Bravo Nintendo, timeless graphics! Snoy BTFO

based

>29
nigger in the top image couldn't even emulate it properly

Top looks more interesting to explore.
Bottom looks like it's from a recent Halo game but without the interesting stuff like the alien architecture or the futuristic vehicles.

Simply beautiful. How will Snoytards ever cope?

Attached: 1542046921996.jpg (1762x2166, 616K)

delete this

Those are some nice pictures, now try actually moving in Red Dead without cramping your hands from that slow ass stiff clunky movement

rdr2 looks so fucking soulless

Agreed it looks so fun to explore. Truly timeless art direction.

Attached: 1542047041054.jpg (1922x2166, 966K)

kinda like how the first game looks more.

Attached: Rdr_montana_ford.jpg (1276x715, 479K)

Photorealism is just so drab. I'm glad Nintendo puts more emphasis on art direction. So much SO- I mean, SOUL

>bottom is just a red dog
When will the meme of foxes being dogs end

You can say what you want but RDR2 is just less fun. Zoomers will never understand graphics aren't worth shit I suppose.

OH NO NO NO NO

Attached: 1562696376560.webm (1280x720, 1.41M)

NOOOO DELETE THIS
IT'S FOR THE CINEMATIC EXPERIENCE

Attached: 1426810806444.jpg (375x550, 42K)

>Bottom already looks outdated

Attached: yikes.jpg (764x713, 309K)

not true, rdr2 looks like a romantic painting at times. the lighting, rain and wind are incredible.
on the other hand, i haven't played botw but i'm 100% sure it has a far better gameplay because rdr2 is absolute shit in that regard

Attached: 10-11-2018_10-48-00.png (1920x1080, 1.98M)

Holy shit Snoy is well and truly done

Attached: 1542594273631.jpg (2328x2160, 953K)

Correct. Graphics will always be shitty eventually but a good gameplay loop is practically timeless.

what looks better than bottom?

Top has a more consistent art style because it's very stylized. Bottom looks uncanny because they tried to stylize the color palette when they're really going for photorealism. The result makes bottom look uncomfortable where you feel something is off because those colors are off, even slightly because of the push toward realism. Top can get away with looking unrealistic and more simplified because the clors and art style are more exaggerated and let the viewer use more imagination and have more suspension of disbelief.

Top has a more consistent and cohesive art style and is more striking to look at. Bottom looks like a still from a movie, but because they're too much realism you take for granted it's a game and are not as impressed because everything looks like it should if it was in a movie, but because you're used to realism in real life, it's not nearly as impressive as you expect it to be because the art style is not that creative. Also the foreground looks more gamey than the background which looks like flat, painted concept art, so it feels like a fake hollywood backdrop. Again this wouldn't be the case if the art style was more stylized and fit better together with the playable area.

wow. Beautiful and timeless, sony never even stood a chance.

Attached: botw4k-760x380.jpg (760x380, 23K)

Meanwhile top would look outdated 10 years ago

>Playing with induced TV lag
lol, ok.

Attached: botw.jpg (2560x2880, 3.22M)

>Emulator
Yawwwwwwwwwn

So much this. When will Snoy ever learn that art style is more important than graphical fidelity?

Attached: 1538578098717.jpg (1918x2162, 862K)

>snoy fags trying to take credit for rdr2
lol xbox one x gang taking 4k shits on snoy all day long

Are you retarded?

>29 fps

Ohnonono

SEETHHTINH NIMTENDO HAHAHAHSHA. NING BING.WAHOO YOU CHILD

>here’s your switch port bro

Attached: A8E94399-3AA9-4166-8E7C-B1B3467456A9.jpg (1024x576, 58K)

Thanks for beta testing
We'll take it from here

>photorealistic
Stop with this garbage. You don't know what it means. RDR2 is a heavily stylized game that will look like a cartoon in 5 years. The same shit was said of The Last of Us and look at it now. It looks like Toy Story.

Honestly looks more interesting than what we actually got.

And the first Red Dead's art style is a lot more compelling.
how blinded by nostalgia do you have to be, to actually think this? RDR2 looks so much better that it makes the first game look like total shit

Attached: rdrcomparison.jpg (2553x2857, 2.22M)

Cope

>he fell for realism meme
Future is now, old man. Realism is passe since Minecraft. Like 10 years ago.

The game obviously aimed to be photorealistic you zoomer brainlet. There is absolutely zero intentional stylization in the game apart from UI.

Do people that shit on the switch unironically hate anything less than the most cutting edge graphics? Like do they think some modern low budget game is better than classic N64 or SNES games because the graphics are more realistic?

Exactly. Nintendo really knows how to craft a cohesive, immersive world with their incredible art style. When will Cockstar ever learn?

Attached: 1541905419782.jpg (1922x2162, 1012K)

>I'm glad Nintendo puts more emphasis on art direction.
smearing tons of cel-shading all over everything until the characters look like cardboard cutouts is the antithesis of good art direction. the same goes for the washed-out colors that every switch game has for some reason. botw looks like shit.

rdr2 is the least stylized game of all time

Nobody is falling for your shitty bait newfag.

thy really do.
see for examples.

first game had more soul

Attached: Landscape.nekoti.jpg (1280x718, 564K)

both of them are just the same empty, boring, rehashed open-world sandbox "game." i don't see how one can be "more fun" than the other when it's the same shit.

Guess you wouldn't know if you played neither. The way enemies interact with you and the large amount of approaches is what made botw so good to me at least. Also I don't like sandboxes either but I haven't seen a game do it better yet.

>epona behind a paywall
I'll never forgive nintendo for this.

Seething Snoyshills.
t.

Attached: christopher-logan-01-0001-rdr5.jpg (1914x1001, 236K)

The best part of RDR2 is how luscious and meaty the horse asses are

the real first game is still the only actual game in the series.

Attached: reddead.jpg (800x1150, 209K)

Attached: yikes.png (514x480, 45K)

BoTW has more unique gameplay elements in the first hour than RDR2 has in the entire game

>Guy tries to bait people into giving him (You)s with contrarian posts
>Call him out on it
>Some tranny doesn't get it but sensed an opportunity to call somebody a shill

>Runescape 3: Wild Hunt

They're just coping. I would take 8 bit Super Mario on the NES over this literal disgusting pile of trash any day.

Attached: red-dead-redemption-2-animals.jpg (1920x1080, 352K)

>Top: Good game, people still talking about it today
>Bottom: Shit flavor of the month game that no one cares about anymore

nah the music in redemption 1 had tons of soul

youtube.com/watch?v=BXsyn1rOvG8

>RDR1
interesting colours and landscapes
>RDR2
flat, green and brown ad infinitum

Switch those around and you're correct

why is rockstar so bad with modeling eyes?

BOTW looks and runs like total shit docked to a tv

>RDR1
>interesting colours and landscapes
Literally the entire game is brown except Tall Trees

>Bottom: Shit flavor of the month game that no one cares about anymore
>Top: Good game, people still talking about it today

based