real problem is they won't allow people to make their own servers. The more we move away from private servers, the more we need to coddle little faggots that can't handle being called a faggot.
Used to be a time when kids could have their own server, adults could have their own server, and autists could have their own server. Now it's all fucked.

Attached: 1525279872148.png (639x947, 669K)

>From the government
Wait, does that mean that if everything becomes privatized we can get rid of the constitution?
SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>The real problem is they won't allow people to make their own servers. The more we move away from private servers, the more we need to coddle little faggots that can't handle being called a faggot.

Dude, wtf? I'm just there to play video games not practice my freedom of speech in a fucking online video game.

Not understanding why you don’t get banned on 4 chins basket weaving site and why you get banned in Fortnite is peak autism. Social cues and all.

if we get rid of the constitution, nic cage will nave nothing to steal

>MOMMY MOMMY I CANT SAY MEAN WORDS ON THE INTERNET NO MORE I CANT FUCKING TAKE IT MOMMY MAKE THEM LET ME SAY MEAN WORDS MOMMY PLEASE I NEED TO SAY MEAN WORDS THEY WERE BEING MEAN TO ME MOMMY

Attached: wojak.jpg (820x791, 136K)

projection

Court ruled that it's against the constitution for Trump to block people on Twitter because social media is a human right.

So an argument can, and probably will, be made that those TOS don't mean jack and that blocking or banning people from any sort of social platform is violating the constitution.

Have sex.

>implying such decisions get applied equally
Top kek, it will be only applied to screech at republicans, the second a democrat becomes president that decision will be promptly and conveniently forgotten

Depends on when and where the argument is made in court, and how many times it is made.

Then take them to court, oh wait, that happened and the court threw the case out in 5 days

no-one is forced by law to allow you to act like a toxic shitlord on their premises, especially when you signed a contract going in. Video games are very much an "exclusive" club in the sense that you opt in, and enter an agreement with the owners (of the IP, servers, whatever) in order to utilize the perks of said club.

>the housewife book club won't allow me to recite Mein Kampf at Karen's house
>what the fuck is this censorship?

Is this all you people can say when you get absolutely btfo by logic?

My rights are more important than their rights!

if you don't like it then why did you sign the license agreement? that thing you don't even bother to scroll down unless it's greyed out before you do to click the checkmark box?
>i understand they have the right to revoke and remove me and my content for any reason without notification
they can ban you for saying fire is hot if they want

Rules are for other people to follow, not me! I'm special! I'm the most important person in the universe! This is my universe, everyone else just exists to do what I want!

Know what funny about this whole situation? Anons think they are being reported and thus banned by "think skinned snowflakes" when it's actually people who dont care about being called a faggot but know getting you banned is possible, easy and hurts you the most. If you you ever got banned for saying bad words in a video game you got absolutely fucking trolled lmao

trash talk and rivalry is part of the fun of competition and multiplayer games. Only people who've never played a sport will disagree

absolute brainlet comparison

>i-it's online so it's different! i can't get sucker punched!

you are aware that anything other than silence or relentless fake positivity is liable to get you banned in most online games these days, yes? You can get banned for using the quick chat options in games if enough soft skinned people report you for it. You don't have to shout nigger or faggot in a game to get banned, a simple "What a save!" is enough to trigger retards and set them into a tantrum of calling you toxic and reporting you. I'm not entirely against moderation in games, but when it goes so far that it removes all expression and fun, I think it's going overboard. Might as well be playing with bots at that point.

Whoaaa

Attached: received_1809266885885875.jpg (370x960, 69K)

>from any sort of social platform
A game isn't the same as Twitter or Facebook. The primary purpose of a game isn't speech and communication, so it's not like a public square. It also only really applies to the government banning you from social media.

But, people are allowed to mute you on their game servers if they want. If you don't like it, then you need to stop playing and supporting games that don't let you run your own server with your own rules. I'm not supporting banning people for some trash talk, I actually like trash talk which is one reason why I don't play games without dedicated servers.

Specifically because it’s the president and therefore the government.

