Do at least 5 clicks, and then post your age and your average reaction time

27
238 ms

I'll take it.

27
on 60hz 1080p

Attached: 1544848016763.png (721x486, 41K)

Enjoy it while it lasts, zoom zoom.

250 with my right and 200 with my left. I fucking hate being left handed

wasted and got a 193

I have Boomer-tier reflexes already

18
219ms

>you might have a monitor that has really bad lag and is not meant for gaming.
Shit, how do you know what?

29
214 average on 60hz monitor
180 on 145hz monitor

26
238

Good I guess considering I'm a 32 y/o boomer.

Attached: 1553952418371.png (756x566, 46K)

What monitor model do you have and I'll tell you what the specs are.

"Response time is the time it takes your monitor to shift from one color to another. Usually, this is measured in terms of going from black to white to black again, in terms of milliseconds. A typical LCD response time is under ten milliseconds (10 ms), with some being as fast as one millisecond."

I'm top 10% but I've always felt like my reaction times are poor in games compared to actually skilled players

I guess they're the other 10%

20

Attached: 123.png (794x578, 31K)

Not to make excuses, but if I had an actual 1 ms computer monitor instead of the 5 ms Insignia LED TV this would be cut down by a lot

Attached: 5 ms btw.png (722x559, 34K)

amazon.ae/Samsung-inch-Curved-Monitor-SM-LC24F390FH/dp/B07N7624CS

This, just got it because I got it dirty cheap and my old monitor was hot garbage.

23
238
Guess I should just kill myself. I actually play sniper on team which is doubly funny.

35
166 ms

27
tfw washed up former pro gamer

Attached: lol.png (717x181, 25K)

20
270ms

i think my monitor a shit

Using a WMO at 125hz, so that probably adds a significant amount of delay compared to using something like a logitech.

Attached: 1.png (827x538, 16K)

So thats not the worst monitor ever.
Its got a 4 response time of 4 ms, so its not terrible but definitely not the ideal for gaming/lag.

Here, I recommend you watch this video for the next time you plan to upgrade your monitor to a gaming one.

Best Gaming Monitors Under $200
youtube.com/watch?v=AZu0T8H586k

Thanks senpai, I was thinking on getting a second monitor so I can finally dual wield. Here is an Okita

Attached: download (1).jpg (225x225, 7K)

Be honest. You're just clicking too soon until you nail a really fast time. This test is flawed as hell.

Cute!

Average of 240ms

31, drunk as fuck

26
I hope this is wrong but... I've been playing LoL for 6 years now and I've never made it past bronze

Attached: file.png (295x72, 3K)

Dude...you either have a REALLY shitty fucking monitor, or you might legit have some sort of mental or motor control disability.

Actually I have an AW3418DW which is a gaming monitor h-haha

260ms, 31, using a trackpad

first and only attempt
203ms
31

At least try to make it believable.

Grampa here (57). I've noticed I'm getting a lot worse at rhythm games in the past 5 years or so. Left-handed using mouse in right, though I doubt it matters at this point since I've been doing that since the first year mouses were on the market.

I was playing Muse Dash a few days ago and I still can't S rank any 8* maps.

Attached: graveyard.jpg (711x397, 38K)

>used to have 175 at 21 and be able to whiff punish cr.mks on reaction in street fighter
>only 2 years later and >200 already and can't react to the shit I used to

is this what getting old feels like

Attached: 12b[1].png (680x357, 427K)

Sup gramps, what games do you like?

21
212 ms

221
30 year old boomer

nah I'm above 30 and got better results than before better monitor LOL

How and when did you find Yea Forums?
What do you think about current state of the site? Do you hate new userbase? Do you miss old times?
Why are you still here?

yorue fucking retarded

Attached: file.png (800x515, 38K)

Usually just stuff like RTS/4x or map-painting games; more co-op or slower games than frantic input ones like Starcraft. Rhythm games are still a favorite even though I think I'm literally getting too old for this shit.

28
232 ms

I'm sure I used to be a lot faster. I've also had to start wearing glasses a few years back, that probably has something to do with it as well.

You should try they are billions

Attached: Screenshot_1.jpg (707x509, 42K)

19
i play fps mainly

Attached: 1550913799660.png (757x563, 45K)

29
260 ms
but i am tired and drunk, so who knows

Attached: 1542851260303.jpg (550x412, 66K)

I arrived off the SA boat forever ago. Current state doesn't bother me, things change and times change. SA feels like a foreign nation speaking an alien language, this still feels familiar. Anonymity and mostly hands-off moderation ensures that, I suppose.

And because I'll probably be here until I die or go blind.

I've played it for about 7 hours according to my Steam, it's pretty fun and I've been meaning to play it some more.

