Why do so many games take place or have sections that take place on the moon...

Not op
But uhh
Wolfenstein Tno
Prey 2017, the dlc
Uhh borderlands tps

Neil Armstrong never returned from the moon. He was attacked by aliens. The Armstrong back on earth is a clone made by NASA. Only one part of he moon landing was filmed on earth. The part where the alien attacked.

Attached: 1494783600264.webm (720x404, 829K)

Because fucking no one knows what kind of creatures live in the moon
There’s a good reason why nasa hasn’t record anything moon related since the 60’s

I dunno man, if the gameplay mechanics were really good and it was fun id play it
Bet you would too

now this guy knows what he's talking about

Attached: 1543002350777.png (1131x1600, 2.13M)

I don't care, don't @ me again dumb bitch.

eat me

Yeah, actually, I take that back. Sorry for calling you a retard. Shitting out of my dick doesn't sound like a good video game idea, but in the end, lots of games I love don't have good concepts but the execution more than makes up for it. And it's definitely people with more talent with me could make the gameplay mechanics in a dick-shitting game enjoyable despite any initial aversion I may have towards it.

sauce?

pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium&illust_id=68298581

Because it's cool.

Attached: D_8-o4KWsAEdwU5.jpg (1200x675, 66K)

Attached: AS11-40-5875HR.jpg (1057x1064, 1.08M)

there's gondolas on the moon?

Because its the fucking moon you fucking zoomer, its a giant rock in space where you could die at any moment and you can bounce around like a bunny on crack, and people have actually been there.

all over the place

Attached: AS11-40-5943HR.jpg (1057x1068, 918K)

Attached: heh.jpg (317x265, 20K)

how can one user be this dumb
seek help

But it's our lifeless rock with no features.

>people have actually been there
user... I...

Attached: MOON-5.jpg (636x1599, 248K)

They faked the moon landing! The earth is flat! Fire is cold, water is dry! Dogs meow and cats bark!

Attached: MOON-MONSTER-2.jpg (1080x697, 346K)

Attached: 1562331112124.jpg (321x322, 11K)

>It's just a lifeless rock with no features.
It's probably more the act itself of going to the moon rather than the moon itself being interesting.

Because landing on the moon was the greatest accomplishment of human creativity and ingenuity and if you don't get teary eyed thinking about it and watching videos of the Apollo missions you're practically an emotionless NPC. The work of hundreds of thousands of people from almost every discipline coming together to put man on another celestial body supercedes all else.

>fight whalers on the moon
>steal all their harpoons
>all music is whaling tunes

appeal is obvious.

Attached: Finally.jpg (640x360, 159K)

>rejecting propaganda makes you an NPC

Dam straight.

the moon is really interesting if your into the space in general. just the basic things like its composition and the rocks that were brought back tell us volumes about the the state of the solar system since they're so well preserved and billions of years old.

>It's just a lifeless rock with no features.
So? Going there is cool. And it's not like there are billions of games that do it.

Attached: moon.png (1920x1080, 2.44M)

Attached: 09f1ba69a19bb3b70fb7773106516d0c.jpg (533x800, 60K)

nerd

>being so simpleminded that you call things you don't understand propaganda
You must have a sad life

Attached: Apollo_11_insignia.png (1014x1024, 962K)

I do. what kinda question is that?

portal 2
duke nukem

Do you mean shit OUT OF your penis, or do you mean eject your penis out your asshole?

The moon landing is not fundamentally different from a military parade. A show of force that in itself is pointless but which true point is to consolidate state power.

Apollo 11 deniers are just as pathetic as Flat Earthers. There is no difference between the absolute faults in their theories

If you genuinely think a collaborative effort between hundreds of thousands of people to land humans on another celestial body is no different than a military parade you're delusion. If it weren't a mission of peace there wouldn't be the messages from dozens of different world leaders on the placards that were taken to the moon, the astronauts wouldn't have toured other countries to meet other world leaders after their missions, and so on. It was an accomplishment of mankind, not just a show of power.

I'd say they're more pathetic than flat earthers, because by denying the apollo, and other spaceflight, missions its like they're trying to discount human capability and potential.

Yes, it's different, bigger and more impressive for sure, but fundamentally the same thing. Same motivation and, even if this probably will upset you, same method: throw money at it. I don't know what they teach in American schools, if anything at all, but the moon landing is considered part of the Cold War. War, user.

>implying you can't see all the stuff left on the moon by the Apollo missions with a mid-low tier telescope
fucking retarded.
if you wanna act like a true /x/phile then start wondering why would you simulate a 4d multiverse

Made me check (the internet not the actual moon) and this is very much not the case.

>en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_artificial_objects_on_the_Moon
Knock yourself out.

Apollo deniers, flat earthers and antivaxxers are the unholy trinity of contrarianism and anti-intellectualism.

I'm not saying there's not stuff on the moon. There might be but you can't see them from the earth with a telescope like the other guy was saying.

I'm the user who made the claim of being able to see Apollo equipment from Terra and I was mistaken.

Moon landing had big push at the time due to nothing going right for Kennedy and Russia winning space race

otherwise it would have gotten not even a third of the funding and attention

>doctored ""NASA"" images
>proof
Pick one

>you can say Kaguya is on the moon and be technically correct