It's a shitty situation. You can't "vote with your wallet", the way things worked 50 years ago (1969) because there are incredible amounts of people who will never hear the issue and support the bad thing completely obliviously.
If there's a shitty company that takes advantage of something, it doesn't matter if they get called out, it'll reach the hundreds of people states away, not the actual people that use the service.

Twitter still bans racist fucks from their platform.
At the end of the day games are a business. Learn what free speech actually protects you from. By screaming racist remarks or flaming people you are sabotaging the community of that game, costing them money when those people quit for a game with better people. You are costing them money. Go yell nigger in wal-mart as loud as you'd yell it online and see what happens

that's not what it ruled you illiterate faggot

nytimes.com/2019/07/09/us/politics/trump-twitter-first-amendment.html

"Because Mr. Trump uses Twitter to conduct government business, he cannot exclude some Americans from reading his posts — and engaging in conversations in the replies to them — because he does not like their views"

Are you conducting government business by typing "nigger nigger nigger" into the chat while playing Overwatch? Then fuck off.

If you're against private ownership and property rights, become a communist.

Attached: 1558910397132.jpg (944x719, 56K)

Many mad libtards here with more estrogen than testo

>Twitter still bans racist fucks from their platform.

lol, I could go there, say "FUCK WHITE PEOPLE", and nobody would blink and eye.

That isn't racism

Attached: Making+brainlet+memes+is+one+of+my+favorite+things+to+_53612452fb4093c1aa7a97647adc9b08.jpg (555x555, 53K)

The sad part is that there's plenty of hypocritical faggots who unironically believe that shit.

Racist piece of shit
Fuck off to pol fag

This. Why do none of you retards fucking understand this. LOOK IT UP.

Attached: 1530320584767.png (550x535, 198K)

>there are people so dumb that they equate legal free speech rights with moral free speech rights

Incel

Can't you zoomers just NOT call people niggers? I'm 32 and when I was a kid playing Starcraft or whatever I never called anybody a nigger.

Attached: hmm.gif (498x498, 613K)

>Can't you zoomers just NOT call people niggers?

How about not using the n-word at all!? YOU FUCKING BIGOTED BOOMER!! JUST FUCK OFF BACK TO /POL/ ALREADY!

Attached: 1554152416546.jpg (640x640, 53K)

Cringe. Have sex, dilate, cope and seethe.

nigger

hate speech is punishable by law in a huge amount of first world countries

Want to try to say it to my face IRL??? Ill fucking smash your teeth in kid

>Not wanting corporations to control free speech makes you a communist
Sasuga bootlicker-kun

>Throws milkshake.

Attached: 1553229768913.png (350x350, 55K)

Incel loser

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!

Me and my Starbucks friends are going to give it to you!

Attached: soyanger.png (225x225, 8K)

> a simple "What a save!" is enough to trigger retards and set them into a tantrum of calling you toxic and reporting you.
just because you yelled nigger doesn't mean everyone who plays the game gets banned

Because those human rights only extend insofar as you don't cede them.
When you buy a game legally, you typically sign a lease form of some sort that cedes your complete rights to free speech whilst you are playing on their software.
You literally agree to it but you don't know because you clearly never fucking read the T&C
Yes it does, because the terms and conditions is literally you agreeing to give up that right while you're playing.
Free Speech as a human right is only protected from it being FORCED from you, but it's not protected when you voluntarily give it up.

you realize using slurs or being an asshole is usually within the purview of the rights that game devs give themselves when you sign the t&c, yes? you literally agree (by signing it) that you're cool with them being able to ban you for being a dickwad

Do they ban for the word nigger, or other racial terms? What about kike?

>laced with concrete powder

>itt: local idiot doesn't understand that rights are only protected from forceful alienation by the government (i.e. they're only protected in public spaces) and not protected when you voluntarily give those rights up to be accepted into private spaces (i.e. a video game environment)

/thread

That manner of speaking would also get you banned. Rephrase your disagreement with that user in a courteous manner befitting an inclusive platform.

the only people who shout NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER REEEEEE in online games are literally incels who never played sports irl.