35
218ms

20
my csgo career never took off sadly

Attached: Untitled.png (741x616, 30K)

>gatekeeper-tier

Attached: tfw_just_good_enough_to_know_you_are_shit.jpg (704x465, 21K)

21
I just play Dota and FFXIV nowadays

Attached: shoom.png (710x515, 31K)

47
243
the struggle is real

Attached: 1563428114243.jpg (1128x1504, 253K)

>Nip posters are 50 year old boomers
Fucking based

Attached: 1.png (1904x452, 14K)

There's also the inevitable input delay

livechatinc.com/typing-speed-test/#/

63 wpm at 98 percent accuracy ( use 3-4 fingers typing lel)

>405 on a phone.

I hope that is just due to phone screens being awful r-right?

And touch being shit

22 426 on mobile. Am I that bad?

Any of you guys try the hearing test?
I heard the ringing at 16khz, is that bad?

29
260ms
Sometimes it depends when I'm getting pumped over multiplayer, kind of like a warm up.
But with that 5 average clicks, with no practice on any FPS for some time, it is what it is.

grand strategy player lul

Attached: re.png (1114x527, 14K)

19
187

Attached: 55512353261.png (794x564, 35K)

>this would be cut down by a lot
4 ms, my dude

59Hz TV and 9 year old mouse.

Attached: days without proper sleep.png (756x326, 14K)

246 ms average, I'm going to have to chalk it up to my wireless mouse, yep.

Attached: 1433558450619.jpg (450x280, 36K)

Also 25.

77wpm
98% accuracy, botched it on the last word.
I used to do 80+, but it's still nothing to brag about.

31
214
186(best)

>23
>250ms

31 years old. Tried a few rounds of five for the following averages;
>248
>215
>211
I swear I have better reflexes than that.

35
358 ms

I also have the shittiest monitor in the world.

24, 240

Went one more time.
31
211 (average)
92 (best)

That sounds more accurate. I can't go any faster, I need to get back into gaming more frequently, but, eh, gotta work first.

Attached: 1563319597598.png (210x272, 28K)

30
190

26
203ms

>balanced diet
>good posture
>regular exercise
these things will affect your reaction time more than 2 years of aging, barring any illness.

36
320

Im using a shitty notebook without a mouse and i just fapped too tho

Guess being a gamer give me good reactions but thanks to boxing I have some "ultra instinct" reaction sometimes

Attached: Capture.jpg (754x518, 34K)

this man is delusional, take him to the infirmary

I don't think rhythm games have a lot to do with reaction time grandpa, at least real ones

18
223 ms

ok dumb fuck

27

185 avg on my ultrawide monitor, 164 on gaming.

Now I'm thinking I should switch to the smaller monitor for fps but not as comfy.

Mine averaged out to 180. That's good, right? Monitor latency might throw other people off so there's no way to know for sure.

19
200 ms

32
189ms

Attached: oldmanreaction.jpg (777x469, 21K)

20
229ms

33
177 ms
I guess that's good.

Attached: captuire111.jpg (1705x498, 29K)

31
182ms

you do understand that "1ms" in monitor advertising is talking about grey to grey. how fast the individual pixies can change colour. it helps to stop ghosting more then anything. response time is mostly unrelated to that game gamers are dumb and love trends

36 in a week. I'm pretty sure this number will keep falling every year that passes from here on out.

Good think I'm more into RPGs and strategy these days.

Attached: time.jpg (755x501, 33K)

Just turned 18 two days ago.

284 ms

>there are people here that were born after 9/11

I'm pretty sure in most (if not all) the "test yourself" gigs the average they show is always worse than the real average, so that actual average people would think they're good, feel good about it, and share their results and the site.

28

Attached: ereacrion.png (727x510, 33K)

45 226

I tried 3 set of 5, improving each time, I could probably improve more with some monster zero ultra.

I don't think I have monitor latency and it's a gaming mouse.

>20
>322

Good thing i don't care about competitive games

Yea Forums isn't a secret club anymore and how restrictive sites like twitter and reddit are with what you can or can't post, the anonymous nature of Yea Forums attracts young faggots who can simply phonepost and get their teenage angst out without getting their invested accounts banned.

>My average is 50ms, kinda slow today haha

Attached: 16F7DFCB-018C-4A48-94BF-6E2430A6AF83.png (723x666, 163K)

>25
>280ms
>try on my phone
>480ms

Attached: 1452777091628.jpg (450x597, 58K)

got 211ms on the clicking test. i'm 26.
i type fast tho

Attached: 26638390_1508986062516698_642949397_n.png (357x465, 36K)

31
195ms
The last one 166ms being my best.

