Would western puritan censors be okay with lolibabas in videogames?
I mean by definition they are not underage, they are often hundreds of years old
Would western puritan censors be okay with lolibabas in videogames?
I mean by definition they are not underage, they are often hundreds of years old
its still a little girl you are sexualizing and that is not OK in 2019.
Of course not you idiot. "Its okay because she is actually 400 years old" is for them the worst excuse to "be a pedophile"
no because all sexualization is bad these days
then again literally everything is considered awful so basically we're going to end up with gray mush rather than anything at all
better yet, would western puritan censors be ok with a mature-looking sexualized woman with the mind of a 5 year old?
ugh... ouguhuh.. cu... C-CU
Pedophiles are sad people.
>this hog is totally okay to fuck, it's actually princess Isis from Venus given an illusory animal form by an evil witch!
I really want to fuck Wu's cunny.
Even Skyrim has a 100 year old vampire loli
The law is very specific "AGE" nothing like "IT MUS LOOK LIKE X"
So, its absolutely perfectly fine
but in 2020 it'll be okay when some old jewish lady gets shilled into whitehouse.
You know dam well they would because people are fucking Morons. It's funny they push morals with age, but when they are like 100000x over canonically, then it's different. Hypocrisy at it's finest.
B A S E D
>Would western puritan censors be okay
The answer is always no.
You know the answer to that faggot. Reddit has already turned on Manaketes in Fire Emblem.
samefag
Overt sexual pandering is depthless and boring desu
I like to work for my fap these days
as long as there's blood for realism
well go ahead
Fuck off.
Why are white people so fragile?
what did you just say to me you little bigot?
>"Its okay because she is actually 400 years old" is for them the worst excuse to "be a pedophile"
Is the inverse okay though?