>get paid
>due to laws i can only get paid on my bank account
>say "nigger" on Yea Forums
>bank tos says i can't use hate speech
>bank account frozen indefinitely, no way to get money from it anymore

>"HEY BRO"
>"YEA?"
>"UR A FUCKING NIGGER"
>EVERYONE CHEERS

Fuck bros.. I remember when competitive sports was a REAL sport. Back in my day we can call each other NIGGERS. Nowadays people are too FUCKING PUSSY to handle it. Fuck.

Literally take them to court. There's clearly enough of you to make a difference considering how many fucking threads there's been on this subject.

>bank account frozen indefinitely, no way to get money from it anymore
Give one (1) real life example of this happening. You can't.

Mastercard, paypal, stuff like that.
Want to host a site with non kosher speech? Enjoy being blacklisted from payment processors
>b-but muh bitcoin
Sure, if you want your account to shift in value unpredictably that is, oh and not many accept it either

Based bank.

Living rent free.

If you agree to a contract that says you can't use slurs in public forums, that's on you. That's a voluntary contract you entered into.
It comes down to you to make the decision of whether you value money and survival over the ability to say 'nigger' online

Tough shit lmao

>agree to bank's terms of service
>violate terms of service
>IM OPPRESSED
how about you read the fine print and take responsibility for the things situations you put yourself into, idiot

Other than Alex Jones. Who else is experiencing this?

No one, because banks don't check that closely on your public activity other than social media (which have their own terms of service against hate speech and the like, just because they're free doesn't mean they're public domains)

>walk into bank where my savings are.
>yell "this is a bank robbery, give me the money now!"
>get arrested instead.
>wtf guys where is my free speech?

>this thread again
>all these faggots justifying a company using draconian rules in T-M rated games when the fucking mute button exists
go back to the leftist gaming club on facebook and bitch about how you owned racists on the internet so i can screenshot it and laugh at you on Yea Forums

No. Because I have the satisfaction of seeing retards like you getting banned is hilarious.

>No. Because I have the satisfaction of seeing retards like you getting banned is hilarious.
first off, Dilate.
second, i love that feeling too. ive gotten lots of leftists banned from their groups and safe spaces just by sending the conversation into a purity spiral or feigning offence.
third, just because you like seeing people get banned doesnt mean that you should get banned for a swear. grow the fuck up and just use the mute button.

>game company sets out rules
>assholes break rules
>assholes also expect the onus to maintain the rules to fall on those who aren't breaking the rules
are you retarded? Why would a game make people who aren't violating their contract do more work to avoid 13 year olds saying faggot and nigger? Why wouldn't they just kick you out of their clubhouse because you're being a sperg when you said you wouldn't sperg out?

>you should get banned for a swear
No, you should get banned for a swear because you agreed not to swear when you bought the fucking game, you retard.
You agreed to a contract between you and the developer/publisher and you're violating the terms of that agreement. So why shouldn't you be punished? Why should people who aren't being retarded have to put in more work to avoid your bullshit?

sure. youre unironically right. ill fix the entire problem all together. get rid of fucking matchmaking and go back to servers where you dont have to worry about faggots reporting you. it takes more work to report someone than it does to mute someone.

>when the fucking mute button exists
>dude, we shouldnt have police, just buy a gun and defend yourself! the government shouldn't use draconian methods to enforce the laws

Free speech is only a human right in the US, which is the only nation that was constitutionally founded on the principle. Even though it took society a while to recognize that basic right extended to all citizens, it was always written that way. Unlike most laws of the world, the US constitution is additive, not restrictive, in securing personal freedom. That’s why America is the greatest nation that ever existed or ever will exist. If it wasn’t, why are so many willing to risk our lives to protect it, and everyone else so willing to risk their lives to come here?

>sure. youre unironically right. ill fix the entire problem all together. get rid of fucking matchmaking and go back to servers where you dont have to worry about faggots reporting you. it takes more work to report someone than it does to mute someone.
Sure but that's not going to happen since game devs want to control the experience of their games really precisely, so you play by their rules or not at all.
It sucks but it's still a voluntary engagement on the player's side

>That's a voluntary contract you entered into
And if all banks do that? What if you no longer have choice because they all use a standardized tos?