Attached: Benchmarks.png (805x500, 18K)

22

Attached: Screenshot_2019-07-22 Human Benchmark - Dashboard - Guest user.png (728x522, 28K)

>47 year old has yellow fever
I truly am le wrong generation

>Awesome! You type with the speed of 76 WPM (341 CPM). Your accuracy was 89%.
my typing is a fucking mess in english, I'm pretty slow and have to fix typos on most of my posts before sending them
pic related is in my native language, substantially faster but I still make a bunch of typos, though not as much when I type my actual sentences and not random words

Attached: vKjwceg.png (298x296, 13K)

41
1st try: 243
2nd try: 220

24
447 wish I was joking. I love shooters but my reaction time forces me to play RPGs and shit

don't worry I'm even worse
I'm 21 with a 1ms monitor and a gaming mouse

Attached: reaction time.png (723x336, 22K)

maybe this is why i suck at rhythm games

Attached: 2019-07-22 00_45_46-Window.png (651x425, 15K)

23
423ms

I'm using a shitty phone and there's a noticeable lag so I'll probably get sub 400 if I am on actual PC.

24
235 ms

I'm 24

Attached: herthert.png (740x469, 21K)

21
243ms

>all these zoomers with reactions worse than the boomers
you kids should've played cs, ut and quake growing up instead of your new fangled fortnights

Thought I was faster than that

Attached: 716B08CF-E329-4C78-A03B-EB7D9915FB05.jpg (593x1056, 91K)

21
208 ms
I have pretty stiff fingers so its better than what I was expecting

that's now yellow fever, that's plastic fever

i feel like the anons here aren't realizing that 200 ms is 0.201 seconds
its not bad you fucking idiots, and if its below 0.25 congrats your better than the general public at visual reaction time

24
209 best
223 avg

186ms
29
not to bad considering im a fat lazy fuck

30
199 ms

i'm a simple man with no particular interest in fast twitch competitive games. Mostly just fart around with my friends on whatever they're playing.

Attached: ms.png (891x536, 29K)

Attached: click.jpg (727x543, 56K)

24
169
Was top 50 several times

59hz monitor

33
228 best
256 avg

Attached: 2019-07-22_10h28_36.png (623x201, 6K)

27
186 ms

I'm pretty strung out on my adderall right now since I didn't get any sleep last night. I'd like to believe I could score higher because of this, but frankly I doubt it.

I'm a perfectly average guy.
23
244

Attached: 0sRZ8Mb.jpg (745x531, 44K)

23
226

31
423ms
im currently phonefagging

41
275

Time does take a fucking bite, for sure.

23
268

Attached: 1553978300454.jpg (512x512, 83K)

for these you have to disable aero and use fresh chrome or something.
Also 144hz monitor helps a lot.
these numbers mean fuck all because of the delays

Attached: thinking-face.png (256x256, 58K)

>23
>217
Would playing CSGO make me any better or am I doomed?

Attached: 1562813111608.png (700x394, 85K)

28
222ms
could be worse

30yo
274 average, best was 240

i'm 27
age means nothing actually

Attached: 198.png (733x525, 27K)

what are those verbal memories looking like?

Forgot to save it first time so went back and failed quick to get the screencap

Attached: 70.png (1157x858, 65K)

Well Yea Forums, this is me, how bad am I

Attached: Screenshot_20190722-115505.jpg (720x1440, 118K)

20 btw

153
31

28
average 260ms
There's a reason I always preferred turn-based games.

25
281 on a 60ghz TV.

29
245

>open link
>it's another "meaningless string of words with no punctuation or coherence" test that's completely worthless
>close tab

21
239ms

Attached: e7bb187f076a218a5ffc8a8e038a5e80.png (680x360, 15K)

>choke the last one and drop the sub-200 by a fucking hair

h-haha... 25

Attached: chrome_8e2KDFXXKR.png (660x206, 11K)

19
233ms
I noticed last time I played animal crossing that I sucked at fishing a lot more than I used to. Instead of looking at the screen, I had to close my eyes and wait for the sound of the bite, which drastically improved my catch rate. As it turns out, your brain reacts to sound a lot faster than your eyes, due to there being less information to process.

So for all you reactionlets, don't be alarmed. As long as you aren't deaf, there's hope for you.

30 years old

28
228
i accidentally did 6

Did this for a few tries. Pretty consistently hitting 220. At best I can fluke slightly below 200 and if I'm caught off guard (e.g. very short delay between color changes) it's 250.

I'm 25. I have a 60Hz laptop monitor and a $3 (wired) mouse, I don't know if that makes a difference. Probably most people taking this test have a comparable setup.