absolute brainlet response.
>game devs want to control the experience of their games really precisely
this is the problem at the core and has created the absolute state of gaming that exists today. no fun allowed. i dont care if you put in word filters as long as you can turn them off or if there are options to mute people automatically but i remember when "online interactions not rated by the ESRB" basically mean that youre going to hear some shit that you cant rate and you have to be grown up enough to live with them or dont play. griefing and shit sucks when it happens to you but its fun to be an absolute dickhead every once in a while. i want people to be able to play however it is they like unrestricted which is why id rather go back to servers. it ruins the experience for pretty much everyone involved.
>pic related

Attached: nyl17yax79u21.jpg (880x1000, 180K)

>And if all banks do that?
Like I said, you make the choice of whether you value money or doing the shit they disallow.
It may be an extremely one-sided choice but it's still a choice you're allowed to make. You may not like that two things you like are on opposing options, but that's private entities prerogative to set up their own standards of doing business. It wouldn't be right to force a business to provide a service or good to someone they find morally reprehensible, no?

Kys

>i'm literally ok with unaccountable higher ups dictating every single aspect of my life with the threat of being unpersoned if i step out of line
North Korea sounds like the place for you, bub

>letting corporations decide how well you live your life decided based on if youre a good goy or not
a company should not have more power than the government, which if you decided to do something in your own life that had no effect on the bank and all of a sudden they shut down your account causing you to have severe struggles is incredibly fucking terrifying.

I'm with you on that but that doesn't change the reality of the situation we live in now.
I miss fucking around on custom maps in TF2 too.
The bigger issue isn't 'no fun allowed' but esports.
You'll find that the game companies that lean into matchmaking the most are the ones who are trying to push esports in their game. It may seem like a leap but stick with me
>Game devs want e-sports money (which is basically advertiser and buy-in ticket money)
>this means the game needs to be esports
>esports games need to have a single standard rule set so that all tournaments that might be held are the official ones from the game publishers
>this means that devs need to control the rules precisely, which means no private servers
>no private servers means players need to get into matches somehow, which leads to matchmaking
>matchmaking, in turn, becomes a situation where all types of players are in the same pool and thus, to avoid alienating significant swaths of esports-playing/watching public, you need to make sure there's not any turn-offs

>

Well the (You)s start coming and they don't stop coming

The truth that slipped by everyone.

That’s not why, it’s because Trump sometimes makes announcements on his Twitter and the government isn’t allowed to prevent people from hearing those announcements. It had nothing to do with free speech.

Absolutely based and very redpilled

>if private entities aren't FORCED to do business with me regardless of how much of an asshole I am, then they're basically dictators that are controlling my life
why should a private entity be forced to do anything with you? If I don't let you into my home to scream at the top of your lungs, I'm not some 'unaccountable higher up' who's dictating what you do with your life.
Your rights end where they begin to infringe on the rights of others, such as the right of who to choose to do business with.

except they literally aren't because you're free. your personhood isn't defined by having a bank account or social media account, despite what corporations may have trained you to think.
You still have your citizenship and identity, even if you don't engage with banks and the like. it's no one else's fault that you've become so dependent on them

>go to a private club and pay to enter
>doing so means you also agree to various rules even if you don't know them
>start screaming "nigger" at everyone
>security kicks you out
>"but I paid to get in"

Hell, if you go to a park and start screaming nigger at everyone you are going to end up at the police station or hospital.

>letting corporations decide how well you live your life
except they don't. the default state of human beings is poverty. anything above that is acquired by some amount of effort or work or charity. your default state of life, despite what you may believe, is not living comfortably in a home but it's living in nature without protection. if you want resources or protection from another entity, you have to bargain with them for it. that bargain can come in the form of an exchange of goods or services, or in the form of any other request that they offer and you agree to.
But you've got it backwards. the corporations aren't deciding anything. you are by deciding on whether you bother to engage with corporations or not, because you're free and unchained otherwise.

>which if you decided to do something in your own life that had no effect on the bank and all of a sudden they shut down your account causing you to have severe struggles is incredibly fucking terrifying.
except you AGREED not to do that shit when you opened the account. You can just not have a bank account and live off the land or get a cash-only job. If you're too addicted to the corporate-teat, that's your issue because, believe it or not, that's not a requirement to live.

>your personhood isn't defined by having a bank account
>just live like a hobo, bro

>the only people who don't have bank accounts are hobos
you sound like you've never stepped foot outside of your city. You know there are plenty of people who live off the grid, it's a whole life-style

>le epic nigger strawman
yes its always because people say nigger. sure.

>live off the land
Pretty much illegal, also you still need money for taxes and shit, doesn't matter if you live a nomadic life in fucking alaska without even a shelter to your name
>or get a cash-only job
Funny how they keep pushing for eliminating cash altogether and transition to electronic transaction only
Oh, well, i'll just make my own payment processor, and then my own bank, heck, maybe even my own governemnt, with blackjack and hookers, sure, there is like zero unclaimed land but i'm sure the local government will be ok with me and my lot of turf declaring independence

trump 2020
kill all trannies

Dude, I've seen screencaps where they literally say nigger. Don't pretend it doesn't happen.

what a fucking load of horseshit
Your default financial state is the one you inherited from your parents, there's no effort involved to maintain that lol

>Pretty much illegal
not at all
>also you still need money for taxes and shit
you realize you can pay your taxes in cash, yes?
>Funny how they keep pushing for eliminating cash altogether and transition to electronic transaction only
>the """they""" meme
And yet cash still exists and is still accepted by most brick-and-mortar stores.

>reading comprehension
>anything above that is acquired by some amount of effort or work or charity
>or charity
I consider what parents give you to be charity.
the point standing that the default state of mankind, as a general entity, is poverty. engaging with collective entities, either corporations or societies, can offer succor from this poverty but you still have to engage in some voluntary contract of one form or another to gain that relief. There's always a situation where you can't get everything you want all the time

and ive seen screencaps that say my mother will die in her sleep night but that doesnt make it true. fucking smoothbrain.

>I consider what parents give you to be charity.
then you're fucking retarded, because it's enforced by the law

Not when you become an adult and have to take care of yourself.

>screencap of a chatlog is the same as a chain letter
Who's the smoothbrain agian?

Do Nazi's loose sleep knowing they've lost every major war they've ever fought? Such does make it seem like you're a bunch of weak minded failures who spend all your time straw-manning and underestimating your enemies, so they just roll over you because you take your own memes as gospel.

Gosh how pathetic that would be.

>mfw I'm not a multiplayer cuck

Attached: 1422283867825.png (816x587, 116K)

...at which point you've already inherited plenty from your education and family environment to put you leagues ahead of people from poorer backgrounds

Imagine if hitler won ww2

What a better world it would have been

This degeneracy needs to stopp

>dude i saw this pic its 100% true and its the case for every incident
you are one dumb cocksucker

Attached: 1563275596044.png (640x443, 130K)

The faggot that posted it was the one that got banned. Why would he lie?

I'm not saying the world is fair, or that everyone is born into an equal circumstances.
My original post was more about the state of mankind as a species

Incel

all me

I don't even like trump or your stupid right wing politics guys.
But this is just stupid. The man don't want to have people posts mocking him in his social account. I don't care if he is a president or god .It make
sense that he should not be able to hide his posts from some people. But he should be free from blocking communication with who he ever want.

Have sex

>buy movie ticket
>walk into kinoplex
>scream "I HATE NIGGERS"
>get kicked out
wtf bros i paid for that movie

Grow up kid

>Free speech
Free speech means the GOVERNMENT CAN'T put you in JAIL for your opinions.

That happens in other countries, you say something and you go "missing" or charged with something.

Free speech DOES NOT mean you get to say w.e. you want when you feel like it without repercussions. That's retarded.

Even /pol/ has rules, no porn, nothing non-political, etc. Or you get banned.

What happens in America is that you have so much free speech, you don't even know what NOT having free speech feels like. So you confuse it with not being able to say whatever you want on your video game or twitter or classroom. Every place has rules. Yea Forums as rules.

>against the constitution for Trump to block people on Twitter because social media is a human right.
lmao no that is not what any court has ever ruled. It has nothing to do with social media being a human right you dumbfuck. Trump is a public servant and his official twitter, from which he engages in official business, is a public square.

private platform

This exactly. You won't be imprisoned or killed by the government, but it won't stop private organizations or other people.