It's depressing. When I was younger people often noted my fast reflexes in sport etc.

28.
I almost don't play FPS and games where you need high reaction time though.

Attached: 1562437029084.png (715x495, 23K)

214 ms
Think my monitor has 10 ms delay
So yeah, pretty average dude. I'm not terribly competitive at shooters. Just about average.

Also, I'm 26. Good to see you guys aren't all zoomers.

21
Used to play some shooters, but since about two years I started playing more comfy games

Attached: Screenshot_2019-07-22 Human Benchmark - Dashboard - Guest user.png (206x245, 7K)

18
264ms

Attached: 1402077283488.jpg (512x512, 108K)

Reminder that if you have a low refresh rate on your monitor this can add up to 50ms to your response.

Yeah, that's very annoying. However, most people who take this test probably don't have gaming monitors. Much of Yea Forums might, of course.

It:s a compaq wf 1907v bad for time?

27
225
Some of that is probably thanks to my shitty monitor.

24
245ms
Started playing shooters on consoles, then swapped to PC, then realized single player games are hundred times better and stopped being a tryhard faggot, oh well
Does it matter that much? mine is like 7 years old and still alive

220ms
30yo

tfw boomer degradation. Enjoy your good reactions while they last kiddos

24
121

30
261 ms

no wonder i'm shit at blocking overheads.

t. 33 year old boomer. I used to be faster. This is why I rely more on prediction than flick in shooters these days.

Attached: reaction time.png (721x523, 24K)

35 year old boomer
233ms avg on a 60hz monitor, fastest result was 201ms. I think i'm still doing alright for a fucking geriatric.

I'll give you guys all a PROTIP since i've seen these tests done before and there's a slight "exploit" to them. Look to an empty coloured area of the test area and intentionally make your eyes go out of focus so shit is unreadable. The problem is your brain is trying to read any words on the screen immediately which slows you down, for some of you this might improve 10-30ms off your average times. I've done this against a similar test which had the word of a colour written in different colours on a screen and you had to quickly identify what the colour of the word was and not what the colour the word said(e.g If the word BLUE was written in Red you had to quickly identify and yell Red and not Blue)

Yeah it's really fucking annoys me people always mix those two up.
But 1ms is not a meme, you need that speed to display 144hz correctly, thats why 5ms and over is useless if you want to display 100+hz without ghosting all over the place

Step it up nerds

Attached: 1536106194046.jpg (627x306, 22K)

35
208

did you see graphite? i sure didnt

19
178, 144hz

Attached: 1546503516796.jpg (500x567, 31K)

h-help me user

Attached: help.png (692x414, 18K)

>t. took 20 secs to type that

27
189
60hz

28
255
i dont even play video games

Attached: 1520411101499.gif (245x184, 1.32M)

lol thanks user, made my day.

Attached: 1523981101443.jpg (630x757, 142K)

27
179

24

Attached: f.jpg (718x495, 31K)

my mouse is a shit :D

>best is 180
>average is 240
Fuck me.
30yo

24
208

28
the first time i got 243, the second time i got 221
my fastest was 198
i wouldn't say that i don't play video games at all but i don't play video games very much
i'm not really at my peak. probably i'll never reach my peak again. oh well

how much cash have you thrown at paracucks?

30, 170ms. It's on a 60hz so could be a lot better

34
220ms, slightly slower than average, but that was because I got 4 clicks at exactly 200ms which was weird, and 1 click at exactly 300ms bringing my average way up.

467 on my phone

196 with my offhand, 171 with my dominate
i am never not in the top 3 of any shooter i've ever played, at least when i played them

120hz, 1080

even fortnite? what shooters did you play? just wondering

forgot to backspace

Kinda pointless to not have statistics about age or gender.
Like if you're 15y old male and you have 300ms that means your wirings are just defective while it'd be great for a 30y old woman.

Halo 2-4, Halo: Reach, Battlefield 1942, Star Wars: Battlefront 1-2 (the old ones)

there's also two MechWarrior games i cant remember the names of one of which i played with a stick, and there is one old World War 2 game that i also can't remember the name of that i played on the Xbox

i played them because they were fun games, i'm not interested in playing shooters to play shooters

>top 3
how many players play those games at the same time?
i played unreal tournament and tribes in 2003-04 and i was never not in the top few either. usually at least 5 players were in every game too i think
nowadays i'm not that good at video games anymore. i'll probably never be at my peak again either. oh well

that explains everything

christ, i don't remember for all of them
i'd of saved the thing had i knew someone was gonna ask about it
tried to redo it and got slightly higher, but i'm also laying on my side in bed

Attached: Capture.png (409x65, 4K)

>do it with the trackball
>240ms average
>do it with the g502
>190ms average
neat

also 20

235ms average
t. 28-years-old boomer
I remember I had 185 or so in early twenties.

Attached: 1530286964723.jpg (1500x761, 276K)

27 210

i was just asking how many people are in a single game of halo 2 or whatever at the same time. looking it up i guess it's 4 players? so top 3 out of 4 players every time is impressive but it's less impressive than maybe fortnite where there are 100 players. in my opinion of course. your reaction time is better than mine now and maybe better than mine has ever been. like i said though i was good at unreal tournament and tribes in 2003-04 but i wasn't the best person in my school, and definitely never the best in the world at any video game (or probably anything for that matter)

23 y/o first attempt. probably can get around 160 with more tries but cba.

Attached: Screenshot from 2019-07-22 12-42-30.png (464x515, 24K)

27
like 200ms

>i was just asking how many people are in a single game of halo 2 or whatever
i know what you were asking i just can't be asked and i also haven't slept in like 20-ish hours
all is good, i'm not trying to be rowdy
all things being the same, play style and mentality would change these numbers

30, approx 200-210ms.

How do I check how slow my monitor is? I have a pretty old Dell one.

I feel fine

Attached: Human Benchmark - Dashboard - Guest user 7-22-2019 6-48-40 PM.png (1240x725, 47K)

Attached: Human Benchmark - Dashboard - Guest user 7-22-2019 6-49-00 PM.png (1240x725, 49K)

i could probably do better if i wasn't so tired, but i'm seemingly stuck at 171 until i catch some sleep

Attached: Capture.png (857x613, 39K)

>240

guess I'm ready for Stadia

I'm 28, but I mostly play FPS games.

Attached: I masturbate more than I play video games.png (768x550, 32K)

>average 187
>tries 3/5

still get hit by snake edge sometimes though

Attached: lol.png (730x178, 25K)

What's the reaction time for military pilots in such test? Can't really find info.

>people pretend that 1ms monitors matter

32
204ms

Oh well, getting older.

>23
>224
IM STILL YOUNG WHY THE FUCK AM I GRANDPA TIER?

Attached: 1563137364487.jpg (750x1334, 93K)

20.
435
Kill me please I'm begging you, I'll get shot in the head and I'll realize the day after.

I just woke up and did it from my phone, okay? Stop laughing

Attached: image.png (750x1334, 82K)

30
best time vs worst time

I'm high divine in dota 2 and high masters sc2

Attached: 1556091104885.png (797x783, 50K)

BEAT MY BEST

WORLD RECORD
I legit did this one and didn't try and predict either, I'll see if I can get it again

Attached: 1541716271351.png (397x457, 19K)

I'M A GOD GAMER AND DIDN'T REALIZE IT

WHY WASN'T I TRYING EARLIER???

Attached: 1559191079326.png (837x629, 48K)

>average 172ms
what ever. 24 year old alcoholic.

my all-time best average was ~160ms.

Attached: 176ms.jpg (774x508, 33K)

26 years old.
Also don't post your "best" as your fucking score retards, if you can't consistently do it that means it's not your actual reaction speed, it's like bragging about dropping an ace one round and playing like a bottom bitch, only to be like that guy who threw one touchdown pass in the championship game and never shut the fuck up about it

Attached: ms.png (717x489, 32K)

>right handed
>consistantly get better scores if i use my left hand
what does this mean? my left hand is consistantly 10-20ms faster.

38
210

>400ms

Attached: 1460527847668.png (212x172, 23K)

>using a TV instead of a monitor
>still get 156ms
is the "monitors don't have nearly as much input lag!" thing a meme to sell shitty tiny monitors?

>mouse is dying
>first 4 attempts at sub 130ms
>5th attempt lmb click doesnt register
J U S T

These kind of tests were good back when everyone had CRTs running at 100hz

Now everyone has some different kind of monitor and it impacts the test score

34

Attached: 1535744745021.png (725x528, 28K)

35
185avg / 30 clicks

Thought I would be sitting on 300+ms at this age

eat shit zoomers

Attached: Boomer.png (869x481, 16K)

They deny Game Mode's existence. It's so bizarre.

Don't chip your tooth on some applesauce, old fuck

22
~250ms
I am using a tv as a monitor so that could be part of it, I get much better times when playing pic related.

Attached: samurai kirby.gif (400x266, 151K)

Attached: 1.png (660x419, 16K)

270ms average
22 year old

i want to blame being dehydrated and on a slow laptop with a 60hz tv because i remember i could get 170s and 200-220 average just a few months ago but maybe my brain is melting

>ITT
>102
>-10000 ms ez clap
if you aren't posting an image kill yourslef

32

Attached: q3dm6.png (741x512, 27K)

FARRRRT
POOOP
LOOOL I'M SHIT POSTING MOM LUUUUL I"M POOPY ALL COVERED IN ASSSS

>believing Yea Forums about their age
according to every thread like this the average poster is like pushing 40

but our analysts have determined that *that* was a lie

5 clicks

29yo
235 ms

Not too shabby, I guess. Still can't block overheads for the life of me.

Golden

Attached: 423422q.png (688x464, 16K)

Yea Forums is over 15 years old. Most oldfags are well into their 30s

32. Surprised it's as fast as it is. I feel so much slower these days, but the days go by faster and faster.

Attached: surprised.jpg (888x582, 59K)

29
best: 187
average: 205

21
206 ms

27
241ms

23
201 ms
75hz monitor

22
201, but I'm doing this on a laptop with terrible screen response times (30-40ms)

26
Average 182
Best 162
Worst 195
G-good to know I'm not getting much slower with age yet h-haha

I love being retarded and forgetting screencaps

Attached: reaction time.png (929x919, 48K)

Post display refresh too,

>age
34
>test
274ms
>refresh
75hz
>mouse
rival 300

You may have some sort of underlying medical condition developing user, there's nothing otherwise that would account for such a change besides drug and alcohol use (even if you're not under the influence at the moment)

might as well include the screenshot

Attached: ReactionTime.png (758x251, 8K)

24
215 ms

im not sure if thats good.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-07-22 Human Benchmark - Dashboard - Guest user.png (1349x1669, 69K)

More evidence that i'm completely fucking average

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-07-22 at 8.17.34 AM.png (1466x1074, 133K)

43yo
216

Attached: 2019-07-22_141807.png (255x235, 5K)

Pretty good, I was expecting a way worse results. I'm 29.

Attached: Jiji.png (843x1020, 42K)

21 years
144 hz and good wired mouse

pretty shitty score but at least got nice digits

Attached: 1563225890461.png (741x565, 37K)

29
Best was 110
regularly got around 201-210

just woke up and here is my first try

Attached: explain.jpg (843x564, 59K)

accuracy not 100%? i always go back and correct my words on that

27 here, on a work PC with a mouse that's probably 10 years old. Best I ever got on these things is, I think 200ms

Attached: Untitled.png (1107x516, 26K)

So you're telling me my 233ms while tired from work, on my work pc, after not getting much sleep and spending time reading and such might be less than my full potential?

Attached: 1556101933891.jpg (380x380, 50K)

That's apparently top 10% so yea, that's absurdly good.

26
240 ms
In all fairness, I was born with 10 frames of lag.

Oof, sorry to hear user.Maybe you need more sleep?

Age is kinda irelevant for the most part if you keep training it, you shouldn't see much decline in reaction time from what I know. It's not great, but I've had 200-250ms reaction since ... 18 I think (27 now). with some 170-190ms exception rarely but that's likely more anticipation than anything.

I do get plenty of sleep actually
I've just always been slow, as a kid sending the ball back in ping pong or tennis was always an achievement

this guy here
i'm feeling much better right now and i got 195 average
which seems to be a decent score for when i'm feeling good
apparently my score can vary
i'm not feeling the best i've ever felt in my life or anything. just better than earlier this morning

Out of practice? Stopped practicing? I've had the same reaction times since I was 18 from what I recall and I'm 27 now.

Middle of the fucking pack.

Attached: C in all subjects.png (662x415, 16K)

Also, 26 years old. 10 years ago I was ~230-240 ms

226
19
why am I such a slow peice of shit?

Humans aren't born equal user.Reaction times will not always be top 10% tier. They arely will be, hence why it's the 10% tier.

Is it cheating to try and anticipate it

But EA and Blizzard told me I am born equal in every way user are you telling me they're wrong?

Oh well, maybe you'll be albe to adapt and do well regardless.

Attached: 1550577155171.png (591x716, 322K)

i think both of them have esports

21
270 ms

Attached: react.png (790x450, 18K)

Yes. If you anticipate, it's not a test of your response time, which is what this is supposed to test. It's no longer about the time it takes for you to register and act on a cue. Defeating the entire purpose. Be honest with yourself, user, that's how you improve. Cheating is how you convince yourself you're better than the guy that beat you 5-0 somehow.

no

190
22
This test really shows you how small these units of time really are. 1ms to 4ms of response is fucking nothing.

Attached: Screenshot (24).png (829x1037, 60K)

302
25
But im sure the server is at least at 150 ms ping away from me. Because it definitely didnt take 1/3rd of a sec for me to click. Devs should measure users' ping and subtract them from the result to get true reaction time.

And everyone is perfectly capable of being top tier, what's your point?

If they're right than everyone would get first first place in the olimpics.

Reaction time is completely irrelevant for gaming desu

You can test this by using a VPN from asia then doing the test

it just makes me curious how many people posting did this, seems pretty easy to get one like 45 score to lower your average
~275 and hungover 27 year old also

>spell has a 90 ms delay in which you can dodge it
>have too slow of a reaction to do it

It probably already does. I had 214 ms average. There's no way I had like 100 ms response time.

Attached: ping.png (635x179, 18K)

29
215ms

the test runs in your browser and doesn't depend on your connection
or at least it should and if it doesn't then the people who made the website are idiots

that's not how it works you fucking retard, and you are not good at games and never will be

how abotu no?

Damn, I have 209ms latency to it. But isn't timer client-sided?

I guess it really depends on how it works. For all I know, the entire thing operates on your own computer. It wouldn't be hard to just send a javascript file through your browser and have it operate entirely client side, only to send the results to the server. That's how I'd do it if I were them anyway.

30

Attached: asdasdasdad.png (897x646, 42K)

Not for most modern games it isn't. For fighting games, arena shooters, and for niche situations in RTS's it is.

Again, no it's not. That is not the type of "reaction" you have in-game. Pro players of similar skill level can vary in reaction time by over 100 ms.

24
199 (60hz)

Attached: 1535883867652.png (1000x1128, 1.28M)

203ms, 25
Not sure what to do with that information, since I suck ass at actual in-game reactions

>27
>339ms
Am I getting old? This is fucking terrible

Yes it is. The reason why there's such a difference in response time is
1. You can compensate for slower response time
2. Reacting to something by a single cue (character starts moving) and reacting to something by a specific trait (character specifically moving to do a low attack as opposed to mid attack)

But neither of those invalidate the importance of not having the response time of a retarded cat.

cats have fast reflexes. if you'd say "sloth" that'd make more sense. just a minor nitpick

>people mentioning ranks in Dota and LoL
the only thing this shit proves is that you have no taste, reaction time doesn't matter in ASSFAGGOTS

Attached: 1538747294067.gif (500x370, 1018K)

32
144hz

Attached: reactiontime.jpg (930x649, 61K)

Wrong, even the top players do not have some genetic disposition to low reaction time. If you look at the reaction time of pro players (even the absolute top), their reaction times vary wildly.

It's just a crutch for people who are shit at videogames to brag about if their reaction time is low or to blame if their reaction time is high.

Instead of doing this shit and obsessing over it, I recommend checking your resting heart rate. I consistently get 90-100BPM and I'm convinced this will fucking kill me if I don't sort it out.

>27
>240
At least I have carpal tunnel in both hands and I'm recovering from a big injury.

I have rather high heart rate too, what's the deal with it?

are you fat?

>30 yo
>250ms average
Getting old is shit. I had godlike reactions back in UT classic days.

You didn't read my post at all, did you? You just skimmed like 4 words from it and immediately started typing out what you had already prepared to say.
The cat's retarded, user

no, I weigh 65kgs at 180cm of height

could be anything from lack of exercise to family genetics

Attached: 1534778321776.jpg (3840x2160, 752K)

Ancient 3 in dota sweaty :)
That's top 3% btw

36

200

25
224 out of 10 attempts
It feels pretty dumb since the green always appears at fixed intervals

There's no such thing as a raw reaction time test though. Unless for example you have each subject enter a door then you throw something to them and measure how quick they move their hands or some shit. Anticipation is a part of this test because you're told exactly what to do in this situation.

in the end it's never been that much of an issue, I don't play games that need extremely sharp reactions, as far as FPS goes I only like singleplayer ones and I'm not a competitive person at all so I don't play esports game

Then it isn't a reaction time test because it isn't reliant on your reaction time. It's reliant on your ability to anticipate. It's an anticipation test aka pure RNG test. Meaning it isn't a test at all and measures absolutely nothing. There's not even any fun in that. So not only do you get rid of anything that might have a meaningful measurement but you also get rid of the fun.

29
209 on an LG 90 euro office monitor piece of shit
i'm ok

Attached: 1531205956053.gif (200x216, 1.98M)

Competitive games never boil down to raw reaction time alone though. In fighting games you're constantly reading your opponents moves and anticipating certain actions. In CS when you're holding an angle you have an image in your head of the opponent peeking out and you're anticipating this. It's not pure RNG because again you're told to anticipate the color change and to provide a reaction to it. I do agree that this test doesn't count for anything at all and videogames boil down to more than waiting for something to change and clicking a button once.

I never said nor suggested that competitive games ever boiled down to raw reaction time alone.

was meant for

CSGO and FGC pros have completely average reaction times. It's just cope from people who are shit at games and hide behind their reaction time.

Yeah, no prob. I wasn't accusing you of that. Just a lot of people put to much stock into these things when like I said raw reaction isn't something people rely on in competitive games.

most days i go through the whole day without really being surprised by something or something happening that i didn't really anticipate. that's life

how the hell are people getting around 150

Attached: eh.png (345x233, 5K)

That's a very misguided view on anticipation in this test and anticipation in video games as there are a lot of factors that go into anticipating the opponent including psychology, patterns, intelligence, map/general game knowledge such as time required to get to a place, and - admittedly - some luck. Anticipation in this game is pure, raw, aimless, unadulterated, uneducated, grug-style guessing. It doesn't help with anything in any way for any game ever. It sure as fuck doesn't help the silvers but that's what they do. That's why they're silver in the first place.
They might seem similar but that distinction is what differentiates eagle scouts and silver 2. And doing it selectively enough for it to be almost assuredly impactful is what separates eagle scouts and pros, and that's even harder still.

Based on that, I maintain that anticipating in this test measures absolutely nothing of any conceivable use.

Woah guys, epic reaction times, you must be super pro gamers!

Attached: reaction.jpg (4032x3024, 1.02M)

better monitors with no ghosting

justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/
Here's a REAL test.

>justpark.com/creative/reaction-time-test/
i got reaction times of about my age and up to about 5 years younger than me

what is your source for that image?

I won't. My monitor has 20-50ms input lag

31
I have about as good a monitor as you can get for this though.

Attached: 1533968464641.jpg (754x464, 31K)

>client
nah it doesnt work client side. I tried using a vpn and results had +50 ms

32

i don't even know how i did this

Attached: dhrd.png (1345x576, 15K)

Once in a while the color changes when my body is ready and I get a stupidly fast reaction.

yeah i think that's what happened to me

You live near the server.

had that too but pretty sure we're just subconsciously predicting it

this shit happens from time to time, sometimes your brain just aligns with the world

Attached: test2.png (887x890, 35K)

27
176

Also using 144hz and a wireless g305

Attached: 1553390208150.jpg (745x568, 44K)

23
201
That's alright I guess.

I'm 30

I was never quick with reactions, when I was young I had about 180ms

Attached: latency.png (634x410, 16K)

I'm getting 280-310 on there.

I fucked up the first 2-3 tries majorly

Attached: file.png (654x330, 5K)

220 best
238 average
60hz monitor
standard issue razr """"gaming"""" mouse

21
268
Any glasses bro can tell me if they affect reaction time?

23

Attached: Untitled.png (707x502, 33K)

Using an original naga (yes, it's really over a decade old) on 60hz monitor

30
218ms

37
232ms

18

135 ms

Being young feelsgoodman. its all downhill from here isn't it

Attached: Vm7q4aH.png (1920x969, 59K)

30
425

Attached: Screenshot_20190722-074847.png (1080x1920, 96K)

Make way, top chad averageman comming through

Attached: file.png (744x583, 47K)

There's no way the ping matters; the measurement is done client side if the programmer is anywhere close to remotely competent.

19
227ms
I can't believe I'm below average, I play shmups all day shouldn't that help?
I'm using a wireless mouse so uh that's the reason ahah.

I'm pretty hungover though, I need to try again tomorrow morning.

Attached: Screen Shot 2019-07-22 at 10.52.59 AM.png (724x526, 47K)

>23ms
why do you people do this? Go play a video game instead of fucking with a reaction test and then lying to the rest of us.

I got a 83ms you just need to predict when green is coming up and already begin the action of taking a click before it actually comes up.

ez

Attached: ez.jpg (375x222, 7K)

Can any 240Hz Chads do the test and reply to me with their results please? I'm curious to see how much of an advantage that refresh rate is.

Attached: 1561787885825.jpg (600x800, 80K)

18
252ms

60fps gives you a frame every 16.7ms
You're not gonna gain more than 10-12ms by using 240hz

Attached: sydtstfyfdty.jpg (1090x479, 23K)

Yeah i predicted the last one but the rest were legit.

Does having more than 60fps on 60hz monitor help?

Based on my testing where I switch between refresh rates on my monitor, my reaction speeds on 144Hz are around 30ms lower. It doesn't make sense mathematically, but that's how things are. That's why I asked for 240Hz owners to post results.

yes, if it's not v-synced.
But all browsers are v-synced so in this case, no

Forgot to clarify that I was testing the difference between 144Hz and 60hz.

25
301 ms

Attached: Sem título.png (1920x1080, 